You don't need to do anything, I know many altcoins were forked, and there were no hazard for fork actually, sometimes a coin is forked when it has new significant feature updated or parameter changed, like if btc's block time changes to 1 minutes, there will be a hard for. So you just need to upgrade your new wallet and your money won't be lost, take it easy.  Fox, he's talking about the "gavincoin" fork. Ie, the situation with block sizes and the potential hardfork in the network. Under this scenario, bitcoin forks and there's a (potential for) a situation where those who don't upgrade are on an "altcoin". And he'll have coins on both forks - as would everyone else who had bitcoin on the bitcoin chain at the time of the fork being discussed. Good point, and it seems like those agnositc to the the block-size limit could broadcast any future transactions on both networks (say, after hardfork where nodes from one fork don't talk to nodes from the other). |
|
|
|
Thanks LFC_Bitcoin. And FWIW, I am happy, just was curious about how to interpret the numbers. I hope I can remember this next time I forget it (or that they switch to +/- which is not-ambiguous, IMO).
Congratulations  . Ndnhc said to me that basically the reason for using number instead would be that using a (+/-) is not making the formula for the loyalty points to work and he cant figure it out whats wrong, so instead he stick with the number instead  Google Spreadsheets doesn't recognize A+ as different from A. That's interesting. And it explains why you're using the numbers. One follow up, do you need it to "recognize" the difference in order to do a sort? I guess I'm wondering what you mean by "recognize". Another solution might be "Aplus, A, Aminus", but since I don't know why you need the "recognition" I don't know if that helps  |
|
|
|
I find an interesting thing, before the dadice storm, dadice only had around 100 players in peak, but after some people trolling here, the current online players are over 150  So they make your site more exposures to the community, that trolling storm gives 50% more players come to play here, and more and more players like playing here, Free advertisement for dadice?? what do you mean by saying trolling are you talking about those problems with cold storage information? well if yes it wasnt a troll and they showed that they are not reliable casino, im impressed it attracted new players Well we just acted as our dear [dice game] leader, who also declines to show his cold wallet address, which is fine, since both sites are privately funded now. On the other side nobody will tell us how to run our business! you are right that no one can tell you how to run your business, but you could have shared it if you didnt lie and avoid the negative trust you got Negative trust is meaning less-and-less these days. There's been far too many recent false accusations, personal attacks, and other shenanigans by the trust-rangers and others on default trust. It's kind of a shame. |
|
|
|
\
Yeah but it averaged like 10btc wagered per week . It was "graveyard" for spam.
It was rly great idea i have no idea why it wasnt used more , i guess coz of "trust" issue that u are not playing against house.
I never really used it (mainly, I think) because I never really understood it. I tried it once or twice on small stakes but I guess I never looked closely at the rules or something. I'm not saying I'm typical in this, I'm just saying it's what my experience was. |
|
|
|
I never heard or knew about something as "whitelisted" , it's really sucha great feature and more of it should be encouraged to avoid newbie member's buying accounts to lift the limit time.
Idk if whitelisting should be promoted because it would be another system that future scammers would do. They could easily request a whitelist and after that, they could go on to scamming spree. If a user really wants to be part of this forum, he/she must go all through the processes without asking for some privileges that others didn't receive.Or, ahem, buy, since apprantly buying priviledged accounts is considered a.ok!? |
|
|
|
Sorry I know this has been asked but I can't seem to remember and I can't find it with google and with the search disabled ...
Anyway, which is higher 3 or 1 in the grading? Is A3 the highest or is A1?
Also, maybe you can switch to +/- instead of 3,2,1 vs 1,2,3 (ie, it's less ambiguous).
I asked this question the other week mate, an A1 is better than an A3. I just checked my post score for the week & I got a B3, I keep getting B3 week after week, I was hoping for even a B2 Oh well, I'll have to try even more next week to get a B2 or higher. You should be happy with any sort of A grading mate, most posters on the campaign get C's. Thanks LFC_Bitcoin. And FWIW, I am happy, just was curious about how to interpret the numbers. I hope I can remember this next time I forget it (or that they switch to +/- which is not-ambiguous, IMO). |
|
|
|
Sign a message with your private key and post it here. Then we can verify your signature by looking at this public key you posted. The public key by itself doesn't really help us do that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Yup its cool :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVbdNWAAoJEPFSiTz6FLjYt4UH/1vpY1uiW+R1hfh40a1nI2YS
zHoJnKeK2J/qWNxmfv4c1Viy1ppQiitBkYkonhTTOhnC6CWzello/PCtjC05xUib
dAfOa+ZFE+9aD8ByYpjdGAYhf2v1aYepkMGrg36dwFcE5289f9S9dL39nE5TknIJ
sACy1n92nrQlUpL0TULkgVg31LmPFGa7snMEOvI390+7m+NuBNSjc/MezZAGn4CZ
9WTGtPQl72PsFO0XOsCqmaczp0XFBdlOhA2V6iXRBP469+8Khm8uKAtt96oHhmKy
ZvaYhRTvqX6GoeY6lhgYk4+g0YTzYlRWce7gJPAsDHIFax64yHlomxEr0e8/bqE=
=55+a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
It works brother! (I saved your message in pm.asc) tspacepilot@computer:~$ gpg --verify pm.asc
gpg: Signature made Tue 02 Jun 2015 09:01:26 AM PDT using RSA key ID FA14B8D8
gpg: Good signature from "Testing (Testing) <Test@testmail.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 30DD 26E5 F6FA 7A73 CCDB 0B9F F152 893C FA14 B8D8
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I know this has been asked but I can't seem to remember and I can't find it with google and with the search disabled ...
Anyway, which is higher 3 or 1 in the grading? Is A3 the highest or is A1?
Also, maybe you can switch to +/- instead of 3,2,1 vs 1,2,3 (ie, it's less ambiguous).
|
|
|
|
Heya! Two years later but it's done! Thanks for finaly fixing this (below)! Dragons tale is cool! The explanation above wasn't quite right; we have several machines that serve resources; one of them had an old file on it that pointed to a different compute server.
Everything is now running smoothly- sorry for the downtime.
Teppy
Indeed, the game is up again. In re "smoothly" there's this which I'm hoping you can fix sometime this year (it's been this way for 2 years...): tspacepilot@citrus:~$ ./eClient/elaunch &
[1] 1075
tspacepilot@citrus:~$ libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
And so on, for thousands of lines, as long as the game stays up. The interenet tells me that if you simply link to a libpng from this decade when compiling that these errors go away. Wanna test it? |
|
|
|
Did you project just like bitmixer & bit-x signature post counter ?
Maybe you can just show us the design or some flowchart how it works...
Right, if he's just making a counter robot, he has to compete with marcotheminer's program. If he's doing something more, it's completely clear what it is. Also, a lot of folks have pointed out that in order to keep spam out of the forums, you still need a human to check the posts---like dadice campaign does. |
|
|
|
|
I'm sorta surprised you can't run one of the pre-compiled binaries for another distro and just use LD_LIBRARY_PATH or something like that to fix up any missing dynamic links (IE, where libraries are in the wrong locations). I've never used linaro so I have no idea, really. Complining bitcoin is usually pretty easy on linux (but I don't know the package manager on linaro), presumably you can get gnu make and g++ and whatnot, then just run configure and make.
|
|
|
|
|
Got it. Thanks MZ, mitzie and QS.
|
|
|
|
Please help me test, spent all day reading papers -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1
mQENBFVtsHoBCACwfVs8jQqxaqL9fy6Wi3e71vrcpwk/yZWah0i2feago6b6gE9b
Gl+7we6K77g+th+EvP0EW6EKyx31k93z+svRiOsTXQrDIF8ROxifxQmSEGv+vff6
8s0yCz+IWfHV/sjoMFfzuP2HycJ+gSDR3RAidTSh0vfj0kEpYiHdWZPtKdfzPPTu
HFU+d8+J7rQYVI/1bvBEtpMGMztvfhGRz/fkSFU/E06hUY8xrztxWPQtKADZnTwb
XS03E3n5hMKFKF0/9IZtbuOfmwnKAZJvlSAutrrtNmqCwja+k9QztcBsDbDBygp0
GiHANcvYSpMQMfodv8zixK9lY3HWjgyvAVb3ABEBAAG0JVRlc3RpbmcgKFRlc3Rp
bmcpIDxUZXN0QHRlc3RtYWlsLmNvbT6JATwEEwEKACYFAlVtsHoCGwMFCQAJgC4F
CwkIBwMFFQoJCAsEFgIBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRDxUok8+hS42GY3CACnt4lHSgTC7dkq
6wNTq6owfKKg+NegdbVXzQmwuW+3hniDbuSLBexm49csnnQhZUORiEp7vt4Ah7nY
vFr5P0X/XLbNi+cMYqtm6L52c3F0xd7F7NXRyJErdR6yfyZKabLfnZOe6OEjkoS/
KD5XS9EH70xwTF9BixlJdQCSG0Uubof6B4N+q+6zEj+Ni5YR5HMtOXQpDHHGDjTQ
TV3OqWuRH/ezNrU9r6gIvMdx3tiaO4DDJop7ZuEVqU9cKvrjWiU4tWfFAZ6f+jm4
vGfD0Cw3EokBqQJ1O7GTUEUCud+vwiLReRaUxwCBkJBztAsDf3s3HTYBCIhuyGak
ncFnmEevuQENBFVtsHoBCADn644kEG38GdsEkTw146NLmDAPhApz7S5wkdB0qLjJ
pHxNvYgdozIaODBJAnac5TyhJ7OcWkqn6ZHsmURJDC7yAIAdFGs6NgD4jX4enxXM
tdgCnuwuw8FW1rvbl3ZmyuTPqCY/K9kTNWld7DoRM7bQh0vibcGR+CY2H+HKHL88
ArxFUlmyb3XTA8tDhuEgl2rB4rPEX6OBMm4n1E3P6M70on7BkiguQAF0tfeLs1qW
UzmtWkjJu4XTaG75ToJCBuU7RlQW1F1tqB5GKb3nclvEG6rqQ3Kha8w6HJ8ie5k0
kJXrHycU7R5L2rx/1LEX1zlaJBLRCvyLeX6VyoLUZeOjABEBAAGJASUEGAEKAA8F
AlVtsHoCGwwFCQAJgC4ACgkQ8VKJPPoUuNjWZQf8Cc2Uvy28sdfZTbxsRFbHjZnq
pVYhiIVNUZdFKMkhEK70ls5ZkzXkvJX35A6rxsuZjun3SUmUDulanpvrdautRBwP
s1Nxbqpkh5zYNp+4iNqfr1KaWOdt7D/LoWhJV4fzWoaHRgOmYNC7BAT7z5e5OAl7
0TZnxAY6SJeN5MJAXu7YdAAZdsSjm05cToVwwxqNAjGgb20a/vN/L03Cwi0Rphys
CfX+l8q67bFebCKOmxZCTNN6XI/9AxwYnXpU92lLByuHpfxYlU29MvuA+1q5OV5w
LtDkeIG9VUBDqVV55vLQW1hc4gjsp+MdyGDpMhL3Qa6R6ScK7mCl+qjWrPmU+w==
=loZW
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Sign a message with your private key and post it here. Then we can verify your signature by looking at this public key you posted. The public key by itself doesn't really help us do that. On second thought, I guess we can send you and encrypted message. -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
hQEMA+EoW6S7pcEeAQf/WaZhSK0vT60fe2PtXXJbkvqKrE/VJfJlrjdgxSiLNC2U
3649khB65IaMsY26KuPUf+zY5Na+jdFOLNx5f/xEIT71P6gw2Lbh4xL8vk2PiwR6
sQ+anz4zW/2dgfFU5BclC5qvFAWR9EwYTm70zMOchD2f4mB7rDMGy8mcsWlSrIBT
zzMbEr7rucsPEYpjH1yqrqq7a2W0lOsl+9NO0vo9GYyMdouat9OZzoCi/t2hMoLe
6xCGx9B7EQwcl8r1otuWFoJXh0vbhofS4MTggmDZcNlxfKbEMOvc1+0i6cFJP2Fl
viPJJRhRP2H8U3NlHEVJS4h4rAIaLx+a4KlGjLDwQNJqAYLEGz3oXTmKNWTtF8Uj
WOv/n6iCW73Ovwa+wOb+xX8P6UCETnx+qk6TuNWBGEoC40vlDm+/59fvU1ei4jpe
KrPA4Gvw20o0xQCKbPeuUSaN4gIUe9GuJzGQls8JTRRXtFhnuhkZjhg35A==
=74p2
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
Use your private key to decrypt my message to you. |
|
|
|
I honestly didn't even know there were scrypt asics (silly me, I guess). Now I'm gonna check out amazon and see if I can get an old usb one for super cheap (just for the museum). |
|
|
|
Whitelisting does not take away PM per hour limits. You will not need to wait 360 seconds between PMs however you will be stopped at 5 PMs per hour (and I am fairly certain that a PM to two people will count as two PMs).
What does this mean? Ecuamobi suggests that OP just has to sit it out. Quickseller suggests there is such a thing as whitelisting but that it doesn't affect PMs. I'm confused. |
|
|
|
Well, there goes my dream lol But I'll probably let those ports running as an exit anyway. Thanks for the info. You will still be a tor node, and that will help the tor network. running exit nodes are a hassle since some sites block tor users from browsing their site. once you run a exit node, you will be flagged by a list of database and it is easy for webowners to flag your IPs. True, and that's why I decided to be an exit for bitcoin only. I won't get the exit flag for that and my exit traffic will not easily be abused. It's honestly sad. I have went to quite a few computer security conferences. Even listened to some of the TOR team speak. They had a great idea to help out people, and was about everyone having equal access to the internet in an anomyous fashion. If a country or isp blocking a legitmate site then it's goal was to allow access. But slowly in my opinion it degraded. The amount of bad traffic just went up and up, and the network got slower and slower. I have not used it in over a year so it cold have changed. But the being flagged is a real worry with being a exit node. It's still not fast, but it's useable. I do so quite often. I honestly think that tor is a bit like bitcoin---empowering. Some people will use that power for evil, some for good, but overall I see the empowerment as a good thing. I try to support tor but I don't have enough bandwidth myself to actually run a node. Although the idea in the OP of just running bitcoin ports is quite interesting---it got me reading up on the tor docs and whatnot. Thanks OP! |
|
|
|
I wanted a way to more quickly distribute the blockchain to people - especially those on older computers - without sacrificing my important data. I've got an old laptop that I keep nestled away as an emergency backup and it took me between 4-5 days to to download the blockchain on a new Bitcoin install.
I removed my wallet, compressed it down to 29gb, split it into 2 archives, and uploaded it to a file service. If anyone wants to try it, let me know if it's working for you. If not, then I'll have to go with a torrent. It's down in my sig.
Thanks for your help, folks.
One suggestion, use gzipped tarball (tgz) or zip file (zip). rar is not standard and not easy to decompress without having to download extra software. Just a suggestion. |
|
|
|
I wont explain the way they abuse faucet for obvious reasons . I mean its not that hard to figure it out but i wont help . That's fair. I won't ask again. And, fwiw,I won't think about it very hard because I'm not really interested in abusing a faucet (sounds a little gross!). |
|
|
|
Tu recibes tu dinero, y si no te gusta la moneda en la que te lo pagan, la cambias y listo, y si aún así no te gusta, pues no haces el trabajo y que lo haga otro.
Pero él, lo que está diciendo en el fondo, es "no quiero foobarcoin porque no me apetece tener que tomarme la molestia de registrarme en el chiringuito de turno para poder obtener BTC, que es lo que quiero en el fondo". ^^Exacto Si es que quieren otro traductor, no pasa nada. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
