What a crappy end of the race...
They could have been hurrying a little and get at least 1-2 laps without safety car...

Oh well... Max won again..
Bad luck for Checo, he has lost too many points to gain the fastest lap.
And Nyck has made points, which is wonderful!

I would prefer the square brackets (bold or not).

And on the discussion about getting this actually implemented I would say that indeed it may have a better chance to come as BPIP extension (and yes, it would be nice to not interfere with the DT mark the BPIP extension already adds).

I've seen in the past a crypto news aggregator with many sources. I don't know if they were using Regex or not (heck, I don't even remember which aggregator it was), but I remember I've seen the same news in many places with somewhat different title and wording. I don't know how good can Regex handle this.

Me neither, still I don't claim to know everything on this world and strange / meaningless things can happen.
And although OP has done mistakes and now he went overly defensive, it could have been nice to see him clear this up.

@Agbe: you've started this topic with a mistake (and I'm being nice) related to the images. People getting now overly cautious about your every word is pretty much a normal development. So (as an advice you take into account or not, up to you) you should calm down before any answer you want to give.

Well said. Also with the grid penalty Max has got, Leclerc clearly has a bit of advantage.
Even more, Alonso, Ricci, Lando Norris or Russell may give some hard times to Max, meaning lost time and extra tyre wear, all playing in the favor of Leclerc.
We will have to see whether the RBR cars are still that much better than the rest, like they were in the past 2 races. It may be a close call (and hopefully a race very nice to see). Right now Leclerc seems to have a slight advantage.

My eyes are also on Nyck de Vries, I wish he gets some points.

Get well, all the rest can wait.

I didn't want to give false hopes... and now I've become the party crasher
I'm sorry 

I will give you an analogy:
Why are you closing and even locking your door? It means (by your logic) that you must be doing something illegal there.
(also by extending that logic) If you would have nothing to hide, you would have no curtains, the door open and even advertising your address and what goods you keep at home.


Show some proof and maybe you can have some basis for a discussion. Else I could argue (for the fun of it) that you have made billions for selling meth.

If this sounded like an attack or complaint, apologies for that, it's not intended.
My intention is to give all the details, be constructive, see what we can do, since it's not the first request like this (although I also agree they're were very few), especially as I expect OP is disappointed by how the things have gone.

My expectations are that in the future - quite a good number of years - maybe Bitcoin will be treated less like "my preciousssss" and more like actual money.
Then this could get more traction.

The point about the info already available is also good, although some just don't know how to use it for their specific case and that will still be/keep being helpful.

I've said from start that all this is about cutting costs.
Now, the 24/7 ATMs usually brings them good benefit vs cost ratio, unless the number of ATM heists is big.
There may be however another reason for this, read below.


I think that they may "skip a step" and try to move in the direction Europe is moving.
In Europe they started reducing the number of employees and convince people use online banking an ATMs. Of course, in order to be able to do all operations, from paying bills to depositing money, they need a different, more complex (and probably more expensive) type of ATMs. Maybe, just maybe, that's (also) why the number of ATMs is low (and if I'm right, the numbers will rise).

However, the fact the ATMs are not working 24/7 is unexplainable for me. That part I simply fail to understand. One thing would be they don't replenish them often enough (lack of personnel), but.. are they saving energy, or are they so afraid of thieves?! (the costs are imho small, so cost cutting alone doesn't explain that)

I didn't want to answer because I don't want to give false hopes. Maybe I'm too negativist, but I don't think that this will get enough traction on short term. Maybe on long term.
No offense, the idea / project is good, but I feel like the vast majority on bitcoinitalk is not generous.

Even more, my use of LN is limited yet (yes, shame on me). I do have, however, a LN wallet in Blue Wallet (custodial). Maybe, with some guidance, I will do even better.

I've just looked it up and from what I see:
* In Bounties (Altcoins) one of the pinned posts tells "Giveaway threads are not allowed"
* OP has tried to start a giveaway, but
** somebody has ignored OP request (for PM) and answered with address
** the whole topic got removed (found topic 5412920 in modlog)

While I understand that the rules are there to avoid mindless spam, I also feel for users like OP and maybe we can do something about it.
I mean, look at the sheer number of (nice!) raffles in collectible section. Maybe we should somehow find a solution for this?


Giveaway with no rules means some may create 100s of new accounts to participate. Maybe you want to do better 

While the filters are remembered as long as I navigate defidive, if I close the tab and open it again, that's lost.
I am telling this just as "debug info" in case you need it, since for me you've handled the problem gracefully with this other approach:


So yes, I've made the correct bookmark and I'm good. Thank you.
Even more, I see you have at least one more news source, very nice, keep'em coming!  


LE: can you please add (sometime in the future, no rush) also Monero to the list of coins for news/filters?

Max said (ironically) not long ago something like his car is the fastest on the straits, and on the corners too 
The thing is that after the last two races he looks like the most solid option for the winner, but F1 tends to offer suprises.

If we're lucky and Ferrari stops sabotaging himself, maybe we get a better chance to see some good racing either between RBR and Ferrari, either between Ferrari and Mercedes.

Actually the highest punishments go until temporary or permanent ban. Just look for game-protect, who has taken trolling and scam to a completely new level.


Clearly.


I can't say what the mods think; I've done my part, although now I feel the (neutral) tag I've given him was almost too soft.
I see now he's playing the victim card: he has a new topic asking why is he hated by the leaders of the forum (heh).

Let me see:

• you have announced you've made a bitcoin service, but your questions show you have not even the basic knowledge about Bitcoin

   --> This means that you put people's money at risk, hence you can easily be tagged as scammer

• you have asked people to help you build a block explorer which you don't even know if it's meant to be block explorer, DEX or OTC exchange

   --> This means that you are trolling and have no respect for people's work/effort

• you have announced some strange ambassador program you implied you're offering (big) money, but you've never shown any proof of money (nor promised at least to escrow it)

   --> This is somewhere trolling and scam

People don't care about your name. People don't hate you per se; people hate to be taken for fools and this is what your actions are implying, hence the response you've got.

So maybe instead of asking why the community is doing this, you should start asking what you have been doing wrong.

My country is not far from that either. But, 25 years ago for example, it was much worse.


Yep, many years.


It's not something specific to Africa. Same goes on in Eastern Europe too. So you're not telling me anything new. This still happens here too.


This is exactly what the bad politicians want: kill the interest in the smart people so the dumb masses keep voting for them. One solution is to disrupt the system with new political parties, with better goals than only getting rich. But that too has more chances for failure than success. As I said from the start, all this goes painfully slow and there are (far too) many disappointments.

---
However, let's get back to the actual topic: banks are private businesses. They have a predatory mentality and will go for their sole interest if they're allowed.
Since politics is slow and tricky solution, Bitcoin remains the proper option, clearly.

And I was just thinking... Africa also has smart people, Africa must also have smart programmers; while people don't tell their nationality in most cases, I have a feeling Africa is under-represented as developers for bitcoin tools. Am I wrong?

The most problematic image have shown the queue of people waiting, which may or may not have been happening in your case.
However, I do hope you're telling the truth, at least in the text you wrote.

Next time, you better post your own images (nowadays everybody has a smartphone and it's not hard to make a few pictures if you really want to) or live without them, instead of using others' images which, as you've seen, may easily come with extra troubles (even if you are not lying, this can be seen as plagiarism now).

Very nice from you!
First of all, this question may need to be moved to Meta.
Second, in order to get an answer, you'll have to tell a bit more, like what you plan to give, since it depends whether it's bitcoin, or altcoin, or goods, for example.