Of course, this isn't my problem alone when it comes to being more difficult to obsess over rankings, but it is slowly becoming a regular thing and even more fun. I feel more honored by achieving every rankings after the merit system. On the other hand, my circle left the forum one by one at the beginning of the system implementation because they were unable to adapt. And damn, I have to say more when I bring up any topic in this forum to discuss it with them irl.

Try to be more realistic, which trader still considers time as a risk that can be avoided? Because it is an inherent risk whether you trade independently or collaboratively. You have to think from the customer's perspective.

Seriously, in the crypto market? does it even take up your time?

Again, WHERE IS YOUR TEAM?

(Possible) 2nd proof was presented in GazetaBitcoin's reply above. It reminds me of the case of red tagging who didn't respect the auction s/he was holding: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5348726.msg57602602#msg57602602

Comparing these cases, in the context they both show disrespect for auction/contest participants. However, I respect (old)Ratimov as someone the admin has trusted to be a meirt source. Talking about justice... I think it should have a different space especially after the account is really controlled by someone new.

What about the losses? Surely there's no sharing of losses, right? This is not fair cooperation.


Where is your team?

This is just an expected ratio but you won't be fixated on this, you're not using your own money and you're free to take any level of risk (that is if you're legit).

You must have a mindset like:

• Bitcoin OG: You should be as early as possible in owning bitcoin to experience its benefits; or
• Technical Expert: You need high computing specs to corrupt bitcoin.

Yes, but the process is so complicated (calculation of all service fees and estimated deposit/withdrawal times) that in the end you get disproportionate profits. On the other hand, high volatility is the reason why traders feel there is no need to do so.

I've heard this term, yeah "Kimchi Premium".

Prohibited! it is contain a direct link to mixers directory.

---

It's like an analogy if xTV channel boycotted all car factories, would they stop producing cars?
Bro, your argument is too weak to defend mixers.

I'dn't say it's easy, it takes a lot of effort including tracking down criminals first. An address can't simply be a means of identification without finding the person and then investigating whatever they have. In other words, criminals are the first target, then mixers are second. If the mixer is in first place, then global regulations will close the existing mixer services regardless of whether they've been involved in money laundering or not.
​

The main highlight is the news of the approval of the Bitcoin ETF filings by Blackrock et al instead of the case involving CZ which did not even affect the performance of its platform. Bitcoin ETFs have created market optimism since the last quarter of the year which marked the start of a new bull run session.

Here's the latest news: https://cointelegraph.com/news/blackrock-100-k-seed-fund-for-bitcoin-etf-sec-filing

...but you must be able to translate how our code will work, meaning you or your team has at least a developer background.

Is this some kind of cloud software that Binance offers? I'dn't conclude that building an exchange is this easy without coding skills. The main concern (from a potential user's perspective) is that the team won't be able to address serious technical errors on platforms that use this kind of service.

Let me get this straight, you have some theory but haven't started trading anything and then you try to teach your friend the practice of trading? Tell me if I'm wrong, isn't that funny? I don't think you should blame your friend even though you're frustrated.

High liquidity does not always cause high volatility too. For example stablecoins trading pair, here. https://www.bybit.com/en/trade/spot/USDC/USDT
You can see that both have enough liquidity to handle a total of over $3m in conversion value.

A definition that I found is that liquidity should not affect market prices. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidity.asp

What does "active" mean? Your bitcoin address generated from any wallet can't reject incoming transactions. This is the basic Bitcoin protocol that you need to know. I think your incident was because you copied the address in your personal list of destination addresses, not recently copied from your account so you didn't know the obvious warning they were planning to stop the service. cmiiw

I don't know how he clarified it to the politician and then thought this project was legit as I don't think he(BM) is an important guy who is worth employing. I traced his history, this manager worked on strange projects and all ended in not paying the participants.

He deserves red trusts so that people will be careful with the projects he presents here in the future.

This forum is not just an ideal marketing space for them, it is also to gain trust. You know that this forum has more established members with good technical backgrounds than other forum users.
There may be a lot of advertising space out there, but I doubt if a mixer could make it big without including this forum in their journey.

1) N/a. I have experience managing 2 to 3 community groups in the past (more deals outside the forum).
2) $300(to be readjusted in the future). I just wanna be a complementary team here, that doesn't mean I won't be excited. Just adjust the tasks I'll handle to my salary rate in this application.
3) Yes. The level of coding knowledge isn't that much especially for smartcontracts. But I've taken programming classes, so I know algorithms. Learning new things doesn't seem difficult if I have to.

They're simply aggregators who dont selectively list exchanges worth using, their verification based on their customer reports (although a bit too late to raise a warning flag). You should never use sites like that as personal recommendations.

PNNV is now shifting exchange service completely, so it will keep on the front page. No more live price monitors, I think the reason is that preev is back.

With current market conditions? I'll be realistic, I would sell it if I could possibly buy it back somewhere else. I think this will also be done by average holders without thinking hard.
OP's question actually also tests how greedy the answers will be.

You are over interpreting this case, I don't think this has any correlation with the security of binance so you have to empty your balance elsewhere, it costs you withdrawal fees.

Using Binance is like holding a spear. Binance actually has the most complete trading features, but Binance is rejected by regulation in my country. You can use the sharp tip to get something, but you have to hold the stick in the middle (standing in the gray area).