Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 09:11:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 238 »
261  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? on: October 07, 2015, 07:07:59 PM
Your December, 2014 "BTC price to King's pawn and $10 value by March 2015" gambit cost you several thousand Grand Master points.  Have you been reading more chess books since then?
Smiley
OK, bitcoin network is little bit stronger than i thought a year ago Smiley
But the physics remain the same.

You want your name on www.bitcoinobituaries.com. Admit it!
262  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: October 06, 2015, 06:28:08 PM
Of course Mistakes Were Made® at HF.  That's normal and does not imply lack of best efforts (much less "scamming") no matter how ugly your fervent desire to defame those who (as confirmed by the bankruptcy court) tried their hardest to make it work.

It is scamming when you promise October delivery and you receive chips in November!

It is scamming when an employee of yours promises that you can receive the same amount of BTC that you paid if they fail the on-time delivery!

How is it HF's fault the price and difficulty diverged in a perfect storm that also took out Cointerra and AM (among others)?  Is Cointerra a scam also?  Isn't AM a confirmed scam?

Why don't you pester former Cointerra or Asicminer proponents like you do to me?  Is it because I had the temerity to push back against the popular lynch mob mentality/agenda, and you find that unforgivable?  How flattering!   Kiss

Yes Cointerra is a scam!

AM isn't a scam. The party who suffered is only the company and its shareholders and it was by pure theft or malicious third-party (we still don't have any proof about anything regarding this)! Also it should be noted that the damage wasn't made by unrealistic/optimistic promises or by purely lies by the company towards its customers like in HashFail's case.

Oh I have pestered AM proponents worse than you. And CT didn't have any representative to lick their ass and eat their shit like HF had with you and cypherdoc so no fun in there.

HF didn't make us place our bets on the big/fast/hot/immersion strategy.  We freely chose to do that.  Some of us hedged with small/slow/cool ASICs.
Anyway, it's not what the lawyers or I say that matters.  It's the facts, as established by the judicial record, that matter.
There is only one remaining case with the potential to find the CEO/CTO committed fraud, and its scope has already been narrowed.
If you aren't going to listen to what the judges/courts say, just because they disagree with your prejudgements, what does that say about you?  What makes you think your biased, under-informed opinion is more valid than the professional judges who are in possession of all the relevant facts, especially when you can't even be bothered to read the primary sources?
It sounds like you are saying nothing, not even facts, can convince you HF failed due to unfavorable business conditions.
Is that actually your position, that your mind is made up regardless of the truth?
Are you really telling us the courts are lying, unless they reach the same conclusions you have?

HF only made you their humble shit eating dog. Nothing else! No matter how the company performed your only merit in this is that you took all their shit and you ate it and you will do it again if you had the chance!
263  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: October 05, 2015, 05:19:29 PM
AFAIK HF was forced into bankruptcy so Koi/LiquidBits (aka the Edgeworths and Jabobsons) could buy the assets at firesale prices.  The attempt failed miserably, screwing the rest of us creditors in the process.

But good question anyway!  I'm glad you've started asking for information instead of asserting falsehoods.

Before being forced into a predictably futile bankruptcy, HF was "selling those assets" by shopping equity around to potential sources of recapitalization.

You should also know the assets in question were the raw materials (components) and IP needed to create/sell miners (and thus earn revenue to pay refunds).

The market for those assets is, as demonstrated by the spectacular failure of the bankruptcy auction, entirely illiquid.

Ok that makes sense!

But no matter what you or the lawyers say HF will remain in history as a scamming, lying and lousy company instead of a high-tech start-up that simply failed. Period.
264  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: October 04, 2015, 02:35:13 PM
HF had $750k in assets, but they were out of cash.  The forced bankruptcy stopped those assets from being sold to pay refunds or leveraged to secure recapitalization.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?  Everyone else managed to comprehend this very straightforward course of events.

HF *DID NOT* and still *DOES NOT* have "the necessary money for the lawyers" you stupid fucking mountain of ignorance.  That's why the lawyers are, in desperation, now going after cypherdoc's sales commission.

Take your defamatory 'Evil HF could have paid refunds but chose to pay lawyers instead' meme and shove it.  It's a lie, and you know it's a lie.  Actually, it's a compound lie, composed of two separate falsehoods!

Is it asking too much for you to read the primary documents, and gain a working knowledge of the relevant facts, before you spout off with blatantly wrong pronouncements of absolute falsity?

HF was forced into bankruptcy because they weren't paying refunds/shipping miners. What stopped HF from selling those assets (that later they weren't able to sell because of the bankruptcy) BEFORE the bankruptcy in order to avoid it?
265  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? on: October 04, 2015, 02:31:20 PM
With Great power comes great responsibility my child...... Wink
Not in bitcoin world. Responsibility for whom? I do not know you. You do not know me.
There is no third party who can punish me, because I am wrong and you are right.

Props for admitting this and for your attitude. Have a great Sunday!
266  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: October 02, 2015, 05:11:44 PM
It makes perfect sense.  You are either not paying attention or are a lying scumbag (or both).  HF was FORCED to waste its last $750k on lawyers, instead of completing the process of finding investors for recapitalization.

The moment some short-sighted litigious fools forced HF into bankruptcy, it became ILLEGAL for HF to continue paying refunds or MPP or ship upgrades.  Chapter 7 freezes all corporate assets.  Duh!  Duh, you stupid fucking derp-face!

So they had $750k, but they weren't issuing refunds for anyone except B1 customers. How does that makes any sense? They were forced into bankruptcy because they weren't paying refunds. But I don't understand how were they able to find the necessary money for the lawyers, but not for the refunds.

Stop confusing me with cypherdoc.  He earned a HF sales commission of several thousand BTC.  I did no such thing.  Learn to read, or STFU.

cypherdoc received the 3000 BTC only for his useless endorsement topic, not for the sales.


I've already taken responsibility for and learned an expensive lesson via my immensely unprofitable investment in Icedrill/HF.  I don't blame deadterra, will, Simon, or Eduardo for failing despite their best efforts.  Because I am a grown-up mature adult, and don't feel entitled to always win every bet.  Unlike you spoiled babies, who can't let go of your windfall pipe-dream even after being woken up.

I will not take responsibility for other peoples' decisions to gamble on ASIC pre-orders.  I am not your scapegoat.  I am not your punching bag.

Are you interested in the facts and the truth, or are you too committed to pushing the Evil Hashfast storyline to bother with such concepts?

Remind me of what have you taken responsibility for because I don't remember.
267  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hearn Banned from #Bitcoin-dev on: October 01, 2015, 07:25:23 PM
Devs have been saying for a long damn time that Hearn's role in Core development has been as a "cancer" that saps everyone's energy and constantly delays day-to-day work from being done. At some point, they will have gotten fed up. (Shrug)

Bitcoin is open source, Mike. Go fork off if you're unhappy, and if no one runs your shoddy code, you can fade off into irrelevance. (Oh, you've already begun that process Wink)

Proof of those devs?
268  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: October 01, 2015, 04:41:09 PM
Except that they weren't shipping the batches that they were supposed to ship and they weren't offering any refunds except some B1 customers. Am I right or was it different?

HF was issuing refunds, and planned to compensate us for the delays, until they ran out of money.

Having good IP, they were in the process of recapitalizing, only to be stabbed in the back by litigious windfall/golden egg seekers.

So HF's last ~million dollars went to bankruptcy lawyers, instead of customer refunds.  Exactly as predicted.  Good job cedivad/MM/PM!!!

So they ran out of money to compensate for the delays, but they had some millions to spend on the bankruptcy lawyers? Does that make any sense to you?
269  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hearn Banned from #Bitcoin-dev on: October 01, 2015, 04:38:10 PM
deserved.

Why?
270  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: September 29, 2015, 05:42:20 PM
Please note HF didn't want to enter and strenuously fought bankruptcy (thus terminating or severely limiting their liability to us, their customers).

HF was forced into bankruptcy by some short-sighted fools who thought they could cut open the golden goose and simply scoop out all the golden eggs, without all that pesky "waiting" business.  They thought the courts would leap to award them well-deserved windfalls, with cash provided by magical ponies and secret escrows.

Except that they weren't shipping the batches that they were supposed to ship and they weren't offering any refunds except some B1 customers. Am I right or was it different?
271  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Eventually the FUNGIBILITY issue of bitcoin will make headlines ... on: September 26, 2015, 02:47:43 AM
Are we going to the moon?
272  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Spondolies SP50 on: September 25, 2015, 01:39:06 PM

What for? We already have one more except this and the official thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1188299.0

What is the purpose of this useless thread?
273  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: September 23, 2015, 07:10:11 PM
Good to see the 0.15W/GH/s Power Efficiency

On 28nm!
274  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: September 23, 2015, 04:41:16 PM
We've been holding our tongues for a while now...

And finally, we are extremely happy to unveil the SP50!


What a nice surprise  Shocked Shocked Shocked

I have 3 pages to catch on! Oh yeah!
275  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: September 22, 2015, 03:38:47 PM
@Zvisha: Best of luck with your new job. I hope your time at Spondoolies was lucrative.

Same. Thanks for all the sleepless nights!
276  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The 21 Bitcoin Computer on: September 22, 2015, 03:37:38 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/3lxrkg/all_the_comedy_gold_youll_need_to_know_about_from/

After months of suspense, the company finally revealed what market they were after:
Integrated Devices for the Internet of Things (IDIoTs).

Another proof that you are among one of them.
277  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 21 Inc. Releases First "Bitcoin Computer" on: September 22, 2015, 03:37:05 PM
There is a same thread existing there!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1186115.0;topicseen
OP, you should check before creating new thread.

Obviously dude needs some ad revenue for his website  Wink

Maybe a warning ban should help him to reconsider this kind of shit next time.
278  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 22, 2015, 04:25:44 AM
So many narrow minds in this topic. Can't you think of anything else than ROI? I understand that this is top priority in everyone's life, but you just can't apply it to EVERYTHING.
279  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The 21 Bitcoin Computer on: September 22, 2015, 04:08:08 AM
The main question is: Does it fork?  Grin Will it be able to withstand a hard-fork?

By mining on their pool, with their device, your tx will always have high priority against all other tx from others users.
You have paid for this, and you will maintaining the pool and then the priority.

This should be read twice by the people thinking about ROI.
280  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 21 co introducing bitcoin [mining+] computer for $399.99 (unofficial thread) on: September 22, 2015, 04:06:34 AM
Finally they broke the ice!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!