Looks more like a Ponzi scheme than a wallet. I doubt those interest rates are sustainable. |
|
|
|
I didn't see until now that it was a $100 mp, he may very well still have it.
Well, in the meantime I've acquired a pending offer. The one in the OP would have been nice, though. |
|
|
|
Still looking for this. Bump.
If this deal: Is still open I'll take it. I'd send first no escrow required. I usually prefer Vanilla Reload to GreenDot MP, but I'd take it. Unless he bought another then this isn't still available. I bought a $70MP from him last night. Fair enough. |
|
|
|
Still looking for this. Bump.
If this deal: Is still open I'll take it. I'd send first no escrow required. I usually prefer Vanilla Reload to GreenDot MP, but I'd take it. |
|
|
|
|
I would like to trade 1BTC of mine for a $125 Vanilla Reload Card, it is like a Moneypack but on a different network.. I might be somewhat flexible on price if you seem especially reputable, can acquire and trade of of these today, or we've traded before.
The United States Government might have shut down, but Bitcoin endures.
Edit: Offer pending
|
|
|
|
Just signed up to this and got my link ready for this. http://1v.io/Film2240 When should I expect payment? Please bear with me as I had to gloss over the details quickly due to high workload from editing a film project (I'm asked to work on a campaign #seaofchange hashtag on twitter which'll improve rights for disabled/blind people.The film will be shown in a variety of places including the UN from what the client has told me so far). If you need to reach me,find me on twitter @Film2240 as I spend most of my time there now. Thanks for understanding  Paid up to here! Seem to have missed my August 28th renewal post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198934.msg3028534#msg3028534I sent it to your bitcoin address as you haven't put your 1v.io link there. Thanks, Just checked it. My 1v.io link kind of just hides out on the back of the second line of the signature. Inputs.io - instant bitcoin payments & secure wallet 1DRNiHyAVRRiWJ5jWbnqgatritzQrrZKqw Ripple is a scam enabler http://1v.io/BingoBoingoI'll probably rearrange my signature stuff to make it more readable while still keeping it compliant. |
|
|
|
Just signed up to this and got my link ready for this. http://1v.io/Film2240 When should I expect payment? Please bear with me as I had to gloss over the details quickly due to high workload from editing a film project (I'm asked to work on a campaign #seaofchange hashtag on twitter which'll improve rights for disabled/blind people.The film will be shown in a variety of places including the UN from what the client has told me so far). If you need to reach me,find me on twitter @Film2240 as I spend most of my time there now. Thanks for understanding Paid up to here! Seem to have missed my August 28th renewal post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198934.msg3028534#msg3028534 |
|
|
|
Chose link C, had a ripplescam.org link for a while now. I guess I'll have to keep up a decent post rate.
1Magr1FdjAHeST3aVeFQSMZdPKSzWWSfpLEdit: Switching things up to the inputs.io link and payment to my inputs.io address https://inputs.io/u/BingoBoingoPosting to start another cycle. Renewing again. Renewing yet again. |
|
|
|
I'm going to leave forms of currency out since the wider forex and commodity markets will dictate their prices in terms of fiat.
I agree that buying services like translation and editing is great, but I'm not sure if we could quantify a value that could be tracked over time through data.
Thank you for the input. Keep 'em coming.
Raybans, web stuff, some silver that was promptly flipped... |
|
|
|
For those who don't want to read that crap:
Its better to bet on just-dice than to invest in any stocks not available MPEx. The title has nothing to do with the text.
More it is better to gamble on provably fair things explained to you like a five year old than to "invest"/gamble on things you don't care to understand. Man it sure sucks that I see every thread made by MPOE even though he has been on my ignore list since forever. The real "ATTENTION clueless noobs" here is that MPOE is some guy pretending to be a girl representing his "company" which is listed on an exchange that has a graphical interface from the year 1998.
MP is the man with the harem behind the curtain, MPOE is the bot, MPEX is the exchange, and MPOE-PR is the girl hired because MP hates forums. The website seems it is designed rather specifically to keep the ill informed and easily intimidated away. |
|
|
|
BitFunder, Havelock, or CoinBr?
I understand BTCT was registered in Belize but opereated out of Oregan. Does anyone know this information for the other exchanges?
Probably CoinBR or MPEX. |
|
|
|
Do you think the person who broke in is capable of taking everyones money or just selected accounts? He's likely sleeping. I checked his domains whois and he lives in the part of the world where it's 4am. He worked on Blockchain.info I doubt he's going to take anyones money! Someone needs to contact his server administrator and have this fixed if he's not around
He is assuie. I am Chinese, It is 3am now. If your house on fire will you be awake at 4am??? You bet, not really a solid relation with that kind of shitation though. This is more like someone broke in at 4am and blind sided the contents of said home. Personally I am hoping this is less someone broke in and took stuff and more someone unloaded a few dumptrucks worth of hogshit in a manner that blocked the door (seeing as a DDoS isn't a break in as much as an impediment to access). |
|
|
|
The solution for better security would be TradeFortress signing these kind of messages with GPG.
Pretty much.
Pasted below is the public key he had me use to contact him at the admin@glados.cc email address.He as a GPG key posted on the forum here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=290860.0A lot of bitcoin services have been hit with DDoS's lately, so I'm not too concerned. I'd really like to start seeing signed posts on important matters (like suggested changes to host files and reassurances that "SSL certificate errors are ok"). I hope this situation resolves with a more positive outcome than MyBitcoin or Instawallet. |
|
|
|
I'll offer that last weeks game was most likely an outlier for evaluating Alabama's defensive prowess. Alabama's offense also tends to be slower and steadier than it was last week, because normally They don't have to pile on the points like they did racing to outscore Manzeil. I'd probably lean towards taking Alamaba -39. I am taking Indiana vs. Missouri over 71 though so maybe take my input with a healthy amount of salt.
Wanted to say thanks for mentioning it! I looked into it and followed you on the Over 71 - we just barely made it on that one!
Football Indiana
Missouri Under 73.5 10 hours from now 1.724 / -138 Unsettled
Stayeduptolate, you just made that under as well - all winners here on that game, congrats!  thanks bud been killing it in ncaa lets see if I can do it to the NFL today! Yeah, I'm just glad I didn't lean enough to fall into taking Alabama -39. A lot of the FBS teams were running up 70+ points on their own yesterday as they steamrolled their non-conference opponents, but that's never really been Alabama's style. Alabama routinely just works on scoring enough points to hammer a win while burning the clock. Unless their bowl match up places them against a really potent offense like Baylor's (I think their quarterback might beat Manziel in anything by hype generation) Alabama's offense probably isn't going to score more than 40 points in a game again this season simply for the reason that Alabama won't need to score more than 40 points (though they might stumble their way into doing it). |
|
|
|
you need to address me, I will assist you the best that I can. Like Bradley, I have other commitments and I am spread pretty thin
Well having stumbled into this blog post it seems reasonable that people would assume to address you both as though you are interchangeable. but I will do what I can to gain your trust
...
Patience is considered a virtue.
Well, MPOE-PR gave the marching orders thusly: Bradley, you cannot respect me if you do not know what respect is. And you don't, given that my name still appears in the "club" list on the first page of this thread when I expressed zero interest and to the contrary was explaining how and why what you're doing is wrong, and what needs to be done to fix it. Rather than doing those things, and rather than carefully reading and considering the provided literature on this subject, you're expressing your good intentions and apologizing for your failure to deliver. There's nothing wrong with that, UNLESS you're at the same time pretending that you're somebody with something to offer, something for which people should pay, no less. Then it becomes a farce, and moreover, it reeks up these forums and as you've noticed is quite capable of annoying other posters. You do not post "giveaways" and make assertions about being or having anything to do with a "company" before you have a business plan, one that you've put in front of your peers, one for which you've addressed each and every given problem. You do not post contentless marketing junk in the SECURITIES forum, soliciting total newbs to drum up a high thread post count in exchange for breadcrumbs. And you don't start any of this at all without following the steps outlined here (following and completing, to the degree that when asked who you are and what you've done, you can answer). This is scammer behavior, no matter how good your intentions are, no matter how much you believe in what you're trying to do. That part you mentioned SolarWind/Bradley about: Patience is considered a virtue.
Goes especially for people considering a business, especially a business seeking other people's funds to create it. |
|
|
|
So practically speaking, if such failure seems eminent, SolarWind will begin the process of perusing other options to fulfill its obligations. If necessary, all assets will be liquidated and the proceeds distributed to the Partners (that means all shareholders except the company itself.) If all else fails I'll work it off with mine own two hands.
A good start would be for you/Bradley to get into the WTO and GPG sign something to this effect, and you know make a contract with shareholders. This is one of those basic sort of things you should have read and then known to do before doing all of this writing and collecting a bunch of names in the other thread. Also, maybe find a way for investors to sell/transfer/liquidate their shares? On forums/SocialMedia a herculean mining company and a herculean ponzi can look very similar, so read/lurk moar and work on how you can present that distinction if you are going to continue. |
|
|
|
Sorry about the Clemson game, stayeduptolate!
I've been enjoying taking the Over on a few SEC games for the past few weeks; LSU has made me some money against Kent State and UAB.
Do you have any thoughts on over/under 51 for the Alabama / CSU game? In past years, Alabama's usually stopped at about 49 when shutting out or nearly shutting out a team, but this year's Alabama team isn't quite the same team as last year. Plus the CSU coach used to be a part of the Alabama program. They're predicting storms Saturday night in Tuscaloosa, however.
Alabama's lackluster defense plus CSU's coach's history is making me lean towards to Over, but I don't want to get on the wrong side of a slog in the mud - do you think it's worth it to go with the Over or a bit too risky?
I understand if you'd prefer not to give 'advice', but I thought I'd put it out there - I've been enjoying following you recently!
I'll offer that last weeks game was most likely an outlier for evaluating Alabama's defensive prowess. Alabama's offense also tends to be slower and steadier than it was last week, because normally They don't have to pile on the points like they did racing to outscore Manzeil. I'd probably lean towards taking Alamaba -39. I am taking Indiana vs. Missouri over 71 though so maybe take my input with a healthy amount of salt. Thanks for the input! I like betting the over, so I'll check into the Indiana Missouri game - I know the SEC best, so that's usually where I stay. You don't think the weather will be an issue for them to put 39+ points on the board? Edit: Forgot MO was in the SEC now. Hah. As long as both quarterbacks stay healthy (was an issue for Mizzou's Franklin last year). I am driving to this game (IN @ MO), and sitting on 45 yard line. The over in this game should be good, both defenses suck pretty bad, and both like to go uptempo.
Good luck!
Sweet. I have fond memories of having been on campus when ESPN gameday came and Oklahoma was tossed around like a limp bag of dicks (good times). Also don't forget to get some Shakespeare's pizza, any trip to CoMo that doesn't involve Shakespeare's is one that could have been better. |
|
|
|
Really liking the update, it looks like a much quicker read than the original while emphasizing the substance of Ripple. |
|
|
|
Sorry about the Clemson game, stayeduptolate!
I've been enjoying taking the Over on a few SEC games for the past few weeks; LSU has made me some money against Kent State and UAB.
Do you have any thoughts on over/under 51 for the Alabama / CSU game? In past years, Alabama's usually stopped at about 49 when shutting out or nearly shutting out a team, but this year's Alabama team isn't quite the same team as last year. Plus the CSU coach used to be a part of the Alabama program. They're predicting storms Saturday night in Tuscaloosa, however.
Alabama's lackluster defense plus CSU's coach's history is making me lean towards to Over, but I don't want to get on the wrong side of a slog in the mud - do you think it's worth it to go with the Over or a bit too risky?
I understand if you'd prefer not to give 'advice', but I thought I'd put it out there - I've been enjoying following you recently!
I'll offer that last weeks game was most likely an outlier for evaluating Alabama's defensive prowess. Alabama's offense also tends to be slower and steadier than it was last week, because normally They don't have to pile on the points like they did racing to outscore Manzeil. I'd probably lean towards taking Alamaba -39. I am taking Indiana vs. Missouri over 71 though so maybe take my input with a healthy amount of salt. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
