Latest posts of: ahmed

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 128 »

261

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CX][DGC][SYNC][CURE][EMC2][PHC][ARG][VARDIFF][Stratum] CryptoPools.com

on: May 27, 2014, 02:00:36 PM

exactly

262

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CX][DGC][SYNC][CURE][EMC2][PHC][ARG][VARDIFF][Stratum] CryptoPools.com

on: May 26, 2014, 08:32:59 PM

cx is due for a shutdown

263

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 26, 2014, 01:02:06 AM

i handed the solution to you on a golden platter. Upgrade arg to a newer version of the btc/ltc codebase supporting leveldb and then the issue will be fixed Ahmed

264

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 25, 2014, 10:21:12 PM

Quote from: flound1129 on May 25, 2014, 09:03:53 PM Quote from: ahmed_bodi on May 25, 2014, 06:34:56 PM Quote from: flound1129 on May 25, 2014, 03:22:42 AM Quote from: baritus on May 25, 2014, 02:23:06 AM Quote from: ahmed_bodi on May 23, 2014, 09:43:26 PM Update: In the Argentum Data Dir: Create a file called "DB_CONFIG" In this file place the following: Code: set_lk_max_locks 537000 set_lk_max_objects 537000 Once saved, Delete and resync the arg blockchain after backup the wallet.dat You should now be good to go Thanks for posting back. Looks like it's because 4.8 version libs were used. Nope, 5.3. The error is due to berkerly db being used which has a restriction called "locks". The block where clients forked meant that there wernt enough locks for the block to be processed therefore leading to the fork. By switching to leveldb this scenario could be avoided in the future. PS. for anyone doubting me. Look into the bitcoin fork between v0.7 bdb clients and v0.8 level db clients. So to be clear, EVERYONE running an Argentum client is going to experience this issue, unless they explicitly configure the DB_CONFIG parameters that Ahmed was kind enough to post. This means the wallet will be unusable for anyone who simply downloads the client from the website and has never heard of Bitcointalk. Baritus, fix this, kill ARG, or hand it over to someone else. Maybe not at this block but some time in the future surely. 1 Big Block and boom it will stick again. As you said some people may not even be able to sync up. Ahmed

265

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [BTE] The Bytecoin Information Thread

on: May 25, 2014, 07:08:40 PM

Quote from: crazydownloaded on May 25, 2014, 04:56:12 PM What is the correct github repository? I'm using https://github.com/ahmedbodi/bytecoin right now, but no block in 5 hours... that is the correct repo. but diff is insaene

266

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 25, 2014, 06:34:56 PM

Quote from: flound1129 on May 25, 2014, 03:22:42 AM Quote from: baritus on May 25, 2014, 02:23:06 AM Quote from: ahmed_bodi on May 23, 2014, 09:43:26 PM Update: In the Argentum Data Dir: Create a file called "DB_CONFIG" In this file place the following: Code: set_lk_max_locks 537000 set_lk_max_objects 537000 Once saved, Delete and resync the arg blockchain after backup the wallet.dat You should now be good to go Thanks for posting back. Looks like it's because 4.8 version libs were used. Nope, 5.3. The error is due to berkerly db being used which has a restriction called "locks". The block where clients forked meant that there wernt enough locks for the block to be processed therefore leading to the fork. By switching to leveldb this scenario could be avoided in the future. PS. for anyone doubting me. Look into the bitcoin fork between v0.7 bdb clients and v0.8 level db clients.

267

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] BTG BitGem >>> NEW SECURITY UPDATE 0.4.1.8 <<< UPGRADE NOW <<<<

on: May 24, 2014, 06:07:37 PM

ahh not mine then. Mines btg.cryptopools.com

268

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] BTG BitGem >>> NEW SECURITY UPDATE 0.4.1.8 <<< UPGRADE NOW <<<<

on: May 24, 2014, 04:17:48 PM

Quote from: Scyntech on May 24, 2014, 05:40:59 AM Quote from: cryptoholic11 on May 24, 2014, 04:01:37 AM Is there any ongoing development with this coin or is it a dying rare coin? Been a holder since last year, and want to keep holding but seems like there is no active community? The one functioning pool I was at for what ever reason will no longing load. I've tried different browsers and no luck. I like this coin, so I hope it doesn't die out. that isnt my pool is it?

269

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 11:07:28 PM

Quote from: primer- on May 23, 2014, 11:03:47 PM Quote from: foodies123 on May 23, 2014, 10:59:08 PM it's a multipool taking advantage of the retargeting system, this kind of thing can be done on any coin in existence be it scrypt or any other pow algo if the given difficulty is low enough. Issue here is not retargeting but block reorganization. This needs to be fixed ASAP!! as in NOW. Otherwise we might see 200 or less satoshi/MYR before Monday!! Welcome to my ignore list. You dont know what you're talking about. There is no issue at all.

270

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 23, 2014, 09:43:26 PM

Update: In the Argentum Data Dir: Create a file called "DB_CONFIG" In this file place the following: Code: set_lk_max_locks 537000 set_lk_max_objects 537000 Once saved, Delete and resync the arg blockchain after backup the wallet.dat You should now be good to go

271

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 09:33:42 PM

Quote from: Zoella on May 23, 2014, 09:30:21 PM Any way the block explorer output can be updated? Keep getting this error when trying to check an address (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)... Its updated it just means theres so many transactions itd be a drain to show

272

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 09:12:46 PM

hashco.ws i think is guilty. I spoke to nearmiss recently where he asked me if my stratum works with myriadcoin on scrypt.

273

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 07:57:57 PM

Quote from: Zoella on May 23, 2014, 07:51:49 PM Quote from: ahmed_bodi on May 23, 2014, 07:50:28 PM <snip> I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is. Ahh. I have him on ignore so I guess I don't know what he might be saying about it. So. Coin switching pool? EDIT: Ahh yes... http://wafflepool.com/stats There we go, mystery solved

274

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Stop falling for the Mintpal pump and dump scam (this should be a forum sticky)

on: May 23, 2014, 07:53:31 PM

Quote from: pandher on May 23, 2014, 07:32:39 PM Quote from: ebliever on May 23, 2014, 06:31:55 PM and is the oldest and furthest along in development. Shills with zero knowledge, Cryptonote has been development since 2012 and is the most advanced anon protocol, think Monero CryptoNote is an edge case no one knew about it here till a few months ago. AnonCoin is the 1st Bitcoin Like cryptocoin which is in development to be anonymous Ahmed

275

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 07:50:28 PM

Quote from: Zoella on May 23, 2014, 07:49:08 PM Quote from: ahmed_bodi on May 23, 2014, 07:42:28 PM Quote from: Zoella on May 23, 2014, 07:38:43 PM Quote from: mynameisjim on May 23, 2014, 05:32:16 PM Quote from: Wiseman on May 23, 2014, 03:50:34 PM Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things. There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud? For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!) Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt Block # Generation time Difficulty 259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19 259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666 259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153 259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005 259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81 259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157 259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674 259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2 259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736 259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281 259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836 259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399 259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971 259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552 259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305 259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157 259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044 259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965 259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912 259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924 259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921 259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958 259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036 259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157 it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time. Actually seems to happen rather frequently? This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ) 261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26% 261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26% 261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26% 261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26% 261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26% 261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26% 261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26% 261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26% 261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26% 261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26% 261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26% 261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26% 261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26% 261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26% 261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26% 261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26% 261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26% 261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26% 261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26% 261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26% 261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26% A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same Ahmed Nobody is spreading misinformation. I haven't seen one person state this was a double spend. I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is.

276

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Myriad: 1st Multi-PoW - Electrum / MyriadSwitcher / Coinpayments.net Contest

on: May 23, 2014, 07:42:28 PM

Quote from: Zoella on May 23, 2014, 07:38:43 PM Quote from: mynameisjim on May 23, 2014, 05:32:16 PM Quote from: Wiseman on May 23, 2014, 03:50:34 PM Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things. There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud? For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!) Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt Block # Generation time Difficulty 259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19 259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666 259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153 259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005 259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81 259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157 259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674 259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2 259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736 259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281 259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836 259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399 259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971 259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552 259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305 259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157 259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044 259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965 259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912 259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924 259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921 259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958 259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036 259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157 it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time. Actually seems to happen rather frequently? This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ) 261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26% 261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26% 261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26% 261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26% 261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26% 261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26% 261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26% 261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26% 261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26% 261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26% 261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26% 261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26% 261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26% 261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26% 261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26% 261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26% 261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26% 261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26% 261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26% 261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26% 261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26% A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same Ahmed

277

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 23, 2014, 07:10:20 PM

the fix was to increase the blocks and objects in DB_CONFIG in the arg data dir. ill edit this with the full lines in a min

278

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

on: May 22, 2014, 02:43:42 PM

Quote from: baritus on May 22, 2014, 01:15:16 PM Quote from: flound1129 on May 22, 2014, 03:39:40 AM blockchain stuck at 426085 https://altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum Block: 426147 I am assuming there was a fork of some type and you just need to connect to the dominant one. nope. BDB ran out of locks. cryptopools has been patched with a workaround.

279

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead.

on: May 22, 2014, 01:06:03 PM

Quote from: Cryddit on May 10, 2014, 05:09:57 PM okay, here's a list of coins generated via coingen, as maintained automatically by the coingen site. I haven't listed all of these because with a lot of them there's no evidence that they even launched. http://coingen.bluematt.me/status.html Gamecoin, Cloudcoin, Doubloon, Onecoin, and Americancoin have definitely been generated by coingen. If there've been multiple coins by those names, then certainly the fact that at least one of them was a coingen coin is an important part of the history, and may be one of the reasons why it's dead. And honestly it doesn't matter which of them was the original; this thread is only about which one is dead. Androidtokens, though was definitely my mistake; the coingen coin was 'androin' and I misread it. Thanks for the info. Regarding Bottlecaps and EZcoin, please provide a source for your information and I'll be happy to correct the list. I observed that they've been delisted from coinmarketcap at http://coinmarketcap.com/all.html - where else should I be looking? Sorry sir but they were not produced by coingen. They were done by hand using shakezula's cloning guide. We can battle it out all you want but the fact stands

280

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development!

on: May 21, 2014, 11:51:35 PM

is there a need for a stable pool here?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 128 »