"Proof" of what? An Australian man leaves a comment on an American legal issue. Anybody in the world can comment here, and anybody does. The only thing this is "proof" of is that Craig believes he's Satoshi. "If anyone tells you separately the blockchain can work outside existing legislation, statutes and rules they are seeking to mislead and defraud for the sole purpose of avoiding regulation and creating unregulated bucket shops and dark web markets." It does work outside existing legislation and it has for the entirety of its existence. What's he rambling about? He's clearly a lunatic. Triggered? Get over it |
|
|
|
 But I don't need to read it because I know exactly what it is already: more dishonest diarrhea. Like, flaming villainous diarrhea. A heinous spastic spurt. The man is so wrapped up in his own lies that he cannot escape them. This is how madness close up looks like I guess. He blocked me to lol. U are fully excused, since u show to us that u are not able to do own research. Trust others...  I didn't even attack his shitcoin, just posted a Winnie Pooh GIF to one of his rants. He lost it, no matter how u defend CW. His "coin" costs half of the BCash price (which is a shitfork to begin with).  It is very hard to keep order in ur life. U need to work hard for to get it and keep it. Same holds for keeping clean and working the Bitcoin protocol. Keep it simple, stable and working. Defend that. No Segwit, LN, Ctor, Avalynch,.... needed. |
|
|
|
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Code diffs might help u. But if u hold bitcoin from 2009 on u can still use those on bsv wallets like CashPay or handcash on BSV. |
|
|
|
here you go  I saw this. Looks like Wright got shut down by a kid. All the intellect and wisdom in the world is no match for somebody unencumbered by pathological narcissism and sociopathy. Ur post proofs u are a kid. Get learn this https://youtu.be/wQLwUTaOGuo |
|
|
|
But I don't need to read it because I know exactly what it is already: more dishonest diarrhea. Like, flaming villainous diarrhea. A heinous spastic spurt. The man is so wrapped up in his own lies that he cannot escape them. This is how madness close up looks like I guess. He blocked me to lol. U are fully excused, since u show to us that u are not able to do own research. Trust others... |
|
|
|
That’s because he created it dumbass.
Dude... Really?Your savior just got outed as a conman, which most of us already knew, but for the thick-headed among you (cough... jbreher... cough cough) this most recently exposed fuckup of his is the nail in his coffin. If he created it why does he need to edit 6 year old blog entries to make it appear that he created it? He's a lying shitbag and so are you if you continue to espouse otherwise. I have an idea for a cryptocurrency called bitcoin. It's totally my idea you guys, this quote proves it.
|
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/https://archive.is/D6P7ntldr; On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar. So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero. Why make snarky comments about me? I didn't comment on what I quoted. Disprove the man's proofs why not. Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming  what is that? Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work. Read Think Work it out. Nobody will do that work for u.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/https://archive.is/D6P7ntldr; On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar. So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero. Why make snarky comments about me? I didn't comment on what I quoted. Disprove the man's proofs why not. Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming what is that? Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work. Read Think Work it out. Nobody will do that work for u. One start of many https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3065857 |
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/https://archive.is/D6P7ntldr; On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar. So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin IS Satoshi's Vision and it works in the Satoshi Version. Nothing more to do, except hijacking and scamming - that's what happens when ppl want to play better than Satoshi. |
|
|
|
Craig Wright is a great liar. Large blocks are not a future
Lol.. like to limit eMail or any other internet protocol content? Who are you... |
|
|
|
Thx. Great one. Sadly keyportTV not there? |
|
|
|
Kann man überhaupt noch raus bekommen was Scam ist und was nicht? Worauf sollte man achten?
Bei der Analyse von White Paper sollte man auf technische Komponente, Team von Entwicklern, Informationen über den Charakter und das Ausmaß der Ausgabe von Tokens, herangezogene Geldmittel, usw. achten. Das White Paper ist tatsächlich das einzige legal doc / term sheet aus sicht einer Finanzanlage / Produkt-Beschreibung. Dient auch als technische Spezifikation des gesamten (ÖKO-) Systems UND des Konsens-Protokolls. Würde man dann Segwit Coin + LN noch als legit bezeichnen ?? -- uhhh -- die Geister, die ich rief .... |
|
|
|
Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash? Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ? Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help" These are the questions that must be asked. the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. The general public should not, exactly as we do not care about smtp - but this is because it does not change and is on topic / purpose - A protocol MUST be stable and simple (= scalable) and clear to be 'ignored by public' -> Industry / cyber risk whatch dogs take care . There you 'll get the mass adoption - ONLY that way. The white paper is the guide for the paper dogs do check if the protocol is doing what it should. The tech impl must be to spec - or rekt Bitcoin has two layers: Econimics AND tech - if u fiddle with the tech and do not understand the dependencies up-hill -> you ll risk the entire eco system (and create an ALT coin like SegwitCoin). But do not sell that as Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin
Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion. Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do. I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation? From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly. Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine. No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, ... whatever hole ABC loves to add to protocol / allow / change original econimicsto stifle the on-chain scaling ... |
|
|
|
it is always funny to see how many people are easily fooled by the shenanigans of a bunch of scammers who want to take their money.  i don't think in the past year we have had any other scam that was as obvious or as stupid as BSV but still we see people who are passionately falling for the bullshit of one person who is emptying their pockets... haha U must speak about blockstream ... |
|
|
|
Exactly - we can see that hijacking and over-engineering is / was very easily possible by PoSM - when industry adoption is not there ... but BSV will change that |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
