I'm flattered.
About par for the mental caliber of your average BSV muppet.
Yeah, they keep digging, they act so alike their beloved fraudtoshi. Funny. U just cannot define for yourself what u little block should do - except hate the big ones Grow up - start getting big all over  |
|
|
|
Finally, well, I must admit that BSV is perfect!
I recommend BSV to everyone!
Careful - now Lauda will tag you with a scammer accusation. you're right, the guy has such an oversized ego that he did it. I lost my bet, I don't think he'd have the audacity to take on a name that doesn't belong to him. That's his flagrant misdemeanor! Identity crisis of the toilet vigilante. At least it proves that "this guy and a certified perfect asshole that's why he doesn't have hemorrhoids".  Same for me ! he have copy my name and nutildah negative trust me  but i'm the real Iamutut You both really do not need to come in here with your baby sock puppet accounts to finally admit you have learned the lesson  |
|
|
|
Der Seba Crypto Bank traue ich nicht über den Weg, weil das Banker von Grossbanken und Erben sind, die auf den Crypto Well surfen wollen: https://insideparadeplatz.ch/2019/08/27/neue-krypto-chefs-sind-banker-alter-schule/ Wenn ich über eine Schweizer Bank in Crypto Investieren würde, dann über Swissquote. Das ist die erste reine online Bank der Schweiz, welche im Jahr 1999 gegründet wurde, bis heute sind die Gründer (EPFL Absolventen in Elektrotechnik) am Ruder und ihr IT System ist selbst programmiert und funktioniert genau deshalb. Die haben als einzige Bank Kompetenz im Bereich IT und somit auch von Cryptos. (Alle anderen Schweizer Banken haben kreuz und quer IT Produkte eingekauft, welche veraltet sind und nicht optimal zusammen funktionieren. Die IT wurde nach Bangalor und Warschau ausgelagert, weil dort die Löhne niedriger sind. Im Endeffekt kam dieses ganze Outsourcing die Banken viel teuere zu stehen, als wenn sie einfach eigene Software hier entwickelt hätten. Also haben sie im Endeffekt mehr Geld für schlechtere IT Lösungen bezahlt, weil sie die IT nur als Kostenfaktor sehen.) Da is was dran - die grösste Effizienz wäre aber wenn alle sich bei vielen digital-verbuchten Meldungen auf eine einzige offene 10-Jahre sichere (PoW) Blockchain einigen würden. Dann wäre viel gespart und trotzdem sicher |
|
|
|
Mal eine andere Frage.
Hat sich schonmal einer Gedanken gemacht....
Schickst Du mir ein paar von deinen Pillen? Ich will auch so abgehen  Pillen? Doch nicht mit mir... ne ne... ich hab am LAN Kabel geschnüffelt, das ist extase... und am Switch schnüffeln ist dann Orgasmus... Um beim Thema zu bleiben, der Kursverlauf braucht auch mal einen .. Switch |
|
|
|
November 15 marks #BitcoinIndependence Day. Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!  Yes - we got lot's of things done, explained and developed (also on top of the protocol!) Let's see if Jimmy could collect some nice presents https://twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1194825739180351488 |
|
|
|
... most unregulated - most volume ? serves to whom most ? for sure not average Joe - nor BitCoin |
|
|
|
Independence day celebration incoming
Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers
A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream
No you didn't. You broke away from Bcash to make an even bigger block version of Bcash. Way to try to rewrite history though. Have you ever said something that wasn't a lie? Again you re wrong - ABC ppl enforced the split - and did a hell of funny protection into their code BSV kept CLEAN on track to remove Magic numbers and refactor code Are ur bags hurting that strong? Or u never start thinkin .... cannot fix that . Easy lesson: Clean, stable - on purpose protocols are needed (most critical in finance) - easy risk assessed and really used Long term Tech dept and funny governance will kill everything else in the LONG run |
|
|
|
Independence day celebration incoming Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream https://mobile.twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1193876027019333634Back to what simple and origin rules of BitCoin are Happy days |
|
|
|
It's almost as if people don't realize that Bitcoin has been capable of private messaging since genesis. So many things haven t been understood and / or crippled to death or anonymity. Sigh Now invent new wheels again? |
|
|
|
Lol, nutiboy tries and tries, but cannot read / get it. It is GRANTED Put that idiot on ignore. |
|
|
|
Agsin u know only af hominem. Fine boy
Calling Craig a proven fraud isn't an ad hominem attack, nor is calling you a liar. They are both demonstrable logically and pertain directly to your inability to make an honest argument. What it boils down to is you are relying on a fraud's definition of what "set in stone" means. Let's look at the quote you are referencing: The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime.
What about BTC has altered the "core design" of Bitcoin? The core features of Bitcoin work in today's BTC just as they did in Satoshi's 0.1 version of Bitcoin. Craig has convinced you that his new fork of a fork is actually closer to Bitcoin because he says so -- not because the code says so. The BSV code says a bunch of things Satoshi never had in mind, just as BTC's code does as well. If BSV is "set in stone" the way that Bitcoin 0.1 was, fire up a Bitcoin 0.1 client and try connecting to the BSV network with it. The reality is that you will only stand a chance of connecting the 0.1 client to the Bitcoin Network (BTC, the real bitcoin that you constantly troll with a passion). the Goal is clear now - BSV will be able to run with 0.1 You might get that so far without ur funny style. Best ignore all ur crappy stuff |
|
|
|
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well. Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit. Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud. Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem Here Read Stop whining https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611You're referring to a famous comment he left about the protocol, which has changed immensely since vers 0.1, with several changes made by Satoshi himself. Your code contains even more changes made by Bcash developers that aren't included in today's actual Bitcoin (BTC). The "core design" of bitcoin has been altered more by Bcash and BSV than it has in BTC. Funny you linked that comment, because he also said this in it: I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network. The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.
The main problem is your are relying on a proven fraud's definition of what "set in stone" refers to. And why was need for change it - except for bug fix? Agsin u know only af hominem. Fine boy |
|
|
|
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well. Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit. Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud. Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem Here Read Stop whining https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611 |
|
|
|
Dragi sei Dank - Banken können mit 0 Zins nix mehr verdienen - da steigen die Gebühren
Und dadurch sinken die Kundenzahlen. Nuja, bei manchen Kunden sind die Banken ganz froh, wenn sie weg gehen ... Aber das schlimme daran ist ja...wenn sie fast Pleite sind oder Superhoch verschuldet zahlst Du / Wir es ja. Also der Deutsche Bürger. Schau doch mal inne Vergangenheit wie viele Milliarden an Geldern dort draufgegangen sind. Da kannst locker Binance mit kaufen. Das kommt bei den 2-3 ganz Grossen so hin - die kleinen kriegen in der Sippenhaft den Arsch mit voll - das kanns auch nicht sein Da 2015 dazu klammheimlich etwas beschlossen wurde und es hierzu passt, quote ich mich mal aus dem AKV: Das ist ja heftig und war mir bisher total unbekannt. Sollte man sich nun systemunrelevante Banken aussuchen?* Und bevor hier jemand schreibt "Nein. Bitcoin ist die Antwort.", dann kann er sich das sparen, weil das wissen wir schon  Welche Diskussion würde das aber im Volk ergeben, da insbesondere gedeckte Einlagen bis 100.000 Euro und besicherte Verbindlichkeiten davon ausgenommen werden. Eine Diskussion zwischen Arm und Reich, die da oben usw. Andererseits könnte so eine drohende Insolvenz auch vorgeschoben werden, um bestimmte Konten einzufrieren .....nein, das ist zuviel Verschwörungstheorie. Aber guter Stoff für Autoren wie Andreas Eschbach Wenn der E-Euro da ist, funktioniert das allerdings sehr einfach. Und bei entsprechender Konditionierung des Volks vielleicht auch ohne Aufschrei. *Edit: Nö, ist egal. Wenn man Kunde einer systemunrelevanten Bank ist, erhält man nur das normale Programm Potenziell systemgefährdend sind aber nur Institute und Finanzgruppen, die eine gewisse Bedeutung haben. Für Institute, auf die dies nicht zutrifft, steht das normale Insolvenzverfahren zur Verfügung. https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/DE/Fachartikel/2015/fa_bj_1501_sanierungs-abwicklungsgesetz.htmlDas klingt nach Kommunismus - die SystemRelevanz und Staatssicherheit ... die Grossen machen watt se wolln |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
