UK rejected hardcore red socialism in favour of softcore blue socialism ... meh.
Hm, maybe some see the EU Parliament looks more and more like the communists - make all equal - totalitarism ? I can understand that in terms of free capitalism works better for the world |
|
|
|
This blatant scam was spotted by forum member tmfp over 3 years ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1152263.0US prosecutors would have had all the evidence they needed to stop this scam years ago if they had the detective skills to read BCT.....lol Yes - I really wonder why such things take so long. Regulators / anonymous involved ? >> Anonymtiy only helps the big fishes - incl govs and regs ! |
|
|
|
Solution: switch to linux
Yepp - all the other OSses will fuck us I still think how an OS directly launched from Blockchain could do ... |
|
|
|
We know u can all buy such studies... best industries found guilty are pharma and finance |
|
|
|
Unexpectedly, despite a ROI 4 times higher than S&P500 since the beginning of the year, the Sharpe ratio of BTC is only a little bit lower than the S&P500 one. It means BTC isn't disproportionately risky for such a ROI.  The Sharpe ratio was developed by Nobel laureate William F. Sharpe and is used to help investors understand the return of an investment compared to its risk. The ratio is the average return earned in excess of the risk-free rate per unit of volatility or total risk.
Subtracting the risk-free rate from the mean return allows an investor to better isolate the profits associated with risk-taking activities. Generally, the greater the value of the Sharpe ratio, the more attractive the risk-adjusted return. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sharperatio.asp Risk Free Rate for USD is a joke, isn't it? Lots of risks holding long that asset being under central dilution powers |
|
|
|
|
I see at least 3 different 'ticker' Projects still running a hash war on SHA256
|
|
|
|
Nobody is forcing u to use a coin that runs on up to 3 different histories, has nothing to do with BitCOin any more - but has ticker BTC Use something much more transparent and scalable |
|
|
|
About why there was a poker game in first verion of BitCoin the original and the origin at SIGMA 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tv1Pn24pFgTelling the Story that nobody is able to tell - also about fraud and tokens ( so haters ll call the truth is fraud - we know) |
|
|
|
"store of value" is not something that rises in price. instead it is something that keeps its purchasing power and in modern time money is THE store of value that majority use. and since bitcoin IS money, it is also a store of value. the more it is used as money, the stronger store of value it becomes.
Many will dipute that bitcoin is Money - yet. Too much friction and volaitily - not really unit of account... |
|
|
|
|
Pure scarcity does not generate a store of value - not even for cool Bitcoin.
Money functions needed!
|
|
|
|
^^^
Its hard to argue with that because you're not making any sense.
If BSV would have won the Hash War, there would be no BSV. It would still be called "Bitcoin Cash." Only after they lost did Craig scramble to find reasons to make his failed fork its own coin. At the beginning it had no logo, no wallets, no block explorer, and no white paper -- but they solved that last part by just claiming Satoshi's WP as their own. There's basically no reason for it to exist other than to scam noobs.
Guess u mixing up BitCoin with tickers AGAIN - cause u wanna scam ppl int buy shit ? BitCoin had no Logo, Ticker, whatever It had a White paper and some code - here we go with what is BSV ( sure again a stupid ticker ...)
If you insist on calling your fraudulent scamcoin "Bitcoin," then yes, tickers are absolutely necessary.
Nobody should give financial advice - no fraud seen here. It's ur Little mind that frauds yourself BitCoin is Satoshi's Vision - not Segwit, not CTOR, not dev's world If some try to reduce BitCoin to a ticker - that is fraud |
|
|
|
BSVtards whole fucking shitcoin is based on the lies of Craig.
Well, no. BSV is based upon the original Bitcoin protocol. Before 'devs gotta dev' set in, and arguably fucked the whole thing up. Well, no. BSV was an attempt to claim the title of Bitcoin Cash that didn't really have a plan if it failed. Only after Craig lost the hash war did he come up with the whole "original Bitcoin protocol" nonsense and the idea of stuffing data into absurdly huge blocks. You can rewrite history in the most favorable light for your shitcoin, but at the end of the day its still a shitcoin developed by a con artist. Well, no. U write ur own nuti history again, try that in little trolly sandbox - there u can listen to ya own. BSV has all the rights on its sight to be and foremost STAY true original BitCoin forever. That's the thrill and the trigger for all those who either never wanted to understand BitCoin and all what it could do from the very beginning or understood a bit, but tried to alter it cause of fear or make own crap out of it. Keep it as is, or play the Buterin and call it different |
|
|
|
Put that into jail https://nakasendoproject.org/Or try to understand No lies
If anonymous trolls tell ya a public Person lies, and have not guts to go public with such - it's worth what?
Judge Reinhart isn't anonymous, nor is he a troll. And everything he's said about Craig being a liar is very public. Have fun continuing to support the biggest fraud in the crypto universe. I know that you will. Feeded by trolls ? Oh - you want BSV talk into the 'orange suit' ? I know I've mentioned it to you before but could you please speak English when using this forum? If that's too much for you, go back to the Dutch section, or wherever it is that you are from. K thanks. U ve to grow up a lot to play police And Understand BitCoin That is free of human lang or ppl name calling. When will u get that? Here is some Chinese https://mobile.twitter.com/Lise0508/status/1202919804941635584 
Tom Lee is on track https://youtu.be/623Dk419aSsCannot see little nutitroll there... better forget these small blokes. BSV is the workin Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
If anonymous trolls tell ya a public Person lies, and have not guts to go public with such - it's worth what? BSV / metanet does fix that shit BSV = Bitcoin wins, cause all is about truth in public - not ano / anarcho / hidden agenda world where segshit and LN rules
If anonymous trolls tell ya a public Person lies, and have not guts to go public with such - it's worth what?
Judge Reinhart isn't anonymous, nor is he a troll. And everything he's said about Craig being a liar is very public. Have fun continuing to support the biggest fraud in the crypto universe. I know that you will. Feeded by trolls ? Oh - you want BSV talk into the 'orange suit' ? LoL BSV is the Ledger of Truth Happy Weekend |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is more commodity than currency. It needs real world use - interoperability and store of precious data - before it can be used as currency
Do you really think you can lie to me of all people? It says CRYPTO CURRENCY in the god damned title. Bitcoin is a currency, not a commodity. You're trying to weasel your way out of the fact that anything falling under the category of currency has very negative connotations like being a Keynesian, confidence game scam based on artificial scarcity that starts at a value of zero and always returns there. Besides the fact claiming imaginary timestamps are a commodity is ludicrous, fungibility is also required to be a commodity and it's not possible for Bitcoin to be fungible even if you mix outputs. A real commodity is capable of resisting entropy in some manner, at least for a brief period of time. The ones that do it better are known as non-perishable. Bitcoin doesn't resist entropy at all; it's designed to facilitate entropy - aka constantly morph from one thing to another. It's impossible for such a thing to be fungible because it's designed to change. Idiot scammers tried to spin this huge negative as a positive with the bogus term "anti-fragile". Money is supposed to be a constant and unchanging, not facilitating change. Wait. DBK knows it all https://cointelegraph.com/news/deutsche-bank-research-crypto-to-replace-fiat-currencies-by-2030 |
|
|
|
He's a complete moron. All currencies - of which Bitcoin is one - are Keynesian in nature. Currencies are garbage, confidence game scams based on artificial scarcity. They start at a value of zero, are rigged above zero in some manner either by governments or some other market manipulation but are still just as worthless as their first day of creation, then always eventually return back to zero once the confidence game implodes. This is why actual money, as opposed to currency, is required to be a physical commodity resource, because those aren't confidence game scams. Bitcoin is more commodity than currency. It needs real world use - interoperability and store of precious data - before it can be used as currency |
|
|
|
KommDefektBank verdient auch kein Geld mehr. Ojee |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
