Wall observed: The socialist planning feature walls unveilled with Keiser and Song desperadly shilling for the seen dead end https://youtu.be/xNvlmuxPrU0
|
|
|
Don't know. Metanet.icu will do all that nice stuff / based on Bitcoin - the clean protocol
|
|
|
LOL at Roger Ver: If u shill for a clean p2p cash - u should choose BSV .
|
|
|
"Bitcoin SV"? it's BCH SV and to be honest... These forks are going no where, Just another avenue for the lucky BCH holders to dump what they earned out of the forks and move on.
I agree that fundamentals are close to 0, but it is a coin by a company with hundreds of employees and billions to spend. I don't think crypto enthusiasts will ever touch this garbage, but Calvin & Craig will find a way to pump it. Sold at $100, I think my entry point is around $50. You confusing Bitcoin Cash with Satoshies Version of original Bitcoin as in the whitepaper defined, Bitcoin Cash most likely will go Bankrupt. Bitcoin SV is old hard core Bitcoiners sticking to the way it was designed, Peer to Peer and max coins forever 21 Milllion. Bitcoin 3rd party Segregated Witness version in in transformation stage to become currency. Lightning more or less is minable version of xrp, have to establish banking connection before you can sent. As a shop i can refuse your payment. Pretty much true - BTC flawed cause SW + LN + Blowstream - no P2P cash BCH flawed cause DSV - CTOR - 'new protocol features' every 6 months - unstable BSV -> only clean & stable & scalable on-chain protocol. -> SEC - compliant (no regulated security) - due to purpose of selling prospect ( white paper) Safe ur asses
|
|
|
Everyone must make sure that the bitcoin Jesus himself Mr. Roger Ver doesn't make an appearance here! As the World's first Investor in Bitcoin startups including Bitcoin.com, Blockchain.com, Z.cash, BitPay, Kraken, and Purse.io, he may disagree with this thread. He is a firm believer that Bitcoin Cash works as peer to peer cash better than BTC does. I do not choose to buy coins that are forked cause it goes against what I actually believe in.
I define the forks based on the diff to the white paper to the protocol and I always end up here for the cleanest one https://youtu.be/WDuvYp77tJU
|
|
|
Bitcoin cash has virtually ended and we have two new coins... Bitcoin ABC and Bitcoin SV. Both are fighting for the mining power, and both coins have no real use. They are manipulated by the whales that's why we see so much pump and dump in them. I would suggest to boycott BCH, as it is not good for the digital currencies stability.
The real use of BSV is to BE the only correct impl following the original client and white paper's purpose of p2p electronic cash. So yes. It has the best use case I can see in Bitcoin. Onchain scaling is the right thing and keep the 10y proven security model up and running.
|
|
|
The new goxxed: Jihan'd && Ver'd. Bcash scam not working out as planned, ain't it? Wow - not seeing the trees in the wood? SV is exactly making use of scaling of the tech ( upper section for the blind ones - where glasses do not help ) If u make use of all that (hardware) scaling that u get for free - only thing u need to do is make the Bitcoin 0.1 client ready for parallelization ( and bug free ) -> DONE All that 'corework' and poopstream propaganda can be seen with that picture very nicely - if u WANT to see it. But who cares if they get hit by a lightening ?
|
|
|
BSV is mostly aimed at being an exact copy of Bitcoin 0.1, hoping that hardware improvements and increased investments will make up for the sub-optimal code.
Close but no cigar. Don't confuse the protocol with the code. They are two different things. BSV mostly seeks to implement the 0.1 protocol. With better code than years past. Indeed, there is no other way the network could choke down a 65MB block, what with Core's (built of course upon the original satoshi) client's crappy multitasking architecture. Maybe core tried some multitasking stuff, but never haerd about multithreading - Raspis just dont...
|
|
|
volatility is a consequence of small capitalization, but not quality. The harder you fell, the more will grow
By this logic you are proabbly hoarding as much Bitconnect as you can now. Let's face it, bcash is a failed project and main promoters of bcash are scammers. In fact at some point, bcash had too many scammers (Jihan, Ver, Craig etc) concentrated at 1 point, they had to fork off because they started to scam each other. Jihan and Ver are good people, I trust them U are lost. In Bitcoin u should not trust ppl https://www.ccn.com/shots-fired-craig-wright-calls-bitcoin-evangelist-andreas-antonopoulos-shtcoin-expert/
|
|
|
Ask yourself, why is name calling needed at all here? What does this proof? Go and find out yourselve what tech is working and due to Bitcoin's honest purpose..
|
|
|
Bitcoin fees are higher than any other coin. This is due to a lack of scalability and thus high mining fees, which also effects transaction speeds. Ethereum and LiteCoin have much lower fees and send much faster. XRP is cheaper and faster than that. IOTA is free but their wallet is not quite up to par yet. This market is still very young and growing. Eventually these issues will be worked out. But the great thing about competition is that you can choose which method you want to use. And if you’d rather stay in the fiat world you’re free to do that as well.
Yes your right, every coins has their own issue, so for me i will combine those coins that fits for me, like i made a trade in bitcoin, ethereum and bch, then covert in xrp and send to my wallet from exchange for more faster and cheaper, then convert it again to bch and withdraw to fiat, meaning if i do to stick to one crypto, the fees are high like in bitcoin to be send to my wallet and sometimes it takes too long, so ive learned to use those altcoins for me to make transactions more faster and cheaper. Use BSV
|
|
|
Instead of Chartbuddy bumping it every hour, is engaging It the new sign of thread deadness?
It's just as mechanical and uncreative.
I want chartbuddy and Adam back..
|
|
|
|