That's true; a high GPA doesn't guarantee you a future, nor does a college diploma. On top of that, GPA and paid universities are US things; if I'm not mistaken, most European countries don't work that way. There's zero correlation between bitcoins and grades; thus, there's no reason to compare the two. Everyone is going to choose the money over some meaningless GPA because college also requires a ton of money—no money, no college degree. You can have an average GPA and still do fine in college and land a decent job, with or without a degree; something you do as a teenager doesn't necessarily have to reflect your whole life.

The article later mentions that the transaction did go through but was delayed due to a bad signal. The cashier in the shop also confirmed it. Therefore, although she appears to be the legal owner of the ticket, it's actually him who paid for the tickets, and something like this can also be proved. In my opinion, since the ticket was bought by the two of them, the money should be split 50/50. It seems to me that she got greedy, and knowing that they weren't married and that the ticket was in her name, she could run away with the money and dump him. What a shallow human being.

In any case, this man dodged a bullet by breaking up with this woman.

I don't think it's possible to acquire the listed coin before it's listed on the exchange or Launchpool, unless there was a presale going on sometime before it was announced on Binance. No matter how much money you'll farm through the platform, you'll still earn more than regular staking in USDT or FDUSD would get you, so it's a win-win situation. I haven't sold my Pixels yet, but I remain confident.

Actually, a little after my previous post, another coin portal was announced and listed today, February 22 at 00:00 UTC, and will be available for 7 days.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401014;
Bitcointalk Rank: Hero
BTC address for payouts: bc1q7632nghs6ekc0vjv24cwkgvrpjjl4lq9tkkfxx
USDT address (TRC-20) for payouts: TKAhnQVuuLfZmSXRsd2enko87uUjsr6CCL (Binance address if it matters)

A little late update: Pixels was listed on Binance on Monday at 10:00 UTC. It's listed price was $0.04, but it immediately climbed up to $0.45 per coin, and within a couple of hours it surpassed $0.60, beating our previous predictions and reaching as high as $0.70, but only for a brief moment. This time, I decided to hold these coins for a little while. I was contemplating selling them at $0.60, which would have resulted in an over $70 profit, but I was busy at the time, so the price later dropped and I missed my opportunity. Now it's trading at $0.50~ and I'm planning to risk it and hold for a while; in the worst-case scenario, I'll lose some of my profit.

Unfortunately, another Launchpool project is yet to be announced.

Consider this a second chance to resolve your gambling addiction. This gesture is extremely generous from Rollbit's side, and I'm honestly dumbfounded. I doubt that any other casino would proceed with refunding your deposit plus an extra $500 for an inconvenience; I personally wouldn't, which was mostly caused by miscommunication from your side, as I wasn't the only one mentioning that you could have specified your needs better. Don't waste your money gambling again and use it to seek professional assistance. You won't get another shot; don't mess it up.

I'll go ahead and congratulate you, it's a great achievement and an over 2.5x return on your investment. I don't really care if the OP is lying or not, but I can understand why some are a little sceptical, because a few newbies had attempted to farm merit through their topics. Good luck to you and I hope you continue investing in Bitcoin.

Some claim that he was a part of the gang underworld as well, which played a vital role in eradicating crime and gang violence. Certainly, he's not a Messiah, but so far it seems that he has solved an ongoing issue that was causing thousands of deaths and was burdening the economy in the process.
Excuse me but the user you quoted has no idea what he's talking about, this wasn't even the subject of this topic. Relative to what you mentioned, I doubt that Bitcoin had any role in payments between gang activity, cash is king in such instances.

It's quite possible; I haven't read the Bible, but I wouldn't be surprised if it explicitly mentioned that gambling is a sin. As I mentioned in my previous post, I'm an atheist and can't say I'm too bothered about what religion or the Bible says. It wouldn't affect me either way. However, if you take into account the Bible, a lot of things we do on a daily basis, or at least quite frequently, are considered sins. Thus, why should anyone take into consideration whether religion condemns gambling or not?

It's rather saddening and painful to see other users suffering from gambling addictions. Although I'd like to sympathize with you, I personally see it as bad communication from your side. As @JollyGood already mentioned, you asked them to close the account from which you were contacting them; not both accounts registered under your name. Despite that, I understand your frustration because they have your data available at any time and could have seen that you have two accounts; however, it doesn't necessarily mean that this data is accessible at any time by any employee in customer support. I doubt that they're going to go through your details to see if you have multiple accounts or if their system is portraying that when you reach out to their support. They do what they're told, as you didn't specify to have both accounts closed. Had you specified it, both accounts would now be closed, and there's a chance you wouldn't have gone through all this.

I believe that there are applications or browser extensions that block gambling websites, acting similarly to parental control, perhaps you should look into that in the future.

Best of luck.

Is it just me, or am I not understanding what exactly the OP is trying to say? Of course, money is a vital part of gambling; we're not expecting to make a living through it, nor are we anticipating it to become a secondary income flow. It is an entertaining activity, but no one plays solely for the sake of "playing for fun" without involving the money aspect. If that were the case, then I doubt if anyone would be interested in playing, because that couldn't be called gambling without the aspect of money and high returns; that's what gambling promises, but not everyone gets it.

Depends on the individual. We've seen a few stories in the forum of users barely making ends meet but investing in Bitcoin simultaneously. These individuals are way more likely to sell earlier than someone who's better off financially. I personally have a job and a steady source of income; any Bitcoin I have is through signature campaigns; therefore, I don't need the money in the near future. There are others, however, that may consider taking profit, provided that they've bought at a lower price, as there have been an abundance of opportunities in the past two years.

I also believe that there's a large number of traders who have sold or are willing to sell and proceed to wait for the upcoming dip to repurchase at a lower price.

I'm certainly not calling him a dictator; that's how some media websites are portraying him, and I fully disagree. On top of that, he's receiving criticism that the economy is still in a bad state, that his Bitcoin adoption scheme wasn't effective, and that billions were wasted because Bitcoin had plummeted. However, Bitcoin has now surpassed $50,000. I don't know at what price El Salvador purchased it, but there's a high chance these claims may as well be abolished now.

It's interesting, though, that the media will constantly give him crap about what he hasn't resolved yet, such as the economy, while the country is tremendously suffering from gang violence. This was the first step in fixing the economy, and it was necessary. I don't understand how it was even remotely possible to resolve the financial crisis with gangs still in place.

The reason I'm not going into much detail regarding Bitcoin's adoption as legal tender is because there are plenty of other threads analyzing it. I don't doubt that Bitcoin has provided some sort of assistance in the economy; it's very possible; however, I believe that it wasn't what Bukele was anticipating when he introduced Bitcoin to the economy.

Bukele's approach to tackling the crime rate was harsh but justified, and I personally don't think any other approach would have such a success rate. Not only were gangs responsible for thousands of deaths, but they were also ruining the economy in a variety of ways. With it now being a safe country, the tourism sector is far more likely to boom, leading to more work opportunities for locals and increased revenues.

I was about to post the upcoming matches. The odds on Aris vs. Atromitos are quite good, although it's a far riskier bet than betting on Panathinaikos vs. Lamia, or AEK vs. Kifisia. Aris is a decent team but it sounds like a riskier option, the odds are great but I'll pass. Personally, I'm considering going with the two I mentioned and OFI vs. Panseraikos as well; they seem like safer options to me, even though the odds aren't as good as the other matches.

First of all, it stinks to be in that position because, on the one hand, you feel bad for him and want to help him, but on the other hand, you don't want to get involved. From my understanding, he's asking you to take advantage of a bug at a casino and cash out as much money as possible. Am I right? I would strongly advise against this as it's likely to get you in trouble, and I'm almost certain that it's also written in their TOS that they don't tolerate taking advantage of such bugs.

I personally wouldn't help him; he dug his own hole, and it'd be safer to not get involved; he'll drag you down as well. Don't lend him any money either; it's a guaranteed loss.

It depends on who it is; I've even seen people bragging about how much they lost in their last gambling session. Yeah, there are people who're that dumb and feel like it's something to brag about. But you're right; the majority doesn't reveal how much or how frequently they lose but only presents their winnings. Gambling periodically is fine if you're aware of how much you're spending.
It is certainly not the most pleasant thing to see. Moreover, there isn't any standard or designated approach on how to handle something like this because everyone is different and their reactions are too.

I had recently created a topic regarding Bitcoin's capabilities and the opportunities it presents, and the main topic of discussion was reaching the $50,000 mark. Most users, myself included, projected that this would likely happen anywhere after April or May, but we were ultimately proven wrong. It's exciting, but that means that the phase of more affordable Bitcoin has now officially ended. Accumulating Bitcoin was already a lot harder after it surpassed $40,000, let alone 50,000, but that's okay.

Keep your money, wallets, and seed phrases safe. Exchanges are not the best option in terms of safety and privacy issues for taxation purposes, but they're convenient, so I can't blame anyone for using them, but I'd be cautious nonetheless. The same rule applies to online wallets; these are, in my opinion, worse.

It's rather common when a group of friends are introduced to gambling gatherings that at least one of them will end up addicted. I've seen it on a few occasions. However, I don't find it necessary for the rest of the group to quit gambling, especially if they have full control over it and it isn't causing them any issues. Certainly, they shouldn't encourage it when he's in front, but eventually his compulsive behavior will lead him to start borrowing money and going into debt in a mere attempt to recoup his losses, a common mistake or misconception compulsive gamblers have.

The whole group quitting, although not necessary, is unlikely to have an effect; he has a mind of his own, and he's free to gamble with or without his friends. They need to assist him by seeking out a professional; otherwise, he'll end up screwed before he even realizes it.

We're not in the best position to judge, but since the people of El Salvador voted for him, it means that he has done a good job and people support him. Although his actions may look harsh to some, I personally don't see how else someone could tackle such a delicate issue when gangs were controlling over 80% of your country's land.
Indeed, there's a chance someone is wrongfully convicted, but that's not something that isn't happening in the rest of the world either. Over 7,000 people were released after initially being arrested. At least the country is finally safe.
That's true; most non-profit and human rights organizations are a plague. They're calling out for the rights of these gang members, who were the root of El Salvador's corruption and increased homicide rates that led to thousands of deaths. Yet, these organizations were absent when this was happening and the country was suffering, where were they to support the rights of those who got murdered by them?