Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:30:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 189 »
1281  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: How safe are offline wallets? on: December 03, 2022, 07:56:01 PM
~Snipped~
Thank you for your extremely detailed response. It contains a great deal of information that I wouldn't find otherwise. Based on the information you've provided, I'd go for Trezor, as it sounds like a safer option. I'll look into others as well, but I'm mostly heading towards Trezor. It's interesting to notice how much hardware wallets have increased in price since the creation of that thread.
But if you are buying a new one because your old one is getting very slow as you said above, then surely your old one then becomes the perfect candidate for an airgapped wallet? You don't need it anymore once everything is transferred to your new one, and the fact that the hardware is outdated is irrelevant for running something as simple as an airgapped Electrum wallet. You can format it and load any lightweight Linux distro to keep hardware demands to an absolutely minimum, and then the only piece of software you need to install on top of that is Electrum itself. Plus if it's an old device you aren't going to use anyway, then there are no issues with you opening it up and removing the WiFi module.
My main concern is that it's not that slow to render it unused. It's a 2013 refurbished laptop, but it runs quite decently for its age. It really depends on what I do. If I end up buying a desktop, I'll still need the laptop when I'm away. On the other hand, if I end up buying another laptop, then it could be used as an airgapped device.
1282  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fake coingecko site please beware! on: December 02, 2022, 11:43:47 PM
Great find. As the above poster already mentioned, a few weeks ago there were similar instances with Coinmarketcap clones. How did you stumble across this website though? The last time, the fake CMC websites used to pop up in the paid advertising section of Google. Is it a similar case with Coingecko? I can't recreate it, no matter how many times I try. Fortunately, it seems easy enough to spot: the domain is invalid, and there aren't many reasons why you would possibly want to connect your wallet to a website such as Coinmarketcap or Coingecko.
1283  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: How safe are offline wallets? on: December 02, 2022, 09:55:55 PM
~Snipped~
I actually meant Ledger Nano (S Plus), but I confused both names and combined them into one. I've seen both devices, and during the Black Friday sale, they were a great bargain. An approximate of 50–60 euros isn't a big deal when it comes to protecting your funds and is far safer and more economical than a completely independent computer that is guaranteed to eventually be used for something else too. I'm looking forward to a possible promotion during the Christmas holidays and seeing if there are any decent deals. If not, I'll just purchase it at full price; it isn't that expensive.

I've noticed that Trezor and Ledger are the most common ones; are there any others that can compete with them?
1284  Other / Off-topic / Re: Am I being scammed? on: December 02, 2022, 08:06:37 PM
I am using the apple trust wallet for these transfers.

Yeah I thought it was too good to be true. I am cutting off contact now.

Not sure where the large loss of funds is beside the small transfers I have done.

Out of curiosity what does it take to make a view only wallet accessible to a third party?
I haven't seen such a scam before, possibly due to regional differences, but I've had similar ones. If something seems too good to be true, it probably is. No easy money can be made. However, from your way of writing, you're implying that you've transferred $300; did I understand correctly? If so, why? Always trust your instincts; if it sounded fishy, why would you send money and then proceed to ask questions here? I don't mean to offend you, but $300 is still a pretty decent sum to lose to a scammer. I'd be furious.

Anyway, in such cases, this forum and Reddit can be incredible sources to seek information.
1285  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Binance asking for KYC, again on: December 02, 2022, 07:20:50 PM
So it is, Binance is extremely sensitive to new ip addresses and device changes, as well as to any conversations since support regarding changes to account security data. My account was banned twice in 3 months.

1 time, when I decided to try to log into my account from a mobile phone, and the second time I wrote to technical support and asked: Is there such a possibility to replace the mailbox with another one? I was told that it can be done. This ended the conversation, and after 5 minutes they blocked the withdrawal of funds from the exchange, saying that I was conducting extremely suspicious conversations and the account might have been compromised. So with technical support, need to be careful. Anything you write can be used against you.
Okay, on the one hand I understand any possible frustration caused by such a move, however, on the other hand it was done for safety reasons and not in an attempt to mess with its users. Imagine if your account somehow got compromised and ended up with your money. I generally never had any negative experience with Binance, except from their KYC and the constantly decreasing yield from staking and savings.
If you are using them to store your money, then I would say that it is a bad deal to do KYC just because of that. My reason for using them is simple; since I already did KYC, I might as well use their debit card to spend my bitcoin in an easy and convenient way. But even then, I am aware that every time I send bitcoin there is that I may lose it so I only send smaller amounts, no more than I spend in a week or so.
I never had any money in exhanges the past few years, for the obvious reasons. However, it was the easiest and fastest solution to generate a minimal income after Terra USD crashed.
1286  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Here is my analysis about btc on: December 01, 2022, 08:59:19 PM
Bitcoin has already recovered a tiny bit and surpassed $17,000 today. In my opinion, the current fall in the market is due to the FTX bankruptcy incident and is bound to recover soon enough. No sophisticated analysis is required in this case. Cryptocurrencies have taken a hit; it's perfectly normal to go through such a phase. After all, it was one of the largest exchanges. It shouldn't take long for the whole incident to start fading away, resulting in the possible recovery of Bitcoin in the upcoming month or two. Judging by the current market standing, it's likely to return to pre-FTX levels, back to $19.00–$20.000. I don't think there's much reason to worry, unless you've lost money in the exchange.
1287  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: How safe are offline wallets? on: December 01, 2022, 07:49:38 PM
~Snipped~
Thank you for your detailed response. I was already planning on buying a new computer because this one is getting rather old and slow. I struggled quite a lot a few months ago when I used more strenuous applications. This is why I considered isolating my older laptop with a Bitcoin wallet. Generally, hardware wallets seem like a decent measure to be on the safe side. During the Black Friday special, the most affordable Ledger one cost approximately €50, if I remember correctly. It sucks to have missed it.
I'm planning to purchase a new laptop or even a desktop computer quite soon, and was actually planning to install the wallet to the old one and isolating it. What happens if the HDD goes bad, though? Backing up the seed phrase enough to recover it from another computer, I guess.
As long as you have the ability to purchase a new computer, buying a hardware wallet wallet will be a better solution if you are the skeptical type or that clicks randomly and explore new applications or download many unknown closed source programs/crackers.

A cold storage management requires some knowledge and keenness, otherwise it is better to purchase hardware wallet.

Finally, being offline does not mean that you are safe. If hacker gets access to the root, he may do a lot of things, so closing the Internet, signing TX, and re-connecting to the Internet does not mean that you are safe.
I guess there isn't such a thing as 100% safety. So far, the hardware wallet option seems to be the safest and most affordable one. Buying a new computer was already on the schedule, but honestly, completely isolating it isn't always possible, and in my case, it probably isn't, because a functioning laptop is always handy.
1288  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: 🔥BLACK FRIDAY DEALS 🔥 -> 21% discount on Satochip/Satodime/Seedkeeper on: November 30, 2022, 11:54:23 PM
Hello there,
I find the whole concept quite interesting, it's quite convenient and stealth looking. However, it's mentioned in your website that the smart reader is also required. My question now is if that can be avoided, since my laptop (HP Probook) has a so-called smart card reader. Do you have any clue if there's any compatibility or is it a completely different thing?

Excuse me if my question sounds stupid but I always wondered how that card reader could be used.

Photo for reference
1289  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Binance asking for KYC, again on: November 30, 2022, 10:26:59 PM
I can't beleive people seriously are having conversation about passing KYC somewhere when dealing with crypto. Spit to the face of everyone who asks you to pass KYC and that's all. Crypto isn't ment for this. I think a person who passes KYC betrays the idea of crypto, of decentralized money that isn't governed by any country etc. And also accepting KYC is harmful to the community because this way you allow companies like Binance to grow. So crypto becomes more controlled, this is such a shame. If Binance didn't had any users because of KYC this practice wouldn't become so popular.
I don't think Binance enjoys having KYC themselves. Whether we like it or not, Binance has to comply with the EU's regulations and is forced to conduct KYC on their customers. I'm not a supporter of them by any means.
Anyone else got an email from Binance in the last few days (I got it yesterday), asking for additional KYC in order to comply with the "latest set of European Union regulations"? All those who don't go through KYC won't be able to deposit after 10 days from receiving an email, and after 30 days account will be restricted to withdrawals only.  I heard its a mass emails sent to all Binance users so just wanted to check it out. Andf as walys they are offering 10 BUSD rerward lol, like that will make someone who doesn't want to do KYC change his mind.
The same email we all received. Are you going to comply with the KYC? Honestly, I regret doing so because I don't see a reason to have money stored with them. Their staking and savings platform has taken a huge hit and is no longer profitable. On top of that, it's funny that they're offering a $10 cashback voucher. They don't specify that you don't actually get the $10. Someone new might be fooled by this practice.
1290  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: How safe are offline wallets? on: November 30, 2022, 07:04:57 PM
Pardon me for not replying for over two days. I was having some health troubles and had some doc appointments and blood tests. Back to the subject now. Thank you for your replies, I'll try to respond to most of them.
I don't feel quite safe or comfortable practically having my bitcoin stored on my computer.
Your bitcoin isn't stored on your computer.  Your bitcoin is on the blockchain and the keys you need to access your bitcoin are on your computer.
Excuse me, wrong selection of words. You're correct.
It's not that Electrum is unsafe - it's that your entire set up is unsafe.

The current version of Electrum has no critical bugs or vulnerabilities which could directly lead to your coins being stolen. In that sense, it is a very safe piece of software. However, it cannot protect you against malicious parties attacking your computer, stealing your wallet file, planting clipboard malware, keyloggers, or other malware, and so on. You are storing funds in a hot wallet and so no wallet software, regardless of how good it is, can possibly mitigate against all potential threats.

I must say that downloading pirated software on the same computer that stores a bitcoin hot wallet is a particularly dangerous move. As is using anything Google related.
Certainly. Electrum is perfectly safe and have never faced any issues using it. My whole setup of storing my wallet in the computer I use sounds and is absolutely not that safe. I almost got burned once and could have lost a decent sum of money. I won't be that lucky next time.
The correct terminology for a wallet like Electrum is "desktop wallet" not "offline wallet".

The only true security is in cold storage which is where your wallet is created and stored in an air gap environment. The easiest solution is hardware wallets which I consider semi-cold since there still is a small chance to be compromised. The best solution is a completely offline PC that is cut off from the rest of the world.
Sorry, you're correct.

I'm planning to purchase a new laptop or even a desktop computer quite soon, and was actually planning to install the wallet to the old one and isolating it. What happens if the HDD goes bad, though? Backing up the seed phrase enough to recover it from another computer, I guess.
Today is the last day of the Black Friday sale and you can order hardware wallet at a 15-30% discount depending on the brand. Check out this section to find out more: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=261.0
The idea of either buying a HW or buying a new laptop/desktop (which I was already planning to) are the most prevailing onces at the moment. Unfortunately, due to feeling unwell the past few days as explained before, I missed the Black Friday discount.
@Ultegra134, there is an option to still have Electrum on your computer, but at the same time you don't have any risk for your BTC. All you need to do is check whether your backup is correct and in a safe place, and then start the process of creating a watch-only wallet with which you can then have complete insight into your transactions and deposit addresses, but without the risk that you can in any way be hacked.

What you should pay attention to in that case is that if you want to recover the standard wallet again, be especially careful with your seed in the sense that you don't have a keylogger or some other dangerous malware on your PC.
Thanks for the suggestion. So, if I understand correctly, backing up the seed phrase on paper, for example, and setting the wallet to watch-only removes the ability to send funds and practically secures your wallet. Thus, in case I want to send Bitcoin to someone, I have to recover my wallet using the seed phrase. Am I correct?
1291  Bitcoin / Wallet software / How safe are offline wallets? on: November 27, 2022, 07:31:46 PM
I'm currently using Electrum on my laptop; however, for whatever reason, I don't feel quite safe or comfortable practically having my bitcoin stored on my computer. How safe is a wallet like Electrum? If we suppose that my computer is infected with malware (or a Trojan horse, you name it), can someone access my wallet and send funds to another address? Is it possible to have the wallet.dat file stolen and accessed even though it's protected with a password?

I generally feel a little paranoid after being infected with a fake Google Sheets extension. I didn't lose anything of value, but I don't feel comfortable having my funds on the computer I'm using. Ever since, I've stopped downloading any pirated software and performed regular checks, but it's still unknown how I got infected. What other options do I have? Using a separate computer or hard drive for my wallet? The best option, I guess, is a hardware wallet.
1292  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Accumulation phase is out!? on: November 27, 2022, 05:48:36 PM
I had "predicted" that Bitcoin was capable of crashing down to $15,000 levels a few weeks ago. We're not that far off the mark. Honestly, I believe that we've reached the bottom; even if we haven't, I doubt that it'll lose too much value from now on. As others have already mentioned, this bear market does look quite similar to 2018's bearish period. I didn't survive the whole bear market in 2018, but both periods share a few similarities. We're now slowly entering the second year of the bear market, which, in my opinion, is bound to last at least one or even two more years.

Accumulating Bitcoin now is essential and way more affordable than it was a few months ago, especially after it plummeted below $20,000. Let's see who survives without selling until the bullish period.
1293  Economy / Economics / Re: The world’s baby shortfall is so bad that the labor shortage will last for years on: November 27, 2022, 04:45:58 PM
We are short of babies, dam that must be psychic assumption from Elon Musk. I think he does not understand each baby costs you food, money, health and living! From diaper changing to making him/her marry a right person it takes huge stuff from parents.  Roll Eyes

Dude does not even know there is part of world which is vulnerable to higher death rate due to hunger and no water and no proper authorities to provide substantial healthcare.

And he wants to grow the population even more?

I have seen him stating that “AI are far more dangerous than Nukes” and that mean automatic industry is gonna take peak soon. Where would the extra babies work?

Oh yeah right may be Mars.

In many countries, an increase in living standards leads to a decrease in the birth rate.  

People try to live for their own pleasure and have sex using condoms.  They eat delicious food, drink delicious drinks, buy expensive clothes and household appliances, attend theaters and concerts.  The uneducated poor have only one entertainment in life - to have sex without condoms.  Wealthier people in big cities have a million ways to entertain themselves.  

However, there are many different countries in the world and not all countries have a high standard of living.  There is also labor migration.  

People from poor depressed regions move to richer countries.

In my opinion, demographic problems are problems that can be solved, it is not fatal for humanity.
To be honest, I haven't thought of that. Now, due to the modern age, condoms are pretty much the easiest and safest method to prevent STDs and unwanted pregnancies. A few decades ago, their usage wasn't as widespread compared to now, which potentially also contributes to the birth deficit the West is facing. You can easily guess that 3rd world countries aren't keen on using them judging by how many children they're having, living in poor conditions, and often working since a very young age. 

People in the past had larger families but different raising standards. Children now require a lot more attention and activities, and we're focusing on their education. The total population is constantly rising; it reached 8 billion a few days ago, but this increase is not coming from the West. In the next few years, we're going to face extreme immigration issues, something we're already facing.
1294  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Misconception about cryptocurrency on: November 27, 2022, 11:50:13 AM
When people accuse cryptocurrency of being a scam in light of recent events like the luna and FXT exchange, it irritates me. Crypto is a risky investment but that's not a good reason to call it a scam during a bear market.
The bear market has always been and will be the most fruitful time for those who want to attack Bitcoin, and this should not surprise us - because many invested with the intention of profiting and were waiting for $100k, and then everything started to collapse. In the age of social networks, good news travels fast, and bad news even faster. Therefore, I advise you to be as little involved in them as possible, because that is one of the ways to get away from all that negativity that does not bring anything good.
This is a great explanation regarding attacks against Bitcoin. Whenever we're going through a bear market, news articles keep popping up claiming that Bitcoin is about to die and speculating on its possible failure. The exact same thing also occurs during bullish periods, but I believe that it's more prominent during bearish seasons. The reasons may vary, from being against cryptocurrencies or because they simply try to fish out clicks for their website, because it's certainly a controversial subject.

Do I believe that incidents such as FTX or Mt. Gox ruin the cryptocurrency industry's reputation? They do, but this simply applies to pretty much everything. There are even banks going bankrupt; does that mean that all banks are scams and are bound to steal your money? I'm not promoting banks by any means, but I think you get my point. There's always a black sheep in the family.
1295  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Tips to Becoming a Successful Holder on: November 26, 2022, 09:35:01 PM
Great tips overall, and it's also worth noting the necessary patience and discipline in order to survive through tough market periods. However, I'd like to add that holding may not apply to altcoins other than a few popular ones, such as Ethereum or Binance. Generally, we've seen quite a few altcoins involved in scams, scandals, rug pulls, you name it, such as Celsius, Luna, or FTT. I'm not saying that you can't hold altcoins, but personally, I don't feel comfortable doing so. The only coin I trust holding for long periods is Bitcoin. If you're planning to invest in altcoins, the least you should do is diversify your portfolio.
1296  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Are stablecoins safe? on: November 26, 2022, 08:02:53 PM
Just look at Luna(UST) then I reckon you'd get your answer. It may be a single instance, but it's still an instance nonetheless to take into account. I'd honestly just avoid holding any stablecoins for a long period of time if possible, I've only ever used stablecoins when paying/moving stuff, the rest of what is in my wallet is always invested in some crypto for the long term.

Here's an old post by mk4 about stablecoins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204055.0
You're comparing an algorithmic stablecoin (UST) with established stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. The latter are deemed safe enough to use and have hardly ever lost their $1 peg. Even when they did, they quickly recovered. That's not the case with algorithmic stablecoins, though, which can be deemed extremely risky because they rely on two types of tokens: a stablecoin and another token supporting the aforementioned stablecoin. There are several examples of failed ones out there, such as BoltDollar or UST. It's easy to mention that plenty can go wrong with them, and they're not actually guaranteed to have a secure 1:1 dollar peg (see USDN, FEI, or DEI).
1297  Other / Meta / Re: What’s wrong with Gambling Discussion board on: November 26, 2022, 06:47:34 PM
Well, that's also common in other subforums as well. I might gamble every once in a while, but generally, I'm not really interested in gambling conversations; most are also directed towards sports betting, and guess what? I'm not into sports either. Thus, I rarely participate in gambling discussions. If I were to guess, I'd say that quite a few signature campaigns have a certain post requirement to be made in the gambling section. As a result, there are people who may have zero interest in gambling who try to fit into conversations in order to achieve their quota.

I'm not following the gambling sections, and it's just my personal opinion, but I thought there might be a correlation between spam posts and the minimum post requirement in the specific section of the forum.
1298  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Share your Crypto experience. on: November 25, 2022, 11:51:47 PM
I've been in cryptocurrencies since approximately 2014, with two major breaks in 2014 and 2018. My Bitcoin's value has plummeted over 60%, but you know what? I don't really care. On the contrary, I'm somewhat satisfied when its value drops because every time I get paid in Bitcoin, I receive a significantly larger amount of BTC. You're still early in the game, but the issue is that the media often portrayed cryptocurrency success stories in such a way that they looked like a get-rich-quick scheme. Trust me, they're not. You'll need a ton of patience to survive the bear market; I didn't in 2018. If I hadn't quit then, there's a great chance that I'd have a great deal of money now.
1299  Other / Off-topic / Re: Increase in cost of running the family on: November 25, 2022, 10:38:35 PM
Inflation, increased expenses, soaring rent costs, and poor wages make it almost impossible to raise a family. Children now require much more attention than in the past; a foreign language and an activity are a must nowadays. These things weren't considered necessary in the 1950s, and what I mentioned is often the bare minimum. On top of that, benefits for larger families have been cut off, with most families now opting to have one child at most.

The west is suffering lower birth rates for the reasons mentioned above. Third world countries, on the other hand, continue to have an abundance of children, often lacking what we consider necessary.
1300  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How many of you believe in Litecoin? on: November 25, 2022, 09:07:16 PM
Litecoin is growing despite the current drop in prices of major coins.
I would say the potential is still on this coin but never I expect $500 could easily be reached this coming bull season. Though I wasn't buying Litecoin at this time still I know that many investors have their trust remain on this project as they believe the capability of this project and thinking for a profit once the bull season comes.
That's the intriguing part I also noticed. I was observing its price a month or so ago, and Bitcoin was at $20.000 and Litecoin was at $50 levels. Currently, it's one of the few coins that is growing (over 20% increase in the past week) despite the ongoing bear market, making me regret thinking twice when I was interested in buying a while ago. In my opinion, it does have the potential to shine again; it used to be in the top 3 a few years ago, although it will still be outperformed by others such as BNB.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 189 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!