Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 02:03:29 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 ... 233 »
2881  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BM1384 Pod Miner plus trade-in/recycling - an interest and feasibility poll on: October 09, 2015, 04:01:41 AM
Obsolete -> one generation behind; yes I get it now. By pure efficiency it's pretty good compared to current stuff only by merit of its adjustability; if someone else makes an S7-caliber miner that's adjustable this guy starts looking worse.

I have talked to Spondoolies about their new chip. Spondoolies likes NDAs so I can't talk about anything that I know because NDA. I don't know anything about what Avalon or InnoSilicon are doing right now. But I'm not too worried about "2 step behind before 2016". That said, I'm very much looking forward to working with current-gen chips. This project is another step toward the end goal of making not-crappy miners for not-crappy people.

The pods won't be daisychainable. Each pod will have its own USB connection so you'd have to hub multiples together, but they could still all be run on a single controller - say, a Pi with cgminer. That controller could have a wifi adapter. I don't know.

1000 sticks requires 1000 chips. Chips are the limiting factor. I have 1000 chips budgeted for Compacs, and another 200 for whatever else, and then a bunch of pulls. For 1000 chips I could make 125 pods. The chips I have available after Compacs are over can make about 50 pods. If someone wants to scrounge up a berjillion S5 boards that'd be pretty smexy. With the six boards I should expect from survey responders that's about 16 more pods (not counting the 6 that would be given in trade for said boards) so it'd take a lot of scrounging to get a big batch.

Now i know the limit amount of BM1384 chips you have/had.
chiguireitor seem up to the challenge, maybe he can scrounge up that berjillion S5 boards ^_^"

For the non daisy, usb hub still work, its a small extra expense, but very manageable, especially since i won't be getting 100 of them apparently. Tongue Good idea for slapping a Wifi adapter on the pi if ever.

Cool for SP NDA stuff. I guess this mean at least there is a channel of communication open. Hopefully at one point you get to tell us you'll have a batch of their chips.

Maybe we can setup something for the dead board. For instance i wouldn't mind buying dead S5 board and have them shipped directly to you.No point in having them shipped to me, then i reship them to you, especially since there's probably a bunch of them, dead already in the US.
2882  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Feature that should be added on: October 09, 2015, 03:00:16 AM
Under file it should have "Write offline transaction" and "Put offline transaction online" or something along those words.  Already has sign/verify message, sweet feature.

What are you talking about? The Bitcoin core wallet? Which wallet? If you want a wallet that does this, the Feature is already available for almost all wallet. (Sign message)
And if you want offline signing, the feature is already available as well; https://bitcoinarmory.com/
2883  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Can I Sell Goods Yet? on: October 09, 2015, 02:58:37 AM
I pretty much have been a gamer my whole life, and get every console that is released. Well I have an Xbox One already and would like to get rid of my 360, I was just wondering before I go ahead and get into any trouble if I could sell in the forum's marketplace yet? Please let me know, and some tips would also be appreciated, thank you.

Nope. Anyone can be a buyer/seller, but I can recommend for you to use an escrow when selling the console/other goods (to avoid being scammed). Here's a list of 'em.

Best of luck to your selling adventures, and as always, GLWS!

Awesome list, Thank you. Seems like OGNasty is more trusted with 301+ trust level.

I can recommend OgNasty, as i have personal dealings with him. I simply sent a message to him in the form he suggest and it did not take long, even though it was the middle of the night, to PM both traders with confirmation of fund being in escrow.

Then when i told him to release, he released in ... minutes? Overall it was great. If you can fork over the 1% fee, go ahead. If not, there's very good active escrow that do it for free or tip.
2884  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Antminer s5 not expected Hashrate on: October 09, 2015, 02:56:00 AM
Hey Guys

Ive a Problem with my 3 Days old Antminer S5. I started mining Bitcoins 3 Days ago with the mining Pool mining.bitcoins.cz.
I scored a hashrate of 1180 GH avg. but Today it broke down to 500-600 GH.
The ping and Tempature is good. I also the frequency on mining.bitcoins.cz

Can you help me?


Sry for bad English (Swiss guy Cheesy)

Give us a screenshot for the miner status page on the AntMiner's webserver page. A picture of your setup, your psu connected to it. Does it beep, is the light on the cold board on and if the red led is flashing, always on, or always off.
2885  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BM1384 Pod Miner plus trade-in/recycling - an interest and feasibility poll on: October 09, 2015, 02:44:22 AM
I'm not sure how a device you can get for free or close to free which will quietly generate 100GH from about 35W - which is more efficient than any miner (which I didn't build) that you can buy for less than $1500 - is already obsolete.

I honestly didn't expect to see as many people voting for the "I'd pay $50 for that" option, because as mentioned, the $/GH isn't so great. If I was buying chips straight from Bitmain it'd be even worse. At top clock it's about 0.25$/GH but that's also at 0.5W/GH where the S3 at 0.5W/GH is probably priced comparably but you get a bit more hashrate from a single unit - except it also has no future.

Anyone wanting to run 3KW should probably fill it with S3 or S5 or S7. Monolithic units with less per-unit overhead. As soon as I can (which is to say, as soon as someone has available chips worth using), I'll be building TypeZero boards that run up to 300W each and mount on the S1 chassis. Then I'll meet the needs of people who want to run 3KW or 30KW or whatever. This is more for people who want gifts, toys or lottery machines but want something bigger than stick miners. Honestly, if Bitmain keeps making things on the scale of the S4+ or S7, I really won't be competing in their domain. They're building big KW boxes and jet turbines and I prefer to specifically avoid that.

If I can get BM1385 chips, I'd probably port the 8-chip design straight across. It'd actually be easier to design with the new chips because Bitmain did a heck of a good job with the pinout and integrated features. You might not be able to push the chips quite as far as the 1384 design because the per-chip currents increase for the same power dissipation, so with a good cooler you'd run into power availability limits before you ran into power dissipation limits. But it'd still be a heck of a good little box.

chig, if you can get a board from Venezuela to the US for $5, make sure to send a shipping label because I guarantee I can't get get a board to you for that price. Maybe with the absolute cheapest slow-boat takes-a-month shipping option. Maybe.
They could make great room heater instead of using electricity cooling for this winter.

I said "obsolete" when i should say efficiency is already one generation behind. And next gen chips surpassing the S7 are supposedly already in existence, however not easily available. For example the nice SP chips we were talking about making a 400-600gh pod at under 100w. So in short, a pod using the BM1384 could fall 2 step behind before 2016.

Since the chips are available with the S5, you're competing at that efficiency but your pod would be a great value for people who want to control the voltage without using special PSU's or downsteps. And only the S5 v1.91 board seem to take the downvolt properly.

And for getting them in lots of 6, i don't really see a problem in term of setup. I already run more Antminer S1's than any other miners, so i thought of the pod as a "upgrade" for them. Albeit i suspect your pod wont run on wifi.

The builder himself designing them said 3000 watt filler is not what they are meant for on target audience.   For one reason if there are a limited amount of these selling 20 to one person chances are is a lot of them.    And you really do not want to mine with 20 devices when you have an option for 1 or 2.

If your just trying to fill up 3k make your life easier and get a S5 or S7.   But these pods will be a ton of fun to play with I already want one.  I think I have an addiction.

The builder himself doesn't know my situation and what is my best target for ROI. Seeing how so many more people voted 50$, he probably did not imagine all the situations that people maybe be in. Or why people people are so interested.
Because at the price he suggest, This would be a much better option for me than getting a s7.(Which i just can't, the price is ridiculous) And is also better than buying more S5's which are insanely hard to find in Canada, at least at a reasonable price/proper seller.


For example the S7 is about the worse ROI of all my active options. Because the $/GH is just horrible. And more S5 is already what i'm doing but there are a few reasons why the pod is better;
-I could get all that i need from one deal and pay shipping once.
-Possibly better overclocking than S5
-Volt control (Awesome sauce)
-Lower heat density = less noise
-And i suspect easier management as i believe Sidehack said they would daisy chain connect to make it easy to run all the miners on one controller.

While the deciding factor is i can't run a S5 next to my head to me when i sleep,... while maybe 12 pods running at moderate freq might be. I need miners that will run in my room quiet.

If the amount is limited, then of course. I said "I'd fill 3kW with them" before knowing there could be so few, after all, he's going to have made over 1000 usb sticks.

But who knows maybe some people are sitting on dozens of dead board that would let sidehack make a few hundreds pods.

If that is not the case a single lot of 6 would be just as nice since i got quite a bit of S1 and old Scrypt miner to replace.

It's very likely that I'll start this project. Even if I don't sell them, it's worth it to me to mine on these pods myself because, since most of the parts are scrounge, the $/GH is better than anything else I could buy and especially better when you consider the combination of efficiency and adjustability.

The real concern is how many I build, which is going to depend heavily on how many other people want to get it on it.

Yes, the deal would be you send S5 boards and I send you working pods. You'd have to pay shipping for the boards and the pods, but as mentioned before, if all shipping is within the US that'd be in the $15 neighborhood. I really wish I was able to ship internationally for cheaper. Even shipping to Canada costs $45 for something I can ship for $15 within the US, and it'd be $65 to anywhere overseas.

A small pod should be 30$ with USPS. A lot of 6 should be 45-50$. From experience with all the stuff i bought from sellers in the US so far. Its bad for one pod, but okay for 5-6.
If you decide to keep them, then i could see value in you doing that until they become unprofitable and you need to sell them to others. At either point i'd be interested in buying them.
2886  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BM1384 Pod Miner plus trade-in/recycling - an interest and feasibility poll on: October 08, 2015, 09:37:07 PM
Within the US, shipping a dead board and me shipping the miner is going to cost less than $15 total.

Right now I am able to make about 50. I have that many chips. It's worth it to me to make that many anyway even if I don't sell them, because nothing beats the $/GH I'd have in materials from stuff I already have, not even your S3, and nothing beats the efficiency except the S7 and I sure as heck ain't gonna pay for one of those. If I make more than that it's because other people are getting in on it and sending boards I can raid for parts, or because demand is high enough that I go find more parts anyway.

Also, how does the S3 get the same efficiency range if this thing is about 0.3 to 0.55 wall? Is the best-case for an S3 that low? I guess the very bottom end for an S3 is comparable to the very top end of this guy, but the difference is in two months the bottom end of the S3 is no longer viable while this thing would probably run you all the way to the halving. The S3 is closer to this guy's use-case than the S5 to be sure, but still not really the same. This is a U3 replacement, or a New R-Box replacement, not an S3 or S5 replacement.

And yes, in the grand scheme of things I likely will only build "a handful".

I had not realized the value of this unit for people who have high electricity cost to validate the unit's ability to go down to 0.3. I have no argument there.

I figured if going from 0.5 to 0.3 and losing half the hashrate on the unit is your target, then i think that range is already obsolete for such a person, because of the price of the unit.

The math i did was undervolting the S3 down to the 0.5X range would give more hashrate for the same efficiency than that pod, for less than just shipping you a board back and forth.

And thats only because US/Canada shipping became crazy after 9-11. Its not because the S3 is a better unit.

In my mind, this unit you'd be building is already obsolete to people who pay their electricity, thus i would of imagined you would target people where $/GHs is more important than GHs/J because of how cheap their electricity is.

To be fair, someone in Canada with 3KW to spare also isn't really the target customer. I have nothing against Canda, but filling 3KW with 80W pod miners doesn't seem terribly practical. I mean that's fine; if you pay for 'em and I can get the materials together I'll build 'em. But I'm looking more at people who want entry-level, who don't want the size of an S3 or the noise (and expense) of an S5. Comparing this to an S5 makes some sense in that they're in the same efficiency class, but they're not in the same use-case class, power class, size class or really much else.

I don't think your pod fit the entry-level miner to familiarize themselves with bitcoin either. I would recommend the sidehack stick for that. It doesn't make any noise, is cheap, cheap to run and doesnt take any space.

If you target the few people, only in the US, who want to run a single one next to their router for fun, learning and well just having one little miner that isin't meant to be ROI'd.

Then sure that could be your target, which would work if you only plan on making a handful of these.

Because as purely a recycling small scale plan, this would only be for US customers;

Ffor one pod or two, and i ship you a dead board. And then i pay for shipping back, that would be more money than just buying a S3 and undervolting it, getting same efficiency range and more hash and more hash/$.

Its totally okay if that is not your plan, but then i can't tell if its feasible.

Sadly this is the world of asics.   Some countries make it harder to be a customer then others.   US to US is as bout as simple as it gets.    And shipping as long as it does not weight a ton can be done at a decent price.

I think on recycle US will make most sense unless you find some great shipping rates in canada or other places.  The pod is still in the category of past pods, and U3 I believe.  So comparing it and S3 are apples and oranges.   And sidehacks will be much more efficient then S3 and funner to play with.  

I would not knock scale.   I think there is a decent amount of loyal customers sidehack and novak have made, including myself. Sidehack is right if your looking to fill 3000 k watts you honestly are looking for a bigger miner.  I cant imagine 3k watts of any pod at this point.  

Why? Filling 2 breaker with this is only 20~ units.
2887  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S7 is available at bitmaintech.com with 4.86TH/s, 0.25J/GH on: October 08, 2015, 09:24:33 PM
Where are you guys getting that there will be compensation for orders shipped after the 10th?  Huh

Bitmain's text was something like "if its shipped less than 10 days after the initial shipping date, it will not be considered late." So this extrapolate into. "If its after x date, only then the late shipped order will be considered late and will then allow you to be compensated."
2888  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: good places to hide paper wallet ? on: October 08, 2015, 09:22:28 PM
snip
You want to get creative? How about a non electronic sub dermal implant with a sealed capsule that has the encrypted priv key inside? All you would have to do is scratch that spot to be remembered that you're walking around with all that bitcoin.

You can always keep an eye on it and it cannot be stolen while you're not looking.

You sir are more dedicated them me if you are willing to do this.  I will keep safety deposit box Smiley

If you can handle injecting it in your body, and cutting out each time you want it... just would take it to another level.   

Yeah no, thats crazy. This could work with a electronic implant that is your hardware wallet key. Otherwise hell no.

I was thinking about someone that has like hundreds or thousands of Bitcoin that wish to keep his Bitcoin safe in cold storage but still in reach for many years, as a bet that Bitcoin's market cap will eventually beat other payment processors.

You keep those until its time to retire, then take it out and cash out, live the good live.
2889  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Lot of 19 PSUs 1600/1300/1200/750 on: October 08, 2015, 09:19:23 PM
I need one EVGA 1300W, possible to ship in Canada ?
I would like all the cables and original box.
I pay shipping fee of course.


Exact same thing here. I pm'ed OP about this offer previously, i told him i'd be interested to pick up one or two if he end up breaking them down.
I guess its not a bad idea to leave the offer here, as this offer of mine will be valid ongoingly until i get 2 of them one way or another.
2890  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Most Secure bitcoin wallet ? on: October 08, 2015, 09:16:11 PM
snip
That would make more sense on teaching how to do it.     With "have to mostly agree with that point of view, but if you want to store serious about of BTC and you're "non-technical" you should hire someone technical to do it."  just sounded like pay for someone to do it not teach, so I could have read it wrong I guess.

But make sure the person teaching you is honest and you trust them.  Also DO NOT let them plug anything even just a thumb drive into your computer.   And watch them the whole time on computer.

I guess that if a person actually came to your home and set up the software could be somehow installing everything with a privkey he already own, i guess this is some kind of thing you should keep in mind in the BTC world.

I guess we should say hire someone to hold your hand through the process of learning and setting it up, maybe online. You're not really physically storing wealth in a container, so there's no physical setup of a vault to do.

Its not like there's much that need to be done physically anyways. You just install the software on a offline computer, then learn how to sign transactions on the offline computer. If a very small step up from normal bitcoin usage.

The problem is a person loading software from a USB and you do not know about it.   Look up about bad usb.  You should never on any of your computers let someone plug a USB drive of theirs in.

If you pay someone and he uses a bad usb exploit it might look like hes nice and helping.  But it could be capturing keys from everything after bad usb exploit was used.

I know how vulnerable the usb port is for bypassing security, but i never pictured the process as having someone physically go to your house and show you how to do something you already know how to do (Use a bitcoin wallet).

Its not very any more complicated than that, you just need to keep the wallet instead, on a offline computer and then you have your cold storage that cannot be hacked. There's guides for that but if reading is somehow hard for you, then you just hire someone to walk you through the process for you.
2891  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BM1384 Pod Miner plus trade-in/recycling - an interest and feasibility poll on: October 08, 2015, 09:09:50 PM
To be fair, someone in Canada with 3KW to spare also isn't really the target customer. I have nothing against Canda, but filling 3KW with 80W pod miners doesn't seem terribly practical. I mean that's fine; if you pay for 'em and I can get the materials together I'll build 'em. But I'm looking more at people who want entry-level, who don't want the size of an S3 or the noise (and expense) of an S5. Comparing this to an S5 makes some sense in that they're in the same efficiency class, but they're not in the same use-case class, power class, size class or really much else.

I don't think your pod fit the entry-level miner to familiarize themselves with bitcoin either. I would recommend the sidehack stick for that. It doesn't make any noise, is cheap, cheap to run and doesnt take any space.

If you target the few people, only in the US, who want to run a single one next to their router for fun, learning and well just having one little miner that isin't meant to be ROI'd.

Then sure that could be your target, which would work if you only plan on making a handful of these.

Because as purely a recycling small scale plan, this would only be for US customers;

Ffor one pod or two, and i ship you a dead board. And then i pay for shipping back, that would be more money than just buying a S3 and undervolting it, getting same efficiency range and more hash and more hash/$.

Its totally okay if that is not your plan, but then i can't tell if its feasible.
2892  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: good places to hide paper wallet ? on: October 08, 2015, 09:01:59 PM
I am searching for a good place to hide my paper wallet
i don't want any one to see it or try to scan the QR code
please don't give me silly places, I really want to hide it in secure place

Maybe the best place is in plain sight:
you generate 100-200 pairs of public+private keys, pick one number you prefer and use that as actual paper wallet. Nobody will have the patience to enter them all by hand until they find the non-empty one.

Of course, you'll have to keep your actually used public key also hidden from the people you know, so you'll need a few public/buffer wallets. They'll be empty 99.9% of the time.

They can use an automatic bot that tries all of them, if you do this on your PC.

If you do it with paper wallets, then you will need alot of printing ,and have a good mark on the real private key, while marking the fakes one too.


Also you can descuise it.  Dont have it say bitcoin or private key on it.  Put it as camo like "Family Pictures Link 2015" or something a "bad guy" would have no interest.  And on private key could put picture storage id.

Be creative with it.  A little camo like this to hide it and might do a world of good.

You want to get creative? How about a non electronic sub dermal implant with a sealed capsule that has the encrypted priv key inside? All you would have to do is scratch that spot to be remembered that you're walking around with all that bitcoin.

You can always keep an eye on it and it cannot be stolen while you're not looking.

2893  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.319/GH & 0.51W/GH on: October 08, 2015, 08:58:51 PM
I am going to keep working on my boards and will probably get there in the end. One approach I will probably take if I cannot get the hang of replacing chips is what you are saying and that is to bypass the faulty stages.

This is not quite as simple as it sounds as the chips and level shifters need to be removed then the signals connected directly to the next stage and the voltage reduced to allow for the shorter chain. It does however require the first stage to be operational as that has the oscillator.

If I can get to grips with repairing hash boards and also ideally making pre V1.91 boards undervolt I will post up all the information.

However If it fails, and will go with one board anyway, with Sidehacks latest recycling project which is a very attractive alternative.  Smiley


Rich

Then i wish you good luck.

I invite you to start a thread and act as a journal, so that people can keep track, learn and give feedback.

Personally it would be of interest to keep track of.

It's a bit bothersome for me since I have plenty of time to put time on repairing this board, but i'm afraid without some sort of map that show me what everything should be at, i can't figure out what the problem is. And once i figure it out, i don,t even have the pieces to repair the board.

In your case if you had several dead boards. You could more reliably just swap bad parts and probably be able to get a high % of dead board working by cannibalizing the rest of the boards.
2894  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I want to store bitcoin in USD without transferring to my bank? on: October 08, 2015, 08:54:50 PM
I was watching a video for coinbase.

It seemed like when you sell bitcoin to USD, that it instantly goes to your bank?

Is there any wallet that will let me convert/sell bitcoin to USD then leave it in the wallet in USD?


I also need to be able to register and do this without a bank account. I plan to open a new bank account this week, but I would like to gegt the bitcoin sent to me ASAP and have it sit in my wallet as USD until the bank account is open and ready for transfer.

You can use Payza, it accept Bitcoin and you can from your Payza account exchange your BTC to USD in your wallet on Payza.

They are pretty new, not that established, but definitely better than paypal and with less restrictions.

It seems like old companies always fuck up in innovation. I`d use them.

Maybe so but if OP wants to store USD online, i don't think Payza is it. In term for safety, Paypal might be better, but in truth i think this simply should not be done. Buy gold and hide it pirate-style 6 feets bellow in your garden or something.

On the upside, if Fiat ever break down, Gold will still be worthwhile.

Haha, gold can be stolen too, not very good

Bitcoin & land is pretty good. A land is always yours, while bitcoin too, good stores of value.

Its not really easy to steal gold from a vault and those are insured. Bitcoin is a unknown store of value. Its not because its protected from fiat inflation that its a good store of value. Its volatile as hell and probably what people would give as an example to being a poor store of value. If the price change a lot, its not a "good store of value".

It may however be a "good long term hold investment" if you bet on Bitcoin succeeding its revolution.

If it fail you lost everything, Hence a bad store of value.

Meanwhile gold, even if ever government blow up/vanish, the world end will retain value.

I think toilet paper is a better store of value than Bitcoin Wink
2895  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BM1384 Pod Miner plus trade-in/recycling - an interest and feasibility poll on: October 08, 2015, 08:50:50 PM
Correct. Saying "Your biggest problem is going to be getting functioning S5 chips" is pretty much repeating what I said myself in the very first post, and then offered a solution to that problem as noted in the first post and as the second option of the poll. This project exists because of dead S5 boards as a source of chips.

The project would be even less viable if I didn't have that as a material source, because even if Bitmain would sell me more chips (they won't, I've asked repeatedly) they'd be cost-prohibitive (about $26 per pod just for the ASICs) and instead of a $50 purchase option you'd see a $75 option, minimum.

If I'm allowed to simile, your suggestion is akin to telling me I should worry about rebuilding engines for drag racers because it's a better use of time than designing motorcycles from junkyard parts. Not only is the customer base different, but the whole concept is different. I'm not trying to solve the problem of making the S5 more efficient for the people who have one that works. I'm solving the problem of having one that doesn't work, and the problem of retired miners gathering dust, and the problem of no good options for entry-level miners and lottery boxes.

Maybe I'll tackle your S5 undervolt problem next week. Right now I don't care.

With proper volt control, these pods could be of interest at 50$(or one dead S5 board) each if one could buy enough in one go to be worthwhile. You would need to buy/sell them in small batches because of the the numbers are as such;

Buying a used S5 including shipping right now= 0.2$-0.26$/GH.

One pod + shipping to Canada = 0.4$/GH if the pod include the fan/heatsink you said you had somewhat available = no amount of fanciness can cover that price as a ROI-able investment. However;

6 Pods at 50$ea, which is the seller's price on the marketplace atm for a S5 + shipping would now give you a total of 340$~ so the % of money going to shipping is much lower. The final number become 0.28$/GH which is reasonable at the moment + quiet/volt control very much justify the extra price for people with cheap electricity.

I think the project with the figures you mentioned can be feasible at current market values. If you can pull it off before difficulty make this impossible or a new option lower the value of such a pod considerably, this would sound pretty tasty.

In current condition and prices(assuming it include the heatsink/fan already) i'd be inclined to fill 3000watts with these at home assuming they can do the 190gh per unit at 0.5~ efficiency.
2896  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: ASIC Hardware??? on: October 08, 2015, 08:31:09 PM
VirosaGITS,

i pay about £0.06 for it

That seem expensive, i'm not sure you could ROI the S7 before the halving. If you can, it could be worth a shot. If you cannot, i don't think there's anything on the open market atm that would work for you. If you need to pay for heating, instead heating with an ASIC would be worthwhile however.

it works out to about $0.09

Yes that seem too expensive. There's nothing to recommend since you probably pay 3 time what the network's average pay.

On a S7, if your total investment for one S7 is 2000USD, with a mere 2% increase rate it would take 500days to ROI, if there was no halving. With the halving in 9~ months, you simply have no chance unless the BTC price go up by quite a bit.

You could mine the S7 for a few months and then sell it before people realize it will be worth very little soon. Or before a S9 or other such major event that would make it obsolete.
2897  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Getting started on: October 08, 2015, 08:24:55 PM
3 per 15A breaker will trip.  If it's a 20A breaker, he'll be alright, but won't be able to run much of anything else on that same circuit.  Could probably run a decent LED TV and a lamp or two Tongue
You're right I just checked the S5 wattage it is higher than I had thought, if hes running 20amp he'll be fine, he could underclock the s5 to 500w each and run all 3 on a 15amp breaker and have ~200w to spare, this would give him led lights, clocks, and what not.

The 15A breaker are designed to run at less than 12A continuous you won't have 200w to spare you'll be 60-120watts over limit for "continuous load" = over 3 hours. It would then be very likely to trip over any little thing. If you're lucky it wont cause a fire, too. I have breakers who randomly tripped because they were at 13A~ A less sensitive breaker might of burnt out.

Proper power bar will tell you that the circuit is overloaded as well. If you have actual 120v you should limit yourself to 1400-1440. Many have less however, the range is 110v-120v.
2898  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.319/GH & 0.51W/GH on: October 08, 2015, 08:13:05 PM
Yes that board looks ok, however dependant on how it failed you it may not have overheated. I bought an S5 from ebay that had burnt itself up on losing the internet connection and the fans had stopped. It had got sufficiently hot that the side plastic pieces were very distorted. Here is the picture.



You can see the darkening on the PCB around all the chips on the right, some of that has also been made slightly worse by me removing chips.

If anyone has any recommendations on what, reasonably priced, equipment is best for removing and replacing this style of chip that would be very helpful.  Smiley I have a hot air blower which has been fine for 64 pin QFP, but I am finding that these chips need to get very hot to remove & am concerned that I am damaging them in the process.


Rich

Really wish you could just bypass bad sections, ugh. But i guess they were designed to be cheap to make, not easy to maintain, repair or be resilient.

I guess Sidehack would be a good one to tell you this information. Making a thread just for this fiddling would be nice but i'm afraid there's no much more i can do with my knowlewdge.
2899  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.319/GH & 0.51W/GH on: October 08, 2015, 09:58:11 AM
OK I have reordered the measurements to represent how they are connected on the board. The chain bottom is connected to 0V is C17, they then go anticlock round the board ending up at C2 which is connected to +12V.

+12V

C2 5mV
C3 4.4mV
C5 0.885V
C6 1.08V

Right hand top corner of board

C7 0.95V
C8 0.995V
C10 0.91V
C11 0.97V
C12 0.9V
C13 0.87V
C14 0.951V

Left hand top corner of board.

C15 1.015V
C16 1.11V
C17 0.45V

0V


So the obviously odd voltages are those on the top 2 stages (C2 & C3) which are very low. This will probably mean that one or both chips at those stages are low resistance, probably because one or both of the Hash Chips on those stages are short circuit? Does the board look slightly blackened around those stages? C17 is also low, indicating perhaps that one of the first stage chips is also faulty? However this is just a guess....

Rich


http://imgur.com/a/q0xgX

I would say no burn marks, judge by yourself. The black smudges are thin layer of cooked thermal paste i believe. They were not there when i cleaned it. The board did end up at 205C~ when i tried to oven cook it.

My camera derp out and lose focus on the chip top side, which is weird, but anyways, even though that side is blurry, its still decent enough to see i guess.
2900  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: ASIC Hardware??? on: October 08, 2015, 09:32:36 AM
VirosaGITS,

i pay about £0.06 for it

That seem expensive, i'm not sure you could ROI the S7 before the halving. If you can, it could be worth a shot. If you cannot, i don't think there's anything on the open market atm that would work for you. If you need to pay for heating, instead heating with an ASIC would be worthwhile however.
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 ... 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!