Well no shock owlcatz supports and trusts lauda since they were both implicated in the same extortion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0



Next up panda...

Not sure I get your point, you don't believe the observable and undeniable instances? you do note these are independently verifiable and undeniable right?

Twitchy? what was your point exactly? how does this relate to lauda being on DT?
I think it goes without saying we would not trust any person with observable and undeniable instances of scamming and other undeniably high risk financial behaviors and blatant trust abuse, now found threatening people with flags if they advocate free speech.

Those distrusting us are mainly found on the dirty turds thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.160

To be distrusted by scammers and scammer supporters is something one should strive for. That indicates fear and acknowledgement as a clear threat to their status quo.

If one is unable to demonstrate they (scammers and scammer supporters) are observably and undeniably high risk and financially dangerous via the broken systems of control then one must do their uttermost to find a way to warn other members.

I wonder how many of those got the MEMO from theymos? to get rid of that piece of shit lauda and refused. Of course there are the alts, the turd world ass kissing plebs who perceive laudas gang of controlling their possible rise out of the gutter, the feeble terrified dregs like LFC who have stated they are petrified of falling out with laudas gang, the banned people, the deceased (RIP), those that say they are pleased honest members are given red trust who are not interested in the truth, HugeBlackWoman aka the pharmacist (refused theymos we note), other idiots taken in by this croatian scum bag. None of any real substance or achievements.

I really see no members that are even semi credible on there except a tiny few. Even they must be considered complicit now that so much evidence of his undeniable scamming and trust abuse has been presented.

Good list though. Nice to make sure this is documented for historical purposes. The smarter crowd have dumped that scum bag since they know there is no coming back from the position his own scamming and trust abuser has placed him in.

We will see to that.

It would seem most even semi credible members have removed him.

Shame he wimped out of his bullying threats. Anyone standing up to him will see the same happens, runs away or back peddles.

He will be removed from DT fully with his complicit bunch of scammer supporters like pharmacist in the future. There is no place on trust positions for such scumbags. Once they are off and the gang is crushed finally and fully. They are never going to forget their pasts here. You don't get to scam or support and excuse scammers continuously,  then come back later and all if forgotten. Some things are beyond forgiveness. It is not for people to forgive undeniable financially high risk behaviors and undeniable scamming, you don't get to choose if you take risks with other members security here.

Those too slow to jump ship away from these scammers are going down with that stinky wreck..

Fair and transparent standards coupled with the observable instances from the past present and inexorable future for these types.



@ pada....

anecdotal good experience do NOT mitigate undeniable instances of scamming and trust abuse. You don't get to place in positions of trust undeniable scammers and trust abusers because they were nice to you. That is not how it works.

However on a serious note agent fox poop is always welcome. His opinions that are not based on reasoning (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52479030#msg52479030) are always worth destroying in public.

1. your gender is not an observable and undeniable action on the forum. Therefore does not present a clear and undeniable piece of independently verifiable proof. If you are claiming to have a very small penis the size perhaps of a girls clit then one could be forgiven for believing you were female and they were scamming people on the advertisements right?

2. This is regarding the ACCUSATION OF TROLLING Please keep on topic.

3. If you are claiming a person is trolling you with being female when you are male. I guess you would need to present kyc to clearly debunk their claims and then if they continued with that claim they could be viewed as trolling you. Other than that I have no idea how you will attempt to demonstrate they are willfully and deliberately presenting observably and undeniably incorrect information and true.

You (not surprisingly) have not understood the concept.


Undeniable and fully independently verifiable observable instances of SCAMMING can not be compared to your "word" that you consider yourself female at this time.

The concept is here

FALSE claims of TROLLING to deceive members and to try to discredit undeniable Undeniable and fully independently verifiable observable instances of SCAMMING. 

So since you seem to need specifics here to give a demonstration. Don't run away.

This statement for instance.

Tman is an auction scammer.  Is this trolling or is it true foxpoop?  If it is trolling then clearly explain how you see it to be so. 
I notice people are claiming this is TROLLING. By doing so they are deliberately trying to deceive the honest members here. That is dangerous.

Answer please foxpoop. Is that statement trolling or not. I mean I know you have seen the observable and undeniable instance of it that we have detailed in the recent pages of the dirty turds thread. If you need it presented again here, just ask for it.

If it is trolling (provably untrue) then explain how that works.

We did not intend to use specific instances here but since you insist on making it immediately personal then fair enough, to hammer the point home we will gladly present statements for you to claim trolling or untrue to.

Then we can demonstrate how that is clearly different to you claiming you are not female right now.

I mean if you are going to claim that ALL information that is unverifiable is trolling then the board will have a lot less members lol.

Only information that is CONCLUSIVELY and undeniably debunked and demonstrated to be certainly UNTRUE can be used as basis for a trolling "claim".  That would have to be an action or instance that is there in black and white on this forum really.

So

Tman is an auction scammer !! - trolling or not foxpoop?  I see lots of screaming it is trolling. Here is your chance to demonstrate WHY it is grounds for a trolling claim.

Or

Nutildah was willing to facilitate scamming for 0.3 BTC.  - trolling or not ??

Foxpoop includes an auction scammer on his trust inclusions - trolling or true...

We of course none can even be trolling until they are undeniably debunked and undeniably are proven incorrect.
So for instance say you said.... I have never had tman on my trust includes. That does not immediately mean that is trolling. Only if we repeated it as if it were true would that be trolling.

So if you wish to just get back to the initial post, try to understand the concept and then carry on debating without making it personal... then I will find it in my heart not to push you to debase yourself in public trying to explain how those statements are untrue and are rather TROLLING.

We are interested in TROLLING TROLLING here. The continually presentation of a blatantly faux defense (the only one they have) by screaming trolling at Undeniable and fully independently verifiable observable instances of SCAMMING.

Want to claim trolling, demonstrate how the statements are undeniably untrue or incorrect or STFU crying trolling.

There should be punishment for deliberate deception like this, especially to shield scammers and scamming who are a direct financial high risk to the honest members here. 6 month sig bans would be a good start. Moving to perm sig bans if they continue.



 

Hahaha  " challenge denied"  aka I was trying to bully you and now got called on it so will weasel my way out of it and still pretend I can lecture you anyway at the same time as being a coward. hahaha

This scammer lauda always runs when people stand up to it. Typical yapping scamming pleb.

Since lauda still appears to be on DT where can we obtain the data that reveals which of the 100+ members theymos requested exclude the scamming trust abusing scum bag REFUSED to do so?

How many of that 100+ members did then exclude this proven scammer Lauda?

Was the list made public and how does that compare with their current exclusions. There is NO ROOM for scammers and trust abusers on Default trust.

Trolling, inflammatory and  bullying according to thenewanon ... oh wait " the new " trolling definition seems not to apply to proven scammers and their supporters.

NOW BACK ON TOPIC.

Please debate only the central points of the initial post please. Keep on topic.

As you can see now they CAN NOT PRESENT the central points of ours that they can demonstrate are clearly debunked and incorrect ( BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDENIABLY TRUE) they try to pull out some blanket definition of trolling that they can mutate to prevent people from posting the truth about them. Hence being super deceptive.


1. undeniable scammers being called scammers = true
2. People making observably false and stupid statements being called idiots and imbeciles = true
3. People supporting undeniable scammers on DT being called scammer supporters = true

compared to

1. People presenting observable instances of their scamming being called trolls = FALSE

also for consideration

People making inflammatory remarks that are untrue or they can not present very compelling evidence to corroborate  is NOT the same as a person presenting observable instances of truth that fully corroborate their inflammatory remarks.

So us calling tman a dirty scammer is inflammatory, but is supported by undeniable evidence and is net positive for honest members = TRUE AND NOT TROLLING

Tman then responding claiming that we are trolling him = UNTRUE and TROLLING US and deceiving the honest members of this forum.


Get how it works now??

We should adopt some new clear and transparent RULES that ensure the fair treatment of all members and that are optimal for this entire movement.

Let's get back on topic. We do not need to make it personal or derail this into specifics.

This can be a general rule. These fools came here to derail and discredit the idea because they likely fear any transparent and fair rules that get applied to each and every member equally.


OIEIOIE - we read your messages. Detail now exactly the central points you have debunked. No point saying errr all of it. Point to one specific point. What are you afraid of?

We just see you escaping any debate by saying " i have debunked everything you said " then running away from giving any specific details.

It seems therefore you are unwilling to really get down to a serious debate at all.  Which parts have you debunked?? demonstrate which central points and how you have clearly debunked them.

You need to first demonstrate the central points and NONSENSE you have debunked. Start there. We are waiting. This seems like trolling to us.

FALSE CLAIMS OF DEBUNKING AND NO DEBUNKING PROVIDED AFTER REPEATED REQUEST FOR PRESENTATION.  That is trolling if you can not demonstrate the central points you have clearly debunked.

This is very deceptive and certainly net negative shit posting on your part. I must call darkstar_ to answer for this kind of sponsorship on the rep section if you continue to troll endlessly and give ZERO evidence to substantiate your false claims.

This is NOT the forum definition of trolling and even if it were that does not apply to me and not you


Hence we can see from your

a/ incorrect definition of trolling per the board defintion
b/ your clear double standards
c/ your failure to realize that your comments clearly define you as an imbecile (therefore the truth)


The fact you feel someone can be observably and undeniably bias on multiple occasions, then gets called on that .......then later if they actually operate in an unbiased objective way and enforce the boards rules  THAT PROVES THEY WERE NEVER BIAS is the "brain fart" of an imbecile? start to get that now?

You are an imbecile. I know this correct and observably accurate definition of yourself does not meet with your own self image but I am helping you see the truth. I have correctly called you an imbecile and demonstrated why you are an imbecile. You see those are examples of your stupidity.

Now bring our central points that you can observably debunk and clearly demonstrate are incorrect with out doubt,  then you can call us an imbecile, and also if we repeat them again as being true you can call us a troll.

See how it works now?

Love how people can come here screaming shut up troll, keep your brainfarts contained with ZERO observable instances to support their claims or accusations. THEN cry bullying and trolling when we correctly define what you have said as the words of an imbecile and the evidence is there in your face. haha

So okay, let's DEFINE trolling in a TRANSPARENT WAY and ENFORCE IT EQUALLY ON ALL MEMBERS.

We believe the board rules regarding trolling are the most OPTIMAL for the forum. If you want to debate a different definition of trolling then you ask them to put it in the rules and it must be applied to ALL members equally.



oieoie or whatever you crap user name is.


Present the NONSENSE specifically so we can demonstrate you are the one making false claims.

We have already challenged you to present our central points that you have debunked and proven are untrue.  You have FAILED to meet that challenge.

Now oeieie either

1. accept the challenge

or

2. accept we have just debunked your claims and demonstrated you are making false allegations.


hurry up TROLL.

Haha RUNS AWAY .... haha

Present the lies you scamming piece of croatian dirt. You will not because you can NOT.

This is why the lemons flag is worthless... Now lauda says if he thinks you are virtue signalling you get a lemons flag.

Watch out eddie ... lauda says fall in line of get a flag.

Notice how your flags and tags do NOTHING to us at all LaudaM. We continue to post observable instances of your scamming when and when it is on topic and relevant.

Freedom of  speech here to stay.

Sorry if seeing observable instances presented of your own prior behaviors is SUFFERING..


Quick scream trolling ( without any evidence and will not provide any when called to present it) then lock the thread. Be a good little scammer supporter royce777. Lock it now we came to crush the scammers here calling for free speech to be reduced further.

Love turning up at these scammer supporting pity parties ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9FYBjSc3cU

We are simply going to highlight that freedom of speech must be permitted within the rules here full stop. Short of serious hate crimes then there can be no reason to even debate the price Scammers and scammer supporters are suffering at the hands of those that correctly and rightly enjoy punishing them.

eddie13 is not a Scammer like you are, nor a trust abuser, so we feel he should advocate support for it where he wants to.  Regardless of what a scammer like you says about it. Got it now??

Anything he does in opposition to your approval has a high probability of being optimal for all other honest members lauda worm tongue.

What are you gonna do about it scammer?

Nice to see the liar suchmoon who has us on ignore and does not read our posts... is still reading them all haha

I am simply giving the advice I see as the most optimal for this forum and all members here. Sorry if you don't think that is what we are all here for.

If you think he needs to demonstrate he has 800btc also that is for further debate and we are not contesting that at this stage.

However your false accusation of hypertroll has been clearly debunked and destroyed since you have run away from numerous challenges to present the central points of ours that you have debunked and undeniably demonstrated are untrue.

Only in the mind an imbecile such as yourself would that provide such proof. It may demonstrate that they are starting to realize we will highlight failures to delete undeniably low value shit posts.

If it is not deleted then we will be creating another thread to decide if such low value shit posts should be allowed to remain and the report be market bad.

Reminder to you and all others

Please keep ON TOPIC and RELEVANT to the initial post from now on. Discuss the central points and debate them or refrain from posting.

Quoted to demonstrate the kind of attempts to silence debate that would rock the status quo and push for fair and transparent standards for all posters.

I will report that as low value shit post and see what happens.

quoting this to demonstrate the kind of crazy situation that is being permitted here.

Can you present the central points of ours that you can clearly debunk so that you can demonstrate it is trolling.

Failure to do so should result clearly demonstrate that you are given a warning for false accusation of trolling.

This entire TROLLING trolling is getting crazy.

People like the above moron just blurts out false accusations based and reliant on prior false accusations LOL

Then a total strawman to end with.

Knowingly proliferating false and incorrect clearly debunked information is trolling according to the board rules. Is not the same as your final strawman.

Chipmixer must be called to recognize they are sponsoring scammer supporters and imbeciles that are not trust worthy at all. This will be our next focus. These shitposters like the above idiot, should not be humiliating themselves in public for btc dust.

Yes, you are fighting with some of the most foolish and clearly double standards deceptive members here. Tman for example is an undeniable auction scammer, self confessed trust abuser, implicated in extortion schemes and yet all his pals here including nutildah a self confessed scam facilitator are here to punish you for making what they insist are false claims.

This is the issue with this forum. You can not have people that are confirmed scammers and willing scam facilitators for pay punishing others it simply does NOT WORK.

I mean in the context of their own actions nobody would claim your actions should have a red tag or flag. However if they were all squeaky clean and the context was that ANY ACTIONS that could be demonstrated as PROBABLE high risk could get a warning then that would just be how it is.

The onus on them would be to demonstrate how probable the high risk would be. Cases like this are kind of impossible to prove because you could have huge reserves of your own to make sure guarantees. The point about conflating bitcoin key with this api key could simply be adapted on your part for extra clarity to the investors if they wished.

This is the problem with the trust system ONLY type 2 flags and above have any kind of objective standards that must be met. The rest is just down right now to the discretion of a bunch of undeniable scammers and scumbags who's own actions introduce a context of acceptable behavior that makes pretty much anything acceptable. On top of that their discretion is dependent upon their own reliance of income from competing projects. The entire thing is broken below type 2 flags.

So there is nothing you can do at all except point out the double standards here and hope for objective standards be introduced for the entire trust system. Even though should that be introduced I think the standards will always be developed that demonstrate a warning could be sensible for claims of huge % returns that are guaranteed.

I think a slight rewording and removing any guarantees ( although you may have reserves to make those) and a slight tweak to the description of bitcoin key /api key thing and THEY would have NO grounds to put warnings on your project.  

Something like:  based on past trades we think it is likely you will get x returns in future but no guarantees.
and the bitcoin/api key specifics drilled down on

Then you can certainly ask for the red and flags to be taken down. I would rather you blast them for their double standards and clear personal scamming, but that probably will not immediately or even long term be best in your specific case.

Even without guarantees most people are so hopeless at trading they will likely put a little bit with you to see if they can get some returns anyway.

Just read all of that and if you see clear issues then bring them up. I am simply saying what I think is best for you at this point and those that will use your bot. I think the results look interesting. I prefer to do research based trading myself after talking with the dev teams but that is time consuming and you need to be friends with several developers to get some kind of useful feedback to compare. These bots may be using some kind of system to gain % that I have no understanding of, so I don't know how successful they can be longterm.

Seems almost racist to make a fuss or raise "objections"  because he is " apparently" white.

What is up with you low functioning dregs. You want the person that has the most to lose if they scam you. Hence the best reputation.

I often find that those screaming or implying racism are the most racist of all.  Just because they are "darker" ( same goes for any tone) skinned they feel they HAVE to have positive discrimination their way LOL or it is racist haha.  That is racism don't yall know it...

Most times I analyse people screaming racism, their claims are bogus and clearly racist and insulting in the first place.

Forget about it bozos everyone should get treated according to their personal deeds/merit. No special treatment for having darker skin or any other colored skin.

Although darkstar_ needs to start actually doing some work of his own and research people not just rely on the broken and gamed metrics he seems to place so much faith in  it is insulting to compare him to legendster.  Legendster is a low functioning drooling low life. The very notion of using him for anything relying on trust would be insane haha.

Prove using objective and fair standards you are better suited to the position than others or stfu.

Improvements 1. Punishment for False accusations of trolling

Since this is a clear rule infraction, apparently punishable by a ban and since there is a clear and sensible definition of trolling " continuously proliferating conclusively debunked and incorrect information as true"  

Since also that it is quite easy to mislead the reader when many "highly merited" and " high trust score" and " high rank" members simply scream trolling to undeniable, independently verifiable observable instances as an attempt to discredit or throw doubt over their validity rather than attempting to debunk these instances ( which of course they realize is impossible).  

Then surely such a blatant and flagrant attempt to mislead and in many cases place in danger the reader should have a punishment.

So certainly in the case where the information and statements are undeniably true ( they relate to specific documented behaviors conducted on this forum and are independently verifiable) are presented and another member states they are TROLLING or in other words claiming these are conclusively debunked and UNTRUE. Then we need to take a more responsible role here in ensuring these people that attempt to prevent the truth by screaming trolling should be punished so that they no longer use this tool of deception.


One should be REQUIRED to present the EXACT and PRECISE piece of information they are referring to as trolling and provide a clear and conclusive debunking of that information. Once they have conclusively debunked that information as false. Then after that point it can be called out as trolling and reported to mods for a punishment.

Any attempts to discredit central points other than public and fair debate should be prevented. It is clearly sub optimal and in many serious cases dangerous to the reader.

Perhaps a 6 month signature ban for any person that tries to discredit observable instances as trolling would be a sensible start. If you want to claim a person is trolling (in relation to behaviors/instances documented in black and white on this forum) you must be able to conclusively debunk the information you specifically call out as trolling.

This would need to be a CONCLUSIVE and undeniable debunking. An observable instance can never meet the sensible criteria of trolling it is impossible. It could be off topic or irrelevant ( that would need to be considered) but it can never be called be termed as trolling. Certain members need to be taught that screaming trolling in response to undeniable independently verifiable observable instances is not acceptable and is indeed deceptive and in many cases deliberately so.

Notice Lauda the undisputed king of scammers and extortionists + shady escrow + laudas front man SUCHMOON = THE MOST VOCAL about crushing free speech??

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0

Notice how this undeniable scammer has tried to crush those that whistle blow on his prior deeds has tried to use the trust system itself to silence them??

Suchmoon that fat slob who we have continuously destroyed in public debate also crying for it to come to an end??

They are only interested in preventing the TRUTH being spoken.

We issue the challenge again BRING ONE CENTRAL POINT OF OURS YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE IS INCORRECT

This forum CORRECTLY terms trolling as continuously proliferating INCORRECT or conclusively debunked statements as TRUE.

Lauda being a scammer who uses the trust system to attempt to silence whistle blowing is UNDENIABLE.

Suchmoon being a retard who keeps touting the merit metric as valid after stating " good poster"  and " bad poster " are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria  is UNDENIABLE

Suchmoon making claims such as

It is foolish and incorrect to state that some of the 99.87%  members of this forum are capable of making posts as good as some of the posts of 0.13% (top 200 merit holders).


The undeniable scammers and their supporters want the truth to be silenced whilst they get on with milking this board for all the best rev streams.

Sorry NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

Debunk peoples arguments and statements in public and demonstrate they are untrue, or get back to hiding under your fucking rocks you scum bags.

We own you and meta board now. Start to notice how we will remain on topic and relevant (within the rules) but make sure your VIRTUE SIGNALLING and hypocritical bullshit is called out at every single opportunity or when and where we like.

Debunk any point we have just made ......haha oh wait you can't

" see more trolling" - no examples of central points they can debunk
" see more lies"  - no examples of central points they can debunk
" see this is exactly why we can not have free speech" - no examples of central points they can debunk

Never will you see these scamming dregs DARE to get specific and debunk and central points we make.

Notice how suchmoon is always found back lauda??  notice how suchmoon tried to stab theymos in the back for asking for some people to exclude that undeniable scammer from DT?  scumbags the pair of them.

Freedom of speech is paramount to this movement, only proliferating conclusively debunked information should be moderated (outside of the off topic and irrelevant) ...that and serious hate crimes that is it. Everything else is for public debate and should remain.

You want to stop people making statements that fall within the rules - then debunk those statements conclusively and just hammer that quote it each time.

Crying for bans, ending free speech, trolling, mod bias  =  weasels all trying to hide their past.  Read about them and the reasons they want free speech prevented here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0

Thanks mikey for helping support what we said.

Bitcoin did revolve around this forum 7yrs ago pretty much and this is still really the center of the crypto movement. Your story is rather peculiar..so although you knew about bitcoin years ago, you did not buy it when it was cheap because you didn't want to join the board and contribute then but rather you just wanted to " get what you want and leave"?  back then(whilst others were single handed forcing huge scams to offer 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offers to the board or fighting to introduce fair launch protocols or making people into millionaires) but now you decided to join and spam chipmixer based on some gamed and cycled merit score then they ( real achievers)  can not point out the obvious that most noobs are fools that have achieved nothing except ass licking scammers here and proving they will support their scamming  actions and make excuses for their undeniably financially dangerous behaviors.......for what reason exactly??  As we said most "self made" legends are non achieving scammer supporting sig spamming moronic scum bags.  SELF MADE = nothing burger noob. Of course feel free to prove us wrong. We are not aiming that at you specifically but since once again you wish to wade in and make some strange comments then you have involved yourself.

If people have been here on this forum since 2012 ish (or known about bitcoin for years on end, but didn't join due to the forum layout haha) then yes if they are not multi millionaires  then certainly they are fools that were either not true believers or have been suckered into stupid alt icos that parted them from their btc.

There are a handful of people that have moved up via the merit rankings near hero /legend that are not total and utter dregs and scammer supporting ass lickers ( only the scammers that give them merits and are on DT of course) but that would be a tiny tiny fraction of those on meta board if any at all.

The big achievers here that made any real differences, are the pre merit legend/heros or were here long before the moronic merit system was sharted upon the members. You didn't realize bitcoin/crypto was a thing and didn't get involved until after the merit system = lol

Good to see suchmoon still making a total idiot of her revolting self  After stating " good poster" and " bad poster" are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria. Is still here making posts that are conflating high merit with good post. NOW SPAMMING CHIPMIXER too haha  no lambos for suchmoon it seems, perhaps a lambo tractor could handle her anyway. Keep spamming and saving your bitcoin dust suchmoon.

When is the thread title being changed ? you can't be " after" the merit system if you had air dropped merits can you?

The largest achievers here are PRE MERIT LEGENDS many of which have hardly ANY cycled merits,compared to the non achieving ass feltching noob lengeds/heros in meta that willingly and knowingly support scammers here.

This is a fair point and one which is undeniable. However, we need to consider that as soon as it was undeniable that he was a danger, he was removed by theymos correct?

The far larger problem now is that, even with undeniable evidence of financially high risk behaviors (multiple counts of)  or even undeniable SCAMMING, there is nothing to say and indeed there is plenty of evidence to demonstrate they are NOT removed, but further entrenched by those they selectively ALLOW to join DT..

The point that DT are now seen as Not essentially trustworthy I would agree with, but only by those that are familiar with meta board. Most hardly know anything about the trust system and take it at face value.
Furthermore we often hear that they give accurate ratings. I mean if they are not 100% trustworthy themselves but are on DT that opens up many vectors of abuse and that their inclusions will eventually entrench themselves to an extent where they are immune to being removed regardless of their actions. There is undeniable incentive to have unreliable trust ratings where DTs are caught out in financially dangerous behaviors.

It is solving one issue but creating a host of other issues including crushing free speech and removing all accountability for DT behaviors.

So to say it is an improvement is not something that really holds water. Crushing free speech is far more important than saving the very most greedy and very most stupid from themselves.  Anyone using the trust score metric at face value is still taking a huge risk and the glaring new issues and problems the new trust system opens far far far outweigh any real benefits.

I would say the most ironic thing about bitcointalk is that  " default trust" is full of undeniable scammers and scammer supporters and that they are able to give negative trust to those that whistle blow on their actions.  

If that is not ironic , nothing is.

Which part of

You are deliberately defending and attempting to excuse an UNDENIABLE scammer (which you will not even deny because it is impossible), You are supporting and EVEN CLAIMING he is one of the most trust worthy members on this forum.

Which part of that do you not understand is

Undeniably financially high risk behavior??

Even more amusing you are QUOTING THE WORDS OF ANOTHER SCAM SUPPORTER who was crying because A REAL SCAM HUNTER forced their dev to acknowledge their scamming and offer the entire board a share of a  2 000 000 000 USD compensation offer.

Haha so supporting scammers and scammer supporters is becoming a bit of a theme for you I see?

Thanks for not running away and rather launching into MORE ad hominem speculation of the age of a member you on top of the speculation that you believe we are the same member.

Thanks for undeniably confirming in the post that you are a scammer supporter and excuser. Given the observable evidence you have willingly provided there is no way to refute/deny this.

Keep dredging back to 2014 in the history of REAL LEGENDS with REAL ACHIEVEMENTS and you may find what suchmoon and all the other goons has missed. That evidence of some financial wrong doing ( that does not exist)

Imagine if you dug into the past histories of those scammers you are supporting....spend your time more wisely fool.

When people succeed at things in their teen years that others can not achieve in their lives ..... they are not going to look up to them especially when those demanding respect are undeniable scammer supporters .

You have no credible or reasonable explanation to rewarding and excusing undeniable scammers. If these " own standards" you have allow that then you should have red trust and not be on DT.  Undeniable.

Nobody with any kind of  knowledge here considers chipmixer spammers here to be the best posters.

Chipmixer sig spammers are predominantly SHIT POSTERS and low functioning CORRUPT dregs. There are a tiny handful of reasonable Chipmixer spammers but the best posters on this forum would NEVER SPAM SIGS here.

Just because you likely are far too low functioning to realize most of their spurious garbage is net negative that is no reason to feltch your garbage all over the place. We have challenged plenty of chipmixer sig spammers to present their best original thought inspiring posts for analysis. Most ran away. They are just backscratching corrupt scum who lodge themselves on DT and cycle merit and trust inclusions.

@ iamsenko or whatever...

CHANGE THE TITLE if you are not really going to make it AFTER the merit system. You can not say AFTER the merit system if you were airdropped ANY merit.

You need to have joined AFTER THE MERIT system right? or did not receive ANY airdropped merit.

Although it is hilarious to see SELF CYCLED noob "Legendary" or " heros" seemingly dreaming they are some kind of superior breed ....haha you do realize MOST of the REAL achievements here were made by premerit legends that have hardly any of this crappy cycled merit? Look at all the big developers, REAL scam hunters, etc  all old members that hardly have any cycled merits.

I mean how SLOW and RETARDED would you have to be to not find out about bitcoin for the first 7+ years hahah.....

self made = dumb shits who were too stupid to realize bitcoin existed for years on end. ...... well done dummies. Thanks for coming 7 years after the party started just to claim only you guys are the smartest and best because now you can feltch, beg and spam to get some bitcoin dust that we all got for 100x less.

RULZ legends

LULZ legends