No where it could be seen that Adioliver or Fazlur used the address 0x9, all along it was used by me. 0x9 and 0x3 are being used by me.
There are way too many coincidences for these transactions to be random  And even if I cheated bounties, why would I just cheat 0.184 eth and 0 003 eth?
I've seen a lot worse done by people for a lot less. And I didn't know that sending some eth to someone makes them there alts (noted).
It does when the transactions, joined bounties, post activity times and ETH addresses all coincide with each other. I can't see any 100% proof showing that I ever used alts.
Doesn't matter. Apparently, the behavior that your accounts showed was enough to raise suspicion and deem you untrustworthy to at least two DT members, which is why the trust system exists. Now that the accusations have been made, the ball's in your court to prove that these are not alt accounts of each other. Perhaps you can send a staff member of the forums a message to provide proof that none of the accounts have matching IP addresses? I dunno, it seems pretty apparent to me, but hey, what do I know. I'm just a random forum user *shrugs* |
|
|
|
1) None of the profiles applied to any campaigns or bounties with the same addresses.
That's not why you were tagged, though. You were tagged for having multiple accounts participate in the same bounty campaign, and then having funds transferred from ETH accounts related to the multis to the ETH address that was previously associated with your current account. There is an outbound transaction from @Adioliver's recorded ETH address ( 0x2425736D0764A630bc011C6118d3d01DdbF79470) to a recorded ETH address ( 0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73) that you've used in the past, as can be seen here: 1. BTT Username: Sasuke102001
2. ETH Address:0x9bb968440878783811ecf303523c35b7643a9c73
3. Telegram username: @UchihASasukee
4. Date Joined the Telegram: 4th February 2018
The same is also evident with @Fazlurkhan.kz's recorded ETH address ( 0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e) having an outbound transaction to your recorded ETH address. Stating "Just one transaction with each address, no frequent transactions that can raise suspicion." is not enough to reduce suspicion. All it takes is one transaction to take place in order for suspicion to be aroused. There were TWO transactions (one each from two separate accounts) that took place from those individual accounts to yours. You got caught. Deal with it. |
|
|
|
Can I advertise merit as reward for using my referral link? Basically it's qualify as helpful member activity.
Referral links to external sites? No, don't do that. You'll get negative trust on your account for doing so, as this would be considered gaming the merit system for personal gain. That is in no way "helpful member activity". |
|
|
|
I love all of my cute forum users. 💓
That's not fair to us ugly users, though. #uglylivesmatter
Theymos isnt active because he is busy atm,he might be having problems in his personal life,he might be in heaven right now ,or any places where you can imagine,the great theymos doesnt care about us,he already abandoned this forum a long time ago when the DT members take in charge,do not expect theymos to hear your moaning because you wont get any response.
This literally made me  more than the original post.
Can any OG member or staff or moderator answer the following question? If posts are reported in sections that don't have mods, how are those posts handled? Do they go to a global queue of some sort for other mods to handle these submissions? If so, then would it be beneficial for users to report posts in these mod-less boards, or would their reports be pointless? |
|
|
|
|
What mining projects? Are you implying that you own mining equipment and can generate freshly-mined Bitcoins? Your service is more expensive than existing reputable and trustworthy mixers, so what alternative benefit do I have to using your personal/manual mixing service?
|
|
|
|
ah come on i was drunk at that day. who doesn't has his crisis days?
Oh come on. Your argument is invalid. It's like me getting drunk and getting into an accident where I kill the victim, and then I tell the judge "Ah come on, I was drunk on that day! Let me have a second chance. I won't do it again!"Sorry, but that's not how consequences for your actions work, mate. |
|
|
|
1. negative trust i got was about supposed merit trade,
i was just asking weather its possible to exchange merit donations, didnt knew it was illegal, the mods should here think:
This is absolutely false. Here is what you wrote verbatim: since merit is impossible to get in this forum, even if you write good posts.
why dont we just exchange sell it to each other.
i have 22 merits i could give to someone if he then gives me 22 merits in return.
i doubt on the viability of this merit system.
regards
This is not simply asking a question. You are proposing to engage in shady and untrustworthy behavior in order to swap your merit. With that said, you didn't get red-tagged because of your supposed merit trade, you got it because you showed untrustworthy behavior. Regardless of whether merit trading is "illegal" here or not, offering to trade your merit for someone else because you "doubt on the viability of this merit system" is very shady and goes against the very purpose of why merit was created. THAT'S why you get a negative trust. You, yourself, laughed at the fact that merit-exchanging was "not possible to be legally exchanged" as can be seen here: actually I also want to approve your plan, but merit can not be said to be legally exchange, merit only given to those who make / post about something useful for forum
not possible to be legally exchanged? hmmm, sounds interesting in a forum around a currency that cannot be legally exchanged in many countries of the world sorry but i have to laugh at this, (not you and your post its just how the world is crazy)  You made light of a situation that was implemented to improve the overall health of the forums, and now you want to whine about getting a red tag because of your actions? Remember, you had the freedom to write whatever you want, and you chose to display yourself in a manner that appeared to be shady and untrustworthy. I agree with the negative trust ratings left on your profile. |
|
|
|
Yeah, this is a big fat nope...  For anyone reading this, please never ever trust a site that will handle any amount of (crypto)currency without a proper security certificate. This is the very least that any developer should do to protect its users, and the fact that this site is not secure should be a big fat warning not to trust this site with your bitcoin. Be cautious. |
|
|
|
Are you this Tedy? The Tedy that made the website promising to release the entire FJ database to the public?  Holy crap, you're right. I remember this futile attempt by this user to exploit FJ. Didn't the day come and go without any leak of any information that this person allegedly had? What a tool. The best thing to do is probably just to ignore this fool. |
|
|
|
I just wanted to update this thread to let you guys know that @digaran has allegedly resigned from his position as a merit source:
I'm not sure he ever was a source. He sent ~200 sMerits total, which for all his posturing is way too low for a source. According to theymos' formula he would have received 175 in the "airdrop" and a few more from other members. Probably just another one of his jokes. You know, it sounds like your theory could be true. He says one of the reasons he resigned was because he was sick of having 0 sMerits all the time. In a lot of threads, though, he claims that he submitted his resignation letter to @theymos. When he was (allegedly) a merit source, he would boast it loudly. While I can see him trolling everyone, I don't know if staff here would allow him to troll to that level?? I dunno... And I wonder why the number of merit sources dropped from 80 to 79. |
|
|
|
|
Oh hell no.
Have you ever been on a chatbox when mods weren't around? YoBit? C-Cex? Poloniex? FaucetGame?
It's filled with nothing but trolls and spam.
Who would be responsible for moderating the chatbox? While in theory, this would be a pretty dope feature, it would be abused immensely by shitposters spamming their ref links and airdrops.
An alternative may be to allow a chatbox only for Legendary members?
|
|
|
|
|
I received an email and a direct message from two separate users in my referral network that had PayPal payments reversed in the past few weeks. One of the payments was made as a "Goods or Services" payment while the other one was a "Friends or Family" payment.
I'm bumping this thread with the hopes that at least one person will view this thread and save themselves from getting scammed.
|
|
|
|
I just wanted to update this thread to let you guys know that @digaran has allegedly resigned from his position as a merit source: As of this moment I'm no longer a merit source. there was too much drama and clearly I wasn't trustworthy enough. I was unfit to represent this forum and the community. I have resigned.
Another super-funny "joke" by digaran: He may be "joking", but I also think he'll pop up a Hero account when someone is willing to pay $2000 for it. People have received red trust for less. Additionally, @digaran's "joking" has ultimately ended up getting him red-tagged by @marlboroza, who's negative trust became default negative trust after he was included in the DT2 network. As seen on digaran's trust summary: No one who would take money to remove negative trust from scammers and cheaters should be trusted:
"I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback."
referencing this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg36165900#msg36165900
Justice is served. |
|
|
|
|
I can understand why these types of threads were moved... I think it's now gotten to the point where merit threads shouldn't really be a big deal anymore, whether it's giving them away, awarding them, or complaining about them. I haven't really checked out the rest of the Meta or Services sections just yet, since returning from my brief hiatus, but if these boards are starting to show less whiny threads about the merit system, I'm all for it.
If this means that legitimate review threads like yours, @bill gator, had to be moved as well, then I guess I'll simply accept that it's a small sacrifice to make to ensure that the boards are properly being moderated.
I'm find with having my Challenge being based in the Games & Rounds board, I suppose, but I'm not sure that I entirely agree with it being in the "Gambling" section.
Either way, I have no major objections with the new homes for these types of topics.
|
|
|
|
Bump. So, perhaps another batch change to the source members, at some point, but might include both the addition and the subtraction of source members.
Apparently, digaran resigned from being a merit source. Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3436932.0All the more reason to be replaced by @LoyceV! I've been semi-afk for a few weeks now, and if I may be honest, I'm quite surprised that LoyceV is still not a merit source. I'm curious to know why, as @bill gator has briefly touched upon above. Either way, my endorsement and vouch for LoyceV still stands. |
|
|
|
|
Hey all, been a crazy week, but I'm back for the weekend. Unfortunately, I'll be unavailable next weekend, so I'll START the next round that weekend (Week of May 13). Thanks for being patient, and I hope this serves you enough warning and notice if you'd like to partake in the next round!
I will be closing this thread for now, and will reopen it on Wednesday, May 9!
Thanks again for all of your patience.
Note: All the participants are allowed to wear the signature of their choice while the campaign is paused! No worries!
|
|
|
|
Bump. I would like to join the other top-merited users of all time in this thread in endorsing @LoyceV as an excellent choice to become a merit source. It's kind of awkward, honestly, to see certain merit sources (well, just one) voicing their particular methods in how they disperse merit while highly-criticizing others' methods and insulting them in slanderous ways. All the while, @LoyceV is sitting patiently twiddling their thumbs and undoubtedly sitting on a list of posts that are waiting to be merited  Do the forums a solid and make it happen, @theymos! May I just reference this previous post and add that the user that I referenced in said post has since jokingly offered an account for sale for $2,000USD? Joking aside, that behavior is very shady. All I'm saying is that @LoyceV is being passed up for being a merit source because at least one spot is taken by a douche like the one I referenced above. Just sayin'. Make this man a merit source already! |
|
|
|
How did your alts drop to -1?  We're all still here. It's because I've been absent. I'm back, bizznatches! Well, at least for today and tomorrow, which I'm taking a full day off for myself. @DarkStar_ please feel free to adjust your alt count properly due to my return. Oh, and count me out for the LN testing. I'm curious to see what Amazon announces first (tomorrow, hopefully). |
|
|
|
Another week and a half has gone by, and this account is still working, and it's still uninterrupted! I use this account for several hours a day and listen to all kinds of genres and radio stations. Can we make it a full month on this single account? Stay tuned, and let's find out!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
