That is because Vegas is already well known for its casinos and gambling platforms, but if the case is if there are people that could live with just playing online gambling, I bet there's probably none. Because the technology nowadays could be very strict to their system, they might not show any potential exploit of their gambling platform for the player to have something to take advantage to. To make it short, it is quite impossible for a person to live with just gambling unless that person is efficient to transform his gambling activities and make it as a vlog that could teach many people here to earn some side money.

Would it really need to involve the family matters when gambling in cryptocurrency? Because gambling is one of the ways we can spend our bitcoins and it doesn't necessarily considered to risk to much in gambling. We have funds allotted for playing and with a righteous mind, I consider every cryptocurrency enthusiast as intelligent and knowledgeable beings, in this case, I believe they will not pursue deciding to risk the money intended for their family matters. My advise is to only spend what you think you can afford to lose. Meaning to say that just spend a very small percentage of your funds in gambling.

But for me this will not affect the operation of bitcoin, as long as people are still utilizing it for their own purpose, and decentralization is always met, then bitcoin can still be considered useful.

Though, with practical purpose that could replace the function of fiat, I think what we can get here is more, in which other people could be involved in a sense that they could be convinced to use bitcoin as well. Meaning to say that we aren't just using it, at the same time promoting cryptocurrency to be widely accepted by the people.

Looking about the topic, I think it depends on what purpose we have for such a reason that we need to spend too much budget for a bitcoin movie. If we are to state facts and make the video informative, I think a movie will not be the most suitable to do it. Since we can create a documentary which in face needed not too much fund to make, and can deliver a very informative contents that will show and tell the world what bitcoin is. But for a good market adoption, it is enough for other movies to show that they have their characters paying using bitcoin. With a repetitive showcase of how bitcoin can be use, it can surely be imparted to the mind of the people will induce great market adoption.

I think the case here is not the large groups that could basically control or manipulate the price of bitcoin. What is important to determine decentralization is the freedom of individuals to control their money and spend it with their own purpose. In the first place, the security of bitcoin and the main characteristic of it is still there which is to use a currency without any third parties that will interfere or will serve as a mediator for their transactions.

Actually it doesn't just take times, it takes the proper time when to invest. And investing right would not be the right idea because bitcoin's market price is in a crucial part for me, once it breaks the 7000 dollars support level, it could lead to more market decline which will be the time where we, short investors are waiting, what we just need to do is to stay awake in the market or to set an alarm for us to see how the market will behave and to guess the possible dip it could reach.

One thing you should consider when investing is to spot the right price based on your market analysis, because if you really want to earn profit in trading, more profits will depends on how close you buy the dip.

I feel its quite not appropriate to expect too much from bitcoin at the moment, in the first place, we could see the market is too volatile and we couldn't blame the market price because we are the one that influence its change and rate. We have the chance and power to trade, buy and sell bitcoin, and it is upon us to think of possible ways we could help bitcoin for adoption.

If we think bitcoin is undervalued, then we should consider buying bitcoin and hodling it rather than just try to earn bitcoin without really contributing to the market price of it.

That is in fact the major reason why, but still there are some ideas we could do to integrate cryptocurrencies and the government. In the first place, it is not really necessary that cryptocurrency should be centralized and should be handled by the government. I've just think of some ideas that maybe they could have their regulation on the local exchanges that their country has. What if they try to incorporate the exchanges to banks? Where people could choose cryptocurrency as their option of storing their money in a sense that banks will be the one that will serve as the exchange and people depositing money should pay the banks for taxes in exchange of their funds to be transferred to cryptocurrency.

Some of the first encounter with bitcoin consists of positive and negative sides. I would like to share first the negative.

As the bitcoin becomes an emerging technology, of course people are too excited on its capability in the market. As well as some people who are inclined with illegal activities, I've heard an information from a  fried about a site that utilizes bitcoin for sure, offered by services and products. With that, follows my impression about bitcoin as something good people would not want to use.

Followed by some torrents sites I've viewed that has their bitcoin logo accompanied by the address that seeks for some donations in BTC. From time to time, we could see how bitcoin is finding its true value, and as of the moment, bitcoin already becomes a widely shared currencies with positive impressions from people around the world.

I just thought of an idea about the what you stated regarding worldwide collapse, could it be possible that the reason for this is bitcoin itself? Then the main correction in the market will happen with bitcoin itself, because as of the moment, many government do not want the adoption of bitcoin, and people are also stating that they don't want to be held by the banks so they want to have and be their own banks. In that sense, if people will not utilize the fiats that they have, it can induce a huge collapse of their financial stability and the reason is because of bitcoin. Though, I highly believe that bitcoin will also be the reason for them to get back their financial stability as well.

Upon the invention of technology and the blockchain, I do really see how the banks reacts with this. Basically, the first thing is that the government will not show the support to cryptocurrency and sometimes they block it to their country for people to still utilize the banks. But this is in fact has a deeper reason why. We are living in a country where we need regulation to make our economy developed. The centralization of our money in banks do greatly a big part to help us have infrastructures where we could benefit from, and the only problem is the how we could incorporate the cryptocurrency. Because in the first place, they will not ban crypto if they didn't see threats on it. So, if we are to show them how to use crypto, and they develop a good understanding of it, then we could be our own bank supported by them as well. And the banks that we have right now could find their way on how to still operate despite of the innovation.

To satisfy the issue, rather than sending bitcoin to address even in QR or copy and pasting the wallet address. If we already sent an amount to that particular address then we should take into consideration that looking on the transaction history and making a transaction will be more secure on it rather than inputting the address again and scanning the QR. In other ways, the developers should also consider making a payment profile to easily send bitcoin to particular address with just one click without risking on some clipboard scams and hacking.

Basically sometimes we need to be the one to initiate an information for them to know bitcoin instead of them just freely knowing it to the social media sites that could turn out to be negative when the information that they could get is based from frauds and scams occurred online. For me, the initiative to gift them even with just a cold bitcoin wallet such as cards that contains bitcoin is already an effective way. Especially if we are to give it to them during Christmas, it will be imparted on their mind that they received something unusual, and because of this, their knowledge about bitcoin scams could be turn out to a nice present and a bright future for bitcoin as well if ever the recipient becomes curious and starts to use bitcoin as well.

Unless if they will go ahead and invest to create satellites that are meant only to be a mediator to strengthen the signals just like in a basic router and network systems. There are those we call the bridges and signal amplifiers that could be use if the distance is quite too far enough to still make the transaction faster and efficient.

But in the first place, why would we need bitcoin and crypto outside of the planet? For me, we should first focus on developing and enhancing bitcoin and crypto system here before we start to implement it outside of our vicinity.

By the way, I like your disposition about your hope for bitcoin to be one of the most valuable currency in the world. Moving on, fiats actually isn't failing or in some words, worthless at all. Basically, to accumulate bitcoin, what users are doing is converting their money to Bitcoin and I see, most people are seeing bitcoin as an investment platform and not really an effective payment option because of some reasons that we already know for sure (Trans fee). Despite of that, Achieving a huge amount like that seems to be impossible as for me, it takes all of the currencies mixed together converted to bitcoin to hit the goal. And not all of the country's government do really welcomes crypto in the first place.

Btctalk name: Polar91
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=947291
Rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 3399
Windice username: Polar91
Wear appropriate signature: I will add once accepted
Wear avatar: I will add once accepted

9 - Polar91

Actually, as long as it's listed in a registered exchange, even though it's not the top one or top two then it's completely fine. A lot of traders have different biases when it comes to selecting which exchanges suit for them. On the other hand, partnering with various exchanges for IEO projects can certainly give more chanes to be successful.

Perhpas you haven't tried it yet though. It's a good strategy to make multiple gambling site accounts in order for you to maximize the potential of making profit. If you're only using one account and the house edge isn't that favorable much to that account, then there is no something you can do but to stop. Meanwhile when you have alternative accounts, you can simply switch to another account and experience the different output that the house edge gives. This is simply a stratgey and there's nothing wrong if we don't use to believe if it's whether effrctive or not as we have different opinions.

This is non sense if the project is really scam. Bounty manager has nothing to do towards the kyc approval and bounty distribution. Thus, we really have to be smart in choosing which bounty is worth it to participate in and as much as possible we should avoid the projects who are requring kyc because our privacy is valuable and it can't paid by any value unless you don't have dignity.