Accepting Bitcoin transactions for a seller doesn't imply he's holding Bitcoin and doesn't reveal anything about the amount of Bitcoins he is in possession. Sellers who doesn't like volatility or who doesn't want to keep accounts in Bitcoin, will exchange bitcoin payments into fiat money as soon as they can and won't leave one single satoshis in their own accounts. So if you think sellers accepting Bitcoin are all Bitcoin holders you're wrong.

With such a bad reputation it's sad to see they are still listed on Google, with no warnings and they even have an Android app hosted on Google Play. Google should ban them, along with all social medias platforms, they would certainly be forced to close their doors soon after a move like that. Regulators do not lack imagination in inventing measures against cryptocurrencies users but don't bother to do anything against blatant crypto scammers.

May I ask what will happen precisely if the base reward fall below 1 sat? Freebitcoin will stop the faucet or they will only allow users to claim faucet rewards every 2hours (or more)? Another solution would be to let people claiming decimal of satoshis even if they can't withdraw them at the end, but it would force the platform to update all user's account balances, and AFAIK there are several dozens of millions of them.

Don't hesitate to copy and paste the text of their emails or messages next to the links of your screenshots, as it's easier to find it back and to quote it. In addition picture links will likely be broken in several months/few years later.

Their email thread is very clear indeed, they've obviously told BS to you and they don't even bother to apologize for that. While, again, we are not talking about $40 or even $400 here. I have no words. It's worrying.

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/02/24/Y5jlg.png

As it has been said above, the situation is unfortunately quite famous here. Since there are doing exactly the same thing with larger coins like Dogecoins whom they allow deposits without displaying any warnings and block withdrawals.
Some people are comparing it with Yobit but Hitbtc is worse since Yobit doesn't allow deposits when a wallet is in maintenance and doesn't take inactivity fees.

Je pense que ça peut aussi bouster l'adoption de Revolut, parce que n'ayant pas de compte chez eux, ca me donne bien envie d'en ouvrir un, rien que pour avoir accès à cette fonctionnalité, qui ne me servirait surement jamais puisqu'on ne peut pas placer d'ordres d'achat et que les ventes ne semblent pas (encore?) possible (seulement des achats instantanés visiblement). Le prix auquel Revolut vend ses cryptos semble toutefois plus intéressant que ses concurrents d'après la photo en illustration de l'article.

Tu exageres un peu là quand même, un smartphone ce n'est pas la même chose qu'une carte je trouve. Une carte tu peux la laisser dans les mains de la personne sans problème, voir lui donner si c'est une grosse transaction, contrairement à un smartphone. Et puis tout le monde n'aime pas avoir de wallet crypto sur son smartphone, il faut donc penser à prendre une photo du QR-code de son adresse dans ce cas-là et s'assurer que la photo n'est pas floue et que le QR-code est bien lisible(c'est capricieux parfois). On peut aussi trouver ça plus élégant et plus "pro", en plus de la commodité, de présenter une jolie carte avec son nom plutôt qu'un QR-code sur son smartphone.

Oui mais même si elle assure qu'elle ne reçoit pas les clients chez elle, et qu'elle travaille "en indépendante" comment être sûr que c'est bien vrai et si ça l'est, qu'elle ne changera pas de modus operandi un jour, si j'ose dire? Donc malheureusement oui, je pense que ça peut être compliqué pour elles si elles sont honnêtes sur leur profession et si les propriétaires voyent majoritairement les choses comme moi. En revanche pour les banques, ce n'est pas acceptable si elles ont des difficultés avec. Un compte bancaire n'est pas le bien personnel du banquier qu'il loue au client.

C'est super d'être ouvert mais moi-même perso, j'y regarderais à 2 fois si je devais louer mon appartement à une prostituée. D'une part à cause de l'image que ça donne vis-à-vis des voisins et de la co-propriété. Ils vont se plaindre de nuisances, que ça donne une mauvaise image de la copropriété et que ça diminue sa valeur, si ils le découvrent. Et puis surtout, elles  bossent rarement toutes seules, y'a la racaille qui gravite autour qui ne donne vraiment pas envie de faire d'efforts, si c'est pour se faire emmerder par un petit mac de cité qui se prend pour un caïd, non merci, j'évite de côtoyer ces gens-là pour mon bien-être mental.

Je trouvais qu'on avait eu un peu de répit le mois dernier justement, avec un mois de Février pas vraiment chaud mais visiblement ailleurs dans le monde ça se passait différemment et le thermomètre continuait sa course qui semble inexorable. Certains affirment qu'il ne se passera rien de grave à l'échelle de notre génération, d'autres prédisent un cataclysme imminent, on ne sait pas vraiment qui croire. 

Ils disent cela eux, mais moi je pense que c'est simplement parce que c'est un site de jeux et qu'ils savent qu'une partie des utilisateurs qui déposent leurs fonds aura forcément envie de jouer avec sur le site. Ils ont dû faire leurs calculs, c'est 5% donnés qui doivent leur rapporter plus de 10% au final, je suis sûr.
Et puis c'est 5% si tu holdes des tokens(Fun) sur ton compte, sinon c'est 4.08%.

Je fais surtout du "betting"(paris) dessus mais il n'y a pas besoin de faire quoique ce soit pour gagner les interêts du placement tous les jours. Après comme je dis je ne sais pas si le taux de rémunération vaut le risque encouru de laisser des fonds sur ce genre de plateforme même si elle est assez ancienne(2013) et qu'elle appartient maintenant à une société clairement identifiée mais offshore (au Curaçao).

Je le soupçonne, ainsi que les autres cryptogourous des reseaux sociaux d'en rajouter exprès pour faire du buzz. J'avais relevé cette perle de sa part il y a 2ans. Il ne faudra sans doute pas patienter longtemps avant de voir fleurir à nouveau ce genre de prédictions surréalistes avec le halving qui arrive à grands pas.

Game 1:  26, 9'
Game 2:  26, 9'

It depends of the law and the regulations of the country where it's happening but usually debts can be inherited and the children can only reject the whole legacy if they don't want to have to pay them. That could be seen as unfair for many people but I think it's a protection for lenders and a better guarantee for borrowers who have children. Lenders are rarely responsible of the death of their debtors so it would be also unfair for them to lose their money because of that actually.

If the game is really random and uses a RNG with a strong entropy, so-called patterns found by users are very likely to just being repetitions due to chance. Because even when the randomness is high outcomes with some repetitions are not less likely to be drawn than other outcomes without any repetitions. They are just part of the game and we shouldn't being confused by that, especially for live games where no digital mechanism is involved. Some bugs can happen in digital games when they've not been enough tested or rightly certified but customers should be aware it's usually against the ToS of casinos and considered as cheating to exploit such loopholes. So they are facing the lock of their account and the seizure of their funds if they really find something profitable.

Yes I agree with you, it would definitely have been a better move to address this controversy with a palestinian singer than to boycott the event or to threat to do it. But if she won it's for some reasons. Many people of the Eurovision's audience are women of her generation or older actually, and many younger ones could have her shape. The lyrics of the song are universal and romantic but they are very feminine too. Her voice and the dancing music are nice. So I think she's very likely to get many votes if she participates.

Yes for sure, but what is the nationality of bookmakers' odds providers? Are they americans too? Because for some reasons they now think another time that Lily Gladstone has more chances to win the Oscar than Emma Stone and than few days ago while they think the opposite for Emma Stone.



Yes his reaction 2 years ago was very confusing. But her wife has been very very sad when she lost her hair from what I heard and maybe she tried to commit suicide or something like that, so this situation could have been very disturbing for him.

I don't understand what Bitcoin have to do with NFT and why a hype from would affect its price. IMO NFT hven't triggered any Bitcoin bull run. Nowadays the current bull run is mainly driven by the ETF FOMO afaik and the halving narrative. Most bulls and bears are waiting the halving event to take their profits or to place big short orders. Layer2 network and dApps using them is the current blockchain technology era but I don't think Bitcoin price has anything to do with that.

Satoshi Nakamoto is very unlikely to still be alive IMO. Intelligence services of some big countries like USA, Russia or China would have already found him if he is not protected by one of them at least. In addition, he would have left some legacy message to Bitcoin users and humanity IMO and send his Bitcoins to some charity fundation or a poor country if he doesn't want to use them. Hal Finney had been very badly ill before dying why he did nothing for him if he's not himself Satoshi?