Playing it safe would be better, just split the prize and avoid being too greedy. Or if you're kind enough, give a bigger portion to the other participant which would be lame because both of you played the game. Rerolling might even give you both tendencies of losing and no one to take home the prize, right?
Enterntainment purposes indeed but it would always be better to have something than to gain nothing, in every scenario.If it is an activity wherein all players would enjoy, then that would work, but this is just a 'pick a number' game, there won't be fun from rerolling and such.

If it is dice game, algorithm is the only way. There would be a pattern but won't be easy to figure out because of probability in combinations. For normal players, it is just a game of luck. If some of you are somehow having patterns or strategies to come up with a win, I guess it won't work most of the time. Only developers of the game would be ble to determine possibilities in dice games because they're the one who made it. It won't be called gambling if patterns are easy to be found out, and ofcourse the house won't allow that.

I think casinos would simply not allow their business to lose in any way. House always win right? Faucets and bonuses are simply for promotional purposes . They might seem to be losing in a way that they are giving it for free but that's how promotion works. They are paying people to make them pay afterwards once these people who recieved free money, become interested with what they are 'selling' or offering to the audiences. Maybe not visible to consumers' perspectives but there are gains by doing so. They won't do it if they will earn nothing from doing so, as simple as that.

Im always a fan of pacman but let us accept the fact that he's not as focused as before with boxing. His visions were altered by his other ambitions as a basketball team playing coach and as a politician. He still got the juice or skills indeed, but not as refined as before. Age? possible. But bottomline here is that his odds of winning is not as big as before even on the weighing in phase. So it's a 50-50 on my end, his opponent is strong as well we cannot disregard that.

Power of experience indeed. But capacities has limitations based on one's bodies. But I'm not saying pacman won't completely have a chance to overcome the contender, but for sure he'd have a tough fight this time.

Taking a pause would help. You must make time to kill time without thinking about or atleast lessen the thoughts that you've lost an amount. Some people would continue playing to get their money back but as cliche as it may sound, things could got worse by doing so. Try doing other things that you usually do other than gambling or playing, would be unfortunate if you have no other hobby or leisure.

But prevention is better than cure. Prioritize putting in mind that in gambling, there's no easy way to win. Always regard the possibilities of losing to avoid suffering when expectations are not met. Reflect as well if you could afford continuing this activity because you are free not to do so.

On my case, if his girl friend demands for it, give less; if she did not give more than what he borrowed. Asking for more has a different meaning which could be related to greed. When it comes to his boss, why would he be required to split it? Did that boss contribute for his capital that he used to gamble? If no help was made, I guess his boss is not entitled for that half, much more if he's just using his position.

We are talking about gambling here. There are tendencies of losing, and if that happened rather than winnings, will these people be the same? Possibility is that, they might not.

Influence is a broad thing. But given 'idols' have the power to encourage people towards or away something, there is a high tendency that some people would be affected or influenced by celebrities into such activities. Gambling perhaps is an example; those who are not into gambling could be persuaded to try which means there would be a chance for them to be hooked up with such activity one their attention is carried away. Factors such as trustworthiness (which I deem to be the biggest), could boost the confidence of those who are not really into it. There are many gambling sites to choose from but given someone they know promoted it, it could be something which could make them choose that specific website.

Akaho is a strong contender no doubt. Casimero being a crowd favorite could be both a disadvantage and advantage. Disadvantage if he would be carried away by his drive to avenge his fellowmen who were defeated by akaho (we all know that this contender has a good record consisting of opponents with the same nationality as Riel). It could make him less focused with the fight. While on the other hand, this drive can give him the advantage to be more serious with this match up. Another thing is Casimero's previous fight result wherein it was a bitter end. Will it be a comeback or not? I am ofcourse in favor of Riel with this fight, but considering they are both good fighters, we may see the unexpected. Hoping that it would be a great fight.

Unfortunately, what's happening more often; greed prevails. Winning would push a gambler to play more. Gambler's Fallacy I guess? It would be easy to have idea of such; quitting once you win a reasonable amount to quit, but that would be hard to be honest. A money earned easily is usually spent quickly as well. But ofcourse if you can simply show discipline, it would be much better . It is not impossible in the first place, it is just that such thing is not present to most of us, let us accept that. Money is too powerful that it can alter our ambitions, plans, and ideas.

If players are into KYC services, they should have played with FIAT-Based casinos. Personally, I am against KYC procedures not only in gambling but to most of the online services, because I am anxious that my information could be used to something which may cause danger to me, basically. I do get the point of KYC to those which are mainly for transactions, but in gambling, I guess addresses (cryptowallet) would be enough for a player to send and recieve payments to the gambling site. Personal informations are quite suspiscious even if the gambling site itself is considered trusted or registered.

Utility and Popularity are my two main basis when choosing a project to invest. But for sure there are other factors such as the concept itself, team behind that project, and such. This is crucial especially to newly introduced projects; some would be popular at first but in the long run, there's a tendency for its demand to fall if some factors would be missing or negatively affected.

On choosing a project it could either be subjective or not. An investor may depend to other investors on which is which, and he/she may also create his/her own judgement. Ofcourse it won't always be a winning investment, there'll be loss sometimes or often, and this is where luck may take place.

These are issues present for decades. Keep in mind that online payments are still having problems at the present because of connectivity issues. Also, not all people are 'tech savvy', perhaps how about older people? teaching this technology would still be a problem right now. Bitcoin and other cryptos, indeed, has many advantages but allow things to continue developing. It should be supported by now to counteies around the globe if there would be no potential problems. This technology has a high tendency to be on 'that' phase so for now, be patient.

We never saw Bitcoin being the only token in a bullish movement, definitely other tokens should also be in an upward motion. At the present we are seeing the opposite wherein majority of cryptos are struggling to break margins and barriers. Now that we are already in the fourth quarter of the year, I guess it would be more realistic to view this year end as something not as most of us hoped and expected. Hopefully, early next year would be a better year for this industry. Many factors affected our assumption for this year such as economic crisis and conflict between countries, and this simply shows there are many things that could affect price predictions.

We all know things about this technology and industry in general but is it really an enough reason to 'make it a course' or 'subject'? 'coz I would agree more if it will be discussed on invetment and economy related subjects as a sub-topic but nothing much. This technology is still undergoing growth procedures and developments, so I guess things would be 'wasted' a bit when its 'final phase' has been reached, right? And even if it has reached its peak, I still don't understant its relevance to academe or as a profession. Indeed, it is profitable and it has many advantages over FIAT but the mere fact inconsistency occurs and is present in this technology, we would be exposing people to risks.

Yes it could be learned, that's why it is being pushed to the academic systems but if you're aware of 'Monte Carlo Fallacy', 'innate frustrations of an individual', 'drive for revenge' and such, for sure many people would get this point.

Good thing if the team managed to cope with the mistake. It simply shows how professional they are with their project. But I hope this won't mess their project in general 'coz for sure there will be impressions especially to those who are really meticulous with their prospects.

But I'm a bit curious of how will OP team be able to control the inflation rate and using it as an advantage, annually. I mean, adding token supply could put the value at risk right? (correct me if I'm wrong). I do get the point that low inflation rate could stimulate a balance and healthy economy for a token but I guess it would be better if they will be focusing more on the aspect of attracting investors to theur project first.

Speculation is a part of the process interms of investment. The idea of assuming that its market value would increase in the future is already speculating. Maybe OP means not speculating that much or not putting that much of attention checking its market value.

That's just okay as long as it's your vison as an investor but we cannot put a margin to those who are using a different method; short term investment. We do all have different perspectives but for sure we are all having one goal; to gain profit from doing so.

Definitely not prophecy, but belief.

Actually, based on my understanding, to some believers they do think that investment is like gambling. I came across with a colleague way back 4 years ago when Bitcoin and other cryptos were also at its peak of popularity, before its downfall. I have opened up to him what am I doing to earn extra money and he's against with the idea. But fortunately, he's not someone who would look down on you simply because you have an opposite perspective.

In my case I am also a believer but I do separate religion/belief to other things especially if it will just form conflicts. As long as it is legal, I guess it would be fine.

Good for you then but as far as I observe, OP has a point. AThere are many altcoins in this industry and choosing the 'right' ones is not that easy;luck would also be a factor. If you are making profit from investing most of your capital to altcoins, then that's good, but at this moment, big names I guess would be able to come out alive of this bear market. Most of the altcoins have low market volume which makes it best for short term investments. For long runs, established demand,and volume will be the key player to generate profit at the end of the day and this 'movement' for sure.

Maybe he's pointing out with market movement wherein 'unity' is evident with the investors which is simply normal. Everyone wants profit from their investment which makes the tendency high for investors to move as one based on the market behavior. Perhaps there is a price increase, most of the investors will avoid selling early not because they planned it, but simply because they are all eyeing to a bigger profit. Also, in something which is controlled by demand, the best way to survive or to benefit from it is to move or go with the flow of the majority because quantity is the bottomline. Try moving on the opposite, I doubt if it would give you a better outcome.

In my persoective, the current situation simply shows how unpredictable this industry is. If we would base from the calendar and the past, there should already be an uprise pressure with market price of cryptos because of the season, but what happened is the other way around. Cryptos are prone from factors such as what we are experiencing right now wherein economic crisis is a problem to many countries around the globe which reflects as well in this industry. Whether it will go up before this year end or not, it would be surely hard to tell. The best thing we can do is to patiently wait and cope with market behavior.