You are looking at the drop, but not the increase and that is the problem with the market right now, and all those who didn't made any profit. Sure it went from 40k to 30k if you look at it that way, but along the way it reached 26k and bounce backed to 31k as well. Why not look at it that way?

Why not check out the situation as a good thing and how we failed to go down even further. Not like there was anything that keeps us from going that that much further, we could have gone down that much, but we failed to do that which means that we already found our bottom and things are looking good for us. So instead of looking at how much we dropped, look at how much we moved up.

The only downside of the crypto part is that, if the price goes down, or even stays the same, you will not be able to repay it back on time. Because, you take out lets’ say 10k, and you have to pay 500 dollars for 2 years, which will be 12k when you pay it back 2 years later right? Well, that means first month if the price doesn't change you cash it out and have only 9.5k left, so instead of %10 increase meaning 1k profit, it will be 950 profit.

So, next month if nothing changes you pay another 500 bucks, and so forth and so forth, eventually becoming very little. Hence, you can't just assume you can pay the loan back with your crypto profits.

That is not a trouble neither, if you are willing to lose that money and realize that there is a good chance for it. There are people in this world who gamble, and I mean gamble against the house type of gamble, which we all know is mathematically impossible to keep winning, sure could win here and there but in the long run house always wins because of the house edge.

This is why I do not see a problem with investing into very very very risky small cap stuff neither, only if you are aware that the money you are putting in there will probably not worth anything in a year, if you are aware of that and taking that risk, then why not take it?

That's the point, he is blaming the channel and not the news website. However, clickbait stuff do happen in news websites as well, some places are taking it a bit more seriously nowadays and taking it to a level where it's no longer clickbaity and write good articles, and places like the New York times or so have always been very good, those places have stuff written there like some super academic professor has been writing there for many years, because every journalist uses that type of language.

Still, most of the online world is still using it to get clicks, so even though the news itself is true this time around, the logic stands for general purposes.

What could ever be the connection between the two? Luna crashed because they had a system where they had a coin, which backed a pegged UST and when people started to depeg their UST, they started to use their reserves for bitcoin and any other coin, and when that wasn't enough they printed probably trillions of Luna and used that to keep it pegged which they still failed.

So, their coin which used to worth 80+ dollars just a week or so ago ended up not being worth anything at all. This is the difference and I do not think that it should be really that much of a problem to ETH because there is absolutely nothing similar going on with ETH 2.0 at all.

Plus, it allows projects to get in front of way too many people. I have seen plenty of projects who got attention more than they deserved and also projects that didn't anticipated that much attention even if they deserved.

The first one is simple, it is a horrible project that shouldn't have gotten that much attention and in the end they ended up with nothing at all and they ended up with getting a bit of "hacking" going on, basically an exit scam to just rugpull and leave. Second is harder, they could be legit project, but since it grew too quickly, there are demands from investors that they can't meet with and that causes a lot of problems.

The world we are living in right now have another currency that people do not realize that much as a currency. The follower numbers, that is an asset, which means that if you own an account with a lot of followers, you have an asset. Even if you do not make any profit with it, and even if you do not use it, if the follower number is stable, then it worth something today and due to inflation, it will worth more in the future as well.

So, if you are giving away free signals, then you are getting followers, and those followers grow to be huge eventually if you are any good, and then you can either take ads and earn money, or you could even sell the account if you want to get out.

This is true if you are investing into something that is great. Like for example bitcoin dropped and ethereum dropped as well so if you buy them a lot more right now then you are going to profit on it a lot in the future as well. However, if you end up buying Luna because it dropped so much and even 1 dollar would pay your mortgage levels of hope, then you are going to be upset about it for sure, there is no way that you could profit from this at all, you will end up with a big loss.

This is why you should be avoid buying big coins and you should invest into something that will make you some profit, a lot more profit, that's how you make a profit in the crypto world, not by investing into "anything" that goes down.

Gold is nothing to me, never made any sense to me. It is a "thing" that people gave a lot of value as investment, why not something else? I mean hydrogen is not stored carefully, but that's basically it, they just found something that is a bit more rare and easily storeable and they put some value on it.

Crypto is not like that, you can spend crypto and send it all around the world, sure we did give it a value ourselves but we are using it as well, there is a very limited usage of gold, and when it is used and gone, to a place where we can't recover it, eventually it will be over whereas crypto is used again and again in many different places.

I would guess that the type of risk you take when you are buying Luna right now is so high that, the reward should be that high in order to justify it as well. Imagine the scenario where they are telling you that you are buying hot shit, and there could be some farmer who may want it or not, a regular person wouldn't pay a lot for it, but a few could find some farmers.

This is the situation, it’s a hot shit right now that you should stay away. I personally believe that there is no price that I would spend even 25 dollars on it, I wouldn't really spend any single cent to it if you ask me, but at the same time it would be something very profitable if you do right now or maybe you will lose all of your money.

This is true, because at the end of the day they are doing it for the money. Why would they do it? Why would they suggest a coin? Just because they love everyone and they want everyone to be happy and rich? Of course not, the aim to do this is becoming richer and that path is from getting paid from people.

You could become like that as well, put aside like 10k dollars, start a brand new twitter account, get a good logo or whatever made, or even buy an NFT if you want, and then start tweeting about possible things, news, and then do giveaways, like for example $50 per week at least, if you can afford more like $50 per day that’s better, and do "retweet and follow to have a chance to win" and you will have 50k+ followers in under a year. It’s not hard to be KOL, and they just get paid to do this.

With USA sending SO much, I do not think that these donations really matter as much as we think it does. They had a total of 100+ million from what they claim came from crypto world, don't know exactly where and which coin, but it is clear that they are getting hundreds of times more from nations directly. Just USA is 400+ times bigger than what the regular retail investor in crypto paid for. This is understandable, because the all of crypto market cap is not even 10% of what USA GDP is or their debt is.

This shows that we are still small and have a room for growth as well. Ukraine will do fine financially, it is retaking the lands they lost that will take a while.

Even on the early days it is not great because we are talking about a situation where we are talking about newbies not learning how to trade and only trading what others trade and they have no idea why they are trading that. I believe that the best way to invest is not copying what others are doing, it could be copying "how" they trade and that way you will learn what they care about the most.

This isn't easy but if you learn that then you are going to be trading very well. Of course this isn't the only way to trade, but at the same time if you learn how they pick the coins, then you could pick anything yourself as well when you see that coin hitting those indicators.

Being young means that they do not have to risk it, because they have a lot of time to get rich, but at the same time you are a dreamer when you are that young as well, he needs to find that right balance. Sure, being a dreamer means that you get to dream something first, before you can achieve it but many dreamers end up with nothing, so you should be careful as well.

This is why I believe that the best thing to do at that moment is to focus on the future and dream about a situation where you are super wealthy when you are 50, but still working regular jobs all through your 20's as well. This will allow you to be much better and can wait for longer.

Their "excuse" for such an action is that they could print but they could buy back and burn it as well when all things are back to normal. I do not believe that, I never owned any luna in my life and I will never own any after this neither, it is just not making any sense to me.

I have seen too many people got in with "how much more could it fall" mindset and I have seen them fail many times before as well, that is not the way to go and they are making a mistake. I hope that people will realize their mistake soon and not get in. The team will not buy that much coins from you and you will end up with a big loss eventually, there is no doubt about that.

At this point they may never list it back again. I mean all they care about is the volume, and not having any problems at all. This means that they could end up with listing it again when all is settled and there are no more problems and they can make some profit from the volume.

However, reality is that many people will not be able to trade it too much, they will want to sell and get rid of it if they can, but they will not be able to buy too much, they won't care for it. The printing of new Luna reached to an insane level and I doubt it will ever worth anything ever again, it's impossible to go from few hundred million to few hundred billion coins and stay the same.

DCA is sort of like that as well. There are two ways of doing it, one of them is setting a time and the other is in batches. In setting up times version, you do it like once every Monday, or once every month, or whatever and you do that, which would work, even in daily if you do that because there are times in crypto where even it changes per day, but weekly is much better.

The batches one is different, it means that you divide it into batches (your fund) and then you buy it in batches depending on the price, for weeks if it doesn't move you do not buy, but if it does go down then you buy one more batch, if it goes down more you buy one more batch.

Are you serious? I haven't seen too many people getting their bank accounts get hacked, in fact I have never heard such a thing before whereas I have seen plenty of crypto projects get hacked constantly. I do not agree with your point of view, I believe that you are wrong about that. I still prefer custodial wallets with crypto inside, over banks with fiat inside but the reason for that is crypto vs fiat not wallet vs bank.

If we could have banks that can hold our crypto, I would put my crypto into my bank account because I am 100% certain that the bank would secure it better than binance or any other exchange and even custodial wallets could.

Unfortunately media has been always purchasable and that is the issue. Rich people could pay whatever they want and get some narrative going. In my nation we have the same narrative for a while now, one person is saying one thing and claiming that nobody else said it when there are others who have been saying the same thing for decades now.

Because, that person paid the media to make that kind of news now and that caused people to think that they are seeing what they should and all others are wrong, when in fact all those others have said it for nearly 50 years now. So all in all, media could be bought, and doesn't matter if it is regular tv news, or twitter accounts.

That moment was basically the moment people gave up about Elon, sure there are some who are holding doge or even shiba and hoping that one day Elon would start pumping that again, which is a weird thing to hope for considering that we suppose to be decentralized and not depending on some whale to help us earn some money, you have a better chance sending your address to Elon and hoping that he would pay you, because why would he care about you in either way?

But, when he stopped pumping it, all the people who are smart, realized that this guy has no idea about crypto and he should not be relied upon and gave up caring about whatever he says.