Who said the case wasn't investigated? Now you are literally making up things and attributing them to me instead of arguing what I actually said. That is called a strawman and is a common logical fallacy. Furthermore it is a clear demonstration of your bias, because you aren't even critically examining any of the information that is presented before you project your own concepts of what you think it is upon it. I said in other cases the information is made public and plastered all over, and in this case they barely released any information and the media was quick to bury it, which is very unusual considering how hard they beat the dead horse of any mass shooting in almost every other case.

Your link doesn't prove anything. I never said witness testimony is infallible. I did however say errors in witness testimony are usually related to mistaken identity or mistakes in relatively minor details. Stress doesn't make you hallucinate entire teams of armed men. Furthermore there are now multiple witness statements coming out that state there were other shooters, I guess they are all hallucinating huh? You are so obviously terrified of having to adjust your world view to incorporate the possibility of this new information. You are looking for any excuse at all to dismiss the mounting evidence that something other than what was reported happened because you can not handle the cognitive dissonance. You aren't examining or arguing the issues, you are summarily dismissing them.

You are correct that it is very difficult to think of universally accepted ideas about what the generic properties of logical truths are or should be.

If you want to understand how it can potentially be done you have to dive into the topic at a far deeper level then the simplified summary I linked above.

This would probably be a good place to start if you have an interest but fair warning it is challenging and dry reading.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-truth/

This will answer your question.

Logical truth
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_truth

The quality of your replies have been declining lately. This one in particular was especially poor.

What I have demonstrated above is that the quoted remarks of Jesus in Matthew 22 are logically true. This truth is derived from logic and does not depend in any way on an argument from authority Biblical or otherwise.

Discussions of the historical evidence of Jesus are interesting I am sure but entirely unrelated to what I wrote.

I am working with this author at this moment. Have already received several articles, no issues.

If I was you, I'd not rely on any third party services and would implement my own email provider using a cloud or something like AWS SES. It takes little technical knowledge to set one up. Anyway, below are the one's I think can help you pass that ICO Block.

https://www.sendinblue.com/
https://eu.getresponse.com/

I think that it would be nice if you send some surveys to your email subscribers and ask them first.You could use Surveymonkey or Google Surveys.
Based on their answers,you could segment them into smaller email lists,targeted around certain topics(if you can do it with your email autoresponder service) and provide more relevant content to the different niche email lists.

did he spoke about the anglopedojew or he is with them? Maybe was, and then didn't behave properly... who knows... it's an american, so first question, is he a pedo?

Modern science is a development of religion, religion which has been around way longer than science.

The development of the wheel was not a modern science development. More than likely it was done with the ideals of religion behind it. Certainly the people who developed it were way more religion minded than science minded. Yet science uses the wheel in one form or another in just about everything it does.

Science is simply another branch of religion.

All you are saying is falsehood and 100% falsehood. Religion is simply the thing that people do to comfort themselves because the future is scary otherwise. Science is the thing that people do to change their future. Science theory is the thing that people believe in when they can't find the answers in science.

In other words, science theory believed in is religion. Religion without science theory covers far more aspects of life, and is way more reliable.

That's what I have been trying to tell you. Faith in God is the thing that shows truth that is most important. Faith is science shows some truth, but there is a whole lot of falsehood in science... like, science theory... like, Big Bang and Evolution Theories.

Doesn't look like it to me at all.

I don't think that the bull market has even entered the major stages of bullishness, fear of missing out, and euphoria yet. Prices have rose a crap ton over the last 3-4 months, yes, but nowhere to the scale of 2017, or what I'd expect to be the peak of the market.

If you look at this chart, I think that the more likely scenario is that we're currently in the first bear trap.



Markets will consolidate at a lower price before testing the $10k once again. I remain bullish for the long run despite people's concerns about Libra, because ultimately that has nothing to do with bitcoin's fundamentals.

Back in 2017, around November, there was a massive drop from 7700 to 5760 or so (25% decrease), you know what happened two weeks later? Price went up to 11300. From 11k it went down to 4-digits again, especifically 9300 (18% decrease), and what happened next? We touched 16k. We saw similar behaviour all the way up until we touched the last ATH.

So, these massive price swings are common in a bull run. Right now, I don't expect a massive crash, quite the opposite, i'm expecting the price to go above the 13k barrier in the upcoming weeks. In the event that the price actually continues to go down from here, fine by me, cheap is always good.

I went way farther with your point than you said. The point of my point was to show you that everything that you suggested is the standard way that life works, not something that is unique to anybody or any group. You and I live by faith all the time. The difference is that I know wherein my faith is placed. Yours has a lot of holes in it, showing not that you don't have faith. But that you don't know the source of your own faith.

You can create a simple algorithm with a number of questions to see the interests of people as you can ask them for cookies files to help you improve the quality of news you provided to them.
I do not like the news that talk about analysis and opinions of others or advertising new ICOs, but a link to important news in twitter or facebook with the price, for example, when the price rise get the most important news that led to the high price and so on.