What a great sign! Glad we have so many random comments being made to bury the true progress. Never had this when I was trying to get BeatleCoin off the ground  There is no progress, there hasn't been any progress for months. You need to stop the charades and lying to people. I really want to see the potential in this coin but it's simply not there. You have donated to carry out these improvements (as do many of us)? Or maybe you expect rain down from the sky? I will gladly donate when we have actually contacted and contracted a real programmer. Start by doing so and if not satisfied your money back! |
|
|
|
What a great sign! Glad we have so many random comments being made to bury the true progress. Never had this when I was trying to get BeatleCoin off the ground There is no progress, there hasn't been any progress for months. You need to stop the charades and lying to people. I really want to see the potential in this coin but it's simply not there. You have donated to carry out these improvements (as do many of us)? Or maybe you expect rain down from the sky? |
|
|
|
|
Personally I think cinnicoin is another victim.
Those who were deceived us battbot, rynomster and that has been all the hosts has been cinnicoin.
You may be criticized for lack of communication (although I did not understand that in a forum where all the anger was directed to it), but I think it was honest and it is showing following us.
I think we should all sing a mea culpa and start a new stage of construction under the direction of cinnicoin and codecaffeinecode.
regards
|
|
|
|
So one guy has offended him.
He may not even be active anymore, yet every Cinnicoin member is effectively being held to randsom.
I say we pay someone, then they will have an obligation to finish the task. It is not nice or right that one poster ruins it for the rest of us. I do not appreciate being held like a hostage because of some idiot that posted bad/rude comments to our coder.
Codecaffeincode, we need Cinni to forge ahead. Either you're willing to work like you have for us or you are not. You are fully entitled to make your own decision, and no one can blame you as you are doing this unpaid. I know it's not nice to be insulted when you're working for Cinni. However, we cannot just sit around hoping you get an apology or a post deleted. Cinni is bigger than individuals here, and the community/cinni does not have the luxury of time.
We need to act NOW!!
Cinni members your thoughts??
Codecaffeinecode work commitment and suggest _schild create an account for donations that will be paid to go according codecaffeinecode delivering updates. The account must be completely transparent to the community. Of course codecaffeinecode must step forward. |
|
|
|
Everyone posting negative content right now is taking the risk to make codecoiffeincode leave us. Please delete.  I do not understand these furious attacks ahoar we have a hope of revival! Why not let us codecaffeinecode show what he is capable of doing? If he does well reward him for it (no one works for free) and if not then we will not be worse than before |
|
|
|
Ah, so these were the "family issues," rynomster. This is where your work for CINNI went. I understand. The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni. Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni: - Instant Messaging UI
- Conversation Grouping
- Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
- More efficient
- BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display
I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin What is certain is that only one who lies you once, will he come to. We lied in CINNI ... |
|
|
|
|
Congratulations on your idea WhiteNotWright!
It seems that the community is moving and putting the money where the mouth.
Invest 30000 fast confirmations.
Txid: fa7e9566d5e5aecc537a09cba9d384abdbf54dd1ca6737868b273f4533f3f5d8
Invest 20000 User Transacctions Know.
Txid: a9b9e44d9574bf95a3cfd8724bb0a34500a7b33a74cd1486a959a4fd57fe388d
I reserve other 100000 (at least) when they start work.
Now the ball is in the court of Mindfox and WCF, I suggest that as soon as possible, I submit we quote and ETA of the request, otherwise ideas like WhiteNotWright could be copied by any other currency and as you may know all the the first set is the winner.
regards
|
|
|
|
|
surfguy72, we must get to work at once!
Nobody doubts that Mindfox here is a great programmer and we pay for their services as is payable to anyone who performs work.
I suggest that you create a start address WC donate now, it will be a motivation to show that this is serious.
A few days ago there was talk of creating a pot of 30,000,000, implying a dilution of 10% which was not (nor am I) agree, but only that each of us donasemos 1% we would have 3,000. 000, that would be a good begining of financing.
Let each one give as he sees fit and post it on this forum (so we know who puts the money where the mouth).
|
|
|
|
It's been decay since launch as expected from pure clone coin. Die shitcoins die!!!
[/quote
If you're thinking that WCs and sell them!
And if you save yourself the FUD here because it will not work. |
|
|
|
I'm looking in the Android market and am not seeing any crypto app with any significant downloads, can someone prove me wrong? I'm starting to wonder if funds shouldn't just be gathered to facilitate the developments previously mentioned
I'm thinking the same thing...let's prioritize one of the other suggestions and move on that for now. It's good to know it can be done, but probably not as important as finding someone to work on the other ideas we have come up with. Currently we have no one to work on new ideas or funds to finance it. If we do not get serious about these issues, immobility eventually affect the currency. Hey Tevayo, We do have some funds saved up, and I do agree with a previous statement on fundraising for development. The WhiteCoin fund address is WdPskLzGkjXkSns3BgkRF5fW5SveTBS7tR with about 650,000 WC raised. I also believe we have a small balance in BTC around .05 BTC. So at least we aren't starting from zero I'll need to see that we are current with any bounties paid for any of the previous developments before we can say that these funds are for upcoming developments. Apart of these funds/funds raised should be to reward those who are working on our current GUI Wallet update. What do you guys feel is the best way to proceed? We can just "have at it" and donate to the the known WCF addresses, or, we could create WC and BTC addresses for specific development ideas. Of course, concurrently, we need to find out what is going to cost what. Hey surfguy72, have been weeks discussing the improvements we want to WC, the reduction of time confirmation with privacy have been the most demanded. I think we should now be more specific and ask Mindfox a quote and an ETA for that. 656000 WCs in the bottom of the WCF is a pittance, and we should all donate more to bring out everything we want, but it seems that people want free stuff done. Or can also be the serpent biting its tail: Do not donate because they do not make improvements or improvements are not made because they do not donate? Anyway we should fix that. |
|
|
|
I'm looking in the Android market and am not seeing any crypto app with any significant downloads, can someone prove me wrong? I'm starting to wonder if funds shouldn't just be gathered to facilitate the developments previously mentioned
I'm thinking the same thing...let's prioritize one of the other suggestions and move on that for now. It's good to know it can be done, but probably not as important as finding someone to work on the other ideas we have come up with. Currently we have no one to work on new ideas or funds to finance it. If we do not get serious about these issues, immobility eventually affect the currency. |
|
|
|
|
It's nice to see something moving in CINNI!
|
|
|
|
|
The main thing now to fix the problems of the wallet, but do not panic because they are the only way problebas running the stake and nobody has NEVER lost a single currency.
Let codecaffeinecode few days to work and show what we can do and if we show that we reward their good work.
|
|
|
|
I can see that we have a strong comunity with a lot of ideas and expectations, a president and VC with enough knowledge to drive the coin and foundation, but we need to have a full time dev...hope could be Mindfox but if he is busy we need another one supervised by him.
I can donate 500k for that and I can found more investors interested in WC but we need a timeline. I think with many shitcoins around, have a trustable coin is our best value.
It is the time to do a great step before depression starts again. We have everything to triumph but we have to improve how to develop the features.
My two WC.
All the best!
Posts by after launching the survey, gather the Privacy Function 2 has been voted by almost all (maybe all). What you think if we start with an update of privacy with the new logo and delivered once we consider the following? It should be easy to finance and (hopefully not mistaken) relatively fast to implement. |
|
|
|
Let's just focus on one of the above tasks. Each time one is completed you will see the price of WC jump. This means it will require less WC to get subsequent jobs done.
However it would be even better if our lead dev was fully invested in WC and not cashing straight out to btc anyway.
1 |
|
|
|
I think we need a poll to see what community thinks about it.
Unfortunately, you can circumvent the IP duplicate protect via TOR or any private internet. We need a coin you can vote with, any out there? here you have one http://strawpoll.me/That would be point #5 - Voting from wallet Edit, here is the list again: 1. Anon - Mindfox said it can be implemented from other work when its tested and working 2. Privacy - Implementation of TOR 3. Review Smart Contract - What would it take, what does a framework look like 4. Reduce Confirmation Times - This could be reviewed now and determined what is required to make this happen 5. Built in Voting App: propose new features, vote from wallet I would like to propose...again...that we are just spinning our wheels on these issues until we get someone (best choice of course being our Chief Technology Officer, Mindfox) to chime in on the specifics of each proposal. For instance, if someone were to say, hey I know this dev, here is his CV...he can do #4...would take about 10 days and cost 250,000 WC, or I know an Android App Dev, he will make an app that will do this and that, would take 30 days and cost 1 Mil WC. That is something the community could get behind. Please understand that these thoughts are not meant to be critical for critical sake, but rather for a deep desire to see WC thrive. We have been tossing around ideas for a couple months now. I would like to see the conversation evolve to a more productive and meaningful place. Totally agree that we need to be more specific when requesting the improvements we want to WC. Democracy is good about asking the people vote for what we want to do, but should not be a burden that prevents rapid decision making. By this I mean that's fine survey, but limit them to a time (eg Sunday), from there we decide what is done, is budgeted, paid and deployed. Of course all under the supervision of the WCF and the Director of Development Team, Mindfox. |
|
|
|
Edit, here is the list again:
1. Anon - Mindfox said it can be implemented from other work when its tested and working
2. Privacy - Implementation of TOR
3. Review Smart Contract - What would it take, what does a framework look like
4. Reduce Confirmation Times - This could be reviewed now and determined what is required to make this happen
5. Built in Voting App: propose new features, vote from wallet
2, 4 and 5 Privacy, reducing time confirmation, wallet android. Also I think we should go for parts and not ask too many things together to turn this into too big a project to comply within a reasonable time. Weather in cryptography is money and I think it would be good first upgrade as soon as possible to give a dramatic effect and show the community and potential investors who are doing things. Once the first installment back to discuss improvements we want. |
|
|
|
Create a superblock 30 million can lead to suspicion and put us under the microscope of potential scams (something that we are now completely safe).
According jarnold, the WCF will present shortly a quote of what it will cost all the improvements we want to do and when we discuss the budget and how to afford the payments.
I am the first (and as I've said above) thinks we should endow the WCF so you can face all the challenges we face, but if we do it may well be worse than the disease.
I do not know why they think it is the big players are not going to engage, when they are most interested in this work.
However, in this we have to engage ALL, large, medium and small.
Greetings.
tell me how 30 million WC held by escrows released only for community approved projects can be a scam? Well, okay let's try the donation route, let's see how many WC we can raise in donations. A superblock is essentially an exactly 10% donation by everyone where each donator is rewarded exactly according to their donation. In other words the most fair form of donation possible. They donate through dilution of their share. I did not say a superblock has to be a scam, I said can be interpreted as such. Those who are already part of the community believe in the WCF, but for WC triumph, the community and investors should not grow exponentially and new investors to think very seriously a coin today and tomorrow 300,000,000 10% more, that leads to think that you can be the next 500,000,000. People need to know what you invest without changes or surprises. Extrapolate this to BTC, you think the thousands of investors think if you tell them now instead of 21,000,000 23,100,000 BTCs now will, I assure you it would be a debacle. The problem with this community is that the mouth is filled want to do things, but when releasing the pasta, it costs too much. I am willing to make a few hundred thousand of WCs, to see how many are willing to do the same (each to their possibilities of course), that SI would be a message that this community is willing to do anything to improve, others are shoddy . |
|
|
|
|
I think we're all excited about these developments. Only waiting budgets by WCF.
regards
|
|
|
|
|
Create a superblock 30 million can lead to suspicion and put us under the microscope of potential scams (something that we are now completely safe).
According jarnold, the WCF will present shortly a quote of what it will cost all the improvements we want to do and when we discuss the budget and how to afford the payments.
I am the first (and as I've said above) thinks we should endow the WCF so you can face all the challenges we face, but if we do it may well be worse than the disease.
I do not know why they think it is the big players are not going to engage, when they are most interested in this work.
However, in this we have to engage ALL, large, medium and small.
Greetings.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
