I probably won't be able to log in the forum for the next 24 hours or so.

For one thing, I had a good opinion of Royse777 before this and would like to get this resolved and remove his tag. I think there are many of you who have expressed a similar opinion.

But on the other hand, my gut tells me that when things like this happen, this may just be the tip of the iceberg.


I read your post history and found it interesting how accurately you predicted how it would all end. But this is a forum, and your word alone is not proof of anything.

Do you know anything about the bounty campaign I mentioned above?

Someone who knows more than me about bounties can help check if what this person says is true or is lying?


The thread in question is this one, I think:

LunaLand FLY ME TO THE MOON [Bounty] 💰🕵🏻‍♂$15,000 in LLN🥳

People who have a grudge against Royse777, like bounty cheaters, can take advantage of these moments to tell lies about her, but also after the last events, I think it's worth checking things like this.

I've already said above whith a screnshot that that form says that people have to previously explain their case in the locked thread. So, I don't know how they are going to do that.

I'm not so sure about that. 99% of NFTs that exist today will be worth 0 in a few years. If you guess the one that will be worth a lot it will be like winning the lottery but chances are you will lose your money.

In this type of NFTs may have more future because if buying a NFT of an NBA team for example, gives you discounts for games, preferential tickets, etc. will have a certain demand because it has a clear utility.

I don't think so. Send him a PM to see, although he's not very often online. I think he's someone's alt account, so if he reads this maybe he'll send you a PM.

I have nothing personal against Royse777, and when I acted in support of the flag and with the feedback, I explicitly said that it is subject to review, as usual.

But I also believe that there have been no more red tags or flags because of the previous reputation and because she has given lots of jobs in campaigns to many people in the forum. In fact, there has not yet been an opposition to the flag nor a neutral tag in her favor.

Closing the Bitlucy thread ahead of schedule, when those who had the problems with withdrawals there were supposed to explain it in that thread before filling in the form doesn't look good to me.

I would like to hear more opinions from DT on this topic, especially from those of you who are more neutral, as it is clear that there are many of you who have a clear empathy for her.

Giving her the benefit of the doubt, I can think that she somewhat got caught in the middle of this.

But I would also say that if this case were to happen with a campaign manager with less experience and less previous reputation she would have a lot more red tags.


I hope this will happen, and when done, let's remove the tags and call it a day.

It looks like it.

Besides, in cases like this, whenever I have seen those we have asked for explanations to blame us, things have not ended well. It is very typical.


I also tagged Bitlucy but it's useless because they are not going to come back here.




If you go to the form you'll see that whoever has a problem first has to explain the problem in the ANN thread, which Royse777 has locked a few hours later.

Was this the thread you were referring to Pmalek?

BitLucy.com 🎰 no more in bitcointalk

It has been locked by Royse777 in well under 24 hours since she appeared this morning.

Moreover, the bitlucy site is down.

Two and a half hours after you wrote the message that I quote, Royse777 has written this:


So it doesn't seem very likely that they will come around here to explain themselves when they are basically putting the blame on us.

On the other hand, Royse777 has and launched another signature campaign.

[OPEN] [banned mixer] 🔥 Signature campaign! Sr+

In which there is a guy complaining:

I think your feeling is wrong.

It is clear that between Royse777 and dkbit98 there is empathy. But all dkbit98 is doing here is criticizing the casino owners and what they said that bitcointalk has become a hostile site. I and many others have criticized that sentence in recent comments as well.

It is not the first time I have seen such a statement, which consists of telling those of us who are asking for things to be done right that it is our fault. And these things don't usually end well.


Have you been waiting for the funds to arrive to you since the end of April?

To you two and the rest I recommend that you read the posts of a profile who claims to know Royse007 personally.


Obviously, this is a forum and anyone could be telling lies, but if in the end this is an exit scam it is very likely that what she says is true.

I doubt if it will be an alt account.

Sure, sure, and the other day you wanted to gamble playing heads or tails in amounts of 50 Bitcoins at a time because you were feeling a little sad.
    
Places where you can bet 50 BTC on 50/50 odds?

Either you were lying then or you are lying now, and looking at your trust page I don't believe your explanations.

I've supported the flag and tagged Royse777. This is obviously open to change if problems are solved, as I did recently in the fairspin.io case.

I don't know much about sports betting but I am interested in the fact that skilled players can win in the long run. I will follow the thread to see how it works out for you.


I think it has nothing to do with martingale.


I haven't stopped to crunch the numbers. Do you mean that based on the bets and odds you will bet €5,350 and the expected profit value is €5,950?

What happens is that with such low odds you will have to place quite a few bets of that kind to win any bet. And then you have to take into account the variance. I hope you have a good bankroll to withstand several rounds of this type without winning.

I have been saying this since the beginning of this year, when people were still saying we were in a delayed cycle and would pass $100K this year. I think even Dan Held was still betting on a supercycle at the beginning of the year.

Not until next halving are we going to beat last year's $70K ath. Where we are now we can call it winter or whatever, but great joys we won't have until next cycle.

I also think both are to blame, but knowing this, a casino must put measures in place so that this does not happen, or at least that the impact is minimal, in the same way that supermarkets put measures in place to avoid being robbed, although it is inevitable that at the end of the year a small percentage of items will be stolen.

I thought this in Bilucy's case. It is one thing if you have half a dozen people abusing you, but when you have such a large number that you have to stop operating, it means that you have had bad foresight and bad management.

Royse777 hasn't logged in for the past two days and so far there is no news of withdrawn funds reaching the players. I have had a look at the thread and I will bring this quote:


I doesn't look good. Even if this is resolved, it seems to me that the site's reputation will be tarnished.

Those who have made this bill do not understand it. Prohibiting only gives wings to Bitcoin, what really stifles it is to allow it by regulating it extremely, forcing AML/KYC protocols to the maximum and measures like blacklisting, because in the end you help an industry to flourish in a very different way from the original idea of P2P and you end up directing it to centralized systems and censorship which is what suits you.

The many bans on Bitcoin since its inception have not prevented its exponential growth, but the latest legislation and the reduction of privacy mean that the enemy is at home.

Any news? I ask you and all those who are waiting to receive their withdrawals. Normally people in these threads usually protest but in some cases they don't come back to say that the problem has been solved.

There is a thread in the reputation section questioning what is going on and at the moment Royse777 has been negative tagged by a DT member.

I am going to wait a bit, but I see the site is working.

I see a couple of things to comment here.

To begin with, there are those who believe that if you get money in your account by mistake, you have the right to spend it. False. You have to pay it back.

The man in the story has all the appearance of being a problem gambler, and the saddest thing is that he spent what was originally intended for low-income households, but you can see at the end of the news that the authorities have sent them the money back without waiting for the man in the story to return it.

At least the story has had a happy ending, now the man has to pay back the money.

That's simply not true. I created the thread:

Do you think Lightlord behavior is acceptable?

And I can tell you that he was treated rather leniently by the community at large because of his previous reputation. However, The Pharmacist did not hesitate for a second to tag him because he had already done so in the past for the same reasons, switching to neutral afterwards. Then some other members thought the same but in general there was debate on the subject so saying that the whole forum came out for him is false.


That's true


I also agree to have a little patience, because also in this case, unlike Lightlord's, as far as I know with Royse777 there have been no previous problems with withdrawals in casinos in which she has been involved in the past.


Look, if you want to open a thread in defense of Lightlord I will answer you there, since what you are questioning is more than explained already.

As far as I know, there are 4 of us in DT that we keep the red tag. And the one who did not hesitate for 24 hours was The Pharmacist, as I explained aobve.

Going back to the point of the thread:


I've just checked and it's not down.