You log into the SIM Exchange and you'll see your SIM balance as being available to sell as you see fit.

https://simxchg.com/

Whether you said 'a' or 'the' is irrelevant. You absolutely did try to imply that you had the SC Whitepaper because you knew that people were getting nervous about it and your invitation for people to send you their email address so they, "should get a copy early tonight", is nothing but evidence of your intention being solely to give the impression you were already in possession of the SC Whitepaper.

Genuine LOL! That would be mind-blowing.

Dude, you tried to extort money out of this situation. Do you deny that?

There are still truly massive concerns about the behaviour of this coin project and those involved in it, but you've messed up royally trying to earn coin out of it.

Don't even bother. You *are* guilty of trying to manipulate the price. There would have been no possible benefit from claiming you had the whitepaper as a way to flush out trolls.

Very disappointed in you. The issues being raised are valid concerns and you want to use it as an opportunity to extort half a bitcoin out of it?

Shameful behaviour. Your credibility has just evaporated and any possible case you might have had is now overshadowed by this.

Did you ask for .5 BTC to stop posting in this thread?

Yeah, if it's true that's bad form from him, absolutely.

I've reported these posts of yours as being criminal threats.

Did you even bother to think that claim through?

I had responded to a typical post of JudgeCrypto's that contained little but a full quote of the wallet picture, something I had pointed out that he kept doing and Jacqul responded with this:

Ooh, snappy comeback!

So you're perfectly happy with the code being so lazily ripped from Blackcoin that it still has the 'B' prefix on the address?
You're perfectly happy with someone posting that they had the Whitepaper and then, when challenged on it, trying to claim they were 'just wanting to see if their posts were being read'?
You're perfectly happy with the fact that JudgeCrypto accidentally replied to a post under his other account, 'Jacqul'?
You're perfectly happy with the fact that these 'inconvenient truths' are being responded to by rapid-fire posting of an old announcement about the SC wallet, as well as camel-memes?

You *do* know what happened in the original Honorcoin thread, right? The thread that blasted out multiple fanboy posts for page after page when their criminal fraud was exposed?

None of this worries you in any way?

This is getting creepy now, JudgeCrypto aka Jacqul, is going all Rainman on us.

I saw this very same behaviour in the Honorcoin thread when it was busted open for being a criminal fraud. Sockpuppets posting multiple internet meme distractions to try and bury the facts.

Ouch! I did not know that. My concerns are over the patently obvious use of multiple accounts to repeatedly post massive pics and quotes, plus the fraudulent claim of having a Whitepaper that could be emailed to people. But that sort of issue is definitely as, if not more, disconcerting.

I really hope this coin isn't yet another fraud, I do, but I have to say that the signs so far are not encouraging.

Cue multiple massive-posts to continue trying to bury this topic.

So you respond to my pointing out of your disingenuous distraction-posts attempts, by posting more obvious-distraction-is-obvious posts?

Man, you're too clever for me Judge, or Jacqul, whichever you prefer to be known as.

So you're JudgeCrypto?

Whoops! Oh dear, little too quick on the quote button were you Judge?

Oh, look, he did it again.^^^^^

Goodness me, you really do need to brush up on your law. Slander refers to a spoken statement which, as far as I know, hasn't occurred here and Libel requires you to demonstrate that the act was intentionally malicious. Also, if a person can demonstrate that they had a good reason to believe their, claimed libellous, assertion to be true, you'd struggle to find any court in any jurisdiction to swing in your favour.

Anyway, has anyone else noticed how JudgeCrypto keeps posting nothing but massive quotes of things posted some time ago in order to drive the pages away from 'difficult' subjects? Would that not add to your concerns as a holder of SC's?

Please do quote which law, in which jurisdiction, legislates for shit-talking on the internet?

Until, and if ever, Crypto exchanges are regulated and licensed with the same stringent requirements as fiat markets, it isn't illegal to attempt to manipulate the price, unfortunately, otherwise people like the aforemention, "I haz Whitepaper . . .kidding!" user would be hauled before the authorities to face the consequences.

But, please, by all means, do continue making bold assertions that are baseless but sound authoritative, then you'll fit right in with most other forum users here.

Ah Dualism, yes, because that's been proven, right? . . . .right? . . . or, maybe, just maybe . . . there are so many people indoctrinated into theist delusion that they can't actually consider that it's about as proven as the invisible pink unicorns that watch over us in 'the quantum', along with elephant wings and garage dragons.

The 'mind' cannot exist without the brain. We exist within the brain and, when the brain stops working, we stop existing.

Dualism, or the belief that the 'mind' and the brain are separate entities leading to the 'mind' possibly continuing after death, is wishful thinking, that's all. There isn't any objective evidence that has ever suggested otherwise.

There's a whole lotta playing pretend *real* hard with myth and magic believed to be true because, well, you were raised that way. A belief in dualism is no different to a belief in Zeus or Thor, or Ra, or any of the currently 'believed' gods, it's just a long-running game of pretend.