I know that this is a big topic these days and that is why people talk about it a lot but the reality is that we are talking about two of the basically same things in different lanes but they are not that much different. Sure eth is expensive and bsc is cheaper, sure eth is decentralized as possible while team still can make changes as long as people agree (which everyone does) and bsc is more centralized with validators at BSC.

However if you look at the bottom line they do the same thing and they work for the same thing, they are not that much different.

There shouldn't have been anything that would make these two things too much far apart. Even if people talk about them like they are different things, market is not acting like that and by the looks of it people are trading and using them like they are the same thing as well so I do not see the point of comparing them.

Those saying that this is the right opportunity to accumulate bitcoins, how sure are you about that? What if it’s not going up again anytime soon and keeps dropping after you might have accumulated? No matter what it is going to be, we all still have to be very careful with the choices we are making at this point. If you feel you should buy now, still do so with a little amount since you’re not 100% sure whether the price will boom immediately they are done with investigating the accidents they are talking about.

No, I guess people who are having belief in fate kind of things, should try only gambling. Because, if they win then they will enjoy and if they lose then they will simply move-on after blaming their fate.

But, people who feel their own responsibilities may not simply move-on on occurrence of losses. They will get frustrations and may try to recover back their losses which usually end up in gambling addictions. So in my opinion, people who believe into their fate are the most appropriate people to gamble.

I guess that you are not fully understanding how martingale approach is working. It is a strategy which will ensure that your loss will be recovered in next attempt (or next to next attempt) and then you can get back to your original way of gambling. Single roll is the core part in martingale strategy as well.

But, when you are losing a bet then you will get chances to balance that losing bet in martingale approach. If you are winning then it will remain exact as "single roll".

Yes, that final ball six in CSK innings might have been breaking the morale support in some sense. There were plenty of chances for KKR to win the match if they would have played Deepak Chahar carefully without losing five wickets inside the power play. Moreover Russel's wicket was game changer as he was expecting a wide but ball clipped the leg side bail.

Mumbai pitch is really a heaven for batters. I just need a T20 matches with high scoring from both the teams whereas in another IPL venue Chennai is doing exact opposite; always low scoring match and 1st batting side is somehow able to defend that small score as well.

I don't think it is necessary to get panic and to react to FUD if you are holding bitcoins. Bitcoin holders must react in a way to make use of FUD to buy more. Honestly I have seen some big investors who are all always searching for cheaper prices and buying at every dips. This kind of people are definitely looking for FUDs to happen , it seems lol. I am a bitcoin holder and I never think about taking profits among all FOMO and FUD.

That must be really a wild and surprising speculation in my opinion because your talking about 10 years from here. I agree and I can get your insight on this but we need to consider lots of factors here for that.

Because I'm seeing most people are giving more important for their social life rather than investment opportunities; unless otherwise people are changing their perspective on investments, I'm not seeing what you are saying is not going to happen. People are prioritizing social life more than earning opportunities but that must change at first hand.

I do not think that $4k capital of OP is 100% of all their money. I understand that they plan to invest some $4k to cryptocurrencies but that is not all their 100% of networth; anyway you got a good suggestion, I must appreciate you for caring another fellow bitcoiner even you are also relatively new to this crypto space. Even cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, I will encourage anyone if they want to invest their all 100% capital in bitcoins only. Yes, I believe into bitcoins and investing with it will not disappoint if plans are dealing in long term.

For long term holders, there will be no such pain of waiting patiencelessly for targets and then after exiting regretting for missing out another round of peak price levels. But for that you must hold highly reputed coins only then you can stay calm without bothering whatever fluctuations happening in-between times. There cannot be any best time to sell and forget cryptos. It is going to be part of our life. We may sell and then buy again and then will wait for another target and I am sure this is how all bitcoiners will spend their rest of life.

From where you got that they got victory against SEC? Could you please link me; I am just another observer of XXRP still somehow missing those information.

If XRP is cleared from the charges by SEC of USA government then I guess that this must be a right time to buy more XRP. Already ripple corporation is known for frequently bumping and dumping XRP for some reasons and they may come this time with more wild plans. So, get ready not to miss any such big round of bull rally.

Tron is still missing to get into bull run, right? Even tron is recovering from below 100 satoshi and now trading around 240 satoshi, I doubt tron will get into a new ATH within this year. Probably Justin Sun is waiting for bitcoin to end its bull run and might have plans to pump later on.

I read SEC has cleared XRP but I am yet to read things on that. I guess until we have concrete information on XRP related to SEC issue, I guess it would be much better to stay away from XRP. When we are having lots of other options, why we need to consider the problematic XRP right away?

Well, that’s nice, but having a 90% selling fees? Don’t you think that’s going to discourage a lot of people. Okay I know that you’re doing this because there are lots of people who usually complain about coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum and the rest of them dropping a lot of times, but trust me all those are just making all those noise because they are losing money.

If you introduce this project to all those people they will be avoiding it because first of all they are not sure of whether it will be having a strong use case, and also people want to be able to sell their coins whenever they want to sell it without having any form of obstruction.

If you are talking about bitcoins then that might be on 2018 and not in 2017 as we were into stronger bull run in 2017 (I agree there were some months in red even in 2017 but overall that year must be a good year for this crypto space and very rarely people might have got panic).

Yes, when you are learning out of your experience then definitely you will get good control over your emotions. We must need to understand the cycle of market fluctuations because it is definitely happening on some pattern; only for the people who never find time to understand that kind of pattern will definitely go emotionally failed.

That I have been thinking for years.

It may be the time to switch to new smaller units to keep attracting investors through psychological way. Stocks are doing in the name of "splitting" (if a stock is valuing $2k then all holders will have 2x shares through the process of splitting but value will be reduced to $1k so new investors will show more interest).

There were lots of initiative to make smaller units to be made popular but I guess unless otherwise bitcoin foundation is not showing interest, nothing will go across all exchanges and to all bitcoiners across the globe.

You mean some pairs of coins are not being traded against BTC or ETH but against USDT? I have not come across such thing in my crypto exchange; all coins are being listed with BTC pair and most ERC20 tokens are getting listed against ETH and some pairs are getting listed along with USD pair and only after that alone some devs go for listing with USDT pairs.

I guess these are preferences of devs as exchange will charge them for each trading pairs. So, not sure it is an option for easier value giving to token or new coins if it is directly paired against a stablecoin.

Not like it’s not possible it’s not every altcoins in the market that goes the same direction with bitcoin (having correlation), most of them don’t have any correlation with bitcoin at all, they are just on their own lane, so there is the possibility of these coins increasing in value even when bitcoin crashing, it’s normal thing and it happens like a lot of times, we see it happen.

Although that might be the same for coins like Ethereum, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash and all of them that moves the same direction with bitcoin.

It has just become the normal thing for most of you people to be asking whether it is over whenever there is a decrease in price . How do you expect the market to be at this time, to just stay stable at that rate of $60,000 until it is read to climb back up again!? You all know very well that such thing is not going to happen in the market.

There are going to be times when there will be slight dip in the price, and this is why as a trader or investor you have to always prepare yourself, if you know you’re going to be getting all emotional at times like this, then why not sell when the market was going all the way up to $64000?

Ponzi is basically a scam all around, it guarantees income and that's why it is a ponzi, nothing in the world could guarantee you any income and that is why ponzis will always stay a scam, even if you managed to get everyone in the world which will make that ponzi trillions of dollars high, you will eventually run out of money in existence to keep paying these people. This is why I think it is obvious that we should not be really looking at bitcoin as a ponzi. Why? Because nobody guarantees income to you, it is like gold, is gold a ponzi? Does anyone guarantee you income with gold?

You do make a profit but it is not guaranteed, it is just a valuable thing that gets more valuable over time and that's it. Bitcoin is the same as that, it is a good thing that people do not really understand bitcoin just yet, it allows us to buy bitcoin at cheaper levels until everyone gets it.

It is weird to see the dread pirate roberts name there, it is really weird because we all know what happened to the real one. However those multipliers are huge numbers, winning with x1000? That is insane, it would be profitable (most probably) just to win that alone, but getting a prize on top of that? Forget about it, you are going to make a huge profit for sure. I think these type of competitions are not just marketing, sure it is mostly marketing, so you can get more people involved with the casino as well.

However I also believe that it makes life more entertaining for the existing customer base as well, someone who would play here anyway, would be happy to join these as well, so it would make duelbits a bit more entertaining so that is going to be another part of these competitions aside from marketing. Although maybe making things more fun for your current customers could be considered marketing as well I don't know.

Curry is playing at MVP level once again. Dude missed so many games this year and he still ended up with the highest total games and highest points per game at the same time. You do not do this without being one of the best offensive players eve in the league. I do not remember any player being as great as him on offense, I know Lebron is great, I know Kobe was great, I know MJ was great, all of these players are great but I still say that he is the best scorer we have ever seen.

MJ had other stuff, Kobe had other stuff, Lebron has other stuff, but Curry is a pure scorer that can never be found anywhere ever again, dude is just surreal and he should even get MVP but warriors suck so he will probably not get it, most of the time MVP is given to players who plays in a team that is highly ranked, barely under 5th seed and usually goes to first seed most of the time.