I think there is some bug with hashrate report. It can't be so equal 15:14:45 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A31:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:44:31 LastShare: 00:00:28
15:15:00 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:14:39
15:15:00 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.713 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:44
15:15:00 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:18
15:15:00 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 52C 49% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:43
15:15:00 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:14:59
15:15:00 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A31:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:44:46 LastShare: 00:00:43
15:15:15 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:14:54
15:15:15 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:59
15:15:15 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:33
15:15:15 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:58
15:15:15 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 54C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:14
15:15:15 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A31:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:45:01 LastShare: 00:00:58
15:15:30 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:09
15:15:30 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:14
15:15:30 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:48
15:15:30 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:13
15:15:30 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:29
15:15:30 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A31:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:45:16 LastShare: 00:01:13
15:15:45 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:24
15:15:45 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.713 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:29
15:15:45 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:03
15:15:45 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:28
15:15:45 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:44
15:15:45 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A31:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:45:31 LastShare: 00:01:28
15:15:53 GPU[-1]: Accepted 0 ms. xzc.2miners.com:8080 [54.36.109.3]
15:16:00 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:39
15:16:00 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.713 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:07
15:16:00 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:18
15:16:00 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:43
15:16:00 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:59
15:16:00 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A32:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:45:46 LastShare: 00:00:07
15:16:15 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:15:54
15:16:15 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.713 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:22
15:16:15 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:33
15:16:15 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:01:58
15:16:15 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:16:14
15:16:15 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A32:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:46:01 LastShare: 00:00:22
15:16:30 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:16:09
15:16:30 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:37
15:16:30 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:48
15:16:30 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.688 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:02:13
15:16:30 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:16:29
15:16:30 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A32:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:46:16 LastShare: 00:00:37
15:16:33 GPU[-1]: Accepted 0 ms. xzc.2miners.com:8080 [54.36.109.3]
15:16:44 GPU[-1]: Accepted 0 ms. xzc.2miners.com:8080 [54.36.109.3]
15:16:45 GPU[0]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 51C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:16:24
15:16:45 GPU[1]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.713 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 48C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:52
15:16:45 GPU[2]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.700 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 56C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:03:03
15:16:45 GPU[3]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 52C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:12
15:16:45 GPU[4]: 1.447 MH/s CClk:1.726 GHz MClk:4.206 GHz 53C 50% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:00
15:16:45 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 7.214 MH/s [A34:R0 0.0%] Uptime: 00:46:31 LastShare: 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
my target is 1EUR  to the end of the year Seriously? Without development for months I don't think it will happen. |
|
|
|
TrailingStop
It's seems to be a driver problem. 5GPU rig that earlier easily run with -i21 after I updated to latest 419.67 now can't run even with -i15. 26Gb is too small for it.
Oh- I didn't know that. Good investigation. Thanks a lot for sharing! Please also note that I have made a change for the intensity values from 2.1.19 to 2.2! All that happens on 2.2. Installed 417.71 and again that rig work with high intensities. P.S. With 2.2.1 all can work with i18 (at least they start and mine a bit). Regardless of driver version. Strange |
|
|
|
|
TrailingStop
It's seems to be a driver problem (or CUDA version). 5GPU rig that earlier easily run with -i21 after I updated to latest 419.67 now can't run even with -i15. 26Gb is too small for it.
|
|
|
|
Intensity depends on number of cores (SM) on the GPU, maximal thread-count and memory. So if you have 1060/6GB only the intensity should be all the same - it changes only if one or more of the parameters changes. Memory-requirements is in first line coming from the driver (as a result of the block / grid size). Do you have the same driver-version installed on each rig? Also OS might be an issue, but I haven't verified that. So if you have one 1060 that works with 21, all of them should work with 231 as long as the driver and OS is the same (and the virtual memory settings). a cuda error is not always a memory issue. I print this text because in most cases the virtual memory settings are really too low - but this is not alwys true. Can you send me a screenshot with the error-message. I have some information in the message (the numbers) that tells me at which point in the program the problem happened.
Thanks.
Yes. Same driver 417.1 on all rigs. Rig with 5GPU has 4Gb and Win10 1709 Rig win 8/9 has 8Gb Win10 1803 So actual difference is only 1709vs1803. 14:51:04 Miner: GPU[7] use intensity 17, Gridsize: 10240
14:51:04 POOL: difficulty up from 0.000 H to 536.88 MH
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[3] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[3] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/2)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[3] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[3] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[0] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[0] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/1)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[0] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[0] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[4] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[4] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/1)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[4] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[4] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[2] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[2] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/1)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[2] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[2] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[6] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[6] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/1)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[6] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[6] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[5] CudaError: 719
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[5] Not enough memory to run algo. GPU disabled.(1/1)
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[5] Please check if your Virtual Memory setting is OK. You can also try to
14:51:12 Miner: Error ******** GPU[5] reduce the intensity/grid-size command line value to fix this problem.
14:51:12 POOL: Error - Low difficulty share(23)
14:51:12 GPU[-1]: Rejected 0 ms. xzc.2miners.com:8080 [54.36.109.3]
14:51:15 GPU[1]: 2.626 MH/s CClk:1.561 GHz MClk:4.189 GHz 49C 60% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: -
14:51:15 GPU[7]: 873.82 kH/s CClk:1.561 GHz MClk:4.189 GHz 44C 60% [A0:R0 0.0%] LastShare: 00:00:02
14:51:15 Rig-Speed[2 min]: 3.500 MH/s [A0:R1 0.0%] Uptime: 00:00:27 LastShare: 00:00:02
|
|
|
|
|
TralingStop
What does MTP intensity setting depends on?
I have a rig with 5*1060 and can run even i21 without problems (but I think there is no sence of it), while I have 26Gb swap only.
On rigs with 8*1060 and 9*1060 and having 50-75Gb swap files I can't run MTP even on i16. (it starts but then cuda error)
|
|
|
|
I have been interested in quantum computing for a while and when I came across SUQA and saw it is quantum resistant, I am wondering how can you say that with certainty? Is there a way to prove it once and for all?
There was so called "quantum proof" XSH - definite shitcoin from the beginning. I haven't seen any simple and clear explanation of this "proof". The document pallas is referring to just states that it is "quantum proof" and that's all. Of cause you need to be very good in maths to understand "proof", but I think that if it was so in reality - someone could at least explain it in simple and understandable words. Usually if there are none then we just have "proof" that is written by someone. It's the same situation as with well known math problem "How much of 5 angle figures exist that can fill endless square". It was mathimatically "proved" several times with very complicated "solutions" - At first for 5, then for 8, then for 9,10,11 figures ....... but each time new figure was found  What is more interesting that 4 figures were found by a housewife . Now there are 15 known figures and noone knows if this is the end. There is a "proof" that 15 is finite quantity but the solution is too complex and noone trust it  . It is very enlightening example of so called "proofs" if they are very very complex and can't be expressed as simple as e=mc 2. |
|
|
|
Wonder who was buying TUBE the last few days...
[...]
I hope that $TUBE will never ever ever never never support any kind of terrorism! Those who like to watch getting people killed are ready to be deported to Mars and play there their live killing game 1 to 1 Oh come on. Many people like to watch (i think - majority. Millions of copies of this accident proves that). It was so in colosseums in Ancient Rome, on squares in Incvisition times and it is now the same. |
|
|
|
Block Reward: 0.9 XSC Per Block and will reduce over time
Total supply: 65,000,000
Premine: ~7.5% ( 4,900,000 XSC)
I'm just laughing under the table.  Thought that times of such a noncense have passed in 2017. |
|
|
|
|
Zminer777
Is it possible to add --pers option to each failover server?
I mean is it possible to switch to another coin without restart? For the cases when all pools of the coin are down due to some problems with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to add an option to switch back to main pool after some time? Something like:
--returntomainpool 3600
which will mean: in 1 hour try to switch back.
|
|
|
|
cool thanks for the work my gtx 970 drip 30 sol) 1060-1070 + 6% Merry Christmas!!   At what algo /params did u get 30 sol on GTX 970 on 144_5 I have only 16sol/s on 192_7 is less aslo can u share with us your GPU settings Thanks GTX970 on 144_5 = 30-31sol/s on HiveOS. I think Win should be the same |
|
|
|
any news about project ?  i'm very nervous .. where is dev team and what he said about it, any news ? The project looked very promising and I will be very disappointed if it fails. Although a similar project (Deep onion) also has problems in development. I was telling with obvious points that this is shit from the beginning - noone listened. So that was easy to prove - people are idiots. |
|
|
|
|
Are there any reasons not to reveal POW algo?
|
|
|
|
From time to time I see this behavior of the miner: 14:22:49 Set Target: 000b3048a0ff68c2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
14:22:49 New Job: d9d
14:22:50 GPU4 Share Accepted 76 ms
14:23:08 GPU2 Share Accepted 76 ms
14:23:17 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 47C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:23:17 Speed: GPU0 28 Sol/s GPU1 29 Sol/s GPU2 28 Sol/s GPU3 31 Sol/s GPU4 33 Sol/s GPU5 32 Sol/s GPU6 30 Sol/s GPU7 32 Sol/s GPU8 31 Sol/s
14:23:17 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:23:17 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:23:17 Total Speed: 274 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:23:44 Set Target: 0003fa6977c25916e00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
14:23:44 New Job: d9e
14:23:48 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 47C GPU2 48C GPU3 41C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:23:48 Speed: GPU0 30 Sol/s GPU1 29 Sol/s GPU2 30 Sol/s GPU3 32 Sol/s GPU4 29 Sol/s GPU5 30 Sol/s GPU6 28 Sol/s GPU7 30 Sol/s GPU8 28 Sol/s
14:23:48 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:23:48 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:23:48 Total Speed: 266 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:24:00 New Job: d9f
14:24:19 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 38C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:24:19 Speed: GPU0 30 Sol/s GPU1 31 Sol/s GPU2 29 Sol/s GPU3 30 Sol/s GPU4 31 Sol/s GPU5 31 Sol/s GPU6 33 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 32 Sol/s
14:24:19 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:24:19 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:24:19 Total Speed: 278 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:24:53 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 51C GPU5 38C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:24:53 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 30 Sol/s GPU2 29 Sol/s GPU3 31 Sol/s GPU4 26 Sol/s GPU5 30 Sol/s GPU6 28 Sol/s GPU7 30 Sol/s GPU8 30 Sol/s
14:24:53 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:24:53 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:24:53 Total Speed: 265 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:24:55 New Job: da0
14:25:25 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:25:25 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 33 Sol/s GPU2 33 Sol/s GPU3 33 Sol/s GPU4 35 Sol/s GPU5 35 Sol/s GPU6 32 Sol/s GPU7 33 Sol/s GPU8 30 Sol/s
14:25:25 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:25:25 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:25:25 Total Speed: 295 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:25:50 New Job: da1
14:25:55 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 51C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:25:55 Speed: GPU0 33 Sol/s GPU1 34 Sol/s GPU2 33 Sol/s GPU3 33 Sol/s GPU4 35 Sol/s GPU5 35 Sol/s GPU6 32 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 34 Sol/s
14:25:55 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:25:55 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:25:55 Total Speed: 300 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:26:06 New Job: da2
14:26:27 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 38C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:26:27 Speed: GPU0 29 Sol/s GPU1 29 Sol/s GPU2 28 Sol/s GPU3 31 Sol/s GPU4 28 Sol/s GPU5 28 Sol/s GPU6 28 Sol/s GPU7 28 Sol/s GPU8 29 Sol/s
14:26:27 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:26:27 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:26:27 Total Speed: 258 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:27:00 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:27:00 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 31 Sol/s GPU2 28 Sol/s GPU3 33 Sol/s GPU4 30 Sol/s GPU5 30 Sol/s GPU6 30 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 28 Sol/s
14:27:00 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:27:00 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:27:00 Total Speed: 272 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:27:01 New Job: da3
14:27:31 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:27:31 Speed: GPU0 34 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s GPU2 33 Sol/s GPU3 36 Sol/s GPU4 34 Sol/s GPU5 34 Sol/s GPU6 34 Sol/s GPU7 34 Sol/s GPU8 34 Sol/s
14:27:31 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:27:31 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:27:31 Total Speed: 308 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:27:56 New Job: da4
14:28:01 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:28:01 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 31 Sol/s GPU2 31 Sol/s GPU3 30 Sol/s GPU4 32 Sol/s GPU5 30 Sol/s GPU6 30 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 29 Sol/s
14:28:01 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:28:01 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:28:01 Total Speed: 275 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:28:32 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 47C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 46C GPU8 45C
14:28:32 Speed: GPU0 30 Sol/s GPU1 31 Sol/s GPU2 28 Sol/s GPU3 28 Sol/s GPU4 30 Sol/s GPU5 29 Sol/s GPU6 31 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 29 Sol/s
14:28:32 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:28:32 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:28:32 Total Speed: 267 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:28:34 New Job: da5
14:29:04 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 47C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 38C GPU6 49C GPU7 46C GPU8 45C
14:29:04 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 30 Sol/s GPU2 30 Sol/s GPU3 32 Sol/s GPU4 32 Sol/s GPU5 31 Sol/s GPU6 34 Sol/s GPU7 31 Sol/s GPU8 30 Sol/s
14:29:04 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:29:04 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:29:04 Total Speed: 281 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:29:13 New Job: da6
14:29:38 Temperature: GPU0 46C GPU1 46C GPU2 48C GPU3 42C GPU4 50C GPU5 39C GPU6 49C GPU7 45C GPU8 45C
14:29:38 Speed: GPU0 31 Sol/s GPU1 31 Sol/s GPU2 30 Sol/s GPU3 32 Sol/s GPU4 33 Sol/s GPU5 31 Sol/s GPU6 33 Sol/s GPU7 33 Sol/s GPU8 29 Sol/s
14:29:38 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1097 GPU1 1095 GPU2 1123 GPU3 1113 GPU4 1141 GPU5 1116 GPU6 1150 GPU7 1166 GPU8 1138
14:29:38 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 1 GPU2 5 GPU3 3 GPU4 1 GPU5 0 GPU6 4 GPU7 1 GPU8 0
14:29:38 Total Speed: 283 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10139 Rejected: 15
14:29:38 New Job: da7
It is 7 minutes without shares (at least). Miner even disappeares from the pool. At the same time equal rigs are finding blocks with no problem. It doesn't matter how fast is the Rig - all occasionally demostrate this behaviour. What is that? |
|
|
|
|
I've made several deposits a while ago on ver1.0.15. But there is no info in last 3 columns (Unlock Height & Time, Spending time)
The transactions for those deposits are empty - no dates. TX's hash can't be found in explorer.
While all coins are "deposited" I can "deposit" again (now it is ver1.0.17) Empty TX's are created and the total number of them in "deposit" grows.
Something is wrong with that - how to unlock my initilal coins?
|
|
|
|
|
Peformance on GTX970 is not good.
20-21sols vs 25-26 with ewbf.
|
|
|
|
> Sending "danger": Error installing hive-miners-sgminer-fancyIX
So than I try to use the custom miners and for what ever reason sgminer will only use 4 of my cards, I would really like to switch to sgminer it seems I get better hashrates than wildrig Thank You
Bug reproduced ... misspelling ...  Real package has name hive-miners-sgminer-fancyix but fork from dropdown box has name fancyIX so package hive-miners-sgminer-fancyIX not exists and of-course couldn't be installed. Reported to devs and thank you again gminer also still doesn't work properly. |
|
|
|
The worse aspect of this fact that ASICs now mine BTX is that from now on BTX is at a very high risk to suffer from a 51% attack. And in middle or long term this will more likely happen. Is the team urgently addressing this crucial issue?
It seems that devs are gone. Exchanges wallets are not working for weeks. So it doesn't matter whether Asics will mine or not. No exchange to sell. |
|
|
|
If you are not sure about this branch and this miner , pass by , please do not clog the branch.
I think you've forgot to upload your "miner" to the branch |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
