The fastest monero miner for NVIDIA is the sp-mod. (0.1 btc donation miner.)
With max oc I have managed to reach 813h/s on the gtx 1070 with samsung memory. And 600h/s on the gtx 1060 with samsung mem.
Work is in progress. Donate and get free updates.
gpu 0: Gigabyte g1 gaming (micron memory)
gpu 3: Gainward 1060 (samsung memory)
gpu 4: Inno3d 1070 (samsung memory)
One more unstable miner showing "best" digits for 30 seconds and false numbers in the miner and not on the pool? Just as with skunk algo where tpruvot ccminer2.2 beats your's eight times "optimised".  Free miners can also do 750H/s  |
|
|
|
I tried a lot of ccminers but I only achieved 650h with a GTX 1070, is there any option to increase the hashrate?
On sigt I used -i for intensity, but I can't use anymore
This algo favors amd, with nvidia you need to play with high mem oc and launch configs. Google is your friend. Thanks, I already searched on google but i can't find about the intensity There is no intensity for cryptonight. ccminer_tpruvot accepts "intensity" setting but it just changes threads/blocks count. |
|
|
|
I tried a lot of ccminers but I only achieved 650h with a GTX 1070, is there any option to increase the hashrate?
On sigt I used -i for intensity, but I can't use anymore
710 is possible  |
|
|
|
Price will adjust in minutes, on all exchanges, bter, bx and nova when btc38 will open the wallet. 90% of xcn is already on btc38. it is the reference market. Mean time i see miners sell xcn on bter, at 50%, and traders buys xcn on bter, nova and bx to sell it with 100% profit on btc38 when wallet will be open. Again Such a confindence in "same price" on btc38 Investors usually avoid coins with many problems. |
|
|
|
28 Мегахешей с 1060??? Пруфы будут? Или очередной "впариватель" видеоасиков?
Шас нафотожопит. |
|
|
|
Devs are not reading Bitcointalk, but don't worry because they are aware the user experience for renting can be improved, and will be improved on the next release. In the meantime, check this guide for renting: https://siawiki.tech/renter/using_the_ui_for_rentingInteresting to know that disappearance of one (more) hosts costs additional money for the renter. I think it is not clever and not fair. I, as a renter, don't care about lost hosts. It's actually Sia Network problem, not mine, and should be solved without extra charges by nework itself. Amazon/Google/etc don't charge extra for faulty drives or some other inner problems - thats fair. |
|
|
|
nowhere on the promised exchanges XLC is not added to the listing
Nova - not listed also
Cryptopia - never saw this coin will be added
94 pages of mining and still no exchange to sell/buy.  |
|
|
|
if anyone has some vivo to sell at an affordable price i am looking for around 5k
5K VIVO FOR 5K BTC - deal? |
|
|
|
1) Newp. Go to yiimp and look at the benchmarks. There is a lot more the results from one person there and it holds a lot more credibility then your word of mouth.
2) Not sure you understand how cryptos work. It's entirely possible for a 1070 to earn more dual mining then a 1080 mining equihash. Could the 1080 dual mine as well? Yes. Will it be a tiny bit faster? Yes while absolutely squandering the GPU compute power of the 1080.
3) Unfortunately Nvidia doesn't have a rosy nice dual miner. That further pushes the point I was making that you need to have the option to mine more powerful currencies as niche coins die out, like skunk right now.
4) Yup. You need to have more rigss... 30% more in a optimal scenario (so lets say $60 on a $200 rig), but mining isn't always optimal, which is why you end up in scenarios where a card that is $200 cheaper will make just as much revenue. Just like a 580 is earning more then a 1070 right now. Still over priced by 60% and still earning more then something that is priced close to what it should (+10%). Weird thing is people don't actually look at stats like this and instead just go 'oh the 580 is overpriced! that's a waste', when pricing and gamer metrics don't apply to mining.
1) I don't know how yimp bench is working, but I wouldn't trust "average" 314Mh/s for 1070 while there are NO results as high - the highest shown is: lbry 4w 1070 ASUS GTX 1070 Strix OC 1043:8599 SM 6.1@5.2 303.14 MH 23 2100 180 1.684 M ccminer/2.0 win64 CUDA 8.0 384.76
Meanwhile I have running rigs with 1070 and 1080 and of course I try to squese each hash from them. And my hashrate is 1070 ~300 1080 ~400 2) May be that is you who don't understand how crypto work? How can someone compare 1070 running Dagger and 1080 running Equihash? Why not to compare with 1080 running Scrypt or SHA256. Wow, what a pity gpu that would be. Idiotism? 3) Unforttunately for you, Claymore Dual miner exist for Nvidia gpus as well. Unfortunately for you 1080/ti still peforms better than 1070 in it. 4) You need to have more rigs, more power, more cooling, more space etc. It is very interesting about "200$ Rig". Do you buy it in second hand store? |
|
|
|
hey sp, any rebate for Bitcore miner?  I think it is better for sp to pay for bad miner he made ...... compensation. It is unstable (spmod2). Only works with intensity 19 but still crashes from time to time. |
|
|
|
1) Yup, I discussed POWER DRAW, which pertains to cooling, not efficiency (literally worded it exactly that way). You can have something that draws a crapton of power and is insanely efficient (or inefficient). That's why you need a three slot cooler to cool a 1080 TI well, which I stipulated specifically that, once again reader comprehension is your friend.
2) Yes, the 1080 scales much better then the 1080ti, but when it comes down to it, it still has issues with some algos. Bitcore for instance it only scales up by 20% based on numbers on Yiimp. 25% for Lbry.
3) While it doesn't seem like much, it essentially nullifies the benefit of buying the card in the first place as the smaller that number gets, the less that card is actually worth. In addition to that Nvidia mining has been pushed down to the point of dual mining being an effective alternative to mining big Nvidia coins (as profitability of Nvidia has fallen). Further into the future Ethereum, specifically Dagger serves as a fall back and 1080/tis can't mine either of those worth crap. Right now you can make more mining Eth+Dcr on a 1070 compared to just Equihash. I mentioned that earlier this year multiple times and even earlier last week before it happened and it happened again, it will happen in the future as well.
The 1080/tis have been out for quite awhile, especially the 1080. Earlier this year and last year 1070s were earning more then 1080s due to what they're capable of mining. It's not always that way and it's nice when algos scale appropriately, but they don't always and when it really matters you don't want to be stuck in the boat where it doesn't scale (say if a new algo comes out that is heavily memory dependent like Dagger).
1) Power draw pertains to cooling. So less power used by 1080 will lead to less overall cooling needed. Isn't that evident for you? 2) Lybry 1070 ~300 1080 ~400. It is 33% not 25%. Bitcore seems more to be badly optimized for 1080? as far as it is not memory dependent algo. Still 20% is the same as the difference in cost of GPU. So as far as other Rig components cost less fo 1080 - it still is a winner even in Bitcore. 3) First 1080 never ever earned less than 1070. Is is simply impossible as far as even mining ETH they mine more by dual mining. Second - you need more MB,CPU,SSD,DDR, PSU, space and total energy comsumption with 1070. It's simple. |
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of exchanges. Why XCN is only on 2 Chinese exchanges?
If not bittrex or similar, why not cryptopia or at least nova?
|
|
|
|
It's closer to 40% slower or a 1070 is 40% faster. That's based off raw CUDA cores. Just off the top, this holds true in Skunk. A 1060 3GB is producing 19 while top results for a 1070 are 32. Which is almost exactly 40% increase. That's from Yiimp. Half as fast was a typo, I meant 50% (but it's closer to 40%).
19 x 1.5 is 28.5. The 40% slower is straight from the difference in cuda cores.
1080/ti both have issues with algos due to their GDDR5X memory. Even algos that they work 'properly' in they don't always get the full speed. You can look at Epsylons thread for more information on that. I had to hammer out a couple really big posts about it and rather not rehash that here. Either way the 1080/ti are bad buys, especially the TIs which have much higher power draw and coolers generally can't keep up with them, in addition to the increased system power draw that requires much more beefy PSUs. They're practically worthless in Dagger. For instance a 1080ti should routinely be 85% faster then a 1070 for the amount of CUDA cores it has, but rarely is and often is closer to 50% depending on the algo.
Best buy still is a 1070, even at the slightly higher prices they have currently.
1) Skunk 1060 6GB ~21, 1070 ~31 1080 ~41 21*1.5 = 31.5 21*2 =42 Straight forward. 2) 1080/ti have issues only with dagger-hashimoto algo. I don't know other. Other algos are like skunk. 3) Your maths is completely wrong 1060 - 115W 21Mh = 5.5W/Mh 1080 - 165W 41Mh = 4W/Mh Of course you can tweak both of them gaining more or less, but anyway 1080 is superior in w/MH 4) 1080/ti are practically worthless only in 1 algo, but thanks to Claymore they are good in Dual mining leaving 1060/1070 far behind (of course it depends on second coins price). Most other algos don't need fast memory. So right for the moment 1080 is the best choice because they cost only ~20-25% more than 1070. Yup, you literally just rewrote what I just wrote for point one after not reading my post. I don't care about watts a mh. That hasn't mattered for quite some time. A extra 100 watts of power for me at $.1 a KWH is $.24 a day. It's not anywhere closer to that. A extra 10 watts is $.024. Furthermore I never discussed efficiency, I was talking about hash a dollar. Not watts a hash. 1080/ti MOST DEFINITELY have issues with other algos other then dagger. Like I said a 1080ti wont achieve +85% performance over a 1070, most of the time it is +50%. Go look at Epsylons thread for discussion of this or look at Yiimp. I'm not going to spoonfeed you the information, you are definitely wrong. GDDR5X is faster then GDDR5. Speed isn't the problem with those cards. 1) Are you able to read? I wrote that 1080 is the best buy. It gives more Hasrate/$ than 1060/1070 (for now). It cost 20% more than 1070 but give: Skunk 1060 6GB ~21, 1070 ~31 1080 ~41 (32%) Tribus 1060 ~40 1070 ~54 1080 ~77 (42%) Skein 1060 ~380 1070 ~550 1080 ~720(30%) Nist5 1070 48.5 1080 64.5 (32%) Equihash 1070 460 1080 580(26%) etc. Everywhere 1080 outperforms 1070 more than it cost. Practicaly daggerhashimoto is the only exception. As far as most algos are just a combinations of previous ones the picture is the same for most of them. 2) What do you mean "I never discussed efficiency". Who wrote: "Either way the 1080/ti are bad buys, especially the TIs which have much higher power draw and coolers generally can't keep up with them, in addition to the increased system power draw that requires much more beefy PSUs." So I pointed that you are completely wrong. You will need more power, you will need more PSU in case you have 1060rigs instead of 1080. It is because 1080 are 25-30% more efficient. |
|
|
|
How much DNR should I put in my wallet so the PoS to be profitable? Is there any formula how can I calculate the PoS gains witht the amount of coins put in my wallet?
Example for 1000 DNR how much will I get per day approximately?
Tnx
It is very interesting why there are so many people concerned about POS%. POS% really matters only if the coin price is stable and high enough. Only if the coin is used, if it has trading volumes etc. 5-10-20-100% from zero is ZERO. P.S. I don't mean that DNR price us 0. |
|
|
|
1) One thing i noticed is that GPU 0 drops hash rate to 25 MH when I connect remotely to my rig. Is this expected? I don't believe other miners had this so pronounced.
2) Off topic. Your pool has nicest dashboard I saw so far .
1) I use internal gpu as main - so no drop of hashrate. If you don't have one use teamviewer, tightvnc etc. May be rdp to main console will also work - /admin parameter (haven't tried that). 2) Many other pool have the same frontend, e.g. look https://zoi.acc-pool.pw/ |
|
|
|
Dual .mining with correct dcri was always profitable on 1080/ti. Because 1080/ti has a lot of cpu power which is not used by daggerhasimoto algo.
Only if by "profitable" you mean more then the electricity cost) No I mean that it have +/- the same profit as zec or other algos. LOL, SIGT wishes. Have you actually tried to mine SIGT or are you preaching from whattomine here? May be you'd better read at first? |
|
|
|
Dual .mining with correct dcri was always profitable on 1080/ti. Because 1080/ti has a lot of cpu power which is not used by daggerhasimoto algo.
Only if by "profitable" you mean more then the electricity cost) No I mean that it have +/- the same profit as zec or other algos. LOL, SIGT wishes. Have you actually tried to mine SIGT or are you preaching from whattomine here? "profitability" is a nonsense unless your coins is sold immediately after being mined (not even after 24 hours). In my case, I actually mine hush and sigt with 2 similar rigs, hush was slightly more profitable over the last 24 hours, but I don't sell them, same for sigt. So only the future will tell which coin was more profitable. I used to mine LBC when it was non "profitable" compared to ZEC, and guess what : when I sold my coins, the LBC I mined were suddently a lot more profitable than ZEC. I think all miners combine both methods: 1) sell after mine in a couple of days - a lot of shit pump dump coins like cxt, ctic2 ... 2) hold until the price "to the Moon". Depends on my inner vision of the coins future. |
|
|
|
Most of miners forget about GTX1080 (NOT Ti). Its price about 470-500 euro and it gives about 580-600 Sol/s on equihash. Also GTX1080 is good for skunkhash (about 40 Mh/s) and many other algos
Thats because most people can't count properly. Of course 1080 is very very good performer. While being 20% more expensive than 1070 (for now) it usually give 25-35% more hashpower on many algos. |
|
|
|
No I mean that it have +/- the same profit as zec or other algos.
No, its -25%. And SIGT was twice more profitable than ZEC before halving. What hashrates do you have for ETH+SC/DCR? Of cause I'm not speaking about sigt before halving. And some other coins which are more profitable for short period of time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
