To be listed on more exchanges is always good news
The main word is "exchanges". Exchange is not just a site where sigt is mentioned. It is where exchange takes place. And that shitty-dritty scam is not exchange in any way. |
|
|
|
My dear you really understand open markets i see. Dont you think price drob is a result of a miner/investor.... decision to hop onto bitcoin since its breaking alltimehighs over and over last few days? PS: Tnx for bumbping the thread. Yes yes persuade yourself. For example Bitconnect somehow rises despite of "investor decision to hop onto BTC"  |
|
|
|
hello, we only buy and wait some good news, and then price will explode :-).. we have a patience, we have a time, we have a balls.... good project... go go go   Oh yes - steel balls are very helpful ... in the grave at 1 satoshi and 0 BTC volume. |
|
|
|
chrysophylaxYou ideas are good. But what had to be done a week ago is finetuning of difficulty setting on the pool. Still everyone get 0.97diff - it is better then 2.5 but I don't like to see that picture with no shares for 4 minutes (actually more) https://ibb.co/nC6u1aI really don't understand what is difficult in doing that. The miner is stable as it is. Hashrate is what to be improved (if you can do that) as far as the clock of POW tik-tak-tik-tak. I get very strange power usage on DNR https://ibb.co/nfHyBahttps://ibb.co/neR3cF2 identical GPU, same clocks, same hashrate.
|
|
|
|
It is better NOT to be listed on such "exchanges". |
|
|
|
Done tanx mate ... btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ... is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ... #crysx No I am just saying that "IF CWI miner shows 5% less _SP mod".. I am not saying that's the truth. I am alluding to the fact that SP code is closed source so visible hashrate does not mean anything until it is proven by testing it for a long long time. thats what i was trying to work out ... because most times - most pools will never really give an accurate projection of hashrate ... but now that he is blocking our pool from the spmod - its a massive plus ... as we have really shown him up - and he is one angry little boy ... we are nearing the end of the week - and still a few things need to be ironed out in the next test ... so lets see how stable it is - and how functionally positive CWIgm-0.9.9 will be ... tanx for your support ... #crysx It is good of course, but meanwile sp has released spmod8 and it shows 60Mh/s on 1080ti. IF they are real it is very good improvement, so as soon as someone share it with community you will loose miners and hashrate on you pool. Meanwile only 13days left to halving? so each day is in great value. |
|
|
|
Also, if your a trader... SIGT has been extremely profitable in small quantity of btc, managed to squeeze out some good profits out of all the drama...
great info ... Storx If it goes to Bitrex... I will swing the farm back to SIGT with latest tpruvot v2.2 fork There is this "AUTO-SELL" function in Bitrex that I cant live without. Check it out under "Lab" Is there any exchange with standart forex trading feature to set 2-nd order if the first was accomplished? For example if my order to sell at 300sat is done than autoput and order to buy for 200sat? |
|
|
|
I have already made a private zcash miner that is around 15% faster than the dj-ezo kernel. It's the same speed as the latest EWFB kernel and no fee
If it is the same just release it with 1-1.5%fee and everyone will use yours you will earn much more than 0.05. Or make it 5% fater and put 2% fee. So whats your choice?  |
|
|
|
That is the point I make to you sometime back. Do the same way, 2% fee base on all your mod. you will earn more than 2btc a day soon! Why just look at the one time charge?
Or grow the farm to 10 000 cards and live of the private bins.. 10000GPU require much more investments at start. Releasing 2% devfee advanced miner requires nothing more then skills. You have them? We hold the breath |
|
|
|
blake2s, skein,lbry...
Simple to do on the FPGA
And they are not profitable on 1060/1070? Wow. |
|
|
|
Problem : Sometimes not working. 1GH-50GH and power 8W-9W. share 0 It is due to overOC. Lower a little bit it will be fine. But I already mentioned the behaviour, that something should be done with it. |
|
|
|
Claymore have the money and resources to hire a team of experienced developers. His work on the NVIDIA dual miner is not optimal. More can be done.
We all hold the breath waiting for your improved "spmod" version. |
|
|
|
he also have 1200 gpu i find it absurd that he can't afford a single 1080ti.....
Really? Doubt it. 1200 * 3$ day * 30day = 108000$ month. Making this farm faster 10-20-30% by internal use miners will give him much more profit then X0.05BTC "donations". |
|
|
|
So i think the point is that you can't make e.g. equihash faster than EWBF? Or a Dual miner for eth+skunk/bitcore/tribus/nist5/skein/...
The point is that custom work on these algos are worth more than a 0.05BTC donation. Claymore is making around 1,7BTC a day on his 2% miner.. Yes, because he made something new and special, not only tricks and someone elses work usage I think if you could you would already release 2.5%Devfee miner faster then Claymores. |
|
|
|
Most farm owners have 1060 and 1070 cards. The 1080 and 1080ti series are to expensive, and the most profitable algos on the 1080's will soon have ASIC's.
It will be very interesting to know what algos are most profitable on 1080 and not so on 1060/1070? If Asics kill one algo then it wil kill profit for all 10 series or any other GPU. |
|
|
|
Can you mod ccminer for C11, lyra2z, lyra2rev2 algos, these algos are very hot for Nvidia now.
Thank you.
These algos can be mined on nicehash and the 1 click nicehashminer. The 50 000 users is killing the profit. 1) C11 cannot be mined by Nicehash. 2) Nist5 is also mined by NHM but it is profitable. So i think the point is that you can't make e.g. equihash faster than EWBF? Or a Dual miner for eth+skunk/bitcore/tribus/nist5/skein/... |
|
|
|
but what is the use of an optimized algo - if the miner is not completely stable? ...
You know there are ways to deal with instability, depends on the miner. For some a simple loop in the batch is enough, for others WDG will do the job .... etc. At the moment you are in beta stage so some faults are acceptable. At least 0.9.8 is very stable if you don't over-overclock and we can always return to it. |
|
|
|
In my opinion- don't get to happy only because you see little higher Mh/s, its the Shares/Min you are getting paid for, so test the miners for actual share rate and not the Mh/s, you gonna be surprised by the result I think :-).
What you are talking about is the correctness of the results claimed by the miner. Of course numbers are just numbers and you should check whether they are true or not. But normally miners should calculate the same way, those that doesn't do that are quickly caught by community. |
|
|
|
Is there any new version aside 0.98?
Should have been released yesterday but still wasn't. All are waiting. SP has just released spmod7 - a little bit faster than previous on 1060/1070 - so its time for CWI to beat it, as far as they claimed having better miner for internal use. no ... you are talking about CWIgm-0.9.9 ... and no - we are NOT in competition with a greedy man like rune ... we are not in competition with ANYONE ... we ARE on the path to making a better miner than our previous one on the two initial goals we set from the beginning ... stability and ease of use ... we ARE succeeding in that - and have no intention to align ourselves with a decidedly greed riddled charlatan ( http://www.dictionary.com/browse/charlatan ) like rune ( sp ) ... we focus on what have in our sights - and goals ONLY - and to make sure that all fixes and growth will come in good time ... in saying that tho - there are a number of advancements in the next test version - and we are squashing some bugs that seem to be difficult to hold down at the moment ... we are also preparing for the testing of the redevlopment of our coins also ... new algo should be ready very soon ... #crysx That is understandable. 1-2% of speed which is hard to notice is ok. But you also understand that if someone will release miner with e.g.+10% speed. 90% miners will move to use it. Because thats the race and competition anyway, whether you accept it or not. It is simply - profit. For example Claymore lost many 1060 miners imediatly after improved version for 1060 was released. For several days until he managed to integrate that improvement in his miner. The same was with skunk with 9 - > 13 -> 19->20MH movement on 1060. SPmod7 gives 19+ for 1060 3gb. It is very good improvement for those gpu users. P.S. Waiting for your bitcore algo also. You pool is empty without it |
|
|
|
I think many miners run their rigs cooler with a lower tdp. and lower hashrates.
Anyway, Signatum #7 released yesterday should be faster than #6..
TDP 80 ,.CC +150 All GPU under 70 https://ibb.co/mCXTRaSignatum sp-mod #7 does 41.8 on the 1080 with +75 on the coreclock For 10 seconds may be then crash or slow down. I can get 43 for 1 or 2 minutes from CWI. And can get 42.5 for half an hour or more. But than it will crash for example. TDP100 +100CC for first GPU and voula 42.5: https://ibb.co/dG2pXFP.S. Why people speak about OC without connection to final CC. I have 4 types of 1080. All have much different base CC, so +250 for one is the same as +80 for another |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
