|
I don't see all the accounts you have listed on your selly.gg page? Is there any other place to buy the other kinds of accounts or do you not have them in stock right now?
Let me know if you have any accounts that have access to tonights Mayweather vs McGregor fight and I'd buy it off of you.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking to buy any kind of streaming account that will have access to today's Mayweather vs Mcgregor fight.
It'll need to be live, and of decent quality (720p at the very least I guess)
PM Me anytime today before the match starts (8 PM PDT), and I'll likely buy it off you.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitbollo seems to be on the right track... Transaction fees eat too much at small investment amounts.
Assuming a transaction fee of 0.0005 when sending the BTC, even at a 0.1 BTC investment, you will be in the red after a one week investment.
Unless you expect people to deposit amounts above 0.1 BTC (despite you being relatively new to this), or deposit for extremely long periods of time, I can't see why this would be good.
And all of this doesn't even take into account the chance that you might not hit the promised rate....
|
|
|
|
|
Well, a significant argument exists against nearly all cloud mining providers.
Mining profit rates seem to be pretty low/negative on a smallish scale. Most cloud mining providers seem to not provide too much proof of the existence of a rig.
Profit where you don't expect it + No proof of legitimate business activity = scam accusations
Maybe GigaWatt is different, maybe they're not. I feel like the onus lies on people defending it to prove that it is legitimate.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! You've mentioned that the coupon codes can only be used once per account, and I think I had bought codes in the past from someone else.
Is there any way I can check which coupon codes I have used on my account so I can buy different ones from you?
Something like the picture at the bottom of your post?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
You honestly don't have much to worry about unless they have actually made a full product and captured a significant portion of the market share already.
If they've just tried developing, and you still think you could do it, you might as well try and make it better.
Also, TBH, in most cases, ideas aren't worth that much. The implementation usually takes hundreds of man hours, and ideas are everywhere. It's not that nobody thought of "a ride sharing app" or "a dating app" before, and that Uber or Tinder were the first ones there. It's just that they were so much better.
|
|
|
|
One question: What happens if you've bought those through stolen CCs/something else illegal?
Whoever buys the cards will probably end up the bag-holder, just like most of other GCs here. Heck, even accepting a vouch copy is risky if that's the case.
I'd say you need a bit more activity here, or some trust before people would trust you. Maybe try somewhere else where you have pre-existing trust?
theyre not carded if you call in you can see they were activated back in 2014. i've been selling these for years and havnt had a single issue nor negative feedback. I've only new here thats why im offering vouches but once there are sales, there will be feedback so just sit tight if you dont feel comfortable. If you've been selling for years, why don't you provide a link to anywhere else with your previous customer feedback/sales history? It would probably be more effective than anything else, and cost you less than vouch copies. Sorry if I came off as too aggressive, but you must understand that since it is your very first post, you should expect to be treated with a degree of suspicion. |
|
|
|
thanks to clarify that. I read in bitcoin or other coins, a transaction is accepted when other nodes recognize that the public key (address) and the hashed transaction itself were signed with the same key. I'm interested in how this is done in specific, i guess i should look up for ECDSA now. Thats why i was not finding anything  If you can still point me to some code sample / documents you know would be appreciated. Thanks To be honest, I think the easiest resource for this is likely just Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_AlgorithmIt outlines both the signature generation algorithm, and the signature verification algorithm. If you really want to look at some code, here's a Python module dealing with the signature verification: https://github.com/nanotube/supybot-bitcoin-marketmonitor/blob/master/GPG/local/bitcoinsig.pyYou can look through the code, but I don't think it will be easily understood. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm fresh new in this game. I need suggestion which alt coin to buy for small amount and which is predicted to have higher growth? My stake will be around 100 USD.
Which exchange is most reliable?
I'm not too sure about which alt-coin is best, but one tip for exchanges: always withdraw. Use whatever exchange you find most convenient, but once you've completed your transaction, make sure you have control of all crypto. Most losses occur when an exchange fully goes offline, and you can avoid that by keeping control of your private keys. |
|
|
|
|
I think you've misunderstood what SHA-256 is.
SHA is a hash function, ie: it takes one value (a message), and outputs one value (a hash). There is no key involved.
Bitcoin signature uses ECDSA, there's stuff like PGP which uses RSA/DSA. But no, SHA256 does not allow for signatures.
The closest I can think of, is when a website publishes a SHA checksum for a file, allowing you to verify that the file was not maliciously altered.
Maybe explain your specific situation more, that might help others figure out what you're looking for.
|
|
|
|
The bitcoin address he used to sign is public 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN.
Sorry, I thought it was apparent that I was somewhat ignoring that for a reason. As mentioned by onnz: You do not have any past trade history, so personally i do not consider your account being worth that much at all. I suggest to whoever fills this request to demand altcoins. Most of your replies consist of one liners that could be considered spammy. And to you i recommend to start with request of 0.01BTC or so on, to show the lender than you have the money to pay them and will pay them. WARNING, ADDRESS HAS NOT BEEN POSTED UNTIL TODAY!!!!Can you sign a message from one of these old addresses to prove that this is not a hacked account? 1MutuG31fQqGmKaLV9Ty3HwZWGE7nnta2w First posted on: April 01, 2014, 06:11:32 PM
1PV48Q86eVfP5YkpD4V3YT71dKit5ccTzM First posted on: March 05, 2014, 10:21:31 AM
13gPg1K5rMg48X7ho7iNtq9QJw9g5RotnD First posted on: February 09, 2014, 09:15:22 AM
168FAMY4UqQ7V2Anr7VSMWAsgdCsKukAd8 First posted on: February 12, 2014, 09:23:34 AM
1NDysiAMA19n3G4UsBT4GzGn7QfytPDRZ9 First posted on: February 10, 2014, 06:47:51 PM
The address used isn't strongly tied to the account. I could imagine him not having access to ancient addresses, but he should be expected to atleast have access to something older than this recently. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what your game is, but if you're willing to go first (ie: send the $10 on Skrill first), I can do this. You will be responsible for any transaction fees on the Skrill side (ie: fees due to sending the $10 to me and sending it back). Not sure if this is particularly helpful for either side due to the super small amount.... but I'm just curious as to how this could end up a scam  |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I am apuestascoin and today is 10/8/2017. I am taking a loan of 0.1BTC from trinaldao on 10/8/2017, forum time. I will repay 0.11BTC to 1Ge2HjrZvB1xf1ogexP24uA9fiyrr5XXR8 by 20/8/2017. I Collateral My BCT Account "apuestascoin " . -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN GxN5QF4SW6aqTm/oVSmNdF8iUt254KAgHarHhCXqUxVNNdhsvRENqGnedSHsYwWkEoIIpa/xwskrHxKqbXJLhNE= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Yes i have updated my Info Bro.  This user's email address was changed recently. This user changed his/her password recently. Huh? Beware possibly account hacked by looking at his recent posts.
I don't see anything suspicious in recent posts, but the fact that OP has not responded with any signature, and has a email/password that were recently changed is plenty suspicious. I'm leaving negative trust, just in case, PM me if you have some proof that you are in fact the original owner of the account, and not a hacker/scammer. |
|
|
|
Well, if this is not the most "lucky" case in non collateral loan history,then which is it? Fist loan request,no collateral, another member with no lending history came out of blue and fills it... Couple mins later the loan repaid and everybody is happy... That's just great,isnt it...  just 0.003 its small loan, i think didnt need collateral and this is my first time give loan  Exactly. Your first time to give a loan and first time that Op here asking one. Big coincidence or damn luck? Btw the loan was .003 or .0045 BTC? The only way I think you could generally benefit from taking a loan and paying it back quick is to gain trust... but the lender has no significant trust here either. The most likely explanation, imo, is just that someone saw a loan looking for $10, guessed that nobody with an account old enough would risk neg trust for that, and took them up for a quick $5 profit. I think you might just be a little paranoid... |
|
|
|
|
One question: What happens if you've bought those through stolen CCs/something else illegal?
Whoever buys the cards will probably end up the bag-holder, just like most of other GCs here. Heck, even accepting a vouch copy is risky if that's the case.
I'd say you need a bit more activity here, or some trust before people would trust you. Maybe try somewhere else where you have pre-existing trust?
|
|
|
|
You forgot the avatar and personal message. Added. Same info, but the post count is 1603 now. |
|
|
|
|
It isn't a 'reward' per se.
A better way to imagine it is that everyone currently owns "keys" (private keys) that open various vaults (addresses) which contain their Bitcoin.
When Bitcoin Cash is created, the creators of Bitcoin cash are essentially going to create a copy of every existing vault, but the new vaults will have Bitcoin Cash in them instead of Bitcoin. This means that if you have a vault key, you can now open your vault that has Bitcoin, but you can also open the vault which has Bitcoin Cash.
If you have access to the private key, you can open both vaults, and hence you have both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
If you don't have access to the private key, but the website says they'll give you both, you still get both.
If you don't have access to the private key, and the website says they won't support Bitcoin Cash, you lose out on a bunch of Bitcoin Cash.
You can't really ever trust websites who hold your Bitcoin to stick to their word, so ideally, you're going to keep all your Bitcoin on private keys that you control, so that you're guaranteed the ability to use both forks.
|
|
|
|
Can confirm that this works for me! Thanks for all the help. PS: Try to add the isos with the text file or in the first post so that it'll be easier to find. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
