Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 09:05:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
41  Other / Meta / Re: The forum is penalizing Tor users on: August 15, 2019, 10:51:52 AM
Use a proxy that doesn't keep logs
With a proxy or VPN you always have to trust a third party. They can say they don't keep logs, but you can never be sure.

There are ones that are very open about what logs they keep and have been independently verified

https://nordvpn.com/blog/nordvpn-audit/

I'm not recommending them over any other but they're the one that come to mind. Regardless, if you didn't want to use a vpn just go with the burner option.

Quote
or use the internet on a pay as you go burner phone.
I doubt that's faster than Tor. It's also more expensive and less convenient.

It's much faster than tor. in my experience Tor is a pain to use and not recommended for every day use. 4g is very fast even on a mobile connection. It's also not that expensive.Credit can be purchased for $10 a month and if you can afford the internet then you can afford this option, but protecting your privacy is going to come at a small cost but some may feel it's worth the money. Of course you can continue using tor but have to bare its restrictions. There's no guarantee that tor is fully safe either. I think the admin of this forum has mentioned the possibility of tor being compromised in some capacity before.

Quote
Get a new sim card or even phone every-time your data runs out.
Most people can't afford to use phones as disposables.

Phones are very cheap these days. New ones can be bought from $20 dollars. You can even buy used ones for less. Using a new phone every time is probably overkill unless you're up to some shady business but if you just want to protect your privacy a new sim every now and again will suffice. Just buy a new one every time you need to top up or chnage it every few months or so but again this is probably overkill.

Quote
I doubt most bots use tor as it's very impractical. Tor is probably just abused by a lot of people like proxies are hence why the forum restricts it.
The forum doesn't restrict Tor users. Google recaptcha "Easy on Humans, Hard on Bots" becomes very difficult when it's used a lot on the same IP (and there are probably other criteria).
Even some normal websites (for instance banks) now make me click recaptcha, and it's a terrible waste of time. Bots don't care, I do.

It restricts them in the sense that you can't sign up via tor - or you can but not without paying a fee.

42  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Employment is over rated (build your own empire). on: August 15, 2019, 10:35:37 AM
But lets be real : This sort of thing is not for everyone. Plus, when you're saying that the reason that the vast majority of people become uber wealthy is due to the fact that they've started their own companies -- that's true, but it doesn't look at everything.

Do you know the amount of people who try to start their own company and fail and lose their savings, their homes, their retirements, and so on and so forth. For every single Bill Gates and Zuckerberg in the world there is 1 million people who lost it all trying to become them.

True, but the trick is is to not bankrupt yourself doing it. IF you have a business that fails, dust yourself off and try again. Start small and work your way up and don't take out loans trying to make your business work. Most great entrepreneurs start off small and build their business up gradually and they expand when there's demand for it.

No one ever went broke working day in and day out -- but there have been many going broke trying to to start their own thing.

This isn't true. I know lots of people who have jobs but live well beyond their means and rely on credit cards to pay for things they can't afford - luxury items and holidays etc. Some people just aren't good with money and those people probably wouldn't make good businessmen either. A lot of people are too greedy and want to be successfully straight away and they're so deperate for that they try anything and take risks that are too big for them to handle. You need to take some risks in business but always have a failsafe and don't bankrupt yourself in the process because that's just going to set you back even further.

There are different types of self employment imo.

1. Business owners
2. Freelancers
3. Mlm partakers

The issue with self employment being overlooked is thst too many people are on the base of an mlm pyramid and only earning a bit every month that isn't much.

Business owners (including innovators) do quite well but they generally require other cogs in the machine and need workers. Most people don't see a point in saving money and trying to move 9n as they're happy where they are.

Freelancers are probably my favourite type of people who are generally skilled enough to take on other people's jobs. But sometimes you get freelancers that do very little (and some do too much that they can't keep up with the load they have to do to keep up their reputation).

Not familiar with that 3rd one. Is that one where you recruit people and you get paid for doing so and then they do the same?


MLM sellers are the worst. They're usually the greediest of people who only care about profit and will push whatever crap they're selling on to you because their business depends on it. Most people won't get rich from this sort or marketing but there is money to be made from it, but it's done in such a sleazy desperate way and they try take others down with them by selling the bullshit dream they're hoping to achieve but as long as they get your money then that's all they care about. 
43  Other / Meta / Re: The forum is penalizing Tor users on: August 15, 2019, 08:59:08 AM
Why do you need to use tor when there are plenty of other faster options? If you want to protect your privacy and remain anonymous then there are other ways to do it. Use a proxy that doesn't keep logs, or use the internet on a pay as you go burner phone. Get a new sim card or even phone every-time your data runs out. You can even combine them and use a proxy over the burner phone. Probably overkill though just to browse a forum.

I doubt most bots use tor as it's very impractical. Tor is probably just abused by a lot of people like proxies are hence why the forum restricts it.
44  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: August 14, 2019, 11:35:37 AM
I doubt Chelsea will have a good season

It is still early.
Lampard needs time to build a strong team again. Plus they can't buy players because of a case. Chelsea must always be ready for what happens in the future, and just look at the end of the season. Are your doubts true that Chelsea won't play well this season.

It is early, but it would also be early to say City or Liverpool are going to be the winners but people are making their predictions on what they think is going to happen. I would be surprised if things didn't go bad for Chelsea. No new signings, a new inexperienced manager, and losing their star striker. What could go right here???  Grin I agree it's too early to shoot them down and Lampard and co should be given a chance, but the odds re stacked against them. I'm actually looking forward to the Chelsea/Leicester game and Wolves vs Man United. I think they both could be close but lets see how Chelsea do at home and United away.
45  Other / Meta / Re: Spam Sections on: August 14, 2019, 11:29:52 AM
To me the spam sections are those sub boards where you can get away with making low value posts in large volume. Gambling Discussion is the main one to me because people are just discussing sports and you can make a lot of posts in there that don't require any technical knowledge of bitcoin. Many signature campaigns are also gambling based ones and they seem to understandably require a certain amount of posts in the gambling sections and that will obviously fuel the fire. Off topic used to be the biggest abused one imo but since most campaigns don't pay for posts in there and with the invention of the merit system posting in there is probably mostly useless other than for post count so users go elsewhere and Gambling Discussing is probably far easier to abuse and get paid for it.

The advises mentioned by you are not easy to implement. I cannot create a self moderation thread on my every query / discussion.
You do not have to always create a self moderated thread, what was suggested was simply measures you can take to curb spam attack on your thread or topic immediately without waiting for a moderator to act upon your report of a spammy reply/replies

Create a self mod thread, if you want to keep things a hundred percent "civil" on your topic as you can easily truncate/remove irrelevant replies and on your threads or topics anywhere around the forum that aren't self moderated, then always report spam posts/replies to the moderators, they'll act on it.

A self-modded thread would be a nightmare. It would be like being an unpaid janitor of a school of unruly and illiterate kids. No thanks. It would take far too much time and from my understanding of the rules people can just create an unmoderated one if they wanted to.
46  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Jeff Epstein DEAD Commits suicide on: August 14, 2019, 11:22:34 AM
It's funny seeing people believe what they want to be true based on their own biases because nobody knows for sure what happened here, but those who are acting like this could only possibly be a 'hit' are silly.

Maybe if the CCTV outside his cell mysteriously goes missing or is unavailable then I'll give you that, but the reality is here he probably just killed himself, like many do in prison, especially pedophiles. He even allegedly tried to kill himself previously so why is it such a big shock when he finally achieved it??? And for those saying he was taken off suicide watch, people don't stay on suicide watch forever. IF your mood improves or a doctor thinks so then you can be taken off it. Suicide watch isn't a perfect system either. From what I understand guards only visit you every 30 mins or so. If you wanted to kill yourself you could just do it one minute after they check on you.



Not dead, look at his left hand, fake to get him out of prison.

If he was dead his left arm would slide down the left of the thing.

He is defying gravity in death. He is on Bill Clinton`s ranch, fucking premature children atm with Osama.

Are you a coroner? I guess James Brown is still alive also



Feels like it's really a hit. Kinda reminded me of that scene from Prison Break where the doctor came home to find the crime scene for her "death" already prepared. These folks ain't playing.


This isn't a TV show. It's real life.

I don't believe he's dead, probably chilling on some tropical island.

The same island with Biggie, 2pac and MJ? It would be much easier to kill someone rather than spirit them away to some island. What happens if someone sees them? Someone would have a lot of explaining to do and the whole conspiracy would come crashing down.

He's an inmate his hands are handcuffed.

They take the cuffs off when your in your cell brother.



He's not in his cell. Cuffs are put on when prisoners go to the hospital because many use it as an attempt to breakout.



Interestingly it looks like Epstein's cellmate was transferred out Friday "just hours before his death." according to Fox News. No logical reason has been given for this transfer. As far as we know no one checked on Epstein after this point until he was found dead the next morning a gross violation of policy.




You see, this is one example of how people believe what they want to believe. To me this is more like proof that only he killed himself if there's no other CCTV to say otherwise. Did some government assassin walk into the prison, kill Epstein, then walk out? IF the other prisoner had been kept in the cell then people would have just been saying he carried out the hit and this is why whatever happens people will just believe whatever they want to believe.
47  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Employment is over rated (build your own empire). on: August 13, 2019, 12:18:01 PM
 The forbes richest men on the planet list composed of self made entrepreneur or business men.

No shit. You're unlikely to get far working a 9-5 unless you're one of the tiny minority that can miraculously work themselves up from lowly employee to CEO but you'll need to work very hard and hope you get some luck. Walmart often tout their CEO as starting off as a truck loader, but he did go and get a MBA in business.

I think more people should start their own businesses. I blame the current education system for this. We're basically told to go to school, get some qualifications and then go get a job with someone else. I don't remember being taught anything of much value at school, just the basics. It's like a 5-year long aptitude test just to make sure you can tie your shoe laces and button up your shirt. They should teach you things like how to start your own business, or grow your own food, and also go more into depth about health, fitness and nutrition. People think starting your own business is hard, or that you need a lot of money to do it and there are plenty of businesses you can start with little to no money. All you need to do is work hard, but you can't beat being your own boss. If your business grows you can then hire someone to run it for you and you can either retire earlier or invest your money into starting a bigger business. Most successful entrepreneurs do it this way and that's how they become successful. Even if their business fails they'll dust themselves off and try again and keep doing it until they succeed and that's the mark of a true entrepreneur.

48  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2019-07-23 Fox Business - BAC CEO, Anonymous Crypto Currencies are not good on: July 26, 2019, 10:29:54 AM
its value is based purely on the faith and confidence of its users. if a cryptocurrency is declared illegal, you don't think that would shake the confidence of its users? you don't think liquidity would utterly vanish as it's pulled from exchanges? of course they couldn't kill it, but they could probably drastically cut the market down in size. and for monero, that would mean making its anonymity set much less effective. is that futile?

Well any money is based on the faith of its users and of course declaring crypto illegal would be a huge blow to it, but my point is that doing that isn't going to stop criminals using it and they will continue to do so and just set up their own exchanges that operate outside of the law so all they're doing is penalizing the average joes like us who (probably) don't use bitcoin just for illegal things. This is obviously just how they will wage war on bitcoin by dragging its name through the mud just based on the possibility that it may be used for 'bad', but if there was any truth to this then they would ban cash as well. They obviously just see bitcoin as a threat as it's something they can't control but as for it's illegal use it's futile iin that respect because criminals will always find a way around it so all they're doing is making criminals out of the regular users as well. Instead of trying to tar everyone with the same brush they should just concentrate on going after the true criminals because cryptos are here to stay now for good or bad and whether they like it or not
49  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2019-07-23 Fox Business - BAC CEO, Anonymous Crypto Currencies are not good on: July 24, 2019, 04:19:47 PM
Physical cash is more anonymous than bitcoin. Is there a public record of all the drug deals that go on across the world every minute of every day??? Nah. At least with bitcoin there's a public ledger. The powers that be are obviously scared and this is their angle of attack to try justify action:



To sell a war you need a direct threat and we know they'll bare faced lie to get the public on board and it's easy to do when you make it out like their security is at risk.

It will be a very problematic discussion in the future. On the one hand, there are governments that use the argument that cryptocurrencies can be used for crime and terrorist financing and so they must be properly regulated and oblige people to do KYC, But how will coins like the monero survive? In a world where every day exchanges are demanding KYC and governments are exerting regulatory pressure, is there any future for anonymous currencies like monero?

If what they say is true and criminals are using monero then what would making it illegal do? Criminals will still use it just like they do with drugs and everything else. Whatever restrictions the government try put in place criminals will either find a way around it or just keep on using it anyway so it's futile.
50  Other / Off-topic / Re: Area 51 / Bob Lazar: Do you believe him? on: July 23, 2019, 10:44:34 AM
I still can't believe this joke got so popular.

That's what I think about religions, but billions of people can't be wrong???  Cheesy

But I highly doubt anyone in a highly-classified military base would be allowed to bring in a camera.

I don't doubt the potential he was just young, looking for attention, and maybe now he's become tired of the spotlight.
But that still doesn't explain certain pieces of information he brought up in the 80s, that was proven 20-30 years later.

Well I would then argue why was he given access to such top secret information as a relative nobody. If what he says is true you would think that only the highest level of government officials or scientists at the top of their field would have this sort of access and would certainly be held accountable for leaking such highly classified material/secrets.

Just look at people like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning. IF they came out and just said the government is spying on us and they're logging everything we do but I don't have any proof then only conspiracy theorists would believe them, but both came through with actual receipts and a colossal amount of verifiable proof. The government is still after Snowden and Chelsea got 30 years but was pardoned by Barack Obama but look like they got her back in jail for some other bullshit now.

All I'm saying is you need more than just your word for these sorts of things otherwise it's just talk. I don't know the full details of what Bob Claimed about things that weren't known at the time but could it not be a coincidence or he just made something vague up that later turned out to bare some resemblance to something he made up?

.
51  Other / Off-topic / Re: Area 51 / Bob Lazar: Do you believe him? on: July 21, 2019, 01:21:05 PM
Except, according to Bob himself, he doesn't have a "business" model. He hasn't profited off the story, and any money generated has been sent to charities.

Quote
"If Lazar is a hoaxster, as many claim, I'm hard-pressed to understand what he actually got out of this whistleblowing. He certainly hasn't profited. For the most part, Lazar has shunned the spotlight and attempted to distance himself from UFOs while coping with relentless attacks on his character and credibility."



If what he says is true and he makes zero from his claims (which I doubt) then I would say he's probably just a fantasist rather than a fraudster. Some fantasists are just mentally ill, whilst others are just insecure about their lack of achievements, but others will also make claims to try enrich themselves. Regardless of the reasoning fantasists often make claims because they just want to be a part of something or go down in history as important in some capacity. You get it quite a lot with people claiming to have been in the army especially claiming to have fought in certain wars (which is called stolen valor) or people claiming to have degrees/doctorates or qualifications they never had or earned. As people say, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that's where I lie with Bob. If this guy was privy to so much of this information then surely we would have more than just his word. If he had access to all this stuff then I'm sure he could have just as easily taken a few pictures or taken some sort of physical proof but that obviously becomes impossible if he never had access to these things in the first place.

I believe him because he simply didn't had any "changes" or "modification" with regards to how he tel his story for 3 decades straight.

He has. He even addresses this in the documentary.
52  Other / Off-topic / Re: Area 51 / Bob Lazar: Do you believe him? on: July 19, 2019, 03:29:38 PM
You're not sure whether a guy talking about UFOs is telling the truth or not??? Has he provided any proof whatsoever or do all we have is his word? Is Craig Wright Satoshi??? All we have is his word and also a lot of lies and misdirection and I think the same of Bob. These guys just lie their way into infamy and that's their business model as they make money from trying to sell conspiracy theorists books and public appearances and so forth. Lazar is full of bs and this is just how he makes his money.

Quote
Lazar claims he earned a master's degree in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and a master's degree in electronic technology from California Institute of Technology (CalTech); however, there are no records of Lazar attending either MIT or CalTech.[5] Furthermore, Lazar was not a member of a professional body.[citation needed] Lazar speculates that his academic records were erased in an effort by authorities to discredit him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar

Really??? There's really no hard evidence of anything he claims. Photos?? Videos??? Documents??? Nada.

There's also a documentary on him: Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers. Doesn't give you any sort of proof though just a whole load of talk. This drawing he did is practically the only evidence he provides in it:



What is it that makes you inclined to believe him exactly? I think Tom Delonge from blink 182 on Joe Rogan made a better case but he's still crazy.
53  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Religion, Why is it still there? on: July 10, 2019, 10:45:25 AM
I think it comes down to fear and ignorance mostly. Most people don't want to look into the reality of existence because the truth behind it scares the hell out of them. For a lot of people they'd just rather shut off their brain and not have to think about something that no human can fully explain and they put everything on a creator because that's the easiest and most comfortable explanation for them rather than the cold, harsh truth. I think most believers are petrified of death or even worse punishment by god for not believing in them so they just fall back on their belief because that's what helps them sleep better at night and get through life. If you told or could convince these people that when you die you're just dead and there's truly not really much point to existence at the end of it all then a lot of them would lose their grip on reality or go all nihilistic and crazy. I've literally heard religious people - mostly Christians - say something along the lines of well what's stopping you from just going out and raping and murdering people. Well if the only thing that is stopping them from raping and murdering is their belief in god or an afterlife then firstly these aren't very good people and secondly imagine what would happen if you took that belief away from them. Would all these devoutly religious people lose all sense of morality and go crazy and start braking the law because nothing matters if there's no god? That's a scary thing to think about and that's why religion is such a strong phenomenon because it does give peace and comfort to a lot of people.
54  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Serious question about Bitcoin. Is it a reliable and stable investment? on: July 10, 2019, 10:29:54 AM
Hi guys. I have a friend who's parents are looking for alternatives and want to invest money into something other than their IRA account. They have a fixed IRA with about $100K, but they are unsatisfied with the miserable amount of interest they're getting. I mentioned to them that bitcoin is a possible alternative and one they can look into. Do you agree? Do you guys consider bitcoin a reliable and stable investment for long term holding(5-10yrs)?

Is bitcoin reliable or stable? Hell no. Is there the possibility to make a very decent return from bitcoin within 5-10 years? Hell yes. However, nothing is guaranteed and it's very risky so be advised. The potential for huge gains is there but also huge loses. Personally I think bitcoin will be worth a lot more than it is right now within 5-10 years, but I also expect it to go through several ups and downs also with huge crashes so it will also be worth much less than it is right now, but hopefully the new lows are always gradually getting higher and higher so there's gradual growth. Before you or they invest in bitcoin look at the performance over the past five years especially the peaks and bubbles. It wasn't that long ago that bitcoin was $1k and then it rallied all the way up to $20k before the bubble burst and it settled back down to about $5k or whatever it was and now it's back to $10k+. Those sorts of bubbles will probably happen again so be aware of that, but there is certainly money to be made in riding them out and I certainly think even long term (5-10 years) bitcoin could be worth multiples of what it is now but again nothing is guaranteed and I could be completely wrong. As people usually say, don't put all your eggs in one basket and don't invest more than you can afford to lose, but also remember you could lose everything or a good chunk of your initial investment.

Have they thought about investing in property to rent out to people. That's usually a safe investment with a guaranteed income from tenants and it's always better than what the banks will give you and at least you have something physical of intrinsic value to show for it whatever happens with the markets.
55  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: July 10, 2019, 10:20:20 AM
It's either going to go really well for Lampard or absolutely disastrous. Of course he's going to be hampered by not being able to buy any players but he should try sell a lot of players that he's not going to utilize on the grounds that he can use that money to buy the players he wants when the fair play restrictions expire. He's got a decent squad as it stands but losing hazard is a huge blow and could really cost Chelsea especially as they can't replace him.  There's rumors that Bakayoko may be on the move to either United or Arsenal as well. Cahill is free to leave on a free transfer also.

Did anyone hear that Diego Costa might be going to Wolves? I'll believe that when I see it but that could give Wolves a huge boost. They played excellently last year  with finishing seventh and maybe this could help them get into the Europa league or maybe even higher. It's going to be very tough for them to break into that top four though with all the competition.
56  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: From Janitor to Millionaire on: July 04, 2019, 10:25:41 AM
What about all the people that went from millionaires to janitors because of their gambling? The odds of winning most high stakes lotteries are ridiculous but a lot of people think it's worth the punt as usually someones gotta win it and the tickets are often fairly cheap

In every rule, there is an exception but we also should not compare his life to us. The universe wants to make him win because of some particular reasons. If you devote your money and time with gambling, you will end up with a life completely opposite to him. Hardwork and dedication is really the key.

The universe does not care about you or anyone else and him winning the lottery is sheer luck and I'd consider him very lucky over anything else especially considering the odds of him winning were probably astronomical, but its still just random and the luck of the draw at the end of the day. If he got cancer and died the same year would you also say that was the universe at work? Nope. Sometimes good things happen to you and sometimes bad but we mostly have no control over that. Sometimes you can make your own luck and this guy did by buying tickets but lets not forget all the other good people who are doing this and never win anything substantial if anything at all.
57  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which crypto to buy? on: June 24, 2019, 05:14:06 PM
Hello,

I already have a lot of crypto but at the moment only BTC and ETH. Of my portfolio, about 85% is BTC and 15% is ETH.
Now I want to buy some more crypto, which can be any kind apart from BTC cause I already have enough of those. The aim of this is make it an investment in the long term. I want to keep them for at least 5 years and then sell, or possibly even longer.
The only 2 factors are:
- it has to be eligible for storage on a Ledger Nano S hardware wallet, so no very strange altcoins
- preferably it did not increase as much in value as BTC and ETH have over the last couple months. Then I feel I have missed out on money already and I prefer to not buy at peak moment (although you never know for sure in advance what a peak is of course)

The coins which look to fit my criteria are Litecoin, XRP, EOS, Monero and Dash.
What would you recommend me? Or possibly buy some more ETH as well?

Or just split it 20% each equally for all the 5 coins I mentioned?

Why not just buy a mixture??? Personally I mostly own bitcoin and ETH but I also have some very small holdings in XRP, EOS, TRON,  VERGE, and some of the bitcoin/bitcoin cash forks. I bought them all a while ago and they've all made me some very good returns but I plan to keep holding them long term in the hope they rise even more. I can afford to gamble on that especially given how much I paid for them.
58  Other / Meta / Re: Who else agrees that self moderation of ANN threads shouldn't be possible? on: June 24, 2019, 04:58:57 PM
I usually don't like self moderated threads but I think they should have the right to mod their own as they want. The mods here seem to let a lot of trolling and fud happen so thread operators should be allowed to moderate their threads without having to rely on the mods to do it for them. The negative of course is that they can use it to silence people or eradicate suspicions but if that happens  and they're clearly abusing the power I think people should creatye their own thread to discuss their behavior and debate whether they're being shady or not.
59  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: June 10, 2019, 03:03:27 PM
So what are you think about speculation on new Newcastle owners from The Bin Zayed Group?
will we have a new wealthy club in PL like Chelsea and City in the next few years?

The deal hasn't been done yet, but Mike Ashley is also a billionaire. That didn't do them any good. You have to have owners that are actually willing to spend money, but FIFA Financial Fair play rules were implemented after the stratospheric rises of teams like Manchester City and Chelsea so it's now going to be very hard for rich owners to simply come in and plough money into teams to make them into super squads. I think more should be done though because the damage has already been done and there are still loopholes that are ready to be exploited and huge teams will be experts in paying lawyers and accountants to find more ways of skirting any laws.

So what are you think about speculation on new Newcastle owners from The Bin Zayed Group?
will we have a new wealthy club in PL like Chelsea and City in the next few years?

This guy apparently tried to buy Liverpool a couple of seasons ago & he couldn’t prove that he had the funds. I think he’s nowhere near rich as City’s & PSG’s owners.

Buying Newcastle will be a lot cheaper than Liverpool. Liverpool's owners are also probably pretty happy and don't want to sell whereas Mike Ashley doesn't seem that content with the club and I think he even called buying them a mistake.

^ Isn't one of the guys at Bin Zayed a cousin of Shiek Mansour, the oiler who owns City?  He could be big too.  And there's a rumor Mou could take over as manager.  Yes please.  Lolol.

If Mourinhio takes over Newcastle and gets them in the top five then I will call him one of the greatest managers  Cheesy. I don't think Newcastle will be willing to pay the wages he demands though. Mike Ashley certainly won't, unless Mou is willing to accept Sports Direct gift cards in exchnage for payment lol.
60  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 5G Has Dual Use As A Weapons System on: June 08, 2019, 07:51:55 PM
Actually, it goes way beyond this. Consider chemtrails. They are made up

I fixed that for you. They're called contrails and we know why they're there. Science.

These and others have been sprayed throughout the air of America (the world?) in large quantities for the last 12 years, and they have been sprayed to some extent since the 1950s.

Where do these nano metals/minerals go after they have been sprayed into the air? Everywhere. Into our lungs through the air we breathe. Onto and into the ground as the rain washes them out of the skies. Into the food that grows in the ground, and later into our bodies when we eat this food. Much of it ultimately goes into our brains in nano form.

So who is doing this and why are they being sprayed exactly? Does the elite not breathe the same air we do? Do they not eat the same food? Some people just find a conspiracy in anything.  

I recently heard this breakdown of exactly why this system is a danger that I thought was quite eloquent and does a good job getting past the "conspiracy theory" aura around this discussion and covering factually possible application.

I totally believe that.
I remember when microwaves were first came to the world that scientists said that they are not healthy and it will make a negative impact to us. The same thing can be applied for 5g and as the frequency increases the more harm is going to happen.

Roll Eyes And was they right? What damage have microwaves done? Maybe microwaves are secretly spying on us all.  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!