I'd advise not to give vouch reviews to low ranking members. I've seen a lot of higher rank members not give good reviews, or just not review a vouch copy at all, let alone lower rank members who will post reviews which don't help at all or most likely just stop talking to you after you give them the method for free. On the off chance they do provide a review, nobody cares or trusts such an easily obtainable account.

The method I got started and was waiting for didn't work. After some research I'm inclined to believe that the methods are old and not working properly anymore. The OP is still wanting for me to try the other ways, so I guess I'll give it one more shot on a new one. But like I've said I've done some reading and all of these may not be possible. That's speculation.

I haven't lost money yet, so I'll still try to verify every method except stripe (OP already has said that so I feel fine repeating it if they leaked that little bit first). I don't feel comfortable linking my SSN, DOB, ID and other stuff to an account. I likely wouldn't recommend that to somebody if they asked me.

As of now it hasn't worked, I'm working on trying to confirm or deny another method, and I can't recommend buying this. I would be very frustrated if I had to purchase this information and it wasn't a vouch.

UPDATE: 2nd way didn't work. IDK if the OP is going to try and give excuses or not, we've been talking and honestly I'm not annoyed or mad or anything. Shit just didn't pan out.

Stripe needs your SSN and multiple other verification, by the way. So it isn't a very comfortable feeling to have to attach all that information into an account that you're using, even if what you're doing in the method is all legal. That's why I haven't tried that way and why the OP is asking for somebody to do that.

For everybody waiting, I got it started today. Same process as yesterday but today things went a lot better and the recommended options were available. I'll know by tomorrow if everything worked so it will be either a yes or no to if I can verify it worked.

Update: The method didn't work. After some research I'm inclined to believe that the methods are old and not working properly anymore. I'll be attempting a different one, but the one I tried did not work. I haven't LOST money yet, but one of the methods provided did not work to get any money either.

Well, haven't been able to confirm or deny if the method works. I tried for a long time as well, but the fault tolerance seems to be a little more dependent on others than I first assumed. Just to clarify, I basically didn't even get to start because it relied on things out of my control. So it is more fickle than my initial reaction. I'll try again later.


It may be known, I definitely wouldn't say it's well known. I didn't know before the guide. Could still be helpful even if the basic theme of it is known, but we're just speculating at that point. I wouldn't really be able to tell if it's a well known method or not.

There are multiple methods but stem from the same idea, all explained well and really quite simple to complete. In step by step tutorial form. There are different ways to obtain your money, so that's nice depending on how you would like to receive it. The methods are quick, don't involve lengthy 'buy this and resell it' or anything else that would take time. It is not illegal. The methods are easy and you could complete them within an hour or sooner. You will need a little money to start but if you're cashin' big time you could use those funds to then make more. It does slightly rely on other services or people, but I'd say the fault tolerance is very good so it'snot a big concern of mine.

I'm verifying one of the methods during business hours tomorrow.


Final update after some days: The method didn't work. After some research I'm inclined to believe that the methods are old and not working properly anymore. I'll be attempting a different one, but the one I tried did not work. I haven't LOST money yet, but one of the methods provided did not work to get any money either.

Sure, I'll try it. Sounds too good to be true but I'll try a vouch copy and give an honest review of it. I've given many reviews on a bunch of different methods and items given as a vouch to me.

Not just from the start, though. MadZ addressed this recently last week or so that they were in talks about the future of the campaign. No update to that yet so it can be reasonable to assume they are still in talks. Obviously they would reevaluate the amount of IOSt payed weekly to be more in line with the weekly targets. As the campaign was launched it was correct, but then IOSt price rose greatly.

Also the title says "CFNP" not "closed"

Yep got payment. Definitely interesting as to the future of the campaign. If they did renew it, I bet it would kind of be like a second campaign where it would start in a little while because trying to make it continue from the last week into week 5 and now week 6 is starting, it is not really a good idea to just extend this current one. It likely would be making a 2nd campaign, probably with revised payments to get back to the normal rates (considering growth has increased the pay dramatically).

I'm pretty sure MadZ is just in talks with the IOSt team still and isn't going to say anything publicly until he knows for sure what they want to do. MadZ hasn't made an announcement since last time, saying they were in talks about the future of the campaign. So I'll keep my signature on until anything definitive is said. Great campaign, great project. IOS is pretty amazing.

Yeah, there's over 800,000 IOSt in the escrow wallet and has been all this time. That's a value of over $60,000 right now in the market. So, I'm not really sure what's going on, and I wouldn't say it's anything new because we've dealt with delays from the start. The only thing really strange is that week 4 isn't even listed on the doc. I'm not sure what conclusion to draw from that.

It's definitely a little strange to see MadZ activity as being online every day, often a couple times a day and still we have no idea about what's up with week 4 or the campaign future. I'm assuming the campaign will be over, but do we all need to keep our signatures until payment? Last I checked there wasn't even a week 4 section in the google doc...very weird.

Campaign week 4 is finished already right? I'm asking because the spreadsheet doesn't even have a week 4 tab open up... I think keeping the signature on until final payment is a good idea. But I'm a little confuse right now, although I do believe week 4 has been over for a few days and we're just waiting on that payment.

Is that right?

The delayed payment for week 2 was because Madz only had one week's worth of payments in the escrow wallet. The money was sent a little late to Madz, but then the payments were issued within days. As well, Madz then payed the week 3 out very quickly. Rounds were supposed to end on Sunday but the dates got confused, so I imagine Madz is busy during the regular week and the one day he had time (he checks every user individually every post) is not when the round ends.

The last part about Madz schedule is just what I assume but the rest is fact about payments to the escrow wallet etc.

A big common problem for me as I use Bitcoin, or any other coin for that matter, is checking the address bar to make sure it copied correctly or whatever. I'm wondering why there isn't some great interface that is better than the public address or even that barscanner for that matter.

People need to be able to use things like debit cards. We need something similar like that in ease of user interface. Ain't nobody got time to mess around with addresses if they want to buy something at the grocery store or whatever.

This is basically just a thread for people to shill their bags for other people to hold. There's really no good that can come from asking a large audience what to buy. You'd probably be better off looking at some cheap coins on coinmarketcap or similar website and reading up on them and looking at the graphs to see if it's something you want to be involved in.

I've had an incredibly hard time getting merit. This doesn't effect me very much since my account is already hero rank, though. I think the real problem is that sMerit doesn't have an incentive for people to send it. This whole system is very incomplete, and while it may cut down on spam in a small way, there's a HUGE barrier to entry into the forum now.

Why make getting a decent account so grindy with no payoff? It's like a video game where you'll spend 100 hours to get .0001% stronger. We need some game theory to make a new system that's rewarding and also fair to all users. This current system is heavily flawed.

That's pretty cool. After the latest Craig Write article I read about him defrauding government grants to buy Bitcoin mining machines and things like that years ago, under the guise of charity or scientific research, I wonder if actual grants can now be given to Australians who will build massive computer systems to support that UNICEF project, if it is officially recognized. Something to consider for people living there!

As what somebody else said, they could have a job that lists in the contract paid housing and expenses like electricity. Also, I've actually seen landlords trying to rent out residential properties with added bonuses such as free electricity or other utilities included. Obviously those may be capped to a certain amount, but free electricity does exist without having to steal it. Just somebody else has to pay for it

I have 4x 3GB amd radeon sapphire r9 280x dual x that I could ship for $120 each, no extra shipping cost. They mined many years ago for a few months at good temperatures. Looks like a broken one is listed at $80 and pre owned ones are $148 + $15 shipping so $163.

Currently, I don't think any governments control Bitcoin. Governments use laws to control things, people, situations. In order to control Bitcoin they need to set laws for it. The laws can be good or bad for Bitcoin, and ultimately the laws would be hard to enforce. Because the government didn't create Bitcoin, and no single person or even group of people can control Bitcoin, they will need to try and use laws to control it.

No, it isn't rare. And no, the price doesn't increase just because it has a finite limit. The finite limit only really matters based on how many dollars in transactions need to be processed at any moment in time. If $21 million in transactions is happening every block then Bitcoin would need to be at least $1 to facilitate that if all coins were spent at that time. $2 if only half the coins are being spent, and so on.

Implying something is rare means it is difficult to get. I simply put some money on an exchange and get Bitcoin. That isn't hard, it isn't rare. While it may be difficult to get the monetary value equal to one Bitcoin, that doesn't make getting Bitcoin any harder.