Eu não fico surpreso... em 7 anos de cripto já vi de tudo, e os NFTs e Memecoins foram os piores.
Tudo bem... NFT eu até engulo porque tem muita gente que realmente mereceu ganhar dinheiro com isso, mas também vi muita gente criando "qualquer ciosa" e lucrando milhões em algo que não valia nada. Como conseguiram isso? propaganda! sempre tem um espertalhão querendo pagar caro acreditando que vai conseguir lucrar 3x mais depois.

Já os memecoins não se salva nenhum, tudo oque vi são coisas sem propósito ou serventia nenhuma além de encher os bolsos de alguém.

E sobre esses satoshis raros  minha opinião é a mesma, por mais que alguém diga que isso possa ser um "item de colecionador", pra mim é apenas mais um motivo para alguém lucrar à custo de algo que não vale nada à mais.

Ok, disregarding those who play just for fun/entertainment and who are not worried about losing money, we have those who play to get "rich", but why do they believe that?

I think the main reason they keep playing even though they lose is because we think that after they lose several times, they believe they will win the next time. For example, we bet that a coin will land “Heads”, and we know that the chance of winning is 50%, but what if “Tails” had already come up “Tails” ten times in a row in the bets, perhaps you think that the chance of it coming up “Heads” ” this time it is greater than 50%, since “Tails” has come out many times, so at some point “Heads” will start to come out, and many really believe that... especially those who bet still believing in the Martingale technique.

But in reality this is not what happens, the coin is the same as always and continues with the same probability of 50% for both sides... it is difficult to explain this to someone who is already addicted to gambling, but the Mathematics is king and casinos even more so when they program their machines to give you chances of winning with just a little more than 50%

No matter how much humanity evolves, gambling will always be our weakness

I'm not sure, but I believe that the casino is the one who manages all the inflow and outflow of money, after all, user deposits are made in the casino's wallets, right?

What game providers should do is periodically "issue a charge" to the casinos demanding their share of the profits... obviously, with each player's "play", the game provider immediately knows what the amount was bet and what the amount was eventually paid to the player, then they just need to calculate their part of the commission and ask the casino to make the payment.

For newer casinos, this may be different, I believe that owners of casinos without reputation even need to make payments in advance or provide some reliable collateral.

Both, equally.

There are those who think that the addict is always the most affected person, but I believe that the family sometimes suffers much more than the addict himself.
While the addict is in a world of illusion, he often does not realize the harm he is causing himself, the only thing he suffers from is the lack of money or "lack of luck" in gambling.
The family, however, remains lucid and really realizes all the harm that gambling is bringing, which is why I believe they suffer more.

However, the family's recovery is usually faster than that of the addict, even though the wounds never heal, the addict may never be cured of this disease.

Eu to lendo direito?
Para presenciou e sofreu de perto com as taxas altíssimas do ETH frente à do BTC na época dos joguinhos e depois dos memes agora está levando um soco no estômago ao sofrer com taxas cada vez mais altas no Bitcoin (e a princípio sem solução à curto prazo) e por outro lado cada vez mais baixas na rede do ETH.

Sempre fui preconceituoso com o ETH, mas assumo que essa "moedinha" se reinventa a cada ano para se manter colada ao Bitcoin por tanto tempo. Várias outras blockchains com tanto ou mais idade que o Ethereum também possuíam grande potencial, mas ficaram estacionadas no tempo e perderam seu espaço.

Poderia o Ethereum, algum dia, superar o Bitcoin!?

Yeap!

So... last season Botafogo led the championship from the third round until the thirty-third, so I honestly don't want to bet on any champion for this 2024 season, at least until the middle of the championship.
We already know that the main Brazilian football championship is the most competitive and difficult in the world, and we also know that being champion in the last season does not guarantee good results in the following season.... unlike the European championships, there are no pre-defined favorites in the Brazilian championship, every year we have a surprise.

Who will win?
Let's leave this question and answer for a few months, maybe!?

I don't understand what's going through Martial's head.... This "striker" isn't able to play for the Manchester United team, he isn't even able to get on the field and on several occasions he hasn't made a point of hiding his dissatisfaction with this situation. In addition to several physical problems, Martial is having a terrible performance on the field... he is unable to maintain a sequence of games.

It is notable that Manchester hoped to negotiate with other teams and proactively sought out several interested parties, but why did Martial refuse!?!?!?
I learned that Fenerbahçe had made a very generous offer.

I'm a terrible person to talk about profit in gambling games in the long term, my winnings are always sporadic and punctual, as I rarely end a month in profit.

It's possible? Yes, I believe it, but I don't think it's a question of strategy, because if there were an infallible recipe for profit then the casinos would be bankrupt. However, this is not what we have been witnessing in recent years.

But how is it possible then? In addition to the risk management that you have already mentioned, you need to bet on something that you are very good at, and in this regard you can now eliminate those games that depend a lot on luck, as these you will never be able to master. I'm talking about sports or card games, in which the player's skills overcome the mathematical probabilities of luck.

I disagree!
Many say that women are better at this or that compared to men, but my opinion is that they have been very stereotyped over time, at the same time that they have also suffered a lot of prejudice in relation to gambling.
Therefore, when we see a wet girl playing we still think... she must not know much about what she is doing, so she should take it easy in the game, take less risks... pure nonsense.

Just like anyone, there are women who are hopelessly addicted to gambling and we also have several examples of fantastic women.

It is not because of their caution, but because they decided to overcome prejudice, that I mention three great women who left a legacy and paved the way for the women we have today in gambling:

• Shirley Brancucci, first female Baccarat dealer in Las Vegas. Although she proved her skills as a dealer, she suffered prejudice because she was a woman and was subject to objectification;
• Judy Bayley, also known as the First Lady of Gambling, was the first woman owner of a major casino in Las Vegas;
• Claudine Williams was the first woman to be inducted into the Nevada Gambling Hall of Fame.

Conselho e dicas preciosas
Recentemente eu habilitei essa configuração em que o filtro por usuário é extremamente útil, do contrário eu receberia dezenas de notificações da galera que posta candidatura quando o manager abre novas vagas.

E sempre que possivel, eu ainda aviso meus colegas de campanhas sobre essas atualizações, pois nem todo mundo possui o bot instalado e devidamente configurado (lamentável né).

Enfim... alguém está acompanhando como que está a disputa de vagas agora que os mixers não são mais permitidos por aqui?

Sou da mesma opinião.... não acredito que o Bitcoin deva subir muito com a eventual aprovação do ETF, acredito que o mercado já tenha precificado o valor acreditando nessa aprovação (que na minha visão o povo está bem otimista).
Claro que minha opinião não tem fundamento algum, mas eu acredito que deve ser adiada novamente, principalmente depois do hack que houve hoje.

E, se de fato não for aprovada, a queda é certeira.
Estou tentado à vender um pouco de Bitcoin antes da votação, será que vou me arrepender?

Puts, é sério!?
Imagina a grana que o hacker não deve ter feito ao posicionar uma alavancagem antes de fazer essa publicação.
E quem sai perdendo com tudo isso somos nós, pois agora a SEC tem mais um motivo para não aprovar o ETF, fora o preço atual do Bitcoin que despencou logo que descobriram a farsa.

Enfim, eu já não estava acreditando nessa aprovação do ETF de Bitcoin agora para Janeiro mesmo.


Não cara, eu não consigo acreditar que isso realmente seja possível, seria muita audácia.

Cara, tem certeza que essa tal de isonomia tributária existe no Brasil?
Pergunto porque temos diversos exemplos de setores da economia, ramos de empresas, produtos ou serviços que possuem determinado benefício fiscal em razão de outros. O quão correto é isso?
Tudo bem que servem para incentivar empregos ou acelerar o desenvolvimento de alguma área específica da economia/região, mas na minha opinião essas medidas temporárias causam um vantagem desleal.

Quanto a isenção de 35 mil para exchanges Brasileiras, deve se manter sim, do contrário diversas outras isenções semelhantes deverão também cair por terra.

Cara, eu estava pensando aqui....
Sempre fiz o máximo para me adequar certinho e não ter problemas quanto as criptos e IR, faço minhas declarações anuais declaradinhas para algum dia poder converter elas com aumento patrimonial justificado e dentro da lei (pagando imposto se preciso) e sempre dentro do limite de isenção para não ter que pagar nada agora (eu pobre mortal nem teria como passar do limite de isenção).

Mas, confesso que com essas novas regras e "zonas cinzentas" que foi comentado aí, principalmente em ralção às campanhas de assinaturas, confesso que nem sei mais se corro algum risco ou não de cair em malha fina a qualquer momento, e acho que isso vale para todos nós.

O pior é que, se a RFB se manifestar a respeito, certamente será para dizer (criar mais alguma lei ou normativa) nos obrigando a recolher mais imposto ainda

Cara, governo FDP mesmo esse que voltou ao poder.

So... I believe the opposite, Botafogo needs to surprise its fans by winning as many results as it can. This will not bring sadness to the players, but rather demonstrate that the team managed to reorganize itself and that it is capable of returning to the main category and being among the first in the following season (2025).

In addition to the Brasileirão, its important to remember that Botafogo can also achieve other achievements this year that will excite their fans, starting with the "Campeonato Carioca" which starts later this month, there is also the "Copa do Brasil" and the "Pre-Libertadores".

I believe that Botafogo can organize its team and think about winning titles... The "Carioca" (state) championship is possible to achieve, and with a good restructuring of the team its possible to also think about greater achievements for this year.

OK, let's go...

Red Bull was unbeatable in the 2023 season with absolute dominance, together with Max Verstappen they managed to rack up impressive feats and milestones.
Just to start... he was crowned three-time Dutch champion, climbing the podium 21 times out of 22 opportunities, 19 victories, triumphed ten times in a row, started from pole position 12 times, was champion with six stages to spare and ended the championship with 545 points . Do you want more than that? Where could he achieve such a feat?

For the first time in its history in F1, Red Bull won all possible titles for the 2023 season. In addition to being crowned champion in the Constructors' and Drivers' World Championships, it finished runner-up with Sergio Pérez finishing second.

If all of this is not yet a reason to make you believe that there is indeed a very strong partnership bond between Verstappen and RedBull, then I give up trying to convince you.

Many will say sports games, but even those depend on a bit of luck, as several times we have seen favorite or better prepared teams lose to a very unlikely opponent.

So, I certainly say that card games are the ones that depend very little on luck. Let's analyze, for example, a traditional poker game.... a player's victory depends fundamentally on specific skills he has to memorize characteristics, numbers and colors of the cards that are presented during the game, so it depends purely on the player adopting strategies and make the best decision (or the right one) to get the best results, then... I would say that an experienced player who has all these characteristics and skills combined, can practically eliminate the "luck" factor, because while he doesn't If he is sure that he can win the game, he will simply give up on continuing to play it or bet a low amount.

Wel... after violating Financial Fair Play, Roma no longer had much money available for transfers in January and this greatly hampered Mourinho's planning.
It is for this reason that I believe we can expect a lot from Dean Huijsen at Roma, he is a great player and he was just not signed because they really don't have the money and not because his performance is questionable.

Loans without transfer costs fit very well into Roma's current situation, and in addition they can also increase their budget by trading players. This would increase the financial power in the market to seek out interesting athletes. And Roma have already defined who they can get rid of to boost their budget in this transfer window.

Cara, essa de salário eu ach oque depende de você converter ou não para Fiat.
Tipo... todo mês você recebe X valor da campanha e deixa lá parado em sua wallet, aí quando chega a hora de declarar você fala que tem Y bitcoins, não precisa falar de onde eles vieram.
Porém, se todo mês você converte esses Bitcoins para Fiat na exchange e faz um PIX para sua conta bancária, aí sim pode ser visto como uma fonte de renda.

Quanto à faixa de isenção, atualmente se você receber até R$ 2.112,00 não precisa recolher imposto. Qual é a campanha de assinatura que paga isso por mês?

Pôxa, se deram ao trabalho de usar um vanitygen para criar a carteira mas fizeram isso em cima do padrão Legacy? Poderiam ter ido de carteira SegWit

Enfim, espero que esse 1 BTC fique por lá tempo suficiente para o valor do Bitcoin disparar à ponto de mais pessoas/empresas terem também a ambição de ir até a lua só para recuperar ele de volta.
Atualmente quem tem esse poder de tecnologia para ir até a lua, possui ambições muito maiores do que resgatar 1 BTC, então mesmo que ele valorize astronomicamente, creio que deva ficar por lá por um bom tempo.

Ah, e que esse 1BTC chegue à lua em segurança, do contrário veremos a aplicação real do termo "coin burn"