New stocks seems to pop up almost everyday now on cryptostocks or at least every week, it wouldent hurt if the one behind the companys/stocks did communicate on the biggest bitcoin forum...

Fas - fasbit do have some communication over here http://behindthecoin.com/threads/201-Instant-GPU-mining-!!!-COMING-SOON?p=763#post763 but it wouldent hurt if you guys came here and explained things.

Cryptostock listing https://cryptostocks.com/securities/87
Why is there another, previous listing https://cryptostocks.com/securities/84 where you used another emailadress and intended to raise 100 btc 1 000 000 shares @ 0.0001 btc each in the first round of shares


Fas - fasbit did a IPO where they sold off 10 000 000 shares @ 0,000001 btc each with an Fee surcharge of 0.1% so they got in 10,01 btc on the first batch of shares.

They claim that there rigs with two  290x GPU's cost them 2,85 btc(even at the temporary low btc price of  710 usd per coin, thats 2020 usd) at current market price and each 290x hashing at 820kh so 1.64 Mh/rig and 2 850 000 shares per rig and people basically buying into already excisting and set up hardware.

Taking a look at pricerunner one sees that 290x is avaliable from 660 usd so PSU, MB and so would have to be 700 usd then per rig, sounds a bit expensive if the MB only should be able to handle 2 cards per rig and why invest in 290X in a big scale mining operation when for example 7970's is avaliable from under 400 usd each(60,5% of the 290X's price) and they seems to produce around 700-750 kh(85,5%-91,5% of the 290X's hashrate) so choosing 290X's for a mining operation on large scale dosent seem like a good ide.

They claim they perform better than alternatepool.com, multipool.us and so on.
They mentioned they would be paying out around 90%(before electricity and such costs) of the profits(generated coins)

Plugging in the numbers you get that each 1.64mhz rig should produce around
0,012269938 BTC a day mining LTC, ~4.3 0.43 satouchi per share and day even just mining Litecoins or for example
0,019751135 BTC a day mining DOGE, ~6.9 0.69 satouchi per share and day

EDIT missed a 0 there before

As far as i know cryptostocks allow dividends from 0,00000001 btc, 1 satouchi per share and up, still FAS - fasbit claim they cant pay out dividend more than every other day due to "...need to accumulate dividends" to come up to the minimum threshold so that must mean they intend to pay out just 0,00000001 btc, 1 satoush every 2 days at current profitabillityi witch should be way less less than 10% of what they generate no matter what GPU's they use and coins they mine if they have any resonable efficiency like they claim ?

Never buy anything from BFL, they will not deliver on time and you will probably not get the advartised hashrate from there products either.

I havent read up on KnC the last months but i think there Neptunes were to be delivered in Q1-Q2 2014 or so. There first release of miners, Jupiter & Saturn was pretty close to projected target dates(end of september) and they started delivering a few days into October so maby they see that they might be a week or two behind there shedule on when to start delivering there new line of  Neptune ASIC miners.

The announcement of plan B is then just telling people that they intend to pay people for the mining incomes people would have got during those 1-2 weeks that they may be late. KnC have some mining on there own with previous generation ASICs and they intend to use generated bitcoins from those machines to pay costumers in the days there late if there late on releasing the Neptunes, thats how i interpret there news.

Locating a data center in the north of Sweden is nothing strange, we have lower electricity prices and lower taxes on electricity in the northen part of Sweden and the labourcost in northern part of Sweden is lower than if the had hosted there devices in Stockholm for example.

I don't see it as possible that KnC would screw up as BFL has done, KnC may be a week or a few late but i doubt it's possible for them to be over a year late on delivering ASICs like BFL was on the delivery some of there costumers machines.

Well just look at JDBIF's original contract for example and you see that TRJ, TheRealJoker that runs the fund have been in violation of his contract for over a year. The shares have a face value of 0,01 btc each and he should pay 20% monthly dividend on that, so 0,002 btc per stock and month.

At the current issued amount ~2 500 000 stocks that's 5 000 btc each month he adds to his debt to the shareholders, well he actually payed around 1,8 btc in January so the debt "only" increased with 4998,2 btc in January.

The way he handled the stock and refuses to pay dividend accourding to the contract has brought the price down from 0,01 btc at the introduction the 9 july 2012 to the current level at 0,000030 btc, 10 days ago or something like that TRJ even pressed the price down to 0,000001 btc where he obviously thought it was good for him to sell at that price so he keeps diluting the share value for previous investors each month by his crazy sellouts of underpriced stocks. The stock has lost 99,7% of it's original value.

What kind off new shit is it thats been introduced now at cryptostocks, can the asset issuer just randomly declare IPO period and reset the buy/sell orders and no new buy/sell orders allowed to be placed at traders preffered amounts ?

Thats total bullshit, if you should introduce a new feature it have to be annonsed before it is introduced and if the share issuer havent specified starting and ending dates of an IPO period or the exact conditions in there original contract you can't just let them randomly dissallow buy/sells after it has previously been allowed.
Kumala kan you please fix the error at the BTC32 stock so people can trade that stock again and make sure you don't allow scamstock like JDBIF to starts to randomly dissallow shareholders abbility to put up sell or buy orders at peoples prefeered values, this new "feature" will clearly be abused by scamstocks and will make all serious investors leave cryptostocks for good if you will keep it in the current form.

There is a 4% fee on selling debt(notes) if they get bought, so if you sell a debt for exactly 1 btc you should recieve 0.960 btc if it get bought.

Usagi was having trouble around the time when the btc stock exchanges closed back in oct-nov with his loan on btcjam and was behind, but it looks like he have been working hard on sorting things since then and has been paying off the loan at btcjam bit by bit and have now paid the whole loan off.

To the people behind Coin Mining Union Corporation(CMUC) at Cryptostocks, you may whanna take a look at the banner add that you run at cryptostocks frontpage https://cryptostocks.com/ and/or the contract description of your stock https://cryptostocks.com/securities/76.

The banner add say "Get 2.4GH/s per 0,6 BTC share"
The contract/description say "max. 1500 shares for the price of 0.06 BTC you participate in 2,4 GH/s a share at the start of the project."

The didivdend payout(and the fact the shares cost 0.06 btc each) seems to indicate it's the add banner thats wrong..

Can we get some clarification on what you actually mean from someone in the get365 team.

In the contract/stocks description https://cryptostocks.com/securities/72 it say
"...Getcoin365 will be offering 20,000 shares at .05BTC per share....All shares will be paid a dividend of 4.25% per annum paid monthly based on the IPO pricing of .05BTC per share"

in the announcement https://cryptostocks.com/announcements/519 you then say

"....
3. Why does your IPO only state it’s a 4.25% dividend ?
-We made a mistake, yes that’s right we did!
We will be paying the 4.25% pa dividend until we are live.
Then our fee share structure will apply     

4. What’s your fee share structure?
-2% of all fee’s generated
..."

Does that mean
1 The stock owners on cryptostocks will get 4.25%(~0,35% per month) in yearly dividend + 2% of the fees generated divided on the 20 000 stocks from when the site goes live the 28 jan onwards or...

2 Do you mean that from the 28 jan onwards people will only get 2% of the fees and no fixed yearly dividend.

Also your IPO of 20 000 stocks at 0,05 btc each, thats 1000 btc for witch the stockowner will get 1/50(2%) of the generated fees, so basically a valuation of the yet to start site at around 50 000 btc, that sounds a bit high...

Check a comparison site like http://www.coinwarz.com/ for example and put in your miners hashrate, power consumption and so on.

Checked the site, i had a small amount of ltc in there i forgot about that i converted to btc and withdraw, worked fine maby i was lucky or just some conis have problems or is it only deposits people have problems with that don't show up ?
But that withdrawal fee, 2 btm, they need to do soething about that.

4GyWqSjHNWJcUzaUEFubFCavgCsu6MRbba

Thank you

Sent you a pm with the username, im not to worried about the 2 btm, but i guess it's good if things work as there supposed to.
I'm more interested to know when the redeems on the loans will be honered.

Yea i meant redeem requests that people did by PM before, but i guess redeeming everyone that requested redeems a bit at a time until it's all done works to.

Looks like the withdraw worked, around 6.17% of the btc i had in weexchange i was able to withdraw, but 2 btm went missing after the page updated and the fee on the transaction was only 0,5 btm accourding to blockchain.info so thats not where it went.

What about people that already have redeemed there ukyo.loans, do they need to do it again at the new portal you are setting up ?


Would also like to thank Neo & Bee, Danny and Ukyo for working hard trying to solve this siituation.

So what's the latest updates on this loan from Graet now ?

It sais right on the first page of this thread that he's the Australian Director of WeExchange so of cource he knows Ukyo.

....
Looks like we finally will get some more update on when the issue with weexchange and ukyo loan will be solved later today.

I have one withdraw from weexchange that hasent been honered yet:
2013-10-28 23:22:06    4.01 btc     processing

Is there any point in sending over more btc from bitfunder to weexchange at the moment will it even show up on weexchange now with the problems he has or will that just delay ukyo's payments even more if his bitcoind gets more to process, has anyone transferred over any more btc lately from bitfunder to weexchange ?

My redeem request is missing in the list to:
5450 shares 54.50 btc, forum timestamp for the PM i sent to you Graet here at bitcointalk October 12, 2013, 05:46:52 AM

TradeFortress my month ended with the 16th So new period starts today same postcount bracket 201-400 0,08 btc per month.
Can you confirm when the 0,08 btc for the past month will be sent out ?
13QXQNqeG8TF4TWd4aSvxE2n9PF5VGGRXq

You can also of course send any balance i had at inputs.io to the same adress, as the site hasent been possible to log into for a while i cant say how much it was, could be just dust, could be more there...


TF is there a single thread where you post info on whats happened and is going on so people can read up about it ?
As far as i understand there should be no reason why people having the signature add should be effected in any way of this.
Same thing with people having funds in CL as CL had no reason to keep any funds in inputs.io, so CL balance holders shoulden't have lost any funds because of what happened.
How is the situation for people with balances in inputs.io and what will the actions from TF be there and to what degree will TF cover losses that may have happened there ?

As far as i understand TF also is having 640+ btc locked up at just-dice that he cant touch just to garateed peoples funds in case any issue would arrise with the inputs.io thing.