There probably not Cryptostocks/Vircurex/kumala unless thats where the stolen Money from Vircurex and the missing Dividends to shareholders went to fund that mining park. If it had been kumala behind it, why wouldent he have said it from the start ?

They also claim to be selling gridseeds 5chip miners for 135 usd each in orders of just 300 devices, but thats prices you would not even get to if you buy directly from Gridseed in quantity's of 5000+ units so thats just not possible for them to resell profitable at those prices, they must be a scam and just try to use cryptostocks emailadress without permission to hope to attract some buyers before they dissapear.

The problem is that many people have stocks in a lot of companys and there is a lot of SCAM company's/listings on cryptostocks so until kumla has fixed all security issues on the site it's not safe to show your emailadress to the share issuers unless your certain that none of the company's you have stocks in isn't a scammer that may use your emailadress to hack your cryptostocks account.
The fact is that a lot of listings on cryptostocks is scams only setup to steal people bitcoins then it isen't that far fetched that one or more of those scammers, some of them scammers is probably behind 5-10 listings each(as there has been an explosion of very poor listings since November and onwards) on cryptostock would also hack peoples accounts to steal even more bitcoins/litecoins/devcoins.

A simple change kumala can do is let people enter a public bitcoin(, litecoin & devcoin)address and to let them show share issuer that instead of an emailadress or let investors pick one by one what listings they want to show the emailadress for and not like now none or all listings your invested in.

Another simple thing Cryptostocks should do to increase security is to also give you the option to set and lock for example 1-5 bitcoin(, litecoin & devcoin) adresses that is the only adresses you can withdraw to, that would take away the incentive for the hackers to hack accounts if they can't withdraw any funds.

He clearly wouldn't have to declare bankruptcy for that small sum $150 000/250 btc, but i guess the legal system would then have to look at all the money he owes to people and if he's possible investments he claims to have done haven't started to produce enough bitcoins yet it may be problematic for him if they can't handle his assets wisely until they do bare fruit, then all people he owes bitcoins may end up getting back less than 100% back.

He does clearly have some holdings worth some amount of bitcoins, the easiest ones is whats tied to a public bitcoinadress known to had the 232 000 activeminer shares at bitfunders closure that belonged to ukyo, that adress, 1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq also had other holdings:

ActiveMining    232,175    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
ADDICTION         3,927    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
BitPride            85,476    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
BTCINVEST            96    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
btcQuick      2,915,576    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
CRYPTO.LTC            2    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
DISCOVERY            10    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
FIAT.AUD                1    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
FIAT.USD               27    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
Graet.Loan           979    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
Kenilworth              25    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
LabRatMining          15    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
NEOBEE          116,667    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
RentalStarter      9,505    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
SatoshiPoker 4,000,000    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
TU.SILVER              11    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq
Ukyo.Loan          7,695    1Mn65Q9Xm6NBoPdF8ppS3AzgRLt92ZKtTq


So if we take the last known price when Bitfunder closed or a later price if they have traded later on other exchanges or for those that haven't traded open just the buyprice we would get the following(i did count on it a few weeks ago so there may be slightly different prices on the stocks actively traded on exchanges now)

                          per share    Btc total          stock current status
satouchipoker       0,00008000   320                private
NEOBEE               0.00400000   466,668           Havelock
RENTAL STARTER  0.00579000     55,03395       Havelock
Graet.Loan          0,01                9,79             when graet gets back on track
ActiveMining        0,0006-0,005 139,305-1106,0875 BF 0,0009 Last price  (Cryptotrade 0,005-0,0005/CS)
BTCQuick            0,00013?       379,02488        values will be payed back to shareholders in 6-12 months time
ADDICTION         0,007              27,489           private
BitPride              0,00000400       0,3419
PAYED OFF ukyo shares             76,95
tu.silver             0,0111              0,1221         Private usagi
LabRatMining      0,119                1,785
Kenilworth         0,00062-0,0018   0,0155         ?? maby havelock in the future
FIAT.USD          0,0012               0,0324
FIAT.AUD             ?                       ?
DISCOVERY       0,0074                0,074
CRYPTO.LTC      0,019                 0,038
BTCINVEST       0,1922              18,4512         Trade Fortress missing, some BTC from Kate/ciphermine holdings
====================================
Total around                           1495,1107 btc

and there have been some dividends after bitfunders closure.

                                 per share    btc total
dividend rentalstarter   0,00001310   0,1245155
dividend btcquick         0,00000008   0,23324608
dividend Addiction          ?           ?

Thats around 1500 btc for those holdings alone.
If Ukyo also had other accounts/public adresses with bitcoinstocks in them on Bitfunfer or stock holdings on other platforms like BTCT-CO i don't know but it seems very likely.
There has also been several threads on bitcointalk where people seems to connect A couple of transfers of ~5000-7000 btc on 2 occations to a mining company and a bitcoin mining hardware producer, whether they got things right when they traced the flow of bitcoins and it was in fact Ukyo buying shares off the open market in the mining company and/or buying mining hardware from the hardware producer i don't know, i guess only ukyo and the 2 company's can tell.

Clearly some positions would have to be sold off carefully, dumping shares on the market wouldn't do any good for the price Ukyo get's for the shares and other things thats not listed may take time to find a buyer at resonable prices and if he in fact has holdings in the mining company that has had some problems sofar those will at least start to generate some btc back now and if ukyo possibly have started to get miners in the 100's of TH they would resonable be producing a fair amount of BTC each day for him now then.

In Ukyo loan it's pretty simple math Ukyo owes people around (2000-76,95)*(1+(0,015*3,5))~2024 BTC
In the weexchange balance matter it's a bit harder to know as we don't know how much of it that belonged to ukyo and whether his and/or cryptosyprus balances was included in the 6.175%, but around (386/0,06175)-386 = 6251-386 = 5865 BTC

I really don't think it will be good for anyone if people started 20 different leagal processes agains Ukyo that would just mean more costs for all parts and less money left to those ukyo own money, ideally Ukyo, Graet and cryptocyprus would talk more openly about what is beeing done and if/what people can do to help Ukyo/Graet to get back on there feets and sort this out as fast as possible.

Well i guess the obvious would be if everyone in the bitcoin community would point one or more of there Bitcoin miners & Litecoin/scrypt miners to Graets Ozcoin pools https://ozcoin.net/ and https://lc.ozcoin.net/ ,there hashrate is a bit weak at the moment and i think Graet would need and appreciate all the help he could get and by helping Graet you would not only be helping Graet and Ukyo but also indirectly be helping the something like 200 people that loaned Graet and ukyo money in there loans and also be helping the unknown amount of people that have funds stuck in weexchange get there bitcoins back, witch in many cases would mean yourself to.

Maby someone that actually have got any information whatsoever outside of whats been said in the open on bitcointalk from Ukyo/Graet/cryptocyprus in this whole Ukyo loan/Graet Loan/Weexchange mess would care to share some light on what really is going on and not just claim they can't say anything either.

This is really getting redicules, Deprived has now been gone from bitcointalk 12 more days after his 4 post 13-14 mars and before that he was gone for 3.5 months, wtf is going on.

Oh ok, that sounds a bit strange unless one of the two Weexchange companys is technically owned by the other, witch one were people that used Weexchange only to get BTC funds in and out of Bitfunder using, the Weexchange company in Usa or the one in Australia ?

The info about stales on p2pnetwork and the fact that pool operators is at 0ms may give them a big advantage then so maby the return will be very good on p2pool mining. Maby it will be better to have a higher % of the miners at p2pool than what other numbers would indicate beeing the optimal then.

Ok thanks for explaining how things on p2pools works. So all p2pools works together then, people mining on p2p pool A will get payed when someone on p2pool B finds a block and so on then ?
If that is the case and there return matches there Hashrate they might be a viable option to then.

from digitalcoinfarms message 25/3 on CS
"Currently, we are getting 93-95% profit rate, because pool lag, doa, time expire.....internet laggy"
If it's that bad return mining on cex.io at the moment it might be a good ide trying Eligus or Btc guild out with a few miners already at this stage.

Is it possible to set backup pools in the mining software on the BTC mining hardware you got, a second/third mining pool as fallback options if there is problems on the main pool your mining at ?

Anyway it might be a good ide to spread the miners out on the different big pools when you get 14/20TH, based on last weeks hashrates and the fact that cex.io was working bad for you, maby something like this:
16-22 mars
          %of found                                                             number miners         
             blocks                info                                     14TH    20TH      40TH 
Eligus      14.01%  (4962 TH pay txfee, 0% fee)                4-6       5-7      10-14    merged mining supported http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Eligius_mining_pool
cex.io      27.58%  (9773 TH ? if the pay txfee, 0% fee)     3-5       4-6        8-12    merged mining supported   http://ghash.io/
discusfish 12.38% (5129 TH ?%fee)                                 2-3       2-4        4-8    ? if merged mining supported http://www.f2pool.com/
Btcguild   14.86%  (5264 TH pay txfee,3% fee)                  1         2-3        4-6     merged mining supported https://www.btcguild.com/
p2p pool     0.51% (181.5TH. pay txfee,0-0,5%? fee)          1         1-2        2-4     merged mining supported http://p2pool.in/
ozpool        0.60% (211.8TH pay txfee 1% fee)                  0           1         1-2     no merged mining https://ozcoin.net/

And see how things works out after 2-4 weeks of mining.
Merged mining adds about 1.5003% for namecoins, 0,0481% ixcoin, 0,01781% devcoins, so it's around 1.5% extra if a pool has merged mining.

Expected income on avg for miners when the pool finds a block.
Eligus   25.475 ((25.1+0,375)*1)
Cex.io  25.375 ((25+0,375)*1)
discusfish ?
Btcguild 24.711 ((25.1+0,375)*0,97)
p2ppool 25.348 BTC ((25.1+0,375)*0,995)
ozpool   24.849 BTC (25.1*0,99)

and avg time to find a block for the different pools (based on 144 blocks per day, in reallity it's slightly more as long as the network difficulty keeps increasing) and blocks per day would look something like this
                     avg time to
                     find blocks      Blocks per day
Eligus              1h 11m 23s     20.17
cex.io              0h 36m 15s     39.72
discusfish         1h 20m 47s     17.83
Btcguild           1h 07m 18s      21.40
p2p pool           32h 40m 47s    0.73
ozpool              27h 46m 40s    0.86

If you spread out the miners over several pools the variance on BTC generated per day/week/month will be reduced and problems at a single pool will effect you less.

You can find interesting statistic on pools here http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2014/03/march-23rd-2014-weekly-hashrate.html#!/2014/03/march-23rd-2014-weekly-hashrate.html or here less detailed here http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/top.php

What happened in the FAS stock on cryptostocks, the public shares suddenly increased by exactly 3 000 000 shares and i can't see that there has been any 3 000 000+ shares sold at 0.000003 recently ?

Thats a good summary of things, I think you got that a few date's wrong thou:

from Ukyo's post the 4 nov
"In connection with BitFunder’s shut-down, please note the following points, which supplement the points outlined in BitFunder’s October 8, and October 11, 2013 notices:
* As of November 14, 2013, no BitFunder user will be able to enter into any new positions or sell positions on the BitFunder website.
* On December 2, 2013, bitcoin balances in the accounts of all users will be transferred to their WeExchange accounts."

I think 8 Oct not 8 July was when us-citizens needed to get verified but they were still allowed to keep trading for a while after that if they got verified and the final trade stop for all users on Bitfunder was the 14 Nov not the 4 Nov.

If Sebastian only had funds stuck in Weexchange(or if he is mostly interested in what happened to the rest(5870? BTC) of the  ~6256?(386/0,0617) BTC in weexchange) and not in Ukyo loan, with Weexchange beeing registered(?) in Australia the logical would be to send the letter to the Weexchange's adress in Australia and not directly to Ukyo even if Ukyo that has handled most of Weexchanges business is in the Usa and it's Graet that is in Australia.
Or maby it's just because it's simpler to handle a process within the same country as he's using an Australian lawyer.

I think it was approximately the equivalent of 2 500 btc and 20 000 usd they lost about a year ago you can read some about it in there shareholders qarterly repports here https://vircurex.com/welcome/investors or search biitcointalk for additional info about it.

By the way Kumala the Feb 2014 repport that should have been published the first week in mars is still Missing

Do/will you have only bitcoin tables in the pokersite or will you also have tables in fiat like USD, EUR, GBP... to ?
If you do/will have fiat tables also, will your sites fiat tables be part of any poker network like ipoker/merge/microgaming or so for a bigger playerbase from the start.

fasbit i saw that you in your forum the 23 mars said that you coulden't find usb cables cheep anywhere ??
"..the USB cords are the main issue...NO ONE has these for chaep..."
bitcoinstore has usb cables for 1,19-1,37 usd / 0,0021-0,0024 BTC, but maby that is to expensive ??
http://www.bitcoinstore.com/1ft-usb-a-to-usb-b-high-speed.html                                                 type A to  B       1,19$/0,0021BTC
http://www.bitcoinstore.com/qvs-usb-2-0-type-a-male-to-mini-b-male-sync-and-charger-cable.html  type A to MINI B 1,37$/0,0024BTC

and the full list of usb cables they have:
http://www.bitcoinstore.com/advancedsearch/result/index/?dir=asc&order=price&q=usb+cable

You have detailed calculators on Bitcoinwisdom to, where you also can set the arrival date for the miner and a few other things also.
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/calculator
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/calculator

and they have a nice page on the current and past Bitcoin/Litecoin difficulty to
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/difficulty

Current predictions for next Bitcoin difficulty change in 7.9 hrs is +18.80%
and the predictions for next Litecoin difficulty change in 2.1 days is  -7.37%

No i havent mailed him, but feel free to relay it to him if you like.
May be good if he has the time to checks in 5 min once or twice a week on bitcointalk to keep in touch with shareholders.

Fabrizio89 are your ISP having shared IP's with 100's-1000's users under the same IP or are you connecting to havelock throu some proxy, that might be the reason then. CloudFlare seems to become crazier by the day.

Will it be announced what the name of the investment group is and who's behind it ?

Yes both the corporate name btcQuick and the domain https://btcquick.com/ has some value for a potential buyer in the bitcoin sector, maby someone behind a similar business can buy it and get part of the thousands of customers btcQuick had as new customers in there business in the future.

Wolftechs anouncement today 24 mars
"Monday/Weekend Dividends due @ 1600h GMT - Vircurex issue
The weekend dividends are due at 1600h GMT.
Vircurex has halted Bitcoin withdraws
https://vircurex.com/welcome/ann_reserved.html
This currently affects us as autotrade is performed on this exchange and the Bitcoin profits are used to supllement the dividends daily.
Autotrade has ceased on Vircurex for the present time. This should not affect divdends too much as about 10-20% of the net dividend payment was made on this system presently.
I am using Cryptsy at the present time and leaving the Bitcoin holdings in Vircurex. (Sold DVC for 47% increase) WIll be paid when Bitcoin withdraw opens up or a time when DVC settles and can be converted back and move to another exchange for liquidation.

Regards

Shane"

It dosen't seem like Wolftech understand the scale of things, you just sold DVC(that you could withdraw from Vircurex) for BTC and left BTC in the form of BTC at Vircurex, that sometime today will become frozen for probably the next 15 years(if your lucky and can get them out at all...). Or are you taking a gamble that your holdings is so small on Vircurex that they will let you withdraw your frozen BTC funds this year ?

Announcement by Coinfarm 18 Mar
"....Let us wait tomorrow.... I might need to build a p2pool for our  14 x 1T asic miner...."

and announcement today, 23 Mar
".....So we will have about 19-20t hash rate. According this, I'm building our own p2pool. Someone said if i have enough hash rate Your own p2pool will incresased your daily profit. We will test it 16 more miner to come "

Running your own pool with 14 TH or later 20 TH is not a wise decition, you will most likely get a lot worse return, maby no return at all than having the miners at a big pool, preferable one with low or even 0% fee like Eligus.

The current Hashrate is 40 432 845 GH/s and you will have 14TH, 14 000 GH/s soon, thats 0,0346253% of the hashrate, it will on avg take over 20 days to find a block and in the mean time your miner gives no return whatsoever, 0%. In 1.0 days time the difficulty increases by around 18% and the 14TH is expected to only find a block every 23,66 days if you run your own pool and after around 12 more days it gets maby 15-20% worse again and so on, if your really unlucky you may never(not very likely but possible) find a block solomining.
So whoever gave you the advise to solomining with 15-20 TH really wasent thinking straight, there's for example 36,89% chance you find 0 blocks in your 14TH miners first 20 days if the difficulty woulden't increase from now in that timeframe but we already know it will go up in that time(a resonable expectation would be +56 to 70%) so the chance to find 0 blocks solomining will be higher.

The only resonable thing to do is to mine in a big pool with sha256/Bitcoinminers unless you have way over 1 000 TH and even then it's a gambling that in many cases would be negative.