Bitcoin Forum
June 04, 2024, 02:53:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 »
421  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blochain.info i need help on: June 29, 2016, 03:11:28 PM
Quote
And that link is not working, it shows: "Transaction not found"
Sorry i forgot to add 1 letter
New link: https://blockchain.info/tx/cc1130066c7e0f8d783a122c20baa2601b0151b06933739c4a70e717dee6261d

That's a medium-sized dust transaction with very low fee.  Most nodes won't even relay that transaction.  It may take a long time for it to get confirmed.

So there is a chance the transaction never confirms?

Yes.  There's a decent chance (not guaranteed) that it will not confirm within 3 days and returns to your blockchain wallet.
422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: This asshole published my private key! on: June 29, 2016, 03:07:24 PM
Lol.  This thread is just going around in circles.  OP keep saying all our keys are there, others counters it, and some others just says they're fake (they're not!).  Again, and again, and again...
423  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blochain.info i need help on: June 29, 2016, 02:55:01 PM
Quote
And that link is not working, it shows: "Transaction not found"
Sorry i forgot to add 1 letter
New link: https://blockchain.info/tx/cc1130066c7e0f8d783a122c20baa2601b0151b06933739c4a70e717dee6261d

That's a medium-sized dust transaction with very low fee.  Most nodes won't even relay that transaction.  It may take a long time for it to get confirmed.
424  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum help on: June 29, 2016, 02:45:24 PM
You should have stored your seed when you first created your electrum wallet, you can use that to create a new wallet with the "restore wallet" option you can then access your coins again.

Sadly i lost the copy of my seed. Is there any other way to recover my coins stucked in the wallet because of the password not accepted by electrum?

There's no way to restore your wallet other than using the seed/password if you don't have the private keys backed up.  Both of those are pretty much the whole security of electrum.
425  Other / Meta / Re: How does negative feedback work? on: June 27, 2016, 09:00:05 PM
I understand positive feedback & its effect on a profile but How does negative feedback work?
Using this profile as an example:
brendanjhwu
-8: -3 / +0

How do these negative numbers behave differently if the profile does/does not have Default trust in their trust settings?
All I fully understand at the moment is the middle number is the number of unique members who have given this user a negative feedback within his/her trust list.


Almost correct.  It's the number of unique members who are in your trust network.  Not having Default trust in your trust list will remove everyone that was added on DT from your trust network.  Adding other user in your trust list will add them, and the users in their trust list if you set the depth to 1 and the users in depth 1 users' trust lists if you set it it to depth 2 and so on, to your trust network.

The number on the right is the positive feedbacks and works the same way as above.
First number is the calculated value of the other two.  It is quite complicated for me to explain properly so I'll just refer you to the formula here.
426  Economy / Lending / Re: KNIGHT & DAY LOAN SERVICE!! on: June 27, 2016, 05:51:01 PM
Member Name: Jhanzo
Loan Amount: 0.05BTC
Loan Reason: Need extra 0.05 for something.
Interest Offered: 0.005BTC
Pay Back Date: July 4, 2016.  Probably sooner.
Collateral Offered: None.

Edit:
Forgot to post the address.
19krRPs4PqtyP2T5GgkVsVxgt7LmypeSJM
I am sorry, this loan is denied.  I will not do a  loan for this much with no collateral.  Your account will not work for collateral for it has to many negative feedback's.

Ah ok.  No worries.
My negative feedback are just baseless accusation from one person with multiple accounts though.  Just saying so you don't think of me as scammer.
427  Economy / Reputation / Re: False Negative Trade Score on: June 27, 2016, 01:59:32 PM
I'm afraid trust is not moderated.  The admin never deletes negative trust (even if they're false) unless the user who gave it is spamming negative trust really, really, bad (this guy have spammed theymos' trust page and they don't get deleted.).

That user is not and never will be trusted anyway.  Just ignore it.
428  Economy / Lending / Re: KNIGHT & DAY LOAN SERVICE!! on: June 27, 2016, 11:06:02 AM
Member Name: Jhanzo
Loan Amount: 0.05BTC
Loan Reason: Need extra 0.05 for something.
Interest Offered: 0.005BTC
Pay Back Date: July 4, 2016.  Probably sooner.
Collateral Offered: None.

Edit:
Forgot to post the address.
19krRPs4PqtyP2T5GgkVsVxgt7LmypeSJM
429  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Oh Fuck! - This asshole published my private key! on: June 27, 2016, 03:40:46 AM
I can store that on a floppy, no problem.

Its 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675  pages x 128 items =1.15792089*10^77 = 256 bit security

lol Cheesy yea
i think the question was if they had to store every private key.. rather than just the formulae that can make it "on the fly"
we both know the website only stores the formulae to create it on the fly but i have done the theoretical (because i rounded) sums of data storage needed if every private key was saved individually, just for fun Cheesy

Oh, I see.  I know that it is not storing all private keys but I had thought that the private keys are stored in specific page once they are generated randomly (because someone picked that page).  Guess they're not so random after all, then?
430  Other / Meta / Re: Brute force attack in progress? on: June 27, 2016, 03:33:25 AM
Looks like it have stopped.  Went from 240~ pages to 100~ pages pretty fast.

A person can read content without logging in. They can't post or view trust though.
That's true, but Jhanzo is pointing out that it looks like a lot of those guests are trying to log into the forum, which could point to a brute force attempt at logging into someone's account.

Aye, that's what I meant.
431  Other / Meta / Brute force attack in progress? on: June 27, 2016, 02:57:41 AM
Who's online page showing unusually large amount of "Guest    XX:XX:XX XX    Logging into the forum.".  Is that normal?

Looks like there's no captcha requests when logging in.  I could've swore it was there before...
432  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Oh Fuck! - This asshole published my private key! on: June 27, 2016, 02:46:43 AM
A noobish question just popped up in my brain.  How large will that website be if it have at least half of the number of possible private keys plus addresses?  Let's exclude the blockchain links for now.
433  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Clean bitcoins on: June 27, 2016, 12:12:08 AM
I've been using bitmixer for more than a year (probably two) and have never faced any problem.  They're a reliable service to make your coins untraceable, but I can't guarantee whether the coins you receive will be "clean" or not.  I think the only sure way of getting "clean" bitcoins is to buy them right off the miners with premium price.
434  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: May I mine Ethereum with hardwares of bitcoin miners? For example AntS7 or S9? on: June 26, 2016, 10:44:21 AM
Not possible.  Different proof-of-work algorithm.  Bitcoin is SHA-256 and ETH is Ethash (some kind of hybrid algo).  Bitcoin miners are designed to "mine" SHA-256 based coins.
You're seeing lower hashrate on ETH pools because they don't use specialized ASICs and only uses GPU to mine.
435  Economy / Speculation / Re: British exit from the European Union How is this going to effect Bitcoin on: June 25, 2016, 02:56:18 PM
This should be good for bitcoin.  Brexit conclusion was just a day ago and the price have risen by $100~ since then.  Could be just a recover from the last price dump but I'm thinking that the brexit news is pushing it up too.
436  Other / Off-topic / Re: Would u still use Bitcoin if u were a USD multi millionaire? on: June 25, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
If my mindset is still the same as it is now then most likely yes, I will still use bitcoin because I've learned a lot about it that makes me believe that it have a great future.  Of course, this can change depending on many factors.  It would be easier to leave bitcoin when you know that you're set for life (Or harder if you've invested more than you can lose.).
437  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Best bitcoin movies according to IMDB on: June 25, 2016, 02:16:22 PM
Never watched any movies about bitcoin here.  Read few books halfway but they quickly get boring because there's no facts written that I can't find using google.  Shouldn't have expected more than that, really.
438  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: what fun in GAMBLING? on: June 21, 2016, 11:37:24 PM
Gambling is simply a way to make some money or try your luck (depends on how you see it) whilst at the same time having fun on something that you enjoy doing.  Like watching sports, or playing poker.  There's no actual "fun" in gambling alone in my opinion. 
439  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Resolution - No gambling on: June 20, 2016, 10:52:20 PM
I never made any resolution to stop gambling (not that I have many successful resolutions).  It never went so bad that I'd feel the need to do anything about it.
Besides, gambling every now and again is healthy. /j
440  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Been waiting 7 hours for transaction still not gone through? on: June 20, 2016, 08:02:25 PM

You're using a very low fee of 0.000045BTC for 225KB transaction.  Of course it'll take long.  There's no way to guarantee how long it'll take to confirm, but my guess it will take 12-30 hours.  Seeing that another transaction with less fee got confirmed in 37 hours.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!