That's a medium-sized dust transaction with very low fee. Most nodes won't even relay that transaction. It may take a long time for it to get confirmed. So there is a chance the transaction never confirms? Yes. There's a decent chance (not guaranteed) that it will not confirm within 3 days and returns to your blockchain wallet.
|
|
|
Lol. This thread is just going around in circles. OP keep saying all our keys are there, others counters it, and some others just says they're fake (they're not!). Again, and again, and again...
|
|
|
That's a medium-sized dust transaction with very low fee. Most nodes won't even relay that transaction. It may take a long time for it to get confirmed.
|
|
|
You should have stored your seed when you first created your electrum wallet, you can use that to create a new wallet with the "restore wallet" option you can then access your coins again.
Sadly i lost the copy of my seed. Is there any other way to recover my coins stucked in the wallet because of the password not accepted by electrum? There's no way to restore your wallet other than using the seed/password if you don't have the private keys backed up. Both of those are pretty much the whole security of electrum.
|
|
|
I understand positive feedback & its effect on a profile but How does negative feedback work? Using this profile as an example: brendanjhwu -8: -3 / +0
How do these negative numbers behave differently if the profile does/does not have Default trust in their trust settings? All I fully understand at the moment is the middle number is the number of unique members who have given this user a negative feedback within his/her trust list.
Almost correct. It's the number of unique members who are in your trust network. Not having Default trust in your trust list will remove everyone that was added on DT from your trust network. Adding other user in your trust list will add them, and the users in their trust list if you set the depth to 1 and the users in depth 1 users' trust lists if you set it it to depth 2 and so on, to your trust network. The number on the right is the positive feedbacks and works the same way as above. First number is the calculated value of the other two. It is quite complicated for me to explain properly so I'll just refer you to the formula here.
|
|
|
Member Name: Jhanzo Loan Amount: 0.05BTC Loan Reason: Need extra 0.05 for something. Interest Offered: 0.005BTC Pay Back Date: July 4, 2016. Probably sooner. Collateral Offered: None.
Edit: Forgot to post the address. 19krRPs4PqtyP2T5GgkVsVxgt7LmypeSJM
I am sorry, this loan is denied. I will not do a loan for this much with no collateral. Your account will not work for collateral for it has to many negative feedback's. Ah ok. No worries. My negative feedback are just baseless accusation from one person with multiple accounts though. Just saying so you don't think of me as scammer.
|
|
|
I'm afraid trust is not moderated. The admin never deletes negative trust (even if they're false) unless the user who gave it is spamming negative trust really, really, bad ( this guy have spammed theymos' trust page and they don't get deleted.). That user is not and never will be trusted anyway. Just ignore it.
|
|
|
Member Name: Jhanzo Loan Amount: 0.05BTC Loan Reason: Need extra 0.05 for something. Interest Offered: 0.005BTC Pay Back Date: July 4, 2016. Probably sooner. Collateral Offered: None.
Edit: Forgot to post the address. 19krRPs4PqtyP2T5GgkVsVxgt7LmypeSJM
|
|
|
I can store that on a floppy, no problem.
Its 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 pages x 128 items =1.15792089*10^77 = 256 bit security
lol yea i think the question was if they had to store every private key.. rather than just the formulae that can make it "on the fly" we both know the website only stores the formulae to create it on the fly but i have done the theoretical (because i rounded) sums of data storage needed if every private key was saved individually, just for fun Oh, I see. I know that it is not storing all private keys but I had thought that the private keys are stored in specific page once they are generated randomly (because someone picked that page). Guess they're not so random after all, then?
|
|
|
Looks like it have stopped. Went from 240~ pages to 100~ pages pretty fast. A person can read content without logging in. They can't post or view trust though.
That's true, but Jhanzo is pointing out that it looks like a lot of those guests are trying to log into the forum, which could point to a brute force attempt at logging into someone's account. Aye, that's what I meant.
|
|
|
Who's online page showing unusually large amount of "Guest XX:XX:XX XX Logging into the forum.". Is that normal? Looks like there's no captcha requests when logging in. I could've swore it was there before...
|
|
|
A noobish question just popped up in my brain. How large will that website be if it have at least half of the number of possible private keys plus addresses? Let's exclude the blockchain links for now.
|
|
|
I've been using bitmixer for more than a year (probably two) and have never faced any problem. They're a reliable service to make your coins untraceable, but I can't guarantee whether the coins you receive will be "clean" or not. I think the only sure way of getting "clean" bitcoins is to buy them right off the miners with premium price.
|
|
|
Not possible. Different proof-of-work algorithm. Bitcoin is SHA-256 and ETH is Ethash (some kind of hybrid algo). Bitcoin miners are designed to "mine" SHA-256 based coins. You're seeing lower hashrate on ETH pools because they don't use specialized ASICs and only uses GPU to mine.
|
|
|
This should be good for bitcoin. Brexit conclusion was just a day ago and the price have risen by $100~ since then. Could be just a recover from the last price dump but I'm thinking that the brexit news is pushing it up too.
|
|
|
If my mindset is still the same as it is now then most likely yes, I will still use bitcoin because I've learned a lot about it that makes me believe that it have a great future. Of course, this can change depending on many factors. It would be easier to leave bitcoin when you know that you're set for life (Or harder if you've invested more than you can lose.).
|
|
|
Never watched any movies about bitcoin here. Read few books halfway but they quickly get boring because there's no facts written that I can't find using google. Shouldn't have expected more than that, really.
|
|
|
Gambling is simply a way to make some money or try your luck (depends on how you see it) whilst at the same time having fun on something that you enjoy doing. Like watching sports, or playing poker. There's no actual "fun" in gambling alone in my opinion.
|
|
|
I never made any resolution to stop gambling (not that I have many successful resolutions). It never went so bad that I'd feel the need to do anything about it. Besides, gambling every now and again is healthy. /j
|
|
|
You're using a very low fee of 0.000045 BTC for 225KB transaction. Of course it'll take long. There's no way to guarantee how long it'll take to confirm, but my guess it will take 12-30 hours. Seeing that another transaction with less fee got confirmed in 37 hours.
|
|
|
|