You guys have been in the service since 2019. Do you have any plans to change your website's domain? I'm not gonna lie; I'm concerned that the current one might make people think it's a scam in my own opinion (or because it's not common domain e.g com, net, io). What do you think about changing it to make your website seem more like trustworthy?
Official domains are below. It does not make sense to spend millions of dollar to buy a domain, if [banned mixer]m has such expensive value. A domain can be either dot com, net, io but it does not mean that domain name is an official one of a service. A famous scam site is bitcoin.com that is owned by Roger Ver and Bitcoin Cash team. It does not represent the unique Bitcoin. If you want to get information and download Bitcoin Core wallet, you must go to either https://bitcoin.org/ or https://bitcoincore.org/Welcome to our official Coinomize Bitcointalk Thread!
----------------------------------------------------
Our Clearnet Domains:
https://[banned mixer]
https://[banned mixer]
https://[banned mixer]
Our Tor Domain (Recommend to use):
New V3: http://[banned mixer]
Old one: http://coinomthajerbtq7.onion
----------------------------------------------------
Attention!
Scam/Clone Domains from Coinomize found!
DO NOT USE:
coino-mize.com / coinomize.bz / coinomize.cc / coinomize.net / coinmize.co / coinomqrds5ti77r.onion / coinomize.la /
coinomize.pw / coinomize.xyz / coinomize.online !
OUR ORIGINAL DOMAINS:
[banned mixer] / [banned mixer] / [banned mixer] / [banned mixer]
|
|
|
|
What i want to determine is until what point of it is OK merge those UXTOs in a TX
If you can make your payments without merging UTXOs, why you don't do this? You care about privacy and try to merge UTXOs, is it something worth to consider for your privacy? If possible, I will use each UTXO for different transaction, for different receiver and I will never to merge those UTXOs like you want to do. |
|
|
|
Well most of us are waiting the next bitcoin halving and speculate about how it will affect the network, mining, fees, and prices
In fact, halving does not affect Bitcoin transaction fee too much. Bitcoin average transaction fee (All time). The chart shows Bitcoin transaction fee usually is not too expensive. Halving does not affect it as the chart shows but some hypes like Ordinals BRC20 a few months ago, made transaction fee on Bitcoin network became expensive months ago. It did not last too long and transaction fee on Bitcoin network drops back to its normal level. |
|
|
|
It seems what happening right now is "buy the news sell the rumors". Look what happened on the price when Grayscale things popped, the market pumped, and look at now, dumped again.
For sure a lot of people are losing money because of these kinds of news.
It is never wrong and the market repeats its many years. They react too fast with news and don't spend enough time to sit down, step back and think deeper a bit. That news about Grayscale lawsuit win against SEC does not directly lead to an approval of a Bitcoin Spot ETF. If they are calm enough, they will realize it. Although the SEC lost the case to Grayscale, the acceptance or rejection of the ETFs is still at the discretion of the SEC and not any other agency. So it's not surprising to me that they continue to reject all ETFs proposals, including BlackRock's, which we were most looking forward to. But what's interesting is that they delayed it until March 2024 and that's also when the halving will take place. Therefore, on social network X, many conspiracy theories have appeared claiming that the SEC is also participating in market manipulation.
The win of Grayscale brings some hope for community but SEC are trying to delay their announcement on approval or rejection of Bitcoin Spot ETFs. There are some important scheduled days to look out. Pay your attention in middle of October this year for more events or dramas from SEC.  |
|
|
|
[JUST IN] Champions League 2023/2024 group drawsGroup ABayern Man United Copenhagen Galatasaray Group BSevilla Arsenal PSV Lens Group CNapoli Real Madrid Braga Union Berlin Group DBenfica Inter Salzburg Real Sociedad Group EFeyenoord Atlético de Madrid Lazio Celtic Group FParis Dortmund Milan Newcastle Group GMan City Leipzig Crvena zvezda Young Boys Group HBarcelona Porto Shakhtar Donetsk Antwerp
Newcastle United get in a toughest group but it is more than a nightmare for them. They did not expect to be in such group. PSG, Dortmund, Milan and Newcastle United will have to beat each other to get only two tickets to go next. Did I miss any new terms in Champions League this season? Do we still have 2 clubs from each group to go next? Will PSG have to stop this season after a group stage? It will certainly push Mbappe to leave PSG. |
|
|
|
Nexo: The insurance amount for all deposits is up to $775 million. If something happens, you may not get anything from it.
Crypto.com:One of the platforms expected to go bankrupt.
Not only them but all lending platforms are risky to put your cryptocurrency on it. It is more risky than centralized exchanges as lending platforms will have to get money from users, circulate it around or use it somewhere to get interest and use part of interest to pay their users with their high promised APYs. If they don't get more money from current and new users, their cash flow is broken and will face with crash. Their crash can be triggered by collapses of other platforms where they deposit user money to get interest. It is a risky cycle among lending platforms and we see how Terra, FTX crashes affected Three Arrows Capital, Celsius, BlockFi, Voyagers ... Three Arrows Capital hit by TerraBlockFi argues FTX, Three Arrows Capital aren’t entitled to repaymentsBehind Voyagers' fall |
|
|
|
It's up to you which of them you prefer, you can see the pros and cons of each one there dude in the link I will give, Now, if you want Decentralized (Dex) you can also try Celcius Network These things I have given you, it is better that you do your own research, because it is better that you have ideas about what I have mentioned. I disagree to list Celsius here. Celsius filed Chapter 11 for bankruptcy after Terra fiasco. I do no longer trust them after that but it's your choice to do this. The archive of their previous websiteCelsius Network Files Chapter 11 BankruptcyI did not follow up their changes recently but like FTX, it's hard to trust a scam company after their first scam and bad management for their company and user funds. |
|
|
|
As long you arent selling or closing up your position then those losses arent realized which means that you would really be that definitely having that kind of emotional hard condition which it is really between cutting losses
or holding up your position even more on which this is a typical condition which we do really face up but on the time that we are on such choice then using up your own common sense would really be just that enough on telling you that holding your position is the most smartest way to be done. We know on how this market works and how volatile it is. If we do enter on such high price then it would really be just that understandable that possibilities of going down would really be that possible in a snap which would causes for you to have that kind of impulsive approach and reaction which might lead into those bad decisions along the way.
Bad decisions and positions can be held up and become good ones if we hold it in our wallets or with Spot trading accounts. If it is margin and futures, chance to see it becomes better is smaller. In addition, by holding your position longer, you will have to pay more fee that is enough painful. It is if you can luckily avoid liquidation on your bad position but usually bad positions will end with exchange liquidations. Speaking about recovery then this is something that cant really be known because we know that whenever we do able to see a consolidating kind of market then movements arent really that something
that you could easily read up. THere's no way that you could simply tell whether it would be going up or down in next.
Binance is under massive cooperating attacks and if they survive through all attacks in 2023 bear market, they will recover in 2024 bull run. I don't recommend anyone to take risk with Binance and BNB like use all capital for it but I believe Binance will not die and BNB will have its show in 2024 and 2025. So surely I believe that token will easily recover to $310. |
|
|
|
the fee is not an "enforced tax," as you say. You're right; its a contribution. Fees stabilize the system, prevent spam, and keep the network running like a well-oiled machine. Yeah, I agree with your point, miners need to eat too, and these fees keep their servers humming. Its the invisible hand of economics showing its genius again, but in a digital landscape.
Transaction fees are income for miners who find blocks and confirm transactions. They spend resources to mine Bitcoin blocks and confirm transactions and they spend money for such resources. So they must gain something that includes Block rewards and transation fees. Without income, miners will stop mining and the network will be dead. Converting BTC to XMR is an option, but its also an extra step that veers off the straightforward path Bitcoin promises.
You have to use exchange for conversion and it is risky. With Bitcoin if you are careful, you can have good privacy and don't have to use Monero. [Guide] Decent mixing methods |
|
|
|
It's important to keep in mind that past results don't guarantee future results. Even while we have some optimism that the market is improving, it's still a gamble. Your choice to progressively sell Bitcoin during a bull market shows that you have acquired the skill of controlling greed, an emotion that has frequently fooled even experienced investors.
Who don't want to sell in a bull market and get profit if they know after a top of bull run, there will be a bear market with lower price. Challenge is they can not time the market, when top is reached and what price is a top of bull run. So they miss opportunities to take profit around the top and fall in a bear market. If they invest with borrow money, they will have to sell in bear market or will be liquidated. If they can hold their coins till a next bull run, it is good but unfortunately most of them will exit in a bear market. |
|
|
|
I just thought of this, and I want you to view it from your own perspective. As everyone hopes that more people get to believe and use bitcoins, I think bitcoins can gain more new users on a large scale if anyone (whales ) can place their advert through a popular football club just as some companies do sponsor football league. I think this will send a strong message to billions of people across the world who do know but does not embrace Bitcoin usage.
In many years, Bitcoin increases its adoption without advertisement at stadiums and I only see Sportsbet.io is a first, likely, cryptocurrency gambling site that advertises their gambling platforms on skirts of some clubs like Wolverhampton and others as well as in stadium and press conference. Altcoin has Terra as a famous advertisement but that project is a scam Ponzi and collapsed in 2022. Without advertisement at stadiums, you see Bitcoin already achieved very good adoption growth. I am positive about Bitcoin adoption even without advertisement at stadiums. Your hope is unrealistic because Bitcoin whales self-respect their privacy and not all of them publicly reveal that they are Bitcoin whales. So requiring them to publicly sponsor for Bitcoin advertisement is unrealistic. |
|
|
|
If you visit the US department of Justice website, you will see a lot of press releases about the US seizing bitcoins. The US government has more bitcoins in her possession than any other any nation in the world as state in a Forbes article. According to this Forbes, the US government is sitting on a stash of 207,189 bitcoin, worth $5 billion, by far the largest such state-owned hoard.
Because Silk Road seizure contributed a lot to those seized amount of bitcoin. As of now, all holdings relate to the seizure of BTC originating from Silk Road. and the amount is 41,491 BTC. I check with Buybitcoinworldwide.com and find differences between two websites. USA government has 207,189 seized bitcoin and already auctioned and sold more than 195,000 seized bitcoin, but still holds seized bitcoin. The 41,491 BTC is from 50,000 BTC seized from James Zhong. Government already sold 9,861.17 BTC on 14 March. U.S. Attorney Announces Historic $3.36 Billion Cryptocurrency Seizure And Conviction In Connection With Silk Road Dark Web Fraud. It is 50,676.17851897 BTC from this seizure. |
|
|
|
There is no doubt that regulation affects the sentiment of the market. If there is a swing of sentiment we can see the changes in the demands and sell walls on the market. Regulation can propel or negate Bitcoin adoption and is maximized depending on how the news is hyped creating investors to get interested to add more funds to the Bitcoin market.
So with the stated effect, we can say that government regulations play a huge part in the demand for Bitcoin that can directly affect the Bitcoin price in the market.
Regulations are biggest fear type in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency market that is young and not yet fully regulated with enough regulations. So more new regulations might come in future, will be enforced by governments so that Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investors are very sensitively affected by regulatory news. Whales and market manipulators use such news to fud the market, create fear, uncertainty and doubt among investors and traders then sometimes they pull the trigger to force liquidate positions of greed people who over leverage for their positions. About sentiment of the market, Fear and Greed index is good to use. - Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index
|
|
|
|
This is the problem with stop losses, which is a tool that is heavily promoted in trading courses but can and does fail in steep market declines, as BitMaxz explains. In your case it seems to have made you lose more than expected but at least you didn't lose everything. When a company goes bankrupt or a shitcoin goes to 0, stop losses are useless and you lose everything.
The best stop loss is prevention by don't touch shit coins and mintable tokens. Because mintable tokens can be minted by developers so if they want to scam and have their reasons to mint more tokens, they will do it. They will not be harmed because they prepare everything behind the scene. Only investors who don't know why and when developers mint more tokens and dump on the market. When they mint more tokens, stop loss won't be able to save you. If you exit, jump in again and more minting happens, you will lose more again. Terra crash and Do Kwon minting then dump on Binance is an example. |
|
|
|
There are 81% of Bitcoin owners who, probably because of the lack of Bitcoin Education or laziness, say that they'll move their coins to their bank's "crypto storage" if it was available. It will not be a good future, if true.
Let's pretend that pie chart also represents the rest of the world, and that a large portion of the supply has actually been "deposited" under the control of centralized entities. How much of the total supply must be under the control of a Cabal before we could consider that Bitcoin has failed?
81% is majority and it can be a big issue in future but I am very doubtful about the information. How did they conduct the survey to get that result? Survey methodology is important to use the sample as a reflection of the whole Bitcoin owner population. If the methodology is bad, the result will be not a good representation for the big population. The figure surprises me as I am so doubtful about reasons of those people, how did they decide to own and use bitcoin. With them, central banks are not risky and they are readily to use both central banks, their cryptocurrency storage service in future without fear that their bitcoin will be stolen. But probably they see similar risk from centralized exchanges and central banks or even consider central banks are safer than centralized exchanges to store their cryptocurrency. Bitcoin will not fail but those people fail with their choices and lose capital. Their failures won't be Bitcoin failure. |
|
|
|
In gambling, everything with impossible will become possible, and vice versa.
It's a game of probability and win or lose can come with our bet. We have to determine it to be more profit-oriented when our finger is on the mouse and bet button. As I remember in high school, there was a math lesson about opportunity theory, but the results were not certain exactly what we wanted, because the number of output results is always two-way which it depend on how many times we spin it. So when we talk about math in gambling, the results will obviously be different and unexpected.
When we bet, our andrenaline and dopamine will change a lot which causes us to be more uncontrollable. We will make more emotional decisions with our bets and it's hard to stop if we can not have a calm mind. Mostly we lose our control with betting, a longer time we are betting continuously, a more possibility we will lose control of emotion and decision. Math will no longer work for us when our minds are already emotional controlled. |
|
|
|
When trading with many pairings, your stop loss may be hit. Each currency has different levels of volatility, which is why the stop loss is usually triggered. As a result, you must investigate each pair in order to choose an appropriate stop loss size. The lower the wicks, the smaller the volatility. The more the volatility, the greater the wicks. So, if you want to be safe, choose a pair with low volatility, such as Bitcoin, which is ideal for scalping.
Trading with many trading pairs is like you are overdo your trading that is not good because you will more easily lose control on your positions. Holding for investment is best. Trading with limited trading pairs is one of best ways for trading with Spot. You will not have to spend too many times to analyze many things for those projects you are trading with. By trading, your positions will be affected by news so you must follow up news as well that is time consuming. If you trade and ignore news, it's not good as sometimes with fiascos like Terra, Celsius, FTX, you must follow up news to cut loss and reduce your loss. |
|
|
|
Atalanta lost versus Forsinone  and now Roma is losing 2-0 after the 1st half. What is happening, if they will end losing it will be a dramatic start for As Roma. Roma have bad defense in this season as they got 4 conceded goals so far and are very bad to fight against counter attacking of opponents. Chris Smalling again was beaten by attacking players easily with face to face situation. With the late conceded goal in a first half extra time, AS Roma will have a very difficult second half and they nearly have no hope to get three points from Verona. Belotti did have some try in this first half but it seems he will not be able to beat Verona defenders. Roma need to change their attacking methods in the second half and I am not sure why Spinazzola did not start in this match. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
