Well, there's a lot more competition now then before, but for some of the older 'cpu only' altcoins, ppl would still use the GPU miners, but not distribute them publicly.
I guess now the "in" thing to do is release it with some built in fee
ed: eh, fixed grammar.. a little
|
|
|
there are so many scams and frauds cause ppl are idiots
easy targets, easy money = more scammers and fraudsters
I'd *think* that your typical bitcoin user is a bit more intelligent then the avg facebook user... but I wouldn't be surprised if a good one out of every three or four of those ppl have compromised passwords
|
|
|
Hey all,
Can a p2pool have different fees for different users? Kind of a "0% fee list" and a "X% fee list", groups of addresses that we can add to that list or something like that?
regards,
P.
no built in functionality like that, no. screen -d -m -S p2pool-vtc ~/p2pool-vtc/run_p2pool.py --net vertcoin -a $someVTCaddress$
so what doesn't work about it? that would work, if you had some build of p2pool that included vertcoin and it was in the /home/<current user>/p2pool-vtc directory
|
|
|
What does the 'score' in getnetworkinfo signify? ... or better, is there some sort of measure to quantify what you see as a 'score'?
|
|
|
Japan rocks. I'm certain that exposed toilet would violate several laws here in the US (ed: and leave you open to a variety of civil lawsuits)
|
|
|
yEA... Got scam written all over it. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I get those on a daily basis, via Facebook, Cellphone, Email ..... I use the delete button, when I see the topic, and do not even read it anymore. Some go directly to the Spam folder, and get deleted every day. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I've actually only ever had one BS bitcoin email besides that one on my facebook acct. I've had some godawful amount sent to the junk folder on my primary email address, though... THANKS MT GOX!
|
|
|
sent to me via the Nogleg page on facebook: Chris Savage Jun 23rd, 5:17am Dear Friend, I write this because I know you stole 91.4 BTC from me on 24 November 2013.
I am prepared to forgive you but to obtain Gods mercy is dependant on your returning just half what you took and I would forgive you the remaining debt and pray to God to also show you mercy and forgiveness.
Praise be to God / Allah.
The address to send 45 BTC is 18HNhww8pH2411omBoy6zRqmZZ4TW6LfK7
Sincerely, Chris SavageFFS ed: http://www.reddit.com/user/superoxyhehe
|
|
|
I have a bit under one bitcoin to my name.
I never solo mined and solved ~60 or so blocks in total, with the vast majority of those being before the reward was halved. So I guess something like 2500-3500, unless I either god incredibly lucky or incredibly unlucky on the pooled mining...
I had to mine bitcoins to buy new hardware, so I don't regret selling them as I mined them. If I hadn't, then I never would have gotten to my max of ~12ghash/s, I would have been forever at the 1.3ghash/s or so after buying four 5830's... I mean with the 20/20 hindsight, it would have been better to NOT reinvest, and just horde all the coins those initial four 5830's made (likely in the hundreds)... but that's not something I can kick myself over.
I do regret selling the ones I mined when I was at 12ghash/s though, seeing as how at that point I wasn't buying any more hardware (ASICs coming). I still wouldn't have had a million $ worth, though (using today's market price). Probably made 500 or less of that total after I reached 12ghash.
...that being said, if I had gambled on and received that first generation Avalon, I'm relatively certain I'd have several hundred bitcoins still in storage. I mean, the vast majority of ASICs didn't start hitting the market until about 2-3 months after that first batch of Avalons. I'd be baffled as to how someone couldn't be a 'bitcoin millionaire' if they had purchased one of those for $1200 or w/e it was (and received it).
|
|
|
We got problems with WLS guys. I've been requesting a change of servers for that bum LA node and this is the response I got: Per our AUP, we do not allow mining, and this was made clear to you in our AUP which you agreed to before signing up for services with us. Thanks, -- Christopher Boswell WeLoveServers.net - Vice President c.boswell@weloveservers.netYeah, I've had some jackass company shut down one of my servers for that too. re: running bitcoind = mining (ed: i remember now, it was host1plus and a south africa vps)
|
|
|
is blockchain most secure wallet?
USB flash disk stuffed in your butt crack is probably the most secure wallet.. uSD might be more comfortable, but whatever floats your boat I guess. If he wanted to store USD and not bitcoins, sure.
|
|
|
I did - but not as pissed as most of the p2pool users are with him. This is his chance to actually participate - let's see ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) But he has no reason to participate So then I guess you're assuming that if he actually was active on the project, then it wouldn't affect donations? in any case, I had my donations set to 0% but I'm fairly certain I sent at least 1% directly to that p2pool donation address, from people with invalid names submitting shares on the next update, maybe he should make it possible to not input a default address, so then ppl with messed up names end up donating their bitcoins, and you can still have it set to 0% for everyone else
|
|
|
Sites are now offline. It's been a fun ride. Too bad more people didn't want to get involved.
well, i updated the client
|
|
|
Are buying 3x USB Bitcoin Block Erupter ASIC Miner 330MH/s worth it?
I seen these on ebay and I was just wondering if they would be worth it to mine and I was just wondering if I were to mine at least 10hours a day for a month, how much btc do you think I'll make? Just a brief estimate would be nice or just a realistic opinion about buying 3 for $15 each
So I'm curious. Did you ever end up picking up those 3 block eruptors? And if so how's your profitability doing? $25 to go and another 5838 years..
|
|
|
How does the peering system work and what do incoming and outgoing peers do?
Are the outgoing peers downloading the sharechain from you because they haven´t got the complete list?
What happens when your node has no ingoing peers?
Does your peernetwork automatically grow with your nodes´online time?
I read somewhere that you can also "force" your node to peer with a certain other node, is there a benefit in that?
Does a bigger peer network mean less orphaned shares? (as the found share should be distributed faster around the p2pool network)
Peers talk to each other ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 20 peers is enough, but 30 is better... Yes they download the chain if they havent got it up todate. You dont necessarily need incoming peers, but if You can open port 9333 it helps network - all cant do that. Force connect if theres a node you think is working very well and might help with your dead or orphan shares.. These questions are relevant to me, thanks for posting Collider... new p2pool node set up in Iceland http://is.centralcavern.uk:9332currently downloading blockchain for a middle east node - to follow. trying to set up nodes in regions of the world who are a little less served. see - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=655493.0 for reference. thanks Collider - i've asked the boss if we can set this all up for our nodes. A single peer could easily be better than 50. There are too many variables. Upstream inparticular is limited for some people, so if you get connected to a peer downloading the blockchain (and don't have something like Netlimiter), it could saturate your upstream and put you up around 1/2 a second latency to your first hop. Likewise, a lot of peers that you request the blockchain from will either not send it at all or (even worse) will send it very slowly. The client isn't aggressive enough in switching peers it tries to download the blockchain from. Get connected to 8 random nodes & sometimes you'll get crap. I've said it before, but when I ran p2pool on any server other than nogleg.com, I ran a bitcoind with two connections, one went to nogleg.com, and one was for p2pool. Probably a better idea is to have three, in case that one goes down or gets DoS'ed or DDoS'ed or something (happened occasionally). The p2pool client sends any blocks discovered over the p2pool network which I assume is faster than bitcoind the vast majority of the time (compare your p2pool log to your bitcoin debug log & time it to the millisecond, see which one reports it first). Bitcoind I don't believe is needed except to generate new blocks, getheaders & maybe transactions? Aren't the other blocks also relayed via the p2pool network? I don't see how such a block wouldn't pay the .5% bonus. The blocktemplate must always include it from the start to make a valid block, it can't be added afterwards or the block wouldn't be valid. I haven't gone over the source in a long time, maybe it got changed since mid-2012.
|
|
|
Thanks, so if you had the no-submit-stale option turned on, it wouldn´t submit valid Bitcoin blocks that are not considered a valid share?
Isn´t there some mechanism every node immediatly recognizes a valid block as such, as every node runs the full Bitcoin client?
I could be wrong here since it's been so long since I've mined on a p2pool with block times (ed: *over* a minute that is) under a minute, but I think it only detects the stale shares after a block.... but all shares should be submitted, as some share that's detected as stale (say, 1ms to 500ms late) could easily win an orphan race, esp. vs some of the pools that aren't set up quite right (propagate their blocks slowly). from personal experience, I've had a share that was detected as DOA solve a bitcoin block, back in 2012
|
|
|
About $250, cause I'm pretty sure I could resell it for more.
If we lived in a fantasy land where I couldn't resell the hardware, I'd pay about $100 for it.
|
|
|
Hey guys, i have a technical question concerning p2pool.
While shares can quite easily be DOA because of the ~60times faster sharechain, found bitcoin blocks shouldn´t become dead/orphaned that quickly, as they are then broadcast on to the Bitcoin network.
So what happens, when my found share would be a Bitcoin block but the p2pool node considers it a "late" share? Is it still passed on to the Bitcoin network?
Yes, but it won't show up in the p2pool block list, either.... and you won't get the .5% bonus for it, just the "normal" amount earned. ... also why no-submit-stale is bad to use with p2pool.
|
|
|
Here's my bitcoind, I restarted it not too long ago:
15194 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 21.9 4.7 2h08:28 bitcoind 15195 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:02.46 bitcoind 15196 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.33 bitcoind 15197 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.32 bitcoind 15198 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.32 bitcoind 15199 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.31 bitcoind 15200 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.34 bitcoind 15201 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.32 bitcoind 15202 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.33 bitcoind 15211 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 12.0 4.7 1h12:37 bitcoind 15212 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:01.62 bitcoind 15213 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.85 bitcoind 15214 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 10.0 4.7 55:37.93 bitcoind 15215 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.22 bitcoind 15216 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.01 bitcoind 15217 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.00 bitcoind 15218 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.00 bitcoind 15219 zevus 20 0 2740M 1513M 4992 S 0.0 4.7 0:00.00 bitcoind
Essentially the base client with a few network optimizations (re: how it used to get the vast majority of the transactions and blocks on blockchain.info).
Since I restarted it not too long ago it only has abt 600 connections now. It usually maxes out at around 2GB of active memory ~750 connections or so. I have it set to a max of 1000 but I haven't seen it over 750 in quite a while... obv varies a bit with the # of transactions in memory...
ed: oh, wallet is disabled, & a few other changes, like significantly less stored addresses etc.
|
|
|
"Just run one... there's no reason to run two instances of Bitcoin Core on same box."
Theres plenty of reasons, but it can be done with just one...
So... what are they? If it can be done with just one, then it really isn't a reason to run two or more. Modifications to the conf file (and/or source code) for p2pool purposes only, i.e. limitfreerelay, changes to mintxfee, etc. If you have enough memory on your system, there are lots of things you could do to make it run faster. Also, a p2pool bitcoind only needs 2 connections, one to your p2pool and the other to a single node. I used to connect my p2pool bitcoind to 5.9.24.81 only. Sun Jun 22 2014 11:59:24 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0489 Sun Jun 22 2014 11:56:36 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0662 Sun Jun 22 2014 11:53:48 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0334 Sun Jun 22 2014 11:51:00 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0242 Sun Jun 22 2014 11:48:12 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0162 Sun Jun 22 2014 11:45:24 GMT+0300 (EEST) 0.0175
This is getblocktemplate latency with 0.0001 fees... Turn off all free transactions if they aren't already & increase fees to .00011. Seems like a decent compromise to me. Getblocktemplate latency isn't a huge deal, anyway... err, well, it is if those numbers are in seconds. Shouldn't worry about it if it's 500ms or less, though. ed: Oh, and you do want minblocksize (or blockminsize? been a while) set to 0, to get rid of all the free transactions. I don't have control over the disk being used, as I'm using a VPS. My maxconn is at 50, though, maybe that's my issue. I'll tweak it and see what happens.
Thanks!
M I already told you to do all that stuff a month or two ago, if it's the same project we're talking about, heh.. It won't have any impact on memory usage really, but you only need 2 connections on your bitcoind.
|
|
|
|