Is there any way for cleaning blockchain from extra coins except coin swap? maybe transferring all coins to a new blockchain or other ways
Some of the hacked coins can't be distinguished from the normal ones, so I don't think there's any "automatic" way of cleaning the blockchain. |
|
|
|
ohh lol. No, its not. U even dont know where its come from.
So all u can is to call each other "bro" in Discrod.
Ok. Bye. Have no more question for you.
You must have mistaken me for someone else, I never used the "bro" term in my whole life. About the file, how comes other people can compile it, if it really was needed? |
|
|
|
So why u just cant compile it for windows and share it?
P.S. And where is ccminer-config.h in your source code?
Because I don't have windows. ccminer-config.h is generated automatically by the build process. |
|
|
|
Dear scummers please stop to post useless links for nonworking source codes. It cant be compiled. If u really want people start mine your coin then make a normal compiled executable miner and share it.
P.S. And WTH you already post GPU miner link so why we need now a CPU miner?
It can be compiled for sure. On Linux it's a breeze, on windows it's a little more complicated but it's nothing different than tpruvot ccminer, which is the most used fork and considered the "official" one. |
|
|
|
The Idea of this project looks like quite interesting, but now it's only Idea. I'd like to see how it will be developed and realized. Good luck everyone!
it is worth writing from cryptonite for a very long letter on poloniex exchange. Unfortunately, exchange policy and low volumem kick xcn with poloniex True, but volume in turn depends on the exchange. When XCN was listed on poloniex, it used to have 50-100 BTC daily volume. |
|
|
|
The Idea of this project looks like quite interesting, but now it's only Idea. I'd like to see how it will be developed and realized. Good luck everyone!
The coin was launched 4 years ago... |
|
|
|
We need someone good at graphics to make a banner. See the 250x250 promos on the right of https://www.altcoininvestingnews.com/We can get one on their homepage for free, so it's a pretty good deal ;-) Let me make you something. Give me about 30 minutes. =)  Here you go~ Hope it isn't too bad, it's not much space to work with. Also great interview! Thanks very much! |
|
|
|
I love this project. Following since this thread. Team is very serious and they will succeed. I think only problem is amount of tokens. It is too much and I hope it does not bring problems to users.
Final amount of coins is big, but distributed over 20 years. |
|
|
|
We need someone good at graphics to make a banner. See the 250x250 promos on the right of https://www.altcoininvestingnews.com/We can get one on their homepage for free, so it's a pretty good deal ;-) |
|
|
|
|
Enexus provided a patch to compile with miniupnp 2.0 (keeping compatibility with older version).
I've merged it now.
|
|
|
|
Yep, I know, tho this bear market will scare them out for good. @pallas - can you think how we can test live network? I'll help with my nodes, in test, I would want to see especially variable size of blocks, and how they propagate through network. Also if we think about high tx/s, we should improve single-threaded code, without parallism, as here: https://youtu.be/5SJm2ep3X_M?t=854Scaling can be only done if code can and will use multi-cores processing. Time to code the tx generator script. Then we should run it on multiple nodes and see how the network reacts. |
|
|
|
duplicate magi coin
How so? #crysx some people don't seem to realize that Cryptonite development started in 2013. |
|
|
|
I'VE GOT NO BIG COMPLAINTS--
cryptonight sp-mod #4 (v7) 1080ti speed: 1MHASH. With modded straps: 1.5 MHASH (And this is much faster than the $3000 NVIDIA Volta., but a slower than the AMD vega's) Yeah. Faster than the ASICs :-D |
|
|
|
And PoS doesn't work?  I think that scalability wise, PoS or DPoS are much better solution. I didn't say that PoS doesn't work. PoW vs PoS is a long debate, they both have plus and minus. Let's concentrate on a possible PoS mini-blockchain implementation, or other alternatives. |
|
|
|
Personally, I'm in 2 minds about POS vs POW.
I love the idea of getting rid of "wasting energy".
On the other hand, it's that "wasted" energy that gives the token additional undisputable value and is therefore a great layer of trust, next to the current trade prices on the exchanges.
Same effect as with gold. It's expensive to mine, hence it's rare, hence it's valuable. In theory, there should be some market-driven self adjustment happening to how much energy a coin consumes and I think that's what's happening. So POW isn't necessarily bad. Also, there are many voices warning against pure POS as there seem to be some issues with that, too.
I've thought about that topic a while ago, too and my feeling is that a new POW/hybrid POW/POS approach that somehow incentivizes contribution to coin network health might be a good approach. E.g. instead of just having the tokens "at stake", the POW part could be about providing network bandwidth (e.g. forwarding new transactions) or transaction history lookups. I'm not sure yet how to encapsulate these tasks in a way so that it can be verified independently that a node has done it. But it must be possible, SETI@home is somehow verifying processed packages as well.
The POS part could stay more or less the same as having tokens at stake I guess.
I agree with your comments on POW and POS. Maybe POW is expensive in terms of energy, but it's what makes it work; and let's remember bitcoin is the biggest coin, the first and it still works pretty fine, regardless of all the attacks it got over the years. Hybrid POW/POS could be a nice solution, but I'm not sure it's a good thing to introduce in a coin like XCN: I mean, what if those huge chinese xcn holders start staking? No coins for new users, no coins for small investors. Furthermore, there is a technical problem to solve: miniblockchain is about removing transaction history and keeping a balance sheet of accounts instead, which clashes with the POS concept of "coin age"; since every node needs to verify the stake transactions, they would need to know the coin age and history of those coins. I'm not saying that it can't be done, just that we need to rethink it and adapt to mini-blockchain. About SETI@home, they probably verify the packages in a centralised manner. You know, that PoW, isn't so secure on alts in reality, because they have rather small processing power. Stakers can secure coin, even if it's small, cause it's almost impossible to gather so large supply of coins in one hands. If the coin is small, then getting a large part of it is easy and cheap. Besides, I've never seen a 51% attack on an altcoin yet. It is possible in theory, but making use of it is not easy. For example, if exchanges have 30 confirmations for altcoins, making a successful hashrate attack means having 99% of the hashrate for a long time. Of course I'm not counting those dead coins where you can mine 30 blocks in a few minutes because no one is mining at that moment in time. And PoW always have limitation, as we can with Bitcoin - it's unsustainable, and it's getting absurd, when miners flew from one country to another, because they are forbidding them (for a good cause - tremendous energy waste is absurd, for sha256 algorythm, that don't contribute to humanity in anyway, nor it can be really used as a global super computer, because it's not designed so, and calculations of sha256, wouldn't have much usage).
True, but I don't think that POS is the answer. POW is a waste of energy but it works. |
|
|
|
some pow/pos stuff
some other pow/pos stuff Agreed ... As for SETI - they do. I used to be number one in the Australiasian region for SETI until all the processing started for Crypto  #crysx What about the M7 pool? Is it still in the works? May I/we help you in setting it up? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
