Jesus Christ! How come that? Regarding the screenshot Part 2. The twitter account https://twitter.com/Bitcoin_Friend ... is mineI can guarantee that 1) it is my twitter handle and 2) I have nothing to do with this guy edit: OK, it was a campaign I participated in ( my post here) The guy litterally cheated @iluvbitcoins by posting something he doesn't own. (Not the first time someone use my twitter account to cheat a campaign manager)
Yeah, I might abuse some of the bounty campaigns before, maybe I just did that cause of a lack of knowledge, I am not fully aware of how to work on this forum. But yeah, I am not reasoning this just to have pity on me.
It's still up to you guys how to judge me, but I am telling my story now.
You cheated the person running the campaign You claimed to be me. I don't give a fuck to your lack of knowledge. If you have a brain, you know it's not right |
|
|
|
By the way, who do some of the TOR links in the start post point to v2 TOR addresses? They are not supported by the TOR network anymore, unfortunately. Even if you prevented you local tor package from updating, the middle tor noe operators typically didn't do so, so v2 TOR addresses are more or less unreachable now.
Because the websites concerned have never switched to v3, so I can't update with the new links. (If you noticed, the sites in question are white labels powered by the same group). I left the links to v2 because it doesn't damage to let them and for reference if I needed later. When we went from v2 to v3, I updated as the mixers made the switch, but some never did. The question is why? My theory is that they just dropped it with Tor because no one was using them and they preferred to stay on the clearnet only. |
|
|
|
You're confusing 2 mixers and both are not related to each other: We're talking about Blender.io in this topic. The topic's link you posted is about @DarkStar_ creating a flag against BitBlender.io (forum username @blender) Hence the title " blender - Ran off with user's funds after shutting down" |
|
|
|
Sharing a few more screenshots to show how PeachBitcoin works You don't see the available offers, like you could see with LocalBitcoins and co. You need to create an offer and then you see the ones that match your criteria (amount, payment method). You then swipe like you do on Tinder. Creating an offer Choosing your payment method Filling your BTC adress
   You've got a match. If you don't like the seller "peach02cf85" (that's the username), you swipe on your screen to go the next offer with your requirements.  The seller then receive a notification on his smartphone and need to open the application. Hopefully he isn't sleeping... There is also a chat system to talk with the person if you ever want to date   |
|
|
|
I just remembered a story. If you think about Chipmixer with his paypal accounts, hosting paid with PP, Binance's account, etc... The same thing happened to Bitcoinfog to arrest the operator. He used Lyberty Reserve, a MtGox account with his real identity, etc. Bought hosting server with LR and BTC coming from MtGox. Almost exactly the same errors. (Old people, or a bit old, surely remember about Liberty Reserve?) What I can't figure out is how can the police prove that the owner of ChipMixer.com knew the origins of the transactions?
It doesn't really matter. The fact is they consider CM as a money transmitter under the Bank Secrecy Act and he hasn't registered with FinCen and so hasn't maintained an anti-money laundering and KYC compliance program. If he did, he would have knew the origins of the transactions Chipmixer: "I didn't know the origins" The USA: "You didn't know because you didn't follow the laws" (but good comparison with a war) If you seize a server, you have no choice to have data of something. And if you're a law enforcement why should you refuse to collect data... Unless you don't want to do your job... |
|
|
|
edit: the site is back
[banned mixer] stopped its service, I believe. Both links on the clearnet and .onion are down. I removed it from the list for now. If the service comes back I will add it again of course because it could be just a maintenance (a too long one) but I'm not sure I'll ever see it online again I don't know if it's because he has been 'afraid' after the case with Chipmixer or he decided to give up... He's a guy with a good knowledge in the bitcoin mixer niche. for my reference ⭐Name: Anonymixer
🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer]
🔹Tor link: [banned mixer]
🔹Bitcointalk thread link: here
🔹Fees: from 1 to 2% (+ Network fee is dynamic depending on the mempool for example right now 6 Feb it's 0.00009281 for a P2PKH address)
🔹Minimum amount: 1 satoshi[/size]
|
|
|
|
from @Olgareva
here is what nicenic.net just sent to LeGaulois
Nicenic.net hasn't send me anything. I didn't even know the company until today. I guess it's an error in english (no problem, it happens), but just to be clear with people. - Moneromixer.net claims "to protect your anonymity since 2018" but the domain name has been registered about 1 month ago. Apparently, like Marty McFly in the movie Back to the Future, the guy is able to travel with a time machine back in 2018. Impressive, I'm jealous. - When you want to mix, the adress generated is always the same. - The email monero-mixer @xmpp.jp on moneromixer.net is also used in monero[banned mixer] People do not need and shouldn't use any Monero mixer because it doesn't provide extra security and the currency already has a mixing mechanism. Better to be your own mixer
|
|
|
|
Because they're not accused of money laundering like Chipmixer is. They perfectly know these sites are just carbon copies to lure people. They're not big enough to interest any 3 letters agency. Now if they come to discover they successfully scamed a thousand of people with a few thousands millions of dollars, it will be another story. These sites will not disappear as long as the traffic keeps coming. At the very least, there might be one or two who will say "oh shit, I can be next" but I'd be very surprised. Scammers know they risk almost nothing. update about what?
LOL, the same thing I was thinking. But he perfectly knows there is none, since he participates in different topics on this matter. If there had been a news item, we would have talked about it and he would have read it |
|
|
|
Somebody has been bumping all the other mixer threads lately...
It's me (for a part). I noticed someone bumped old topics of mixers closed since a long time. I don't get the goal. I couldn't resist to bump some topics of mixers currently alive and Bisq-Coinsbee. childish I know. |
|
|
|
You can only get a negative tag from DT if you use it on improper way Nope dude. People shouldn't do that. That's not a reason to give -1 to someone else. It's not like if there is money involved in. Oherwise, everyone could give -1 because everyone think others don't use the system correctly. At best, it could be a neutral feedback but to be honest that doesn't even derserve it. 99% of the time it could be solved quickly by communicating each other. Send a friendly PM to the user and debate. Or something around. Merit is not moderated so it means that there’s no punishment by the mods on whatever you do to your merit
Not moderated by the mods because after all that's not their job but it could be moderated by the admin. This said, I agree with the remainder of your comment. |
|
|
|
|
A small change in the list to be updated. I added over 30 names in the list:
coinomize.la clone of the former mixer bitcoinmix.org
coinomize.pw clone of the former mixer bitcoinmix.org
chipmixer.com closed
chipmixer.io
chipmixer.club
blendcash.com scam and closed
And other scams posted by the guys above
|
|
|
|
(A me relire, je vais bientôt passer pour un pro-européen) (Je viens de me rendre compte aussi, que ca ne semble pas choquer les gens aux USA de catégoriser des blancs et des noirs dans des statistiques. On ferait ca en France, on aurait tout de suite les ouin-ouins nous traiter de racistes) C'est plutôt bien expliqué, néanmoins certains arguments me semblent un peu capillotractés.
Revolut par exemple l'abonnement standard est gratuit et je peux envoyer de l'argent sans frais immédiatement. Les banques aussi font des virements SEPA instantanés sans frais.
Peu importe si tu utilises une banque traditionnelle ou une néo banque: le problème reste le même. Tu utilises ce même réseau et ses contraintes. C'est comme si tu me disais que pour stopper la malbouffe tu vas arrêter les Kinder, et 2 semaines après je te vois enfiler le pot de Nutella dans la cuisine. => le problème de fond est le même. C'est pour ca que je disais d'exclure les néo banques. D'autant qu'elles ne sont toujours pas rentables (Fortuneo est las seule rentable et encore, seulement depuis l'année dernière). En plus, je crois que c'est les néo banques qui ont été les premières à nous facturer 1€ par retrait dans les DABs (si c'est pas un DAB de leur banque). Ces choses n'existaient pas avant, alors passer du gratuit au payant, j'ai pas l'impression qu'on puisse appeler ca de la progression Oui, ca, toutes les banques permettent d'envoyer de l'argent sans frais, et encore heureux. Seulement pour aller le retirer, c'est une autre histoire. Centaines banques commencent à permettre les SEPA instantanés gratuitement mais c'est très très récent. Il y en a encore beaucoup qui te font payer 1€ par virement et tu en as qui ne te permettent que 1 SEPA instantané par jour |
|
|
|
|
Un commerçant ne peut pas se permettre de faire le holder avec ses bitcoins. Il a l'URSSAF, la CFE, employés, etc à payer....
Son métier, c'est de faire du commerce, pas de spéculer avec une trésorerie.
Après, on peut toujours prétendre qu'un commerçant peut utiliser l'excédent de trésorerie pour faire un pari. Mais vu comme le marché est incertain et hautement volatile, c'est pas vraiment un modèle économique conseillé pour une entreprise.
Je risquerai pas mon entreprise pour ca en tout cas. J'encaisse et je revends direct. A moins de s'appeler Microstrategy et Tesla mais avant d'en arriver là, il y a du chemin à faire, et même si c'était le cas, j-y réfléchirais à deux fois
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
