Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 08:19:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 207 »
561  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Tennis League All Thread on: September 21, 2023, 06:52:19 PM
Fernandez beat Navarro yesterday in 2 sets and lines uo a quarter final clash with Kenin.
The odds are Fernandez 2.0 - 1.8 Kenin, I think Fernandez is good value at 2.0. Kenin can
sometimes get in her own way mentally when things get tough but lately she seems to
snap out of it sooner - going to be tough.

Kenin did well against Ostapenko, exceptional tennis by the American. I'm following a young Colombian Emiliana Arango. She managed to eliminated Townsend in 3 sets: 7:5, 1:6, 6:4 and will be meeting Maria Sakkari in the next round. Sakkari is not showing her best tennis atm so it will be an exciting encounter.
562  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: NFTs in the Bitcoin blockchain - Ordinal Theory on: September 21, 2023, 06:26:15 PM
Not sure Ordinals or something else but my transaction is currently showing at around 150MB from tip. The fee is ~23sat/byte which is by now means small. What could be the reason for this?

I have a transaction that I set at around 13 sats per vbyte within the last few days, and so I already have an understanding that it could take several days and maybe weeks to clear.

A few months ago, I had some others that took a while to go through when I set them at the lower end of the range of what had been being cleared, and surely I can see that there remains a bit of a gap between my transaction and the ones that are currently clearing in the 20-ish sats per vbyte, as you mentioned.

Wen clear?


hahahahaha

I don't really care that much.. I set my fees in that kind of way  just to watch it, but if I was transacting with a stranger, probably there would be a need to set it in the 30-50 sats per vbyte range in order to NOT piss anyone off or to risk losing reputation/credibility.

My transaction cleared minutes after I published this post. It went up from 150mb from tip to the very top immediately. Perhaps a bug in my wallet software or something as I found no evidence Ordinals or any other NFT spam intensifying.   Cool
563  Economy / Economics / Re: Early Retirement [Pros and Cons] on: September 20, 2023, 05:38:24 PM
Early retirement does not mean stopping working and living by the beach, but rather that working is a choice and not something obligatory, so that whether you work or not, you will be able to pay all your bills and live the luxury you want, and then you can do what you love and develop yourself. This development includes higher studies, including: A better body, extended relationships, a close family, and traveling around the world are difficult or almost impossible things if you do not have enough money, and then you will be forced to do something that you do not like or spend most of the hours of your day at work.


Totally agree. Retirement means that you're just reducing any work-related activities and you focus more on yourself and your well-being. Most retired people have an investment or businesses, so that even if they stopped working, they are still able to earn for their living. We should also take note that early retirement doesn't necessarily mean that a person is not happy anymore with their job. But it can be a sign that they have reached financial stability and independence that's why they retired. Remember that retirement takes a lot of planning and preparation and it was not an easy decision to make.

I have mixed feelings about whether early retirement is good or bad.  It is as good in one way as it is bad in another.  If someone starts an investment or business after early retirement, the matter is not bad. However, sufficient capital is required for this.  If someone is very rich in family, then it is easy for him to do business after retirement.  But if one is in the midst of financial stress, it is nothing but foolishness to think of leaving one's job, business, investment or living in comfort.  If one retires for comfort or recreation without thinking about his next life course, he has to pay a heavy price for this decision.  Instead of comfort, life will become hell.  I would say retirement should be thought of with sufficient capital.  And many people's lives are involved with one person. So everyone should take a decision considering the pros and cons.


I couldn't agree more. You have to be prepared if you planned to retire in the future, because the moment you do so, you cannot turn back and change your decision. I believe that retirement is a bold decision to make, because you need to consider various factors before deciding whether to or not to resign.

Woa a guy openly advertising a ddos service on Bitcointalk? Saw it while scrolling and couldn't believe my eyes. Is this legit?  Shocked



Sorry for being completely off topic.
564  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: NFTs in the Bitcoin blockchain - Ordinal Theory on: September 20, 2023, 03:27:19 PM
Not sure Ordinals or something else but my transaction is currently showing at around 150MB from tip. The fee is ~23sat/byte which is by now means small. What could be the reason for this?
565  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Paxos recovers its $500,000 'fat finger' Bitcoin transaction fee on: September 20, 2023, 03:16:04 PM
It brings about an interesting issue. They were a business to business setup.

f2pool is large company.
paypal is large
paxos is large.

If you solo mine or mine at a few small pools there is no pool wallet coins are simply few direct to the miners.

I am U.S.A. based miners. I mine at this pool

https://pool.laurentiapool.org/#/miners
https://pool.laurentiapool.org/#/work

if we had hit it those coins go directly to us not to a pool wallet

I would have received 9.6 coins about 7.2 would have been a mistake
another miner would have received about 11.5 coins about 8 would have been a mistake
the third miner would have got 4 coins about 3 would have been a mistake

If I refund those coins 7.2 I would need quite a lot of assurance from PayPal and paxos that 194k of taxable income goes on their books not mine. I would need to create a legal agreement to refund them.

Well not my problem and some programmer is going to be in trouble for the error.

Guys got really lucky f2pool mined the block, because most pools wouldn't even return the funds at all. Paxos should send them a tip they deserve it. As to taxation, what happens normally when somebody sends you Bitcoin by mistake and you send it back? I'm not a tax guru but there should be some easy solution...
566  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Is The Father After All on: September 20, 2023, 03:05:01 PM
Not because of scarcity (since bitcoin supply is always increasing) but because of less new-sell-pressure as miners will have less income and they will be able to sell less freshly mined coins in the market.

Well, technically not "always" but until 21 million coins will be mined, but I agree: lower reward would lead to less Bitcoins released to the open market and price eventually rising. But fewer Bitcoins being mined also causes scarcity.  
567  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Tennis League All Thread on: September 20, 2023, 02:46:36 PM
Frankly, seems pretty logical to me to legalize doping in some sports. Everybody knows that top athletes are doing it so why pretend they're fighting it? Times change, they have replaced linesmen with cameras, "hawk eye" etc in tennis, video judges in football so why not allow doping in cycling for example as everyone is obviously doing it anyway?  Grin

Ever heard of slippery slope? How would you allow it? Like, open all doors and say go for it? Because implementing limits is as ineffective as prohibiting or allowing it. There is no solution to that problem. There is only one thing for sure: if doping is allowed entirely, we will see athletes dying like flies because the pressure, greed and addiction for personal records and so on will be so intense that athletes will see themselves being forced into insane abuse. Many athletes know that if they stop their doping tomorrow, they will lose their sponsorships the day after and all the fans and admiration/support from the public as well.

This is such a huge topic and I believe there really is no solution to that because whenever there is a set limit, a doctor or chemist is already trying in a laboratory how to circumvent it without getting caught. But allowing it entirely would open the floodgates to death.

And seriously, I am not interested in seeing how far or high someone can jump or how fast they can run when they are pumped up with drugs. I am interested in seeing what is humanly possible. Some will say that doping could be considered an element of human existence. Good point, but why would I care what people are able to do on drugs? It is a different discipline and it can indeed be interesting just for the sake of informing people like me. But in a competition I would like to see people compete on the same level, whatever that means.

My first reaction is to say legalise it, no restrictions but make everyone aware of
the dangers of it. If someone dies then others weill be held responsible then on
the other hand this could result in kids taking drugs trying to make it into professionalism.



Anyone following the WTA1000 event in Guadalajara?

Layla Fernandez is doing really well and is into the last 16 and now plays Emma Navarro.
Fernandez is slight favourite @1.83 v 2.00 for Navarro.

If she progresses she could be in the company of Ostapenko, Sakkari and Kenin.

I'm following Guadalajara tournament. So far many unexpected results: Tomljanovic out, Townsend in round 3, Garcia through to round 3 too. Yesterday I watched a very exciting 3 set match Sasnovich v Garcia. Garcia barely made it, let's hope she will recover after the unsuccessful series of tournaments. Colombian sensation Arango defeated Potapova and Stephens! Today another potential thriller Kenin v Ostapenko!  Roll Eyes
568  Economy / Economics / Re: Early Retirement [Pros and Cons] on: September 20, 2023, 02:39:57 PM
I read a very interesting article that actually happened very realistically.

Quote
retiring early is the new American dream. Imagine working for 15-20 years (instead of 40 years), investing half your income and retiring in your 30s or 40s. But a few early retirees have found out that it’s not as amazing as they thought it would be. We chatted with a few people who retired early — and then realized retirement wasn’t for them and started working again.

- I Wanted To Continue Providing Value
While retiring conjures up images of spending all day on the beach, many early retirees don’t feel satisfied doing nothing.

- I Wanted a Challenge
Retirement removes the challenges that work presents, which can be a good thing, but may also lead to boredom and a lack of purpose. Early retirees who have gone back to work respect the challenge of working for a business.

- I Wanted More Financial Security
Retiring early takes long-term discipline and a large enough nest egg to support your needs for the rest of your life. Sometimes early retirees simply didn’t have as much as they thought they needed or wanted more money to feel secure.

- I Didn’t Want To Retire, I Just Needed a Vacation
When you’re stuck in the daily grind, you might feel like the only escape is retiring from work forever. But in some cases, you are simply working too hard and need a long vacation.

- I Have a Passion for Entrepreneurship
Once you are retired, you have more time to pursue your passions. For some, those passions include entrepreneurship and running a business.
Read More: https://www.msn.com/en-xl/money/other/i-retired-early-and-regretted-it-why-i-went-back-to-work-to-continue-building-wealth/ar-AA1fBYHz?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=f2c759f9480f49fea02aa0d8288cc290&ei=16

this story is the same as what my cousin experienced, he retired early (at the age of around 35 years) now he is around 45 years old but there is an illness he is suffering from and he has to get proper treatment which quite expensive, so he sold some of his valuables and also withdrew his investment in shares.

as long as you can still make money, don't even think about retiring early, I know early retirement is everyone's dream but who knows what will happen next, you have to maintain your grades and productivity so that you stay healthy and respected by people.


I went through this actually. Before I retired early I already knew I couldn't just vegetate doing nothing that would kill me eventually. So I'm doing some occasional side-hustles (not for the remuneration obviously but more like for fun) and some building/house renovation tasks and small repairs around the house. That keeps me busy and doesn't let my brain to idle a single moment. I'm also adding sports to the mix occasionally that also helps a lot.
569  Economy / Economics / Re: How to reduce the price of goods on: September 19, 2023, 10:35:06 PM
I have been thinking and trying to analyze what is really causing the high cost of food in Nigeria, I came to realize that monopoly is the major factors, Nigeria government are the enablers. How can one person be the sole major distributor, government should welcome competition in the business sector, every business person should be allowed to produce.

How to reduce the price of goods? In short: stop the Russo-Ukrainian war. War makes fuel and energy prices soar, that causes inflation and prices are going up. Grain and fertilizers are getting more expensive due to port siege and sanctions. This war should be stopped ASAP and at any cost, while it's still possible to save Global economy from crumbling. 
570  Economy / Economics / Re: Food security in the world has been shaken by Russia's actions on: September 19, 2023, 09:54:56 PM

Tell me: where these cities and villages destroyed exclusively by the Russians? It's like AFU is shelling Russian trenches and the Russians are shelling the civilians? What's the point in that? No-one in his right mind would spend ammo to destroy cities instead of the military.

Russia fires cruise missiles at the entire territory of Ukraine almost every day and launches dozens of attack drones. You can tell different things about where the Russians are aiming, but the missiles mainly hit civilian infrastructure and residential buildings of civilian citizens of Ukraine. Either the Russians have crooked hands, or the Russians’ military equipment is so inaccurate, or they still deliberately shoot in such a way as to cause more harm to the economy of Ukraine and kill more civilians. Just yesterday, on September 8, Russia launched missile attacks on Sumy, Zaporozhye and Krivoy Rog, where civilian infrastructure and residential buildings were hit.
Source:
https://rus.azattyq.org/a/32584034.html

I can also give you an example. On September 6, the Russians fired rockets at the market in the city of Konstantinovka, Donetsk region. The attack took place around 2 p.m., when there were a lot of people in the market. There are 17 deaths and 32 wounded among the civilian population. 28 trade pavilions were destroyed. There were no military targets nearby, that is, the attack was carried out exclusively on civilians. There is already a reaction from officials in the US, Europe and other countries to this terrorist attack.
Source:
https://uatv.ua/takoj-tragedii-gorod-eshhe-ne-videl-posledstviya-rossijskogo-obstrela-rynka-v-konstantinovke-video/

So you are saying that there is no point in such shelling? No one in their right mind would waste ammunition on destroying cities instead of an army? Apparently the Kremlin and the Russian army have not been guided by common sense for a long time, because this has been going on for a year and a half.

Bad news for you, troll: it was a Ukrainian missile. It's actually AFU destroying their own citizens! 

Quote
But evidence collected and analyzed by The New York Times, including missile fragments, satellite imagery, witness accounts and social media posts, strongly suggests the catastrophic strike was the result of an errant Ukrainian air defense missile fired by a Buk launch system.

The attack appears to have been a tragic mishap. Air defense experts say missiles like the one that hit the market can go off course for a variety of reasons, including an electronic malfunction or a guidance fin that is damaged or sheared off at the time of launch.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/18/world/europe/ukraine-missile-kostiantynivka-market.html

There are also reports of other incidents involving air defence systems in Ukraine, when missiles miss aircraft or enemy rocket and hit residential buildings. But I guess Russia is to blame for poor skills of AFU personnel?   Grin
571  Economy / Economics / Re: Economics 101. Stagflation. on: September 15, 2023, 10:59:02 PM
It's laughable that the people I talk to that remain in denial of the high-probability of Stagflation that's going to happen in many regions around the world.

In Europe, Christine Lagarde raised interest rates again, it's the tenth hike and she won't truly confirm when she'll stop. That will slow down most European economies. But in other parts of the world, China's Stimulus and the supply cuts for Crude Oil will cause higher fuel prices and therefore more inflation.

Stagflation will not merely be a narrative.

This. Interest rates affect many Europeans's family budgets in a negative fashion. Frankly, I'm confused how rising interest rates can fight inflation? People pay more for their mortgage so they need to earn more, charge more for their work or service and voila: we get more inflation! Fuel prices are soaring too, accelerating the inflation even more. Additionally, there are rumors of the next Covid wave coming soon... so hold on to your butts, gentlemen!
572  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What type of advice is worth giving such people? on: September 15, 2023, 10:38:38 PM
I have read some painful stories online about Bitcoin fans that lost their Bitcoin to hacks more than once and how they gave up because of the hacks, this made me curious about people on the forum, I will like to ask you guys how many times you have lost Bitcoin to hacks or your own mistakes, and why are you still not giving up.

Can you keep buying bitcoin if you have already get hacked like twice or more in the past?

Like a story about an American who lost his love for Bitcoin because of the hacks, I believe it's because of his own carelessness though, because you can't leave your wallet on a bench outside your home and not expect someone to steal it, and you come out and say your wallet was stolen by a thief, like what do expect?

What advice is worth passing out to people who have lost their Bitcoin more than once and are on the hedge of giving up?

My advice would be: treat your coins like you treat fiat money in your bank account or in your wallet. Bitcoin is not some "monopoly funny money" you have to be really cautious to keep it safe. If you have lost your coins, you shouldn't blame Bitcoin because "non-refundable", "unsafe" etc but rather blame yourself you couldn't keep it. Cool
573  Economy / Economics / Re: The Bullish Case for Bitcoin, reloaded. on: September 15, 2023, 10:29:12 PM
Bitcoin's price seems to be caught in a limbo between bull and bear market. Even if we're still 60% above the November 2022 heights, there is again some fear lurking around. I think thus, it's time to remember why Bitcoin could be a much bigger success than it currently is.

Some will know the blog article The Bullish Case for Bitcoin by Vijay Boyapati, which has been transformed into a general introductory book about Bitcoin.

I agree with many of the ideas displayed in the article, but I get the impression that the linear "adoption timeline" the author pleads for, needs an update.

Basically the author argues that Bitcoin adoption will have four stages:

1. Collectible: A thing some people like to collect, even if its value is still undetermined.
2. Store of value: An asset used to store an abstract "value", for example to invest money in it and get the same or more value/money in the future.
3. Medium of exchange: A currency used to purchase goods and services.
4. Unit of account: A currency which can be used as a base to calculate prices.

We've successfully moved away somewhat from Phase 1. But I've got the impression that Bitcoin is currently caught in an intermediate "limbo" with characteristics of the first three stages, but without progress to evolve into the fourth (unit of account) stage. Even more: it seems that people's hopes currently are linked to the store of value concept, and usage as a medium of exchange was already more popular a few years ago. And as a store of value, it's only useful considering very long timespans (>2-3 years) due to harsh volatility.

My theory is that the order for Bitcoin's "bullish case" has to be updated. For me the stages are:

1. Collectible
2. Medium of exchange
3. Store of value
4. Unit of account

Why? There are basically two reasons.

1) The first one is liquidity and demand. Bitcoin's liquidity is better than 10 years ago, but hasn't made significant progress in the last 2-3 years. This makes its market still vulnerable to panic, FOMO, manipulation and other plagues which lead to its erratic price behavior.

If Bitcoin was used more as a medium of exchange, it would have significantly higher liquidity. Because each time you buy and sell something for Bitcoin it's a market operation where you're establishing its value. Even more important: Each time somebody agrees to sell something for Bitcoin, this can be considered a buy offer in the order book.

Thus, with more usage as medium of exchange and "boosted" liquidity, Bitcoin's volatility would probably lower, and it would become a safer store of value. Imagine you wouldn't have to fear an 70-85% depreciation in a bear market cycle but only 30% in the worst case. Would you invest more in it than now?

People also seem to misunderstand the concept of "scarcity". Scarcity is not equal to "limited supply". Scarcity exists when there is more demand than supply. A limited supply helps, but it does not mean something is really scarce. Many altcoins have a more limited supply than Bitcoin but have dramatically failed. Demand is crucial. If demand is erratic and only depends on FOMO cycles, then no reliable store of value can be achieved.

While if there is an explosion of merchants and everyday people accepting Bitcoin, then this means that there's also an explosion of demand. Again: Each of these offers is an offer in an imaginary orderbook where Bitcoin is traded against "real value".

Of course if volatility lowers then the bull runs will become less steep too. But that isn't a problem because Bitcoin has anyway the potential for values largely above $100,000. And that leads us to the second issue:

2) Many people forgot why Bitcoin is such a big innovation. It is the first digital value exchange medium which lacks central intermediaries completely and thus has its known advantages like censorship resistance. All previous attempts needed some kind of "bank" controlling the system.

This is Bitcoin's USP. Bitcoin can be used by anyone, anywhere (where there is Internet access) and anytime, without the need that someone "allows" you to do so. And this characteristic is most useful for a currency, not so much for a store of value. The internet (and this forum) is full of complaints about banks having closed accounts of people and made your life a pain. Bitcoin fixes this (And no, Ethereum and other centralized coins do not really fix it, as their censorship resistances is much lower).

In my opinion, Bitcoin's big advantages all really shine when it's used as a currency. And thus long term success in the future depends if it's used as a medium of exchange or not.

Once a path to currency usage becomes clear, Bitcoin will thus become a reliable store of value. Not before - before it will be subject to the same wild swings we've seen in the past years.

I would even say: There'll be no $200,000+ ("digital gold") Bitcoin without usage as a currency.

(And if you are worried about scalability: There's LN, there's even progress with sidechains, like projects like Stacks or Nomic and rollups show. It's nothing unsolvable.)

Firstly, I have to point out that we're obviously in the bull market atm. You should trust a person who survived 3 bear markets (or was it 4?). And as to the quote marked in bold, I strongly disagree: Bitcoin can and will reach $200k, possibly in 1-2 years already, without becoming a widely-used currency. Just wait and see for yourself.
574  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ouch, today someone made a transaction with over $500k fee. on: September 15, 2023, 10:17:42 PM
Of course, this is not carelessness and negligence at all. Have to be blind or mentally retarded (I didn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings or offend) for the sender to make such a mistake with the numbers. A person dealing with bitcoin is probably not one of them, if sender managed to figure out how it works.
It's hilarious that people who don't know how to save money, people who make such mistakes, are millionaires.

In fact, I've read somewhere that it was a bot or some kind of system sending coins. Not sure if this is true or not, but in this case the devs should have been hanged by the balls by the management. So, blind, mentally retarded or a bot...  Grin
575  Economy / Economics / Re: BRICS has become eleven countries instead of five. on: September 15, 2023, 10:09:20 PM

This also means that in the future BRICS has the potential to effectively dictate the price of all these resources.
Not to mention that they could effectively recreate Petrodollar concept with the new currency, meaning selling all these resources for the BRICS currency only.

The biggest Issue I see is that BRICS has the poorest population. That is an issue and the numbers of trade won't make a difference.
They BRICS population should get wiser and invest in education, their own.

Poor in comparison to what? The West? Yeah, I believe you can call it poor... but there are numerous countries all around the globe much poorer than BRICS countries. Western countries attract the most intelligent, qualified, trained peeps from developing countries aka "brain drain" but once these intelligent and qualified people will see opportunity in their own countries this process will stop and reverse. Let me remind you about Irish people leaving for the US, Italians moving to Germany, Polish people to the UK etc. Now Ireland and Italy are attracting lots of people from all around the world as a nice place to work and live, including former expats returning back home.
576  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Tennis League All Thread on: September 15, 2023, 09:32:17 PM
What do you all think of this?
Is doping widespread in the ATP and WTA Tennis ?
Was Halep very unlucky to be caught?


I think every athlete (in any sport) who wants to be and stay in the world elite takes substances that are not allowed. One does it smarter and the other gets caught. It is a farce to talk about a sport without doping. Even Amateur athletes take permitted substances to get better.  At some point the body and the genetics reach a limit and one cannot go any further. Then one have to make a decision. Whether not to play at the top or to take illegal performance-enhancing substances to get to the top of the world. Very few people would decide against it.

I actually disagree. If people are consistent enough, they do not have to use these things in my opinion. You have to be very disciplined and have to maintain consistency as a player to actually reach the top of the competition. If any kind of performance enhancing drug is introduced in this situation, and more people are actually performing well than they should be, it is not going to be special anymore, is it?

There have been people who have been playing, consistently at the top of the competition for a very long time without taking anything like those. And that’s how it should be. That creates more competition in my opinion. And without those performance enhancing things, people will know that they have to work hard. And there is no other way. But I do agree on one thing some people do it smart and the others get caught.

A player has trained for a long time and is well prepared for a tournament. 1 week before, he notices he is getting a cold. I do not think he just drinks warm tea with lemon and eats little more fruits

And I not really assume that all the top players and athletes in the various kind of sports (soccer, Tennis, athletics, swimming etc.) are only at the top because their genetics are good, they do a plant based diet and yoga and taking an icecold tub after the training.

Certainly, there are exceptions. And we all have seen them, the talents of the century. But they are in the minority. But nevertheless, at some point they will also be in the situation of quitting or playing this one more game with illegal performance-enhancing substances.

WTA players are also known to take some drugs to delay or suspend their periods. I also woudn't be surprised if I found out some players like Maria Sakkari are using male hormones (anabolic steroids). Some others are born like that - for example Astapenko's average forehand speed is higher than Murray's because she is naturally very strong.
Everyone used to take the right quantity. Things beyond the limit gonna be troublesome. For some players it is normal to have good stamina and good power. Some used to achieve it through regular fitness training whereas some go with these kind of drugs. As said, almost everyone will be taking, while the body that reacts get caught. Recently one of the sporting authority planned of conducting Olympic games with no restrictions on doping. The event didn't take place, but this is how the thinking.

Frankly, seems pretty logical to me to legalize doping in some sports. Everybody knows that top athletes are doing it so why pretend they're fighting it? Times change, they have replaced linesmen with cameras, "hawk eye" etc in tennis, video judges in football so why not allow doping in cycling for example as everyone is obviously doing it anyway?  Grin
577  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: We Are To Turn Bitcoin into a Global payment Network - Former PayPal President on: September 15, 2023, 09:27:33 PM
we are trying to make water wet Grin.

Saw this interview video clip posted on telegram by a news channel i am following, the interview had former president of PayPal and in the video clip, he's saying that,  they are trying to turn Bitcoin into a Global payment Network, and in my own words, what I heard is "they are trying to make water wet 😂..

Who exactly are they trying to fool?, Bitcoin in my own understanding is already a payment system for the entire globe, the former president of PayPal now saying that they are the ones trying to turn Bitcoin into a global payment Network is highly ridiculous and laughable.

Are they trying to steal Satoshi's glory? Not possible I believe..

Source: https://t.me/WatcherGuru/5234

Yeah, unfortunately it's like that... something is working for a decade then some rich a$$hole announces they "will make it work" and everybody thinks he's a genius and signs up in a hurry for their "new", "revolutionary" service.  Grin
578  Economy / Economics / Re: India just bought 1 million barrels of oil using rupees instead of USD on: September 15, 2023, 08:28:21 PM
Sanctions at work:

Quote
Germany apparently imports Russian oil via India
Because of the war in Ukraine, Germany stopped its direct imports of oil from Russia. But now the material apparently comes via a detour. The beneficiaries: Indian billionaires and Russian investors.

Figures from the Federal Statistical Office suggest that Germany continues to import large quantities of Russian oil via India. Imports of petroleum products from India increased more than twelvefold in the first seven months of this year compared to the same period last year, as the Wiesbaden authority announced on Tuesday. Their value increased from just 37 million euros in the first seven months of 2022 to 451 million euros from January to July 2023.

India, on the other hand, is currently purchasing large quantities of crude oil from Russia: in July alone there were almost 60 million barrels (159 liters each), as the analysis house Vortexa calculated. This corresponded to around 40 percent of the total oil imports of the most populous country in the world. Imports fell in August, but in 2021 the Russian share of India's oil imports was just two percent.

But since the beginning of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, trade flows have fundamentally shifted. While the EU, among other things, bans the import of Russian crude oil by sea, has imposed an embargo on Russian diesel and Russian gasoline, and Germany has stopped its direct oil imports from Russia, India has been buying even more oil from Russia ever since. This often happens at significant discounts. And the statistics indicate that some of this material ends up in Germany in processed form.

The main owners of India's second largest refinery are Russians

The imports from India “were mainly gas oils that are used to produce diesel or heating oil,” said the German statisticians. India has recently been producing a significant proportion of these gas oils from Russian crude oil.

The big beneficiaries of this business are the owners of India's large refineries: for example the industrial conglomerate Reliance, which belongs to the Indian billionaire Ambani family. Or Nayara Energy, operator of the country's second largest refinery. One of Nayara's main owners is the Russian oil company Rosneft, which claims to hold more than 49 percent of the shares. A further 49 percent belong to a consortium in which the Russian investor group UCP holds almost half.

The Western states have also introduced a price cap for Russian oil, which they want to enforce internationally using their market power in the shipping and insurance sectors. According to SPIEGEL information, this mechanism does not work as planned.

Data from the KSE Institute of the Kyiv School of Economics show that the oil price cap for Russian oil is flopping: significantly more is still being paid for the Russian reference grade Urals than the maximum price of $60 per barrel prescribed by the G7 countries. There is obviously a problem, especially when it comes to checking compliance with the cap by the authorities in the countries in which the shipping companies and insurers are based.

According to the industry portal oilprice.com, a barrel of Urals was paid for a good $74 on Monday, and over $84 for another Russian variety called Sokol.

Source: https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/trotz-sanktionen-deutschland-importiert-offenbar-russisches-oel-ueber-indien-a-8000ac08-b1d3-4408-8f6d-5d9e7cdd8bf9

No need to worry, sanctions are working, Putin's Russia is suffering.  Grin

Btw, fuel prices in Europe continue to grow and will be soaring for some time apparently due to OPEC cutting down the production:

 Diesel (B7)
Average diesel price in all of the 27 EU member states
Average price this week: €1.702 / L
Average price last week: €1.688 / L
Average price 1 month ago: €1.656 / L
Average price 3 months ago: €1.477 / L

Today, prices are:
Compared to last week: +0.829 %
Compared to a month ago: +2.778 %
Compared to 3 months ago: +15.238 %

Source: https://www.fuel-prices.eu/

Slava Ukraini!  Grin
579  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How much Bitcoin is needed to buy iPhone 15? on: September 15, 2023, 06:29:14 PM
Just imagine after buying an iPhone with a large amount of BTC, then some months later, iPhone 16 was produced. Then you keep planning to buy that one with another BTC. That means you will use all your BTC to buy an iPhone.
That is a very unlikely situation for the majority of people: many bitcoiners are also hodlers, and that doesn't necessarily mean that your are going to spend 0 crypto, if you need a new smartphone there is nothing wrong with it; buying a new model every single year is a totally different thing. I don't know about you, but I know very few people who change their smartphone every year.

Yeah, many get new phones once a year or even more frequently. I find it totally unacceptable for many reasons. For example, it's very ecologically-unfriendly (and no I'm not a Greta Thunberg type of person, not even close). Imagine so many batteries, plastic parts, screens, chips and what not being thrown into the bin. My phone is some 5-6 years old and it's still a decent smartphone, system works well, battery still holds its charge etc....    
580  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Tennis League All Thread on: September 15, 2023, 06:17:08 PM
What do you all think of this?
Is doping widespread in the ATP and WTA Tennis ?
Was Halep very unlucky to be caught?


I think every athlete (in any sport) who wants to be and stay in the world elite takes substances that are not allowed. One does it smarter and the other gets caught. It is a farce to talk about a sport without doping. Even Amateur athletes take permitted substances to get better.  At some point the body and the genetics reach a limit and one cannot go any further. Then one have to make a decision. Whether not to play at the top or to take illegal performance-enhancing substances to get to the top of the world. Very few people would decide against it.

I actually disagree. If people are consistent enough, they do not have to use these things in my opinion. You have to be very disciplined and have to maintain consistency as a player to actually reach the top of the competition. If any kind of performance enhancing drug is introduced in this situation, and more people are actually performing well than they should be, it is not going to be special anymore, is it?

There have been people who have been playing, consistently at the top of the competition for a very long time without taking anything like those. And that’s how it should be. That creates more competition in my opinion. And without those performance enhancing things, people will know that they have to work hard. And there is no other way. But I do agree on one thing some people do it smart and the others get caught.

A player has trained for a long time and is well prepared for a tournament. 1 week before, he notices he is getting a cold. I do not think he just drinks warm tea with lemon and eats little more fruits

And I not really assume that all the top players and athletes in the various kind of sports (soccer, Tennis, athletics, swimming etc.) are only at the top because their genetics are good, they do a plant based diet and yoga and taking an icecold tub after the training.

Certainly, there are exceptions. And we all have seen them, the talents of the century. But they are in the minority. But nevertheless, at some point they will also be in the situation of quitting or playing this one more game with illegal performance-enhancing substances.

WTA players are also known to take some drugs to delay or suspend their periods. I also woudn't be surprised if I found out some players like Maria Sakkari are using male hormones (anabolic steroids). Some others are born like that - for example Astapenko's average forehand speed is higher than Murray's because she is naturally very strong.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 207 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!