Over the recent years, technology has improved leaps and bounds, and one notable development is the rise of GPT AI, an artificial intelligence that allows machine to interact with humans in a more natural and conversational way. We cannot ignore the fact that it lessens the amount of work needed in some areas in our economy and society, thanks to the advancements of machine learning, natural language processing and deep learning, as a result GPT AI has become a powerful tool for businesses. Although we could say it gives us benefit, we can't still be so sure with the risks involved that maybe can outweighed or may potentially ruin the economy.

"GPT AI has also been used to develop trading bots that can automatically execute trades based on pre-programmed rules and conditions. These bots can monitor the market 24/7 and make trades based on real-time data, which can lead to more profitable trades and reduced risk."

Based on that statement alone, we can conclude that there will be potential risks such as trading bots that could manipulate the market which could lead to significant losses.

How about you, what are your thoughts regarding this one?

My bet would be on Medvedev. He has recovered after a series of bitter losses and is now stronger and hungrier than before (just like Swiatek in WTA now). He also has more big tournament and final experience than Jannik.  Cool

I wouldnt say Sinner was unstable, he was actually quite stable in his mentality as was
Medvedev actually.

The match for me was actually closer than the second and third sets suggest, Sinner
in the end had far too many unforced errors which I am putting down to the long rallies,
medvedev is comfortable enough hitting baseline exchanges, sinner was too but
they took their toll on him in the end.

Great match all the same, I didnt bet on either.

You have noticed a very subtle nuance! Indeed, in these countries, approaches to life, the concept of values is very different from the classical behavior of people living for the sake of "accumulation" and visible wealth. Therefore, the value of the car in these countries has decreased. Many people refuse to become a full-fledged owner due to the lack of a constant need. A lot of people use car-sharing and other convenient services that do not burden wallets. Of course, there will be a layer for which a car is an opportunity to show "its advantages" and "its status".

But I think that in today's situation, Russia has staged an oil and gas terror in Europe, will only accelerate the process of Europeans switching to cars that are less dependent on "fuel for the implementation of political complexes and grievances." Whatever one may say, oil will rise in price in the future - its reserves are not unlimited, and the development of new fields is becoming more and more difficult and expensive. Therefore, the transition to at least hybrids and then to full-fledged electric cars is already in the near future. Yes, with the exception of economically and technologically backward countries with underdeveloped economies, where buying and owning an electric car will be very expensive and difficult

Many governments are moving to push hard to reduce sales of diesel and petrol cars, the European Parliament has officially approved a law banning the sale of new petrol and diesel cars in the EU from 2035


Source ---> https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/auto/electric-cars/no-petrol/diesel-car-sales-by-2035-european-parliament-approves-ban/articleshow/97939363.cms

Some reports indicate that the costs of running an electric car are actually lower than the costs of running a car with an internal combustion engine.
So, will this goal be achieved by the year 2035? Will the cars be more efficient and at a good price compared to current prices, or is it a policy that may take decades?

Bitcoin have suffered 2 huge crashes at 2018 and 2021, it's really wrong if you're saying Bitcoin will never crash, I believe we will suffer another crash in the future. Bitcoin could crash, but the point is Bitcoin can survive and recover from the crashes, not like majority of shitcoins were it will become dead coins due to no demand.

Introducing someone about a subject where you're not completely understand is really a big mistake.

Yea both should win today to set up a final.

The final itself if and when Medvedev/Sinner meet should be epic eventhough
as Trofo points out the 4/0 H2H, I believe it might start to change in Sinners favour.

Medvedev is building and from match to match we can see his confidence growing.
Sinner has reached a new level and unlike in the past he seems to be able to maintain
his professionalism, mentality, focus and high intensity. Will it be enough to potentially
beat Medvedev?

Todays matches will reveal a bit more, in theory bothvshould win in 2 sets.

That must depend on your country. Here, even 100 euro bills are often refused. I don't think banks will exchange them either, they don't earn from it and many banks here don't even have a cash register anymore.

Even if you find a car dealer who sells you the car, it needs to be registered, which means you can get questions about it later. And if the money didn't come from a clear source, you can't explain how you paid for it.
This reminds me: Al Capone got caught on tax fraud. You may get away with it, but I wouldn't be comfortable taking the risk.

The distribution of €500 has stopped, but even if it hadn't, spending such a large amount is almost impossible. I remember having trouble even at the gas station, which handles quite a lot of money daily. Smaller notes, such as €50 or €100 ones, would be more preferable. Bringing a ton of cash through the airport is impossible without going through customs declaration; that's why GazetaBitcoin mentioned splitting the money into a few trips. On the other hand, having a decent amount of undeclared cash doesn't help at all, because you can't actually use them for large cash purchases.

This isn't accurate. Most node have 300MB mempool size limit (after transaction is deserialized) and currently unconfirmed transaction already surpass the default limit. If you bother visit https://mempool.space/, currently it purge all transaction with fee rate < 1.08 sat/vB from the mempool.

I think Bitcoin has a big problem with tainted coins and the demand to be a store of value.

My example:

X gets 1 BTC through a criminal act. X is trading something for 1 BTC with Y. The Police is blacklisting the 1 BTC and confiscated the 1 BTC from Y.

This is a 100 percent loss of value for Y.

Then the FBI is selling the 1 BTC, often under value. This is an overall decreasing of value for Bitcoin.

Is there a possibility to protect user like Y for such a loss of value? And how do we protect the community from an overall loss of value?

Another example:

Y gets 1 BTC through a criminal act. The police is blacklisting the 1 BTC. So for X the 1 BTC is less worth than a normal 1 BTC. So there is a second market for Bitcoin's tainted coins, where the "tainted" BTC is less worth than the normal BTC. If somebody has a trick to wash it, isn't it draining value out of the ecosystem, too?

And one additional question: Is it legal to get the transaction fees of illegal transactions?

Bitcoin is still a speculative market, nothing more and there is no regulation on it yet so manipulation is what is happening. You would be naive to assume that decentralized bitcoin cannot be manipulated. Remember what Elon did in 2021, just one of his tweets was enough to make the market move, let alone spend money to manipulate it. No asset class is dependent on supply and demand that can fluctuate several tens of percent in a day.

I have no idea why people want to see notification bot specifically for bonus and promotion while the casino provide promotion page already, telegram channel, and dedicated forum. I dont think it is really needed, at least I have never seen any casino with such feature. It means that most real gamblers do not need it much. One more thing, notification for all bonuses/promotions can be something annoying for some people especially if there is no feature to filter what kind of promotions/bonuses they want to be notified.

investing in crypto is "more risky" than buying penny stocks

One of the most difficult tasks or challenges I've had is openly discussing the multitudes of positives that bitcoin has, with others that are skeptics.

I've been studying/reading/buying bitcoin since 2016. It's the best invention I've seen in my 50 years on this planet. The ability for anyone around the world, to take custody of their own money. The ability to transact with anyone, around the world, at any given time. The open ledger (blockchain) to hold all transaction accountable (that even the US Gov doesn't have).  The limited amount (21 million). The security.  The uptime.  I could go on...

But of all the discussions I've had with co-workers, friends, and relatives about bitcoin, it seems to fall on deaf ears.  In fact, if talking to more than one person, it seems to be almost a witch-hunt on how bad of a ponzi bitcoin is, and how 'it is backed by nothing', etc.

Now I realize that this reaction comes out of either fear, ignorance, or not knowing enough about it.  But no matter how hard I try to educate someone on the positives, it falls on deaf ears with some.  And it's deflating to the core.

I've been in this space for 6-7 years.  I can't imagine how tough it must be for some of you OG's.  Do you still try to enlighten others, or do you relinquish to the fact that you aren't really gonna change someone's opinion, only they can do that?

It says that he even won 35.5 million $ in prize money, but it is also a question of lifestyle. Guys like Federer don't need to worry about money ever again, but I don't know whether Wawrinka has any big sponsoring contracts like the other three guys. If you deduct all the cost for traveling and coaching and so on and so forth, 35.5 million sounds huge but it can still be spent. Wawrinka is more dependent on what he can earn now than what comes after he ends his career. Though I think that he is quite a down to earth guy but who knows.

He is still fun to watch though as he can be a strong fighter on the court. I'd like to see him advance to the next round and get a stronger opponent. Would he meet Zverev if he makes it to the next round?

It's called "ChatGPT", yep... Did you see the word Chat?

It's a chatbot, not a trading bot. It being an AI chatbot does not mean it should make trade decisions for you… lol. Forget about it.
If you want to learn about trading, then it might help you with some theory and that is it.

According to me, we are already in recession, not a prediction anymore, but just the beginning of the recession, not as severe as in 2007, so many people still don't realize it. I really don't believe the government reports, from what I see it makes me feel more clear. The unemployment rate in my country is increasing every day, many people can't afford to spend for living, purchasing power is decreasing markedly. But meanwhile, the government says the economy is showing positive changes.