That's what I have on him: Issuer Details: Eric Corlew Michigan, USA 517-358-1801 creativex@att.netcreativex@broadstripe.netReferences: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=36667http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3907https://btcjam.com/users/487http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,886.0.htmlWebsite: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArTS7AD--9SWdDNfb0lRNElqS1k1eGRoWEw2TGM4NlE#gid=0Forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130982.0--- https://forum.litecoin.net/index.php?topic=6565.0timonex@yahoo.com--- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130982.msg3080941#msg3080941https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130982.1520On 04 September 2013: "I'll be 45 next week." On 07 September 2013: "I'm not officially another year older till the 9th, but thanks!" -> DOB: 1968-09-09 ---- 517-358-1801 Line Type: Cell Phone Carrier: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC - IL (number from issuer details, via peoplesmart.com) --- http://myworld.ebay.de/timonex5jef(via btcjam.com) --- http://www.xlr8gaming.net/?page=viewprofile&id=129622Full Name: ERIC C. Alias: TimoneX Age: 43 *** DOES NOT EXACTLY MATCH *** Location: MI - http://hondamarketplace.com/showpost.php?p=6974631&postcount=3Eric Corlew " timonex@starband.net"; Bought B17 Crank -> http://honda-tech.com/member.php?u=6306About TimoneX Date of Birth November 30 *** DOES NOT MATCH *** Join Date 03-14-2001 Total Posts 2,462 Location Wayland, MI, US -> http://honda-tech.com/showpost.php?p=6797997&postcount=2http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/timonex@starband.net- http://www.carreview.com/cat/parts/tires/bridgestone-tires/potenza-re71/prd_969_1577crx.aspxReviewed by: ERIC CORLEW Review Date January 30, 2001 from WAYLAND, MI (search for "timonex eric corlew") --- http://www.linkedin.com/pub/eric-corlew/13/387/826: Sole Proprietor bASIC-MINING December 2012 – Present (11 months) https://btct.co/security/BASIC-MININGSole Proprietor Creative X-Pressions March 1991 – Present (22 years 8 months) ---- https://pipl.com/directory/name/corlew/eric/Eric A Corlew 45 years old from Grand Rapids, Michigan; Wayland, Michigan (search for "eric corlew wayland") --- http://www.grcourt.org/GRCourt/CaseSearch/Search_by_Sequence.pl?page_id=643&csequence=298006Defendant Corlew, Eric Allen Case Number 2003-OI-0100159 Mailing address 409 S Locust St Wayland, MI 49348 DOB 09/09/1963 155 blk *** DOES NOT EXACTLY MATCH *** Race Caucasian Weight bro Height 006 --- http://radaris.com/~Eric-Corlew/126472777Eric A Corlew, 45 Grand Rapids, MI Related to Stephanie Corlew, 63 Addresses & Phones 2544 Batt, Grand Rapids, MI 49507 (616) 243-7990 2544 Batt Dr Sw, Grand Rapids, MI 49507 (616) 243-7990 708 Hoaglin, Albion, MI 49224 (517) 629-2431 409 Locust, Wayland, MI 49348 (269) 792-4370 --- http://www.whitepages.com/name/Eric-A-Corlew/Grand-Rapids-MI/37wcmfkPrevious locations Wayland, MI East Lansing, MI Marshall, MI --- http://businessfinder.mlive.com/creative-x-pressions-grand-rapids-mi.htmlCreative X-Pressions 2544 Batt Dr SW Grand Rapids MI 49507 (616) 847-2578
|
|
|
And regarding my proposal for a CNAME from faucet.mastercoin.org?
faucet.bitwatch.co goes currently to a webhost. I was looking for ways to process the payout. My first idea was to generate the raw transactions via PHP (which works perfectly fine) and then sign and push them, but I'm stuck at the point where the tx are signed. Therefore I came to the conclusion that I do want to run my own bitcoind instance on a VPS. faucet.bitwatch.co is probably not final and I was also thinking about purchasing mastercoin-faucet.com or mastercoinfaucet.com. Please make sure you use multisig transactions.
Yes, of course. Dispite the frown I also want to generate tx that send the change to the 1-of-2 output to minimize wasted coins (= 1 input [sender], 3 output [exodus, receiver, 1-of-data/sender]).. even if those tx take a while to be confirmed (it's not that bad), this can be countered by using a pool of multiple payout addresses. i think you ought to explain here that Mastercoin address is a Bitcoin address, and that the address should either come from blockchain.info wallet (maybe even link to the blockchain wallet set up page) or bitcoin-qt.
Agreed. There needs to a some more explaination anyway, like a smallish tutorial how a user can use their MSC and generate transactions. Can this be done from Blockhain.info account? I can't get the Bitcoin QT on my hardrive (using only SSD), it eats too much of space (although i'm not even sure it needs to sync fully for this to be done).
I think blockchain.info is able to generate signed messages, yes. Another great thin-client that allows signing is Electrum ( www.electrum.org). No, it just checks karma. I think making it a requirement (if this is even possible) would be too intrusive, same goes for Facebook and potential MSC pages or groups. But this brings me to the idea to suggest users to join the FB group and to subscribe to the subreddit!
|
|
|
Awesome, thanks for the feedback! I'll push a few improvements over the weekend and I also want to start with experimental payouts soon. When it's ready, I'm going to announce it here.
|
|
|
Just FYI: Immerson cooling is awesome! DeathAndTaxes's thread is great, to get some background knowledge: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=313087The technology is already there, but as far as I know it's rarely used. www.allied-control.com and www.grcooling.com and are leading suppliers - if AM really partnered with Allied Control, it's even greater! One advantage is a very high power density as shown in the picture above. To quote DAT: What types of power densities are possible? 3M has conducted experiments cooling 4KW heat loads using 1L of working fluid so in theory heat densities approaching 4,000 W/L are possible. The constraint on commercialization is that existing servers have relatively low energy densities (well low relative to the limits of immersion cooling). Even a high end 3U server (4 CPU, multiple GPUs, 4+ 1200W PSU) may only have an energy density of 100W per Liter. However SHA-256 ASICs have very high energy densities although current systems have server like energy densities due to the limits of air or water cooling. Take a look inside the case of any 2nd gen ASIC design what takes up the most space? Air. The actual ASIC boards are very energy dense however there are surrounded by a significant amount of empty space. Remember these are using boards designed for air/water cooling. It may be possible to improve energy density by making custom compact boards.
|
|
|
However, we as a community need it to be vouched that this is not a follow up scam, and that you yourself are not a scammer. I personally do not think this is the case, but we need some additionally info by which to judge your trustworthiness(or anyone's) to communally stop the scamming. I know some people will be afraid to submit info to you as it currently stands. I'm not sure about how any payments to the lawyer are handled, but I just wanted to confirm that virtualspade does an awesome job behind the curtain and this thread is legit.
|
|
|
Thanks! Litecoin doubling this week can only be good for CipherMine shareholders!
A good chuck of CIPHER's income are probably SHA coins like Bitcoin, but I agree! Though my biggest fear is that the coins were converted to fiat. Kate has this bad habbit and seems to prefer it over coins, but of course that's just a very wild guess and without any indication or basis. I'll keep you updated, when I hear something.
|
|
|
I received this via PM when I asked about the source of the alleged cube pictures: Hi,
The pics were posted some days ago, on instant messenger. friedcat should announce full info by weekend
regards
|
|
|
Hi all, just wanted to give you a no-update. I'm still waiting for the dividend and it will be sent out as soon as possible.
|
|
|
Check this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=290860.0-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: SKS 1.1.0
mQENBFIYPJcBCAClVCDiS+/iiP/UBS8RrPAWHaxmTMvIuLMemplvel21248W87qCsbRLOyN7 HLjPCxWgFz1phKLZA0vzeVT7RKM9wyGTvAdRnrP72JWQsFRJs0MI72aiseO2z9n+SK9Mjwlj Vjpy7vodL+6aczDOoE12pD2bjxFSAvROsn+czjIYS7KnR8g0AM0ztLYBiGrkrT0B0/fOPx4P nwg+p17Y9p0rNWaYhfTo8UvEU3ctg2bkyhoAeeKLQFPQVfrvdj9d31Bsd0FpMjZQOpTvxnAK Rfzr33m3Dh60b9JQKZ/IfRXI3Y3zKb39WLy6qne1+YeZ9CL4WGUKzeG+/5nXw9YvHcXfABEB AAG0GmdsYWRvc2NjIDxhZG1pbkBnbGFkb3MuY2M+iQE4BBMBAgAiBQJSGDyXAhsDBgsJCAcD AgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRAexWsEY90/E3guCACW9bWFx2WgddmkDuoIBns0KaWc GObpgFXwmrURVBsIIqnEZgN9ZvHZXy7FUg73E3UaRgTRHADTdcO4LX0dQjAG03HYMyTS9Ci8 JntYwnQte9hpj7dygyx9ieYb7I2t1nG70VA4NC7I5rOJHn9A/SL1VJxbYX5PbqkaUBFpuaok QxGDVKJGdHhKp/SZNVZDGDi5DTZXnRfdV+BxKQmO46FoUZggzfsWKIS+xmVezDNJxVmifL6y 1LgHuhsDxHbl70aQGG5YACm7DRj5TEka6uC3z085FC/bMptzBdTeRxn3lK9YYNRUhj2NJg6o QFQRmtlHtWiuOONe+iO0wAkQqi72uQENBFIYPJcBCACfjPqREfaOeiwYMoNc2KFadZ/BwW2S L+G2K7wN2wZ5Ey/WqlOEgJbc/h0sD/idrR7QME5jB0ursMRrcRui+4H/7o95Cax59+GyOHjw ekziE/zGMfN5iBkeCGApilj0+FFec+3AxK/CxuMC2VLuHTNK3vIVoQ+cuJphtmOR2srVWAqy DZyrgc7DFtDgyxrzSS90i0A7ONfs49tR7low0IWBYbm+epppuOeLHd8Y/5HrnjqPHjpFN70K SkUIoys3OND8gtfBotFI/JXJssHTb3BVBvWxn8lOlrV6X9jBJlzoHfNaZMoo4pOY6RhZRT2+ UvZbBFrKdtQViLyqAjhYuANhABEBAAGJAR8EGAECAAkFAlIYPJcCGwwACgkQHsVrBGPdPxOU gQf9GmKUC5V228ij8UP7JZwCIKJXiLCnNMpNlOXaDl5RSQLFI1bfDQ/nfYT5ztPRp+a/BQXk VrWFi3tGidhE/8awMCQH1ILl973bFbSvx4OylIo8qHxInjPq3GKVjBmcwJjGfvkukTKel7X8 G4Ik5nShoF+UNnBEF4jSlQ2vrHCnIU39aad49n1x4qL+nrJrfJ75hzNGd5N+My3iPMSfNGCI XaeQ4RG1X9jzeiEZu7MbnpnYdPM9nctl83OqVxgsmdQn0icAnztSFBjB0nzYVoFKx1RVFvYd LldcuUPHMsfeOFb360y1rnbwzjnZTK/i8AVOco/427RaKYYXHIe5TGeOsQ== =do56 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- The signature is valid for this one.
|
|
|
Today I took a look at raw transactions, multi signatures and class B transactions. And after observing the exodus address I was wondering: Is there a specific reason to use an additional output for the change when doing multi sign transactions? Example transaction: Tx id: d445e92dc860b9fe62c53200906c7dfefd011ff2c46d3d99ef996dee0f2ae820In: Out: Total out: 0.04966+0.00006+0.00006+0.00012 = 0.0499 BTC If I'm not mistaken, this would yield the same result: In: Out: Total out: 0.0000543+0.0000543+0.0497914 = 0.0499 BTC The multi sign output can then be referrenced as vin for a new transaction: In: - 0: (simplified multi sign tx id from above), vout: 2
Out: .... Those 1-of-n outputs seem to be redeemable, too, so is there a reason not use them?
|
|
|
Hard to tell, because the last weeks there were coins added in the last minute (probably from sales).
Since this is the speculation thread:
I noticed that CanaryInTheMine, a AM reseller, was involved in more than two AM direct share auctions and he is still buying. This is very bullish sign imho.
|
|
|
Sorry, I should have made this more clear probably. This is just a test, there is no payout yet and what there is, is not 100 % finished. Just wanted to share some progress.
|
|
|
Whoever (I assume Ken) is the owner of those 3.5m shares - there is a typo at the end of the address. The first one (16yTynjmSe5bsRGykDaaCL5bm2pxiEfcqC) is not a valid Bitcoin address.
|
|
|
14hm8rTdknVCDpqXGY5nFqVWruU9UBeuHd The faucet project sparked my interest and now I want to gain a deeper understanding of Mastercoin. I don't need real MSC, just something to create a few test tx. Link: http://faucet.bitwatch.co
|
|
|
So what's your take? AM is one of the last safe harbors now.
|
|
|
looks good but i got this message when I tried out my bitcointalk profile:
Too bad. Sorry, prophetx... You have 825 posts and 224 activity score, your profile was created on April 1, 2013.
And therefore you are not qualified for this reward, because you need an activity score above 10 as well as at least 10 posts and furthermore your account must be created before August 1, 2013.
Could it be that there is an error with the signature? There should be an explicit warning now, if this is the case. I tested: Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=104899;sa=forumProfile Signature: HGcb/BKsCDxGMr8i6oWJEWA+yYlR5VAmPAugHkrAHHyPAXTTMEhhjD/yb0E9aJx/HZG5osiYEmoev3UEL5hVnZU= For address: 17mDAmveV5wBwxajBsY7g1trbMW1DVWcgL Message:
|
|
|
Hey, I created a first test version of a Mastercoin faucet. The actual payout module is not yet created. I want to create raw transactions and push them to blockchained.info (or similar). 4/5 authentication methods are implemented. The code is not complete and not optimized. GitHub: https://github.com/dexX7/mastercoin-faucetWebsite: http://faucet.bitwatch.coLet me know, what you think.
|
|
|
|