yes) nvidia cards are really more convenient now if your choice is to mine alts
it is more balanced rather amd. but vega is the monster for cryptonight algo!
Nowadays, more and more optimized miners are entering AMD GPU, so I think that soon they will not have any significant difference between NVidea and AMD GPU. Take, for example, the optimized miner LYRYV2, which is faster than the analogue nvidia What miner ? Because my AMD still suck big time with Lyra2REv2. The only things I mine with them since last summer is Ethash. I tried CryptoNight and a few others but always came back to Ethash. Seriously. Faster than nvidia? It is not true. |
|
|
|
Although I am a donor, I still like to use SPMOD2 because it does not differ from 4 # for me
This is what I'm talking about. sp4 adds nothing, but more troubles and steals 5-10-20% with so called "2% devfee". |
|
|
|
Why do talking constantly to obtain the wallet to find subsequent prevent, this is actually the 3rd day and also the pocket book is not ready, this is one of the cause I get free from Antshares project at first since it is really frustrating to use their wallet and now almost thesame issue
Sorry I couldn't get what you mean. Could you please explain again? What is frustrating you? Looks like ai generated text... Maybe a translator? It's just another bot account to get airdrops |
|
|
|
|
Any news about windows nvidia miner?
|
|
|
|
It's a 2% fee, I said earlier it wasn't as I thought it was based off of a hour, it's not.
For 2% fee you should mine 4+ hours for those 5minutes at start. If the miner crashes earlier - than it is 3-4-5-10...% devfee. |
|
|
|
On same intensities sp4 is worse than sp2.
Open gpuz and check the memory usage of the two exe files. SP2 is using more memory than SP4 on the same intensity setting. This meens that SP4 need to increase the intensity to have the same memory usage as #2. Comparing the intensities between two kernels with different memory structures is a waste of time... As you can see in my example, the default intensity setting of the sp-mod #4 on the gtx 1070 give you 13.4% more hash than running with -i 20. Once again. 1080 - SP4 crashes on higher intensities with the same OC. I need to lower OC => No advantage 1080ti - SP4 is 3-4% faster on -i25. But all this advantage is eaten by ridiculous 5minutes devfee at the beginning. So, don't lie. |
|
|
|
Still this is only manageble if you mine one algo. I for example switch coins couple times a week and dont remember when I was mining the same coin for 14 days. Each algo stresses your card differently so the curves are not transferable unless you set it really low which kind of nulifies the effort.
I don't mine one algo. There are 5 "slots" for different profiles in MSI AB. I have a different set of curves saved for each slot. All it takes is just to select a different profile before switching to another algo. And here we come to the problem of many rigs. You need to remember each profile, each algo it is capable running with etc. You have 5 profiles at least 4 types of rigs and ~20 algos. That's why it is impossible if you switch coins frequently and have many rigs. I just set maximum OC that is capable of mining all algos without need to change OC. Yes if sometimes I mine some coin for rather long period I finetune the OC. |
|
|
|
1070 sp4 18.5-18.8 -i20 vs 18.8-19.5 sp2 i20
sp-mod #4 test with different intensities: gigabyte g1 gaming 100% tdp and mild oc (core and memory) -i 20: 18.64 MHASH -i 22: 20.50 MHASH (+9,9%) -i 24.7998 (default): 21.14MHASH (+13.4%) So don't run with intensity 20 because you get 13.4% more hash if you run without the -i in the batfile I don't get crashes on my rigs. Wich drivers are you using and operating system? Try to run the miner at default intensity without any oc and 100% tdp. (stock settings.) does it still crash? As I said before sp4 on 1080ti with i25 on same settings is only 3-4% faster then sp2. On same intensities sp4 is worse than sp2. But yes it is capable of running on higher intensities... but as with my 1080 rig I need to lower OC in order to make it work. Which leads to even less advantage. So taking insane 5minutes devfee into account at the start sp4 will make less for the miner. |
|
|
|
Yes I know that. The problem is that it can be done if you have 1-2 rig. But if you have 10-20-100, then you won't do that. May be there is some way to spread setting to all cards?
It can be done with any number of rigs, the principle is exactly the same as with any other way of GPU tuning. "Making" a curve takes me about 30 seconds, while setting +xxx clocks and -% powerlimit takes ~ 10 seconds. Then you test the card(s) as usual. On average it takes ~ 5-10 adjustments per card, so 150-300 seconds vs 50-100 seconds. Not that big of a deal even if you have 100 rigs 8 cards each. Will only take a few days to go through all of them. It all boils down to how much your time's worth. I don't have that many rigs and with curves I get more out of the cards since I can push them further (because the clocks/voltages don't fluctuate as much as they do with +/- xxx kind of tuning, so I don't have to leave nearly as much of a leeway). You can talk fairy tales about 30 seconds to someone else. It is 3 clicks and vs several dosen  . But anyway it is possible to set curve and really save it and spread on other cards by editing file directly. |
|
|
|
What's the reason for me to do that? To mine your devfee?  ) To increase your profit. Do you want a 35MHASH bitcore miner? Or do you want a 31MHASH bitcore miner? The point is that #4 is faster, but it use more power and you need to run with the correct launch configuration. The point is that it could be faster if you burn your card. You have no idea what you're talking about, punctuated by 'burning your card'. TDP is what you're looking for if you want to reduce the load on the cards, not intensity. That's independent of intensity. There is nothing wrong with miners that use more power. If you don't like it, you reduce your TDP. That's your choice. Intensities between #2 and #3/4 for Bitcore SP is indeed different and not because he's just increasing the intensity. Workable intensity in #4 is -i 22, higher then that causes random crashing even at stock clocks and highest TDPs. The net difference between #2 and #4 is about 7%, minus a 2% devfee. So it's about 5% faster at stable intensities. No it doesn't have anything to do with power delivery, I've mined on more demanding algos, such as Nexus and SIB. It has something to do with the fluctuating GPU loads (probably due to the algo) that causes your gpu clock thrashing So depending on how well your card is factory OC'd it can indeed crash on the default intensity with your miner SP. I have enough cards to know certain models will crash and some wont at those intensities. No matter what you adjust the clocks to unless you underclock, they will crash. Open afterburner and watch the stats. That's also why the hashrate goes up and down as it cycles through the algos. Bitcore when it was first implemented was a band aid fix in order to get it up and running, I don't think it really ever got past that point. There was a LOT of initial crashing when the algo was first implemented. I definetly have idea. What I have with sp4. With 1080 and OC that I mentioned above. SP4 crashes with i22+. It is more or less stable at i20. But at that intencity it gives less result than sp2. 22 vs 24 1080ti with sp4 makes 30-30.5 on i25 vs 29-29.5 with sp2 on i20. Same OC settings. 1070 sp4 18.5-18.8 -i20 vs 18.8-19.5 sp2 i20 So it is clear that on the same intensity sp4 is worse than sp2. You can get extra 3-4% by rising intensity but loose at least the same by devfee. That's because 5min devfee is taken first, so after every crash or change you will actually loose much more. As always liar sp_ is calling it 2% devfee while it is not. |
|
|
|
hello! some hashrates on gtx 1060-1070?
my 1060 overclocked gets 13,3 MH/s and 1070 overclocked 21 MH/s what are your OC stats for the 21 on the 1070, best I am doing is 17.5 on my 1070. Ive used every iteration of ccminer as well as others. Spmod 2/3/4 can achieve these results. But usually it is 19-20. |
|
|
|
DDoS is annoying because it’s simply pointless. No data is stolen, nothing is gained from the attacker’s point of view. You are definetly wrong. DDoS of pools have 1 goal. And it is achieved if the pool is down. |
|
|
|
So the price is under 50sat. Where is that guy talking about stable 75-100sat?  1sat price on the horizon - finita la comedia. |
|
|
|
Another attempt to drop under 80sat. Not good at all.  |
|
|
|
does anybody knows when is the last estimated distribution date?
It depens on how many BTX would be claimed and how many would be registered. On initial calculations it was around 6 months. |
|
|
|
does anyone know by what time coins should be on the wallet to get monday airdrop?
0.00 utc monday?
It changes. So better to keen it from midnight till 14-15pm when airdrop usually arrives |
|
|
|
Will bittrex, poloniex and bitfinex support BTX? If yes, the price of BTX will pump a lot, otherwise not. It is difficult to pump a huge market cap coin in one exchange. With HITBTC BTX will be on 3 exchanges, and not the smallest ones. |
|
|
|
ethereum is the best option for gpu rigs. Its stable and profitable.
Yes yes. All mine eth. Don't mine shitcoins. Stay on ethereum. |
|
|
|
I have seen the continual PUMP of BTX for days here on the 'talk' thread, but this is MINING specific
May be it is better way to go to BTX thread and ask your questions. All people successfully mine BTX for several months. To be more precise - your problem lies between your chair and the table. |
|
|
|
My question is, "I am newbie and I will receive 0.5 ALTCOM per week for 10 post. Additionally, the reward will be the same for 10 posts or 49 post per week." Thanks.
0 Posts = 0 Coins http://altcoincommunity.ru/user.html?u=1282184I think everything is quite informative here. No it is not informative. It is not clear - the price is for post or per week. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
