This is a great job, now after mining, it’s very profitable for me with your miner, thanks  Please, can you tell us your hashrate, must be incredible increase to go from non-profiable to very profitable  Without any doubts it is at least 10x times faster then competitors. Just be brave enough to test yourself. You will see how fast it is .... in stealing your coins |
|
|
|
Last HiveOS update states: NEW: gminer 1.08 (Web interface will come soon after) But I can't find it in custom miners on their site. Has anyone? |
|
|
|
I'm getting this on 0.5-82. That's because Hive folder for custom miners has changed in 0.6 for which you did the package. On 0.6 it is fine. /hive/custom/miniZ/h-run.sh: line 7: /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/h-manifest.conf: No such file or directory
No CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILENAME is set
custom miniZ exited, waiting to cooldown a bit |
|
|
|
|
Seriously? I thought the time of these neoscrypt copypasta shitcoins passed in the beginning of this year.
|
|
|
|
bitsend network is 0 active connections since 10 hours ago. please, what happen?  0 active connections since 10 hrs ago, really? Are you kidding, fella? I checked two explorers given by the CMC, all of them shown that there have been blocks found seconds ago. http://exp.mybitsend.com/https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bsd/maybe a mistake of my PC  until now my wallet still stuck while synchronizing. pffft Sometimes it helps to delete the peers.dat file and restart the wallet. If that does not work then maybe add a few add notes to your config file. Obviously there is something with blockchain. (I guess some nodes got out of sync as fitraok09) Cause on 7.11 I suddenly got 4 rewards and 12.11 3 rewards instead of steady 1reward in ~20 hours that lasted for months previously. P.S. As seen here https://www.mybitsend.com/ number of MN's dropped from 467 to 304. |
|
|
|
0.46$ rank 414 on CMC  from 40$ to 0.4$ 99% dump I can't remember any coin That has been able to recover 99% loss There's this coin called litecoin that fell 98%. You mighta heard of it. It did kind of ok after that too. It does not matter 99% or 90%. The main part of the crypto market now shows such results, in addition to some positions from the top. But in the top there is also a drop in prices by 80-85%. "Now" no coin show such results (except abandoned ones). A lot of coins grew from their bottoms 2-3times. Some (like RVN) have more value then they had most of the time. BTX is the only "stablecoin" - permanent drop. |
|
|
|
GMiner v1.08 available for download
Is there any purpose of running 2 miner.exe processes? If another process is some kind of watchdog - maybe it's better to call it different name? |
|
|
|
Is Raven still resistant to ASICs and FPGA?
As far as it equals the price growth - then it's definetly not asics. |
|
|
|
|
I can't open wallet with latest cli version. Daemon work but masari-wallet-cli.exe return this
"Error: failed to load wallet: basic_string::_M_replace_aux"
In the log:
2018-11-02 17:21:42.864 4156 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Masari 'Classy Caiman' (v0.2.4.0-release)
2018-11-02 17:21:42.864 4156 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Logging to C:\Mining\Wallets\MSR\masari-wallet-cli.log
2018-11-02 17:21:46.705 4156 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Wallet and key files found, loading...
2018-11-02 17:21:50.441 4156 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3769 Loaded wallet keys file, with public address: (here my address is written)
2018-11-02 17:21:50.572 4156 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3816 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-11-02 17:21:50.589 4156 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3837 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-11-02 17:21:50.602 4156 ERROR msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Error: failed to load wallet: basic_string::_M_replace_aux
2018-11-02 17:21:50.602 4156 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:3068 failed to open account
2018-11-02 17:21:50.602 4156 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:7312 Failed to initialize wallet
|
|
|
|
.....
We are working on the OZC wallet currently ...
This will be the codebase we will use to migrate the rest of our coin wallets. This means that if PoS is removed from the equation and MasterNodes will be in place, then SWEEP will follow suit.
We have the new basecode built (on the latest BTC codebase - 0.17.x) and are considering MasterNodes OR PoS, as we find that having both is a right pain with the new codebase.
#crysx
As I got PoS mechanism in SWEEP will be changed to MNs. Could you say approximate size of SWEEP MN? How many SWEEPs will be needed to create it? And what reward will MN get? By the total SWEEP supply of 2 billions the MN of 100k SWEEPs will be acceptable. Is my calculations right? We are still working the figures out ... OZC is not finished yet, but as SWEEP and OZC have very high coin caps, the chance of them being the same amounts will be very likely. At the moment the ball park figure is around 70KOZC or 70KSWEEP, but this has NOT been finalized. So your estimate is quite close in terms of coincap and MN assignment. Remembering that there is no solid base yet, so it could be that we stick with PoS instead. When we determine which way we will go, we will publish it in the main CWI thread then the respective coin (in this case OZC first). #crysx Isn't 70K per MN with 2Bl coins too small? Maybe 700K? Or something like zelcash and some others are implementing - 3level MN with strict requirements for VPS resources. E.g. 100K 500K and 2Ml for each level. Otherwise sweep will get thousands of cheapest vps's 99% located within 2-3 VPS providers, like almost all MN coins now (of cause if it will be profitable to run MN for Sweep) This way - no decentralization, no stability, no security could be achieved. Zelcash approach isn't perfect but it is much better that what we have now. |
|
|
|
seems interesting
What is interesting? Another shitcoin with only purpose to dump premine. Whtepaper has no plans even "on paper". |
|
|
|
Of cause there would be only frauds if there are no normal exchanges. |
|
|
|
It seems that sp_ is completely impotent not only in fair competition with cd/trex/zenemy but also in stealing their kernels. Maybe there is some "viagra" to help people with such problems. |
|
|
|
40k blocks premine - nice.
It was announced in BTCZ discord early. The team answered this accusations a few pages back. I saw an "answer". In a more common manner it will be - " yes we mined 40k blocks almost in solo. But some suckers from btcz discord managed to get few. Thats why our premine is a little bit smaller than 500 000 000 coins. And we are waiting for idiots to dump them" |
|
|
|
|
40k blocks premine - nice.
|
|
|
|
Even zcach devs are not so impudent to charge 40% of total. Да Вы ахуэнто. |
|
|
|
Can I see your user-friendly interface on the site?
You have to register .... just to realize that all you can mine for the moment is ETH and XMR on a couple of pools, or use nicehash. It is a long run to get Hive functionality. |
|
|
|
|
Doc. I was asking but maybe I missed an answer. Is it possible to fix the problem - when miner doesn't start after reboot if there is no active local or rdp session? (I mean local monitor connected, or rdp session activated)
It just hangs on "heating up system".
|
|
|
|
Zelcore
Is there any connection between btx and zel teams? Can Zelcore wallet be recommended to use by BTX team? In case of problems - all questions refer to zelcore team? No, these are absolutely two different development teams and two different block chains. Do not try to send your Bitcore coins to Zelcore wallet. Then why it is written among available wallets? Also thread name also has "partnership with Zelcore". |
|
|
|
Zelcore
Is there any connection between btx and zel teams? Can Zelcore wallet be recommended to use by BTX team? In case of problems - all questions refer to zelcore team? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
