On the condition that you are indeed in possession of this piece, it is still in great condition, and that it is currently located in the United Kingdom as per your previous post, then I am prepared to place an opening bid for this.

---

0.1BTC

---

Please update with further pictures showing proof of ownership (username/current date) when you get the opportunity.

Thanks

:thinking_face:

---

Okay, this looks like war.

0.24 BTC

0.18 BTC

0.16 BTC

Uh oh.

0.15BTC

Ditto. I have 1 set left of the SOLD OUT 6 Chip Signature Sets. Shoot me a PM if interested. Delivery to the US
No longer available.

Signed messages are valid.

---

@OP - I have tagged your account with a temporary negative rating until such time as you regain access to it.

Once you do, shoot me a PM from both this account, the hacked account, along with a link to this thread, and I will happily remove the rating.

Cheers

Account has been tagged.

Thanks

You are aware that you will need to collect this in person in China, right? Or have someone you know live there where it could be shipped. Or best of all, you live there yourself.

Apologies for this, don't intend to derail this auction - I am not participating in this one.

However, I have sent you an important message @ BTCC_Official - please get back to me ASAP. There is an issue with the store checkout which I have described in my PM.

Thanks

Please post your proof again, as it comes up as a blank entry on Imgur.

Thanks

Lol, do you think TMAN actually cares whether you believe him or not? Let alone answering such a ridiculous question. How would you know whether he Googled the answer anyway?

I can say that he does indeed live there, has done for several months now.

---

I wish this thread would just die already.. God. That dead horse gif is more than adequate right about now.

Not accusing you of anything dude, I would have stated if I was.I stand corrected - you are different people. Apologies.

I find it quite strange that both hashashin and khufuking use the same style when typing.. a space at the end of a sentence followed by a comma, dot, exclamation mark, etc. This is very unique and uncommon, and to find you both posting like this in the same thread leads me to believe that you are one and the same.

ibrokab, sorry to see you have been scammed.

You are not able to post images due to the age of your account. This restriction gets lifted once you become a Junior Member, which will take you a few weeks to achieve.

I have posted the images for you in the meantime. Note that some of these contain sensitive information such as a phone number (all screenshots), Local Bitcoins account info, and Facebook account info. If you want these images removed at any point, please send me a PM. Thanks.

---

Please see the reference in my rating.

I am not saying that the user has gained trust through fake accounts. I am saying that there is evidence of farming trust via legitimate users on his trust page. The reference also shows both the user and another account advocating people to leave trust for him; which is, once again, farming trust.

That single user wished to "cancel" out the rating left by DogeMajestic, which is perfectly fine. However asking for everyone else to do the same is not.


Precisely.

I am not getting involved in the ongoing mess here, however I have neg rated crypto-rainbow for blatant misuse of the trust system; farming trust. Lets not get into the trust abuse (which I fully expect to be hit with judging by previous ratings left..).

Trust farming is against forum rules, and it is clearly evident this has happened when you see 20-30 ratings left for this user within the space of a few days, with some of them using the exact same note, word for word.

Hi there Ozafejyw782,

Thanks for being generous, even though you really didn't need to do such a thing.

How many people sent you a PM with their address? I won't ask you to name them, but I will say shame on those who took advantage of your offer - I doubt many of them would have done the same thing you did.

Further, please sign a message from every address you have ever posted on this forum, and include a sample of your DNA too.

Only upon verification of everything above shall we deem that specific trade to be legit.

No, you don't. You are not a charity, are you? Last I checked, you charge players a fee for your services, services that a lot of the time wouldn't be beneficial to them in the first place, but we won't get into that here as I don't wish to derail this thread too much.

At least we have worked out what your personal objective is here: Money. Money that you really are not entitled to.

To anyone who doesn't know the full story, you would appear to be fighting on behalf of Ozafejw782, meanwhile this is far from the truth. Ozafejyw782 has accepted that getting his deposit back was about as good as it was going to get, and has moved on. Now, we can all agree that what happened in that situation was utter bullshit, and should never have happened in the first place. However, DuckDice did eventually agree to give him his deposit back after the pressure was piled on them in the initial scam thread. He was happy with this decision as for a good while it looked like he was going to receive nothing at all. DuckDice also eventually admitted that their current bonus system is not exactly fair to the player when choosing to cancel the wagering at x point into the bonus, and are working on trying to make something better.
You are beating a dead horse here, and at the same time trying to seek payment for something that has absolutely nothing to do with you. You are NOT fighting on behalf of the player, he has not solicited your services. This is to benefit YOU, as you have kindly pointed out yourself already in your reply to me..

I don't agree with what happened either, which is why they still have a negative rating on their account from me. But the fact that Ozafejyw782 was happy to drop the complaint when he got his deposit of 2 BTC back, along with DuckDice removing the bonus system so it could be revamped into (hopefully) something better - was enough to close the accusation and move on.


Nope, you are wrong for several reasons. First, Ozafejyw782 did not complete wagering requirements and therefore that 8.15 BTC is not accurate, and is not a fair representation of what his balance would be after he had completed the remaining 4/5ths of the wagering requirement.

The fact that everything was wiped from his account when he cancelled the bonus was indeed alarming, and is something that should not be part of a bonus policy for any casino that wishes to be seen as fair and legit. Yes, it took pressure from the community for them to see the error in their ways and refund his 2 BTC deposit, and, remove the bonus system so that it can improved. Further, we all know that there was just no way Ozafejyw782 was going to receive his "winnings" when they did not even want to refund his deposit, also lets not forget the fact that he had only completed something like 23% of the wagering requirement. The best outcome in this scenario was him getting his deposit back, and that is what happened. Everyone apart from you seem to agree that this was as good as it was going to get. Once again, you need to stop beating a dead horse, and you really need to stop trying to line your own pockets from others' misfortune, especially when they never asked for your interference in the first place.


Once again, this player did not solicit your services. But its not about that. You are just trying to make some money out of this, which is quite despicable really.