[...]they chose that affiliate and it was that affiliate who ripped them off, not Betcoin and Betcoin discontinued his affiliation deal when they found out he was a thief. [...]
Took Betcoin a while to figure this out, didn't it? They could literally see the money disappearing from the wallet/s (or however the rakeback worked), and it was not until this was made public that Xiao got the sack, so to speak. Betcoin, IMO, failed to take note of what was happening with Xiao and the funds he had control over, and are therefore partially at fault for the damage done. This could have been prevented to an extent.. and the damage would be a lot less than it currently is had they kept an eye on his funds.
|
|
|
I just spoke with Henry at Fastbets.io he was on vacation and did not have access to internet. He has resent my my money. I am just waiting for 6 confirmations. When I get those I will update this post again.
Please confirm you have received your refund so I can remove the negative rating, as the owner has sent me a PM and would like the rating reviewed. Thanks. Zepher OP has not responded, which makes me assume he got his funds. With that, Fastbets have provided me with a txid showing funds have been sent to an address which match the amount in the OP. Tag removed. I'll consider this case resolved for now, sure jagged81 would be back complaining if he didn't get the funds. There doesn't appear to be any scam here. A little incompetence with not providing withdrawals in a timely fashion? Yes. Scam? No.
|
|
|
Offer has been taken advantage of. Thank you very much BTCC, this is a pretty sweet offer Grabbed a few sets.
|
|
|
I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.
So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.
LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured. Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults. Taas team also did fool you. Dont you think that it is possible that they are just pretending to not know about trust on bitcointalk and not caring about it. As someone stated here they even dont know who is Lauda. Doesnt it seem strange. I' ll give another reason for that. According to the campaign manager , this page has been written by Taas only - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1804549.0Now see what they write there, 6: Any User get a negative Feedback from any DT2 and Above users will not be eligible for this campaign. Now what do you think? You're still blaming the wrong people. So it is obvious that they do know how the trust system here operates, appreciate the info there BTW. But as yahoo has already mentioned, they really don't seem to give a shit. I'll give them 24hrs to respond here, or pay out the bounties. If they don't, I will leave a rating, whether they care or not. So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.
Assumptions like that make you look like an idiot btw. What's wrong with this my assumption? Yahoo and Lauda isn't giving negative rating because they don't care about their rating. Isn't it a silly excuse? Earlier Lauda said that they will give negative rating . after those strange replies Lauda got from them, he didn't give negative trust to them. The main problem here is this, and I am guessing this is the reason ratings have not been left yet by either Lauda or yahoo. The same applies with me: We are scared that by doing so, the investors (and bounty hunters etc) end up hurt as a result. This is not just a simple case of "tag and move along". I don't wish for anyone who has money in this project to be affected by decisions we as DT members make. As for the assumption bit, saying they made a deal without posting a shred of evidence to support that claim is a little foolish. Hopefully my response above will help you understand why no ratings have as yet been left Take it easy
|
|
|
I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.
So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.
LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured. Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults. Taas team also did fool you. Dont you think that it is possible that they are just pretending to not know about trust on bitcointalk and not caring about it. As someone stated here they even dont know who is Lauda. Doesnt it seem strange. I' ll give another reason for that. According to the campaign manager , this page has been written by Taas only - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1804549.0Now see what they write there, 6: Any User get a negative Feedback from any DT2 and Above users will not be eligible for this campaign. Now what do you think? You're still blaming the wrong people. So it is obvious that they do know how the trust system here operates, appreciate the info there BTW. But as yahoo has already mentioned, they really don't seem to give a shit. I'll give them 24hrs to respond here, or pay out the bounties. If they don't, I will leave a rating, whether they care or not. So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.
Assumptions like that make you look like an idiot btw.
|
|
|
I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.
What do you think @Zepher? I have been away for the last day and was hoping to come back to find this resolved. Guess that hasn't happened. So the bounty payments (100k/2%/w/e) were supposed to be paid on the 18th, and have yet to be paid. This is starting to scream SCAM.To the devs: I know you are refusing to post here, but that really isn't doing you any good. To not realise how the trust system works here will also be to your detriment. I suggest that you pay out what is owed to get this over with. It's quite easy really - pay, and this all goes away. Don't pay - and you are putting your whole development on the line when it comes to its' reputation for keeping to its' word. Your call.
|
|
|
They are refusing to post here. They have PM'd me, but their PM's aren't exactly useful.
Now why would they be refusing to post here.. Is it maybe because they have been caught out and there now lies a massive discrepancy of 60,000 coins that will not be paid out to bounties.. To the dev/s: You better make this right, and fast. Or you'll be getting a tag from me as well, not just Lauda. As for not wanting to post in the thread, that just shows that you are trying to hide from this. Things don't work that way. Burying your head in the sand won't make this go away. Even negative trust would harm Taas investors not their team. I leave it to Lauda if he wants to give negative trust or not.
I see your point of view. I will wait for further updates here before I take any action. Letting such shady behavior slip harms the whole ecosystem by setting a bad precedence. It is perfectly clear that, as per what was written in the thread, they were to pay 2% of the sold tokens (with a 100k minimum) for said bounties. I'm utmost confident that almost all, if not all, participants of said bounties have participated with this number in mind.
Precisely. This was stated in black and white, and now its suddenly "just 100k". You cannot go and change your terms after the fact. Stick to what you originally promised and agreed to, or pay the consequences, one of which you are already witnessing with this thread.
|
|
|
Congrats to the winners! I'm sending pm to you guys.
A: 1.1 (dazedfool) B: 1.4 (Fattcatt) C: 1.51 (miffman)
yes... congrats to all the winners especially the new owner of that silver half!! nice wow! half has pretty nice premium :O Think the firstbits helped a bit as well.. 1Ag1. This is from the first ones produced. Fattcatt got a nice coin here. Get it graded, which is relatively cheap and easy when you are in the USA, and put it away. That price was about right really in current conditions. That coin is a keeper.
|
|
|
lol....I should be ashamed of myself....lol
Lol don't worry about it, I made the same mistake Except you two failed to realise it when teeGUMES mentioned it Good luck with the silver half, not long to go now. hopes he hasn't jinxed it...
|
|
|
As far as I can tell, you are both bidding on a coin that has already ended. Unless I am misunderstanding the OP.
edit: Sniping: Last-minute bids will cause the auction end time to be extended so that the auction ends 60 minutes after the last bid. Since it is a triple auction, last-minute bids will only affect to the coin the bid is for.
|
|
|
i think C is gone boys, miffman's bid takes it
Reading the rules again, you are very much correct. Just the silver half in play. I'm out. All yours if you're not outbid, Fattactt
|
|
|
Well well... B is all yours, unless you get a competitor. me likeeeee b & c I know I rained on your parade for that last coin....sorry about that Zepher B. 1BTC C. 1.52BTC
That 0.5BTC Silver Half is a rarer coin than the 1 BTC Silver. You let me take C, I'll let you have B* *Unless we get someone else decide to jump in lolz.
C - 1.53 BTCEdit to fix quote.
|
|
|
B. 0.88
You disturbed the peace Here is to another 60 minutes plus of waiting.. B - 0.89 BTC
|
|
|
jamesg 1 @ 1.2
This coin had to be good to make a 15 month dormant Legendary VIP account come back to life Last post on the forum was February 2016! Welcome back.
|
|
|
15 minutes remaining! Time will extend 60 minutes for each bid.
Damn, 60mins... B - 0.87
|
|
|
Still not fixed, why is this not affecting fastbets.io's rating on bitcointalk?
As mentioned before, there is nothing that can be done apart from waiting for a response from Fastbets.io Also, their rating is affected, as I have given them a negative as a result of this thread. Look, I don't mean to be rude, and I know you have lost money here, but bumping this thread repeatedly without adding anymore useful information is not going to make this any better or get your money back. If they have a Twitter and/or Facebook account/s, maybe start giving them bad press that way with a link to this thread to put some public pressure on them to respond and make this right? Other than that, I don't have any other suggestions besides spamming them directly (not the forum!).
|
|
|
0.01BTC
0.015 BTCGo find something else to bid on, like that valuable Jetcoin! Oh wait, thread locked due to being busted by Hhampuz (wd H ) Sure you'll find something else to use your Luptin Pennies™ on.
|
|
|
|