https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676313.msg20368185#msg203681851. we've disabled deposit bonuses and currently working on a new algorithm based on your feedback and a new detailed and clear bonus policy.
2. we've refunded the initial deposit to Ozafejyw782 (it's already on a balance). There were people mentioning that we should revert the balance to the moment before cancellation – and this would be the easiest and acceptable solution for everyone, however (unfortunately) this is not technically possible, we just don't have this possibility.
So we believe now this issue has been resolved. You know, I am not even going to remove your rating, just make it more "accurate" as time goes on. I have my reasons for this as I will explain. Had it not been from pressure from the community, you would never have performed this act of refunding this user BTC that was rightfully his in the amount of 2 BTC. This shows that had it not been from pressure from other users here, you would have not given the BTC back and continued to pretend like this was an attack on you and the site. While I am glad to see you refund him, I still think your actions are worthy of a (for now) permanent tag, though I will change it to show that you gave OP his money back. I also applaud you for changing the bonus system, lets see you make it fair for both you and your customer. Waiting for proof from OP that he got his money back and I will change the rating. |
|
|
|
That's nuthin I had guys trying to crowd fund a hitman to wack me here.
Oh man, thanks for the laugh here Spoetnik  I needed that! must...find...this...thread... |
|
|
|
I will just leave this here:
Lol, I find it hilarious how easy it is for some people to troll zepher:D
Had forgotten about that post  |
|
|
|
Some escrow have been compromised...we need to find other escrow method!!
Thanks for the heads up. You can sleep well tonight knowing that you just made this forum a better place with the valuable info you just released to everyone... /s |
|
|
|
PS : I'm wondering what account could be sold for 1.5 to 2 btc  Not sure if OGNasty escrows those kind of trades. There is absolutely no way that an account is worth >= 1.5 BTC. The only possibility that I see is a combination of the following: 1) DT2 account. 2) Donator/VIP. Then again, the OP might not be talking about a Bitcointalk account to begin with.
What kind of account are we talking about? My thoughts exactly. I don't even see a DT2/VIP account combo going for that nowadays, most trusted accounts are known by other members, who would also notice if there was a change in how that account was posting. There are also lots of us watching out for such accounts that suddenly appear to have changed hands, making it a risky bet for a scammer to pay out ~$5,000 for an account that could be caught quickly and rendered useless with one negative rating. I suspect this may not even be a Bitcointalk account that the OP is selling, though I may be wrong. Further, not many escrows will escrow accounts, I know I sure wouldn't. |
|
|
|
ANACS will use what you put in for Variety to match their catalog of coin titles. Notice how most slabbed coins have a consistent
"2011 TOKEN CASASCIUS 1 BITCOIN BRASS (firstbits)" or some such title
No need to pay variety attribution verification fee.
Max value is 100usd per coin on crypto. They will insure for a max of 100usd back to you. They generally ship Fedex.
Natural tarnish or toning is not necessarily a negative. Artificial tarnish (fingerprints, oils, waterspots, etc) is negative. Cleaning or polishing is also bad.
The big two (PCGS and NGC) do not do crypto coins/tokens. There is a UK outfit (CGS?) that does grade these coins I believe.
How's the holo side of your coin look?
CGS in the UK sadly closed their doors a good while ago now, around a year if memory serves. The only option left is ANACS, for anyone in the world at this moment in time. |
|
|
|
and unless OP stated he would not use an alt account to bid up the auction than he is free to do so
Just because 99% of you all here follow "respectable" auction rules doesn't mean that anyone HAS too.
Oh my. Shill bidding in auctions is a major no no. He may be "free to do so", but people who do such things should be negged to hell. I am NOT saying that the seller has done this, so lets make that clear - I am simply stating that bidding in your own auction is essentially fraud - and if you do it and get caught, don't expect any respectable user to ever deal with you again. |
|
|
|
forum rules dude...it ended @ 1.51BTC like I said, it happened to me a few times too...
Auction ended. I'll take 1.55 to be fair, winner is Fattcatt. Please message me and CC the escrow provider with the info. Doesn't quite work that way dude. The auction was won @ 1.51 BTC, that is the price Fattcatt should pay, and nothing more - plus shipping costs if applicable. edit: @ notserp - was thinking the same to be honest. |
|
|
|
They are not scammers. We have got miner from them yesterday!
Care to provide some proof of this? From where I am standing, you appear to be nothing but a shill (and could very well be another account of MinersProject.com as well). Please prove me wrong. |
|
|
|
Looks like I missed this. Dammit  If not, 0.15 BTC |
|
|
|
|
I have temporarily removed the rating on Populous World, pending further information from participants in this bounty project. Some seem to be happy, some don't, but the majority have not made their thoughts clear on the matter as of yet.
So for now, I'll be keeping an eye on this topic, and will take any further action later after speaking with other members of DT.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
This has already been taken care of now delete this garbage thread
I've seen some people agreed upon 1000 PPT each. If every blog bounty participant agrees with this decision, I'll lock this thread and ask for a deletion. You have all agreed to be bribed with an amount that is less than you were promised in the first place? Or am I missing something here? If every blog bounty participant agrees with this decision, I'll lock this thread and ask for a deletion.
Your prerogative - if people are happy with the "resolution" that has been promised, then I'll remove the rating once others' have confirmed this. Again, unless I have missed something here, I don't see why you would settle for less than you were promised. But if people are happy with it, so be it.. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'll check in on this again tomorrow and adjust the rating if necessary. |
|
|
|
Please add any other useful info you have regarding this to the OP of the thread as you manage to gather it, OP. Namely, exactly how much you have been scammed out of personally, along with the "scammers" profile link (thanks a14m for providing it in the second post - but it helps to have it in the OP as well). Further please link where he has promised to fulfil this after the ICO had ended (as someone has stated in Populous Worlds' feedback). Also, please use the normal "Scam Accusation" format for this thread: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Anyone who has been duped by this, please post in this thread so we can see just how far this stretches. I will leave a tag on Populous Worlds' profile temporarily directing him to this thread so he can explain in detail exactly what has gone on here. Judging from his response, and the response of anyone else that posts here, will determine if the tag remains or not. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Any possible way so that someone in the DT will notice it. There are some active ICO that already accept him without further review on his work. He just posting his past shit translation of blog of bancor. Poor bancor. They paid tons of token without reviewing quality. I will edit this thread soon once I'm home. Thanks for reaching here Lauda.  Lauda is back in DT I have left a backup rating to reflect what this user has been doing. Thanks for the report. |
|
|
|
Just see the feedback of this user it says email changed and password changed. See the current post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=220319;sa=showPostsFrom 2015 to 2017 , see the posts if DT members rankein His email and password reset, morebloodwine waking just a months ago then waited for a month to get warning for email change to vanish and now trading in altcoins section. Just suddenly...And are coming... Pay 0.2 BTC and you can get DT accounts... WTF. I will be preparing a full report on this topic..Just need some time. @lauda I will pm you report soon. Sadly, some unscrupulous members (account sellers) of the forum have, over time, managed to get hold of accounts that are within DT ranks. They will continue to do so via various methods, and those accounts usually end up in the hands of a scammer at the end of it. These are accounts that have usually become inactive over time, have been hacked, or for some messed up reason the original owner used their account as collateral on a loan and never paid it back - and lost the account in the process, and disappeared. This is just a few ways of how these DT accounts end up in the hands of someone other than the original owner. A lot of account sellers on here that manage to get hold of a DT account look at it as their golden apple - all they see is money, and they really don't give a shit that the obvious thing that will happen when they sell it, is some unsuspecting person will end up scammed for a chunk of BTC. Scammers will pay a lot of BTC for an account that is in DT. Unfortunately the DT "list" is not kept up to date with people who deserve to be in there, and who doesn't. Deserve might be the wrong word, but you get my point. Accounts can go inactive for a year +++ and still be part of the DT system. They can then later end up in the hands of someone else with little to no people noticing, until someone gets scammed. The only thing that will really prevent this sort of thing going forward is for either theymos, who controls the Default Trust account, to remove these inactive DT accounts from DT (accounts who no longer have any need to be part of the system) - or for the users in DT1 who placed the account in their trust list, to remove them - or, for other DT1 users to exclude them (it takes 2 excludes to get them out of DT). If none of these things happen, unfortunately you will continue to get times when a DT account that has been inactive for a long time will pop up and be inevitably used to scam someone, or multiple people, before it is caught. |
|
|
|
Archive of this thread up until now.
This has got to be one of the weirdest "scam accusations" I have come across in recent times. @MinersProject.com - threatening your customers with legal action for reasons I really cannot work out with the info available to me in this thread is, at the minimum, extremely unprofessional. That is the reason for me archiving this thread anyway. As for what the issues are, I hope everyone gets a satisfactory resolution. I will be watching to see what happens before taking any action.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, this looks like a giant mess. That is an atrocious mark up, from 6 BTC to 15 BTC, as just a starting bid..?! Everyone likes to make money on their deals, but this was a step too far. Pure and utter greed.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
