I also see Manchester City as a favorite team to win the game against Brighton because, despite the fact that Manchester City I lost two games recently, I still believe that Manchester City is still stronger than Brighton, and again, with the Brighton pattern of playing, I will say it will be easy for Manchester City to score because the Brighton pattern of playing is attacking, and if they try attacking Manchester City, I believe Manchester City will use the opportunity on them because Manchester City are very fast at attacking, and if not the opponent has a stronger defense, they will not be able to stop Manchester City attackers.
From the condition of the club's strength and experience, Manchester City are the favorites in this match but in terms of actual results, I think this will also still be a little complicated if in the end Brighton can play well and prepare under the pressure given by Manchester City. Manchester City are still having problems when in the last 2 matches there is no Rodri as their attack organizer but on the other hand I think Pep already knows what they will do in this match. It would be very bad if in the end Pep had to lose points for the 3rd time in a row in this match so I think he will do his best so that Manchester City can bring 3 points at Etihad this week. Manchester City players are under a lot of pressure after defeats against Wolves and Arsenal in the last two matches. Their performance against Arsenal was very poor. I was very disappointed to see such a performance from a big team like Manchester City. And if they put in a similar performance against Brighton, they won't win. But it is Manchester City's home match. It is hoped that the team will return to form with a good performance in the home matches. Manchester City's past record against Brighton is not good. City have won 2 matches and lost 2 matches in their last 5 meetings. A match has been drawn. So it is easy to predict that the match will be very competitive. And if City don't perform well, they will have to concede a third successive defeat. |
|
|
|
350 runs target would have been reasonable in today's match. The openers of Bangladesh made a good start, they would have easily reached above 300+ runs if the middle order players batted with responsibilities. But the middle order players has shown pathetic performance today. India is going to win the match very easily. India and New Zealand could be the finalists in this world cup.
One of the reasons why Bangladesh fought a relatively weak team in this match is that Shakib Al Hasan is injured.When Shakib Al Hasan is in the team, the team has an added motivation and energy.If the middle order batsmen could have played the way Bangladesh's opening batting started today, 300 plus runs would surely have been scored.But unfortunately it didn't happen due to which India went on to win the match very easily. This match is again will be won by India. India batsmen did 230 plus scores together, and the target was 256 scores, till now, India won all the matches that they played in this World Cup. By the way, mostly India won their all matches in the ODI World Cup, the biggest example is that you can see the 2019 ODI World Cup that World Cup India won the all matches and they lost the Semi-Final. I know that India lost their one match against Afghanistan but also India lost Semi-Final. Anyway, Virat Kholi is near to the century, he needs 8 scores to century and the target for India also remains 8 runs. Bangladesh really should have scored at least 300. When I saw the great start that Bangladesh got in this match, I thought they were going to reach at least 350. And I also almost knew that if Bangladesh does not score, 360, they are not going to win this match. And in the end, Bangladesh ended up scoring only something more than 250. I know it was not even 260. As soon as I saw the target, I knew that India was not going to face any problems winning this match. Because The track was really flat. There was nothing for the bowlers and Bangladesh still managed to perform pretty badly, lol. In the end Virat Kohli got his century and India has won the match just now by seven wickets. |
|
|
|
Have seen a lot of threads talking about the bull market, and everyone making comments.
I don't think selling all bitcoin in the bull market is a good idea. Why? Knowing the fact that the next bull price will still come as bitcoin continues to grow, so I don't think selling all my bitcoin in the bull market is the best.
Everyone is holdle bitcoin in the bear market and planning to sell in the bull market, now, when finally, the bull market comes should I sell all my bitcoins and prepare to accumulate from afresh in the next bear market again? or should I keep some percentage to continue the accumulation?
I think our main goal is to make a profit from investing in Bitcoin. So anyone who has as much capital, or as much capital as they can invest, invests in Bitcoin. So, I slightly disagree with you. In the bull season we should sell all our Bitcoin whenever we feel that the market is giving us a good profit, because no one knows the complete top, you can sell your Bitcoin step by step during the same bull season. As far as I am concerned, buying again when the market is down will be the best strategy in the next bear season. The crypto market continues to fluctuate, so the most successful people are those who buy at the bottom and sell at the top. You can guess when the price of Bitcoin reached 67 thousand dollars, If someone didn't sell all of their Bitcoin, after that Bitcoin fell to $15,000. I have no problem with the plan to sell all bitcoin in a bull market because that is what I would do as well. But I think those who do not intend to sell all their bitcoins will also have a reason, maybe they expect a higher price and they achieved their profit target without selling all their bitcoins. And if bitcoin doesn't go higher like they expected, continuing to hold it won't hurt them. It's a trade-off they've considered and are willing to accept. Moreover, if they didn't sell when bitcoin hit $100k and it dropped to $15k, but if they still haven't sold then that means they haven't lost money yet. Each person will have a different investment plan. |
|
|
|
@gunhell16, it is the risk in investment an businesses make people to be conscious about investment and business proper. If there was no risk everyone would be a negligent to their investment but because of the risk we have to be consciously doing and planning things very well. The risk in altcoins are not high, because they are much more stable than bitcoin. Fear on altcoins is the collapse in anytime. Just like some altcoins in the past which have collapsed and people funds also lost as well. And that is one the major fear in altcoins.
Are you sure about this or is this just a mistake? Because I think the opposite is more accurate, the risk of altcoins is extremely high and their volatility is also much greater than bitcoin. People are afraid of altcoins because they are too risky and can collapse at any time. When talking about altcoins, even topcoins are uncertain, they are all completely different from bitcoin. Risk always exists around us and I believe everyone is aware of that, but because of greed, they forget about risk for a moment and end up paying a very expensive price for their greed. |
|
|
|
That transfer did not happen in the summer because of many reasons that I believe did not only come from Mbappe. PSG did not want to lose him too and the player probably was fluctuating between leaving and staying in PSG and Europe. He even wanted a lot, chance to join Real Madrid, opportunity to maximize his salary in Real Madrid too.
He did not only care of money but also titles and wanted to achieve many things at the same time. Saudi Professional League can help him earn money but again he also wanted to play in Europe to prepare for Euro 2024. So many barriers that did not make the superb transfer of Mbappe to Saudi Professional League to happen. It's the past story and I believe we will return with a similar story in future.
Mbappe does not covet huge sums of money, nor is he focused solely on his career, he is at the mid-level. Mbappe has rejected such a big offer thinking that his career may be ruined if he goes to Saudi Arabia, so why does he not understand that if he goes to Real Madrid from PSG, his career will be brighter. Mbappe wants to stay in Europe as well as he wants to earn a lot of money that's why he can't leave PSG. PSG pay Mbappe a huge annual salary that he probably wouldn't get if he went to Real Madrid, which is why every season the transfer market ends with drama between Mbappe and Real Madrid. Mbappé at this age should fully focus on his career, when he can take his career to the level of Ronaldo and Messi then he won't have to worry about money, the money will come to him. Mbappe is probably the best paid sports professional outside of Saudi Arabia. Stating that he doesn't covet huge sums of money has already been proven wrong. No football player has ever received more than Mbappe. He got a huge lump sum and a loyalty bonus for every single year he stayed with PSG. Money was the sole reason why he signed an extensive contract with PSG. He earns around 20% of the entire PSG payroll.  If that doesn't mean he covets huge sums of money, then what else could mean it... But he wanted more money. He didn't want to forego his loyalty bonus of I think around $100 million or so and he was trying to get a deal with Real Madrid that would have made him as much money. But now that he himself is soon as rich as a sheikh who is sitting on a sea of oil, I wonder if he still considers going to Saudi Arabia. You have to understand that if that transfer actually happened, it was going to be the second most influential transfer for the Saudi Pro League. The first one obviously being Cristiano Ronaldo. I said this was going to be the second most influential because if Mbappé actually agreed to go to the Saudi League, a lot more young players were going to be interested in going there. And right now they have already been able to get a lot of legends in there. So young players are what they need right now. that's why there was such a big offering. |
|
|
|
There are several reasons why government would want to ban bitcoin or already banned bitcoin and these reasons differ from country to country and maybe I will have to speak for my country and one of the major reasons why the government has decided not to identify with bitcoin is because of the risk of its citizens getting scammed by those online hoodlums who always get people scammed through bitcoin and this singular act of scam has already painted so much wrong image of bitcoin already and the government has already warned all banks and the cbn from getting involved in any cryptocurrency transaction.
And another reason is the fact that bitcoin is decentralized and if accepted, will be very difficult for the government to country or have dominance or its citizens hence they’re doing really hard to fight and I think they already have wrong advisers around them .
Your concern about governments banning bitcoin to protect citizens from scams is real. The criminal element has tarnished bitcoin's image in the eyes of many governments and their citizenry. Please be honest. Scammers will take any opportunity to profit, but should they obstruct technical advancement? I doubt it. Bitcoin's decentralization does strip governments of some authority, but isnt that its essence? Bitcoin was created to empower individuals without intermediaries. Some governments may see this as a threat to their power. One needs to wonder if governments are actually serving their citizens' best interests or merely resistive to change and afraid of losing control. Some governments have given reasons to protect their citizens from scams and they decided to ban bitcoin, but is that the real reason or just an excuse? Because have they really stopped all the scams involving fiat currencies? Even without bitcoin, scams still happen every day and why haven't they solved it yet? They banned it because it was uncontrollable and they feared their power would be shaken if bitcoin became popular and widely used, there is no second reason for them to ban it. It's all just an excuse because bitcoin is too perfect to find weaknesses. Bitcoin creates decentralization and promotes privacy, and that goes against the government's policy toward its citizens. |
|
|
|
And what matters really is when you're dealing with your own privacy, as in never talking with that public or anyone even the person you trust the most.
Are you choose to donate your coins to the network? I don't think it's cool when all of your hardwork when you're still life not to be given to other people you love, especially your kids. If you don't have a wife or children, you can also share those secrets with your other relatives like your parents, they are the people who gave birth to you, they are more trustworthy than anyone. It would be wasteful and selfish when we only live for ourselves and are willing to throw everything away while our loved ones deserve to inherit that wealth if something unfortunate happens to us. But it's hard to understand why so many people are so selfish. There are even some people who believe that someone dying with their bitcoins is contributing to bitcoin's scarcity, which is the craziest thinking I've ever seen. LAUGH!! |
|
|
|
Honestly my biggest favourite for the Europa League title is Liverpool. They really care about this tournament on one hand. Because basically they are prioritizing the English Premier League. As they aren't a part of the Champions League also it might be hard to predict what they can do before watching them in the Europa League. However I'm contented with what I have seen until now. Klopp is just focusing on resting his main players as much as possible by subbing them off early or subbing them in a little late in the game but this still doesn't affect their result badly. After Liverpool I can show Roma and Leverkusen as the other strong title contenders. I'd put Roma ahead of Leverkusen despite Xabi Alonso's great work. This is because of Roma's performance with Mourinho in the European competitions in the last 2 years.  I will also favor Liverpool in the Europa League this season, but that might change if some of the teams that are struggling in the Champions League drop to the Europa League. Imagine if Manchester United, Arsenal, Newcastle joined the Europa League because they failed in the Champions League, it would be something amazing. Manchester United and Newcastle have the possibility of entering the Europa League because of the tight competition in the group stages Champions League, but not Arsenal. Several La Liga teams could also be a threat in the Europa League, as well as Serie A teams so Liverpool will not be the only favorite. First of all, I do not think that Liverpool will still perform in the Europa League competition in the next season. I think they will be able to finish in the Champions League spot. So let's talk about this season first. Of course, Liverpool is a big favourite to win the Europa League competition this season. But the thing is Bayer Leverkusen is also performing really well, both in Bundesliga and also in the Europa League competition. So right now, I think they are also a heavy favourite to win the Europa League competition. But I think we are talking a little too much in advance. Let's just give them a chance to show their performance and let's see which team is more consistent. |
|
|
|
Osimhen had signed a long-term contract with the club because he was convinced and promised higher salaries and some attractive offers. One thing about footballers is that if they don't feel appreciated by their club and are given a better or less attractive offer somewhere with a positive reception, they won't hesitate to join the new team if it would improve their career chances and provide them with enough playing time. The long-term deal Osimhen signed does not prevent him from leaving the club if he so desires, and the team interested in him is ready to pay for him. As far as I understand, Osimhen stay in Napoli is coming to an end soon and he won’t spend the remaining years left in his contract with Napoli before he leaves to join new team.
Well it is one reason that Osimhen decided to stay with Napoli because he was offered significantly improved conditions, but another reason was the high transfer fee that Napoli wanted. He is a great striker, but in my opinion clubs like Real Madrid were hesitant because Osimhen is not Mbappe and yet Napoli wanted at least 160 million I think? It was a very high amount and while it is almost guaranteed that a player like Mbappe will deliver, I believe there was more doubt about the long-term performances that could be expected from Osimhen. Since prices are inflated anyway because of the clubs from Saudi Arabia paying those high fees, it is still a tough decision to make for any club from Europe to pay so much money for a player lik Osimhen. It's normal to agree to a long term deal because of the promises made before the contract, this is most common amongst player's not only osimhen but then if the conditions promised is no longer met, it's very fine that the player leaves if they decide to, especially if the term of the contract is due, Napoli in recent times have not been really fair to osimhen as they do before now and it's affecting his productivity. They are definitely increasing the price for his sale so as to keep him back probably after many bids from other team who are unable to pay they jus have to let go and he will stay back but then I don't think that will really be the case. I think osimhen will be better for Madrid as compared to mbappe, osimehen is a striker who's position is more likely at Madrid than mbappe, we have the likes of Jude who plays the same position as mbappe so buying him , he will most likely not have a place to play. I believe he will not be able to join any other Italian club before two years have been completed in the contract and he is unable to leave the club before one year is completed. So for this season, at least, I think he is stuck with this team. And he cannot do anything about it. The only thing he can actually do is that, he can perform well and consistently enough to attract other clubs. So that he will be able to move away from the club after this season. And if he is able to perform consistently, it does not matter how the team does, other clubs are definitely going to be interested in him. |
|
|
|
Is it because investors still don't trust Bitcoin as a store of value? Or is it something else? Please enlighten me. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. It sounds harsh but it's true, bitcoin is still considered one of the more volatile and high-risk assets. It is still not comparable to gold whether we want to accept that as truth or not. But there's nothing wrong with that because gold has been recognized for thousands of years, while many people have never even heard of bitcoin. So I'm not surprised that people are still looking to gold instead of bitcoin these days. And that doesn't mean bitcoin isn't safe or can't be compared to gold, simply because bitcoin needs more time to be recognized and proven. You should not be too hasty. |
|
|
|
It is very natural for a big team like PSG who has spent a lot of money to be so ambitious to win the UCL title and maybe they will continue to do so until that title can be achieved. This mentality problem will only come if the PSG coach is a person who has high integrity in football and that must also be accompanied by an attitude of players who are willing to fight together and not just think about the good times at PSG. However, not only that, PSG's management must also be filled with people who are competent in their fields and if so far they still cannot overhaul their management, of course winning the UCL will also be difficult. They have to be consistent and it is not an easy thing, especially if you look at PSG, this is a new big team on the European stage, so they will still need a long time.
However, I think some of the steps taken by PSG were wrong, last season they spent a lot of money buying several star players and targeting to win the UCL, but in fact they couldn't do much in the European competition. And this season PSG is experiencing many problems, especially the drama of Mbappe not wanting to extend his contract anymore and since Luis Enrique took charge of the PSG team it has not made the team's performance better, quite the opposite. If they want to become a strong team and be able to win the UCL, then PSG must create a strong team framework, like Pep Guardiola did against Manchester City and they must also realize that money can never buy a title. Mbappe is not willing to extend his contract because obviously he is not getting what he really wants to get from the team, they are not giving him the platform he desires to win more tittle to his career in his young age, now that ha still gat the capacity to perform as a young star, he needs where he will get the team support he desire and achieve more trophies and title for himself Spending good money to get quality player to enable them win league title wasn't a bad move and couldn't be seen as one aswell but using the players appropriately with good tactics that will help them get things right is what they probably need at the moment, Luis Enrique needs improve more on his tactics and how he position the players so that he will start getting results. The recants slow down in PSG has graduated into great concerns and if Luis doesn't do anything about it sooner he may have his job on the line. I think we still cannot say anything for sure about Mbappé. Who knows if he decides to extend his contract again? I mean he has done this before. He was not supposed to extend his contract with PSG but he did. And that happened on a multiple of occasions so far. So there is no reason for us to believe that he is not going to do that same thing again. I just think if PSG throws enough money on his face, he will eventually stay for another few years or more. I hope he doesn't do that, but I believe he will. If PSG was actually interested in improving the squad, they would have let him go in the first place. They wouldn't have done so many things just to keep him in the squad when he clearly doesn't want to. |
|
|
|
Honestly everyone is pissed from Brazil performance lately. Their performance in World Cup wasn't that top, they even failed to reach semifinals and to finish in top 4 teams.. Richarlison didn't give what he was supposed to offer for his team. Neymar might play good in a match and miss it badly in another. Vinicius Junior is fluctuating with his national team... I believe Ancelotti time to train the Brazilian team will be closer than we thought and once confirmed, he will have a heavy task fixing the Brazilians issues!
In the 2022 World Cup edition in Qatar, the Brazilian national team only reached the quarter-final stage, and had to suffer defeat to Croatia with an aggregate of 4-2. For the upcoming 2026 edition of the World Cup, I hope that Brazil can be one of the ones who can reach the final, I think with the depth of the squad they currently have they will be able to achieve it. Now Brazil is in second place with 7 points in three matches in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers in the South American zone. In the future, with Ancelotti as head coach, I think it will provide better opportunities. However, we have to wait until Ancelotti contract ends with Real Madrid. I am very curious about Ancelotti quality of taktic at the National Team level. Well he is a long time that he is not coaching national teams,he have been coaching CSKA Moscow,Chelsea and Real Madrid so when he gets to Brazil it will be a completely different thing for him,you should not get your hopes that high for where Brazil will go.The good thing is that he will have quite some time to learn the team and the depth of the squad will surely be helpful but first Brazil needs to qualify for there and chances are really high for them to do so,they should avoid these really bad results like drawing with Venezuela. Once Ancelotti get in the grips of it I am sure Brazil can go really high and they can even win the World Cup without this being a big surprise for me. The problem with the Brazil team is that the national team is just not balanced at all. They have all the wingers in the world on the team. But they have very limited strikers, midfielders, and also defensive players. I am not saying they don't have players for those positions. They definitely have players, but those players are not really good, to be honest. And if a player from the midfield or defense gets injured, they cannot replace him with a player who will be able to give the same level of service to the team. I think the next World Cup is going to be the last for Neymar though. |
|
|
|
The new interests me and since Toni Kroos is a player that has worked with Pep Guardiola with Bayern Munich, moving to Manchester City have a good possibility of happening.
Being 34 means nothing. Toni Kroos, still has that ability to break down defense with his passes. That is something he can bring into Pep Guardiola's side. Besides, they've lost Gundogan and since left, no player has met his standards.
Pep Guardiola already brought in a yougin from Manchester City Academy he ( Lewis ,) is already doing well. Did had a good game against Arsenal but no matured enough in midfied.
I instead believe that Guardiola will be interested in young players that has long future to spend in the club. I also do not think that Guardiola will allow players like Gundigon and Mahrez to leave the club and in the end bring player as old as Toni Kross to play with him. His experience with Toni in Bayern is old enough to be forgotten and dwell on new people and new challenges. In the other hand, Toni wanted to end his career in Madrid but was persuaded by Madrid management to help the club to play one more season. I am surprised Toni wants to continue playing. It is good and passionate although I also think Guardiola will plan for the long term. He is an experienced coach. He will not waste money. Manchester City will have to spend a lot of money to add Toni Kroos to the squad. And at the same time it is not sure whether Toni Kross will be able to adapt himself to the Premier League. The Premier League game and the La Liga game are completely different. And so I would say Guardiola should add young talented players to the squad instead of investing money on Toni Kross. As a result, if the young player adapts himself to the team, he will be able to support City for a long time. Adding Toni Kroos to the squad at a high price for only 2 seasons would not be the right decision. However, Manchester City can add Toni Kroos to the squad if the transfer fee is low or a free transfer. Tony Kroos can be an interesting search for Manchester City. You know he is still a great player, even though he is thinking about his retirement. And I believe he is definitely going to perform well even though he is not very young anymore. Yes, I also think that Manchester City will be able to use him properly. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying Real Madrid is using him badly. If anything, Real Madrid is using him the best. But as he is already thinking about retirement, it will probably be a good journey for him to join Manchester City and achieve something with another club as well. |
|
|
|
Lol, the winning results that AS Roma got when AS Roma playing against Frosinone and Cagliari i think cannot be expected for AS Roma to be able to maintain a winning streak. Because after all, Cagliari this moment is a team that is ranked at the bottom, so AS Roma victory against Cagliari is an ordinary result and not an impressive result. Also, at this moment in fact Frosinone position is better than AS Roma, because Frosinone is above AS Roma in the current Serie A table with a gap of one point.
Well even though they don't remain consistent after winning those matches, atleast they've managed to secure 6 points against those two teams and it's got them up to the 10th position, they're even currently doing better than Lazio that finished 2nd on the table last season but are currently underperforming and currently at the 13th position when they should be somewhere close to the top 4 or 6 this season. Roma would be having a tough time in their next two matches cause they'll be playing against Monza and Inter in the league game, they could be lucky against Monza but I doubt if they'll grab a 3 point against Inter well if they defeat Monza it would give them more morale to defeat Slavia Parah in the Europa League, Jose Mourinho and his boys should try secure victory against Monza and Salvia Parah before facing Inter Milan. Actually, whatever happens, I do not think that they will be able to win against Inter. Inter is performing really well right now and it is going to be really hard for them to win against Inter. They have been inconsistent so far in this season. And my opinion about them is not going to change unless they start winning matches one after another. I will say this, if they are able to win the next three matches, including the match with Inter, I will actually say that they are going to improve and will have a chance to compete at the top of the table. But honestly, I do not think that is going to happen. I am even doubtful about them winning the next match, to be honest. |
|
|
|
After the arrival of Rasmus Hojlund Ten Hag was more likely to played him than Anthony Martial for striker position and this make Anthony Martial only being an second choice for that position and this also make Anthony Martial starting to thinking his future on Manchester United because he want to gets more minutes to play which is that's what he won't get if Anthony Martial stays in this team so this winter Martial will thinking to leave Manchester United and find new club and it says Manchester United will allowing him to find new clubs as long as the offers from those clubs is decent to considered but Martial has high salary in Manchester United so most likely if he leave the club then he will no longer gets the salary as much as he does now
The reason is, Anthony Martial performance is not as good as Hojlund, and it makes sense for Ten Hag to entrust the striker position to Hojlund. I think this is a good opportunity because Hojlund has shown his ambition in scoring goals, so Hojlund just needs to have a partner who really supports the ball. Here, Garnacho can be relied on rather than Rashford, who has recently made more mistakes and often fails to execute the ball. If Garnacho, Rashford and Hojlund can work together well, of course the front line will be ideal. Ten Hag's job is to balance his defense after several times being easily penetrated by the opponent. I also believe that the defense is definitely the biggest problem for Manchester United right now. And after that comes the midfield. With the attacking lineup that Manchester United has right now, I still believe that it will be good enough to work with. Just for context, Manchester United has been able to score 9 goals so far this season, and in eight matches they have conceded 12. So the defense definitely has been pretty bad. Well, I do not trust the coach first of all, but that is another story. I think Manchester United will be doing better with a better coach. I definitely do not think the way this team is being managed right now is actually correct and going to be good in the long run. |
|
|
|
A lot of questions have no answers, but only a few have the right answers to 95% of some questions. Well, let me start with trust. Can you trust a person, either a friend, family or a relative, with 100% complete trust? Let me answer myself first? NO I can't. I can't trust anybody fully 100% anymore because I have seen some though cases.
Life is inherently fair, if in this world you can't trust anyone, don't expect or blame others when they don't trust you either. Trust is created from mutual trust, so whether you have people to trust and whether people trust you or not depends on how you live and treat people. Always look at yourself before blaming anyone. I have a lot of people that I trust 100% and I'm sure they trust me too. Especially my mother, wife and children, I have never hidden anything from them and vice versa. It would be funny if we live in the same house, see each other every day, but don't trust each other at all. I wouldn't consider it family life. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is becoming less and less effective for trading and one day the market will become stable for sure. So it is good practice to learn how to trade other coins so that you can be prepared for the future.
Gold is also very stable but have you ever tried trading with gold in the forex market? It is even more volatile than what altcoins offer. In trading, volatility will always occur and whether we want to make more or less profit depends on how we set the leverage, the higher the leverage, the higher the risk but the higher the profit will be. When it comes to holding, it is clear that bitcoin is always the top choice because of its safety but when it comes to trading, there is not much difference between bitcoin or altcoins. Leverage doesn’t increase volatility of the token but rather the risk. Volatility is due to the price change of tokens while leverage just multiply your margin so that even small changes on the price will create huge impact on your trade. Technically, leverage increases only your trade size and not the volatility of the token. Forex trading is a leverage trading which you should compared on futures/leverage trading on crypto not on spot. I mean, it's not like we're increasing leverage to increase the volatility of bitcoin or tokens. He said that bitcoin has become more stable and it is becoming more difficult to profit from bitcoin. But if he increases the leverage, he will see that trading with bitcoin pairs can also make huge profits although the risks are also very high. Yes, I'm talking about futures trading, I'm not talking about spot trading. For spot trading, we have thousands of pairs to choose from, I have not seen anyone focusing solely on bitcoin. In spot trading most people will use multiple pairs to offset each other to get better profits. |
|
|
|
Once again Bayern Munich is trying to hire another palyer from Dortmund and that's what they usually do when they need players. Dortmund and Bayern Munich are the main competitors in the Bundesliga but still, there are many players they left Dortmund for Bayern Munich so far. Since Bayern Munich needs a goalkeeper they want to hire Gregor Kobel from Dortmund, however, this player extended his contract recently until 2028 and this can't be easy for Bayern Munich to hire Gregor Kobel.  Not problem with Dortmund goal keeper have extend his contract until 2028 depend how excited with Bayern Munich bid offer, both team have good communicate with transfer players depend high bid offer from Bayern its not problem for Dortmund sell their goal keeper. Looking on transfer activities last several years, Bayern Munich have signed many Dortmund player as free agent or have to pay with transfer fees. I don't think Dortmund will reject with Bayern Munich interested for their goal keeper Gregor Kobel if can pay highest fees transfer. Not problem for Dortmund have to sell their player with rival teams, so far Dortmund not priority with their rival team winning or dominance in domestic league but also Dortmund have decision with business profitable. Classic Bayern. They just want to bring some trouble into Dortmund's locker room, what a shameful way to do that. Every year they sign a new goal keeper because they can't decide who should be their number 1. Why even talk about Kobel 1 week after he signed his new contract, what are they trying to accomplish here? Just another reason to hate these Bavarian clowns to be honest! Yeah, exactly, classic Bayern Munich. I think they actually just want to make sure that they do not have big competition in the league competition. They just want to take out all the competition and make sure that they are the best team in the Bundesliga competition. I personally do not think that it is competitive thinking. But at the same time, I understand why they want to do this. However, at the same time, it is a little hard to understand why they are trying to bring in new players to fix the problem instead of trying to implement better tactics. |
|
|
|
~snip~
~snip~ So, for me, i think the only safe way to stake in cryptocurrency is by decentralized staking, there are still some decentralized staking that offer up to 10% APY, you can check Renec blockchain for example, you can stake Renec coin on renec blockchain for up to 10% APY, just same as it is with SOL on Solana blockchain. But you will encounter another problem when staking with tokens or altcoins, which is its future value. There is no guarantee that the value of Renec or Solana will stabilize or increase in the future, if it is dumped or disappears, you will also suffer losses and lose all your capital. High APY is just a sophisticated trap that altcoins are creating to trick investors into investing in it for the long term. I have a friend who is also staking, he bought ICP for 50$ in 2021, and he is staking at binance. But you can check ICP's current price, I don't think it can increase in price to help him recover his investment, let alone profit. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is becoming less and less effective for trading and one day the market will become stable for sure. So it is good practice to learn how to trade other coins so that you can be prepared for the future.
Gold is also very stable but have you ever tried trading with gold in the forex market? It is even more volatile than what altcoins offer. In trading, volatility will always occur and whether we want to make more or less profit depends on how we set the leverage, the higher the leverage, the higher the risk but the higher the profit will be. When it comes to holding, it is clear that bitcoin is always the top choice because of its safety but when it comes to trading, there is not much difference between bitcoin or altcoins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
