Well, another thing is I believe Arsenal is going to find Jorginho to be the next regular penalty-taker. I honestly do not know what is the stats with him currently taking penalties. But I still remember the special jumping technique that he used to fake the goalkeepers while taking penalties.



I think everyone is expecting him to be useful for Arsenal. But at the same time, I think it is going to be a little foolish to expect too much from him. Because after all, he is a little old right now. And it is not going to be realistic to expect him to dictate everything in the field.

I've never seen anyone claim to have a method that turns risk close to zero, if you can do that, I think you were already a billionaire long ago and don't have much time left to visit the forum. Cryptocurrencies are considered the riskiest market, and with what I've been through over the years in the market, I'm pretty sure there isn't a single person who doesn't lose money in this market. But experienced investors will have a larger profit to compensate for that loss. By the way, I like OP's method, I found it worked for me too.

Right here in my country, my friends are investing more in stocks than in bitcoin. Simply because investing in bitcoin is riskier, plus it's volatile, investing in bitcoin is not recognized and protected by law. In contrast, stocks have the management and control of the law, so securities trading will be safer. Volatility is also a big obstacle, many people don't like roller coasters. In my opinion, cryptocurrency will not be able to surpass the popularity of securities because of the problem of risk that it brings.

Jorginho is going to be important in the upcoming times for Arsenal in my opinion. Because he is definitely a very experienced midfielder. That is going to come in very handy for Arsenal. Because I believe that Arsenal has lack experience, and Jorginho will be able to provide the experience that they need. Arsenal is already performing really well. I think that is why he will be able to complement his teammates very well.

Honestly, I hardly care about the salary that will be paid weekly or monthly. What I care about is how much they pay me when I work with them, and the payment cannot be delayed. Receiving a weekly or monthly salary, it is not so important because we will have appropriate adjustments and plans.



I prefer working with a fixed monthly salary rather than a commission-based one. Because I like a job that is not too stressful and has a stable income so that I have more time to look for other opportunities for myself, such as investment.

What he is saying is just his misconceptions and without any proof for his claims. Even if bitcoin competes with fiat or gold, bitcoin will never be able to replace fiat, no government organization will do that except in countries with bad economies.

Although bitcoin is deflationary, it has so far been suitable only as a speculative asset. Many say that only bitcoin can reduce inflation, but look at what the Fed is doing, US inflation is falling without bitcoin.

Our economy is thousands of years old, and bitcoin is only 14 years old; bitcoin is outstanding because it gives us huge opportunities that no other asset can give us. But it can't replace fiat or gold, it's a fact we shouldn't run away from.

Jorginho is not as good as he was before. But he can certainly play. I think he is actually going to be useful for Arsenal. I am quite sure that Arsenal is not going to expect something extraordinary from him. And I also think that experience is going to come in handy in the case of Jorginho.

Arsenal is heavily relying on good playmakers. They are making important plays from the midfield. The midfielders are also supplying good balls to the attackers. And that's where I think the experience of Jorginho is going to come into play a lot.

Actually, I wanted to talk about BCCI making money, not taking money. I wanted to say that they make about 80% of the money. And so they are obviously probably going to ask for a bigger percentage (which is now 22.8% if I am not wrong) and that is going to mean less money for the associate nations. And I am not saying that India should not ask for that money. They are of course making ICC more revenue. So they should get more money in return for that as well.

What I really wanted to emphasize is that the ICC should really look into the situation of each cricket board and give them money accordingly.

But with that, there also comes a point where ICC might actually fail to realize or find out how much money a cricket board has. Because of course, there are corrupt officials and members everywhere.

I think there is a big misconception of equality in ICC about distributing funds. Equal distribution of funds between the associate nations is never going to be a good idea. Because they are a lot of cricket boards which are quite rich and also there are a lot of cricket boards which are very poor. So it is never going to be a good idea to distribute the fun equally between the associate nations. There is obviously new funding going to happen for the associate nations. I think the funding for all the associate nations is going to decrease because India is asking for almost 80%. And if that happens, I think ICC will have no option but to actually figure out which cricket boards are poor and actually need the money more.

This was of course a very easy win for the Indian women. I feel like West Indies women will have to improve a lot to actually get even close to the level of Indian women. It was 80-20 match and the Indian women's team won the match with 37 balls left. That's more than 6 overs. It does seem like it is going to be a final between the Indian women's team and the South African women's team. And even in that match, I will say India is going to win quite convincingly in my opinion.

I honestly think that Paul could have been a good contender for the title if we remove Novak Djokovic from the context. But I am someone who does not like to live in a dream world. This was obviously a good performance from Novak Djokovic. And obviously, we should give him credit for that. Now if he was not in the tournament, obviously the tournament might have been a little more interesting. He is the current champion of the Australian Open.

Do you know why El Salvador accepts bitcoin? When they accept bitcoin, they don't have their own currency, they are having economic difficulties and the possibility of default. No one wants to help them, it can be said that they are very stuck, and bitcoin is seen as the last buoy they can use. But luck was with them when bitcoin helped them improve their economy without depending on the help of other countries.

But in great powers, they have a strong economy, their currency has value. There is no reason they accept bitcoin to break their main currency. Bitcoin becoming the world currency is really unlikely, I also believe it can't happen.

Fiat depreciates, that's true, but compared to bitcoin's volatility and risk, it's still nothing and we're talking about our children's future. If we are investing in Bitcoin with money that can be lost, then there is no need to talk about risk because we are ready for it. But we're talking about our children's future, and that's money that can't be lost.

I want to know, do you have children? Because I am quite surprised that you are willing to bet your child's future on such a risky asset. I already have a baby and I won't treat my child's future like you do. 

Napoli versus Roma is going to start about 30 minutes from now. This is going to be a very interesting match. Of course, I believe that Napoli is going to be able to win this match. Actually, even if they do lose it is not going to be too much of a problem for them. A draw is also going to be a good result for them. But the problem is I do not think they are going to play for a draw in this match. Napoli is going to go for the win even though they are ahead in terms of points.

There's nothing wrong with comparing bank rates to bitcoin, but you didn't mention the risk when you put your child's future in an asset fraught with risk and uncertain future. In this case, I would suggest 50% of savings or other assets like gold and 50% of that to bitcoin. If the risk happens, we still have half, maybe gold or savings don't bring the high return, but at least it's safe and stays with us. With bitcoin, you are trading safety for profit, so consider it because it is our children's future.

News of the US government default is always talked about every year, but I have never seen it happen. The dollar is ruling the world and the US government owns the dollar printer. How can one think of the prospect that they will default?

But assuming that happens, the world financial system will collapse then that could be an opportunity for assets like bitcoin or gold, then gold and bitcoin will become everyone's safe haven. It is impossible to imagine what the bitcoin price achieved at that time would be, but unfortunately, that can only happen in dreams .

Actually, I do not think anyone expected England to lose this match. And England was actually playing well. They started very well and were on the right track. But after the openers got out, they were not able to form any type of partnership. Jos Buttler tried to form a partnership and he was actually trying to resist the South African bowlers. But he had no support from the other end and that also put immense pressure on him. In the end, it was a problem of not being able to keep wickets in hand for England.

After all, the reason I find most plausible for the price of bitcoin to rise is that the world economy is showing signs of recovery after a year of crisis. After 3 weeks of announcing a decrease in CPI, yesterday's PCE also decreased, showing signs of stronger economic recovery. And many people predict that with inflation indicators showing signs of decline, a Fed rate hike of only 0.25% is entirely possible. All news is good for the economy, so it is understandable that the entire financial market is benefiting from that.

Bitcoin has been up for more than 2 weeks and still shows no signs of falling, and what you say is the hope of many people. But in the end, we still don't have evidence to say that bitcoin has bottomed out or will definitely not fall any further. Therefore, we should still be more careful, and not too subjective about our predictions.

Usually, people will rush to reinvest when there is a strong bullish signal, but the current signal is not strong enough to make people participate in the market more. We are still 383 days away from the halving, there is still a long way to go.

It is surprising to see that everyone does not believe that bitcoin will drop to zero or die. But anything is possible, and the value of bitcoin is created from human need, as long as people don't need it anymore, it will go to zero. But just looking at people's belief in bitcoin, I can say that the chance of bitcoin falling to zero is almost nonexistent.
In my opinion, this is a money-making playground for big players, so it's tough to let it die unless they find a more attractive game than the cryptocurrency market.