^^^ What argument? There isn't any evolution (ETE) that anyone has any evidence of, to say nothing about proof for. The whole ETE thing is a system of stories that are suppositions about what might be. But there are so many holes in it, besides the fact of no proof, that it should have been dropped as a theory long ago. In fact, the changes in the theory over the years are so great that it isn't really the same theory at all.

All you are attempting to do is maintain a hoax. And, of course, you are reasonably free to do so. It isn't about embarrassment. It's about credibility. And evolutionists are losing theirs.

God made nature so dynamically complex that science is just beginning to delve a little into the real complexity of it. Once they delve a little further, they are going to see that everything is programmed. There isn't any random change.

^^^ No proof that evolution exists there in what you posted.

You don't realize, do you, that the more you attempt to distract away from finding or expressing proof of ETE, the more you are really expressing that there isn't any.

Evolution is a hoax.

And you could feed 100 starving Africans selling that fancy computer you are on. What is your point? Also, Huffington post? Canadian edition no less? LOL!

^^^ Computer matrix or simulation doesn't have anything to do with proving evolution. Your posting of these ideas is simply a method you are using to distract that there isn't any proof for evolution theory evolution at all.

Essentially, evolution is a complete hoax.

^^^ Thank you.

Still lizards of the same kind. Nobody knows that the change wasn't something that is programmed in the DNA as an on-the-shelf adaptation protection, ready since the Beginning, to be used when necessary. Or do they know it, and just haven't announced it?

The point isn't that there might or might not be evolution (ETE). The point is that nobody has proven it. Another point is that nobody has proven it after trying for 150 years or more regarding Darwin, and for thousands of years regarding those who came before him and tried.

These points are starting to prove that ETE doesn't exist, because nobody can find it. And since they are starting prove they can't find it, but keep on talking like it does exist, they are formally promoting a hoax.

Evolution is a hoax.

Starving because you are poor doesnt exists in the first world.

Its basically a requirement for being first world.

Being homeless in western and northern europe is not possible either, only if you choose yourself to be homeless.

There is no long correction that will happen as the price is still undervalued until now.
One good example of correction is what we just witnessed this month, but we see how the market react after that correction, Bitcoin rises again.
I'm expecting the correction to take place when the price of bitcoin will surpass its ATH, which likely gonna happen this year. 

There is no best or worst language as faucets are not really that much of a big deal. I believe most of the old faucets were built using PHP but Python, Java, Ruby on rails, are all good alternatives.

I personally wouldn't pay someone to create a faucet, as you can either use existing open source ones or platforms like FaucetHub for that purpose.

Evolution is a fact... some forms of it.

If you look in the dictionary - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evolution - you can find all kinds of explanations of the word "evolution." Properly applied, evolution is fact.

The form of evolution made popular by Darwin, that says that animals change into other animals over thousands or hundreds of thousands of years, and that all life had its start with some microbe, the descendants of which gradually changed into other "animals," has never come close to having a proof start. All the evidence for such a thing having happened, easily fits other forms of "evolution" found in the dictionary or in encyclopedias.

When Astargath suggests that a link I used is really pro-evolution of the evolution-theory-evolution kind (ETE), he forgets that the evolutionist that speaks in that site, simply announces a fact where there is adaptation change, but still the same basic animal (lizard) - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg51252920#msg51252920. In other words, there is no change into another kind of animal... no ETE.

If you have proof for ETE, other than simple stories about how ETE might exist in history, show the proof. As I have said many times, there is no way that we know to prove it except through painstaking DNA examination. And examining the DNA of millions of animals and plants from thousands and hundreds of thousands of years ago is literally impossible in any way we know.

In other words, we know that evolution can never be proven without tremendous advancements in science. We know this. And since we know this, yet state that evolution is factual, we are promoting a hoax among people who don't understand the ETE process, or who don't understand that we literally can't know if it is factual or not.

Evolution is a hoax.

Here's proof YouTube rigs their 'flat earth' search results,
in support of globalists with a violent message:





This begs the question,



does YouTube need more attitude adjustment?

So you can't prove the Earth is the billions of years old that evolution requires then? I can poke hols in radiometric dating techniques all day, the evidence for an Earth billions of years old is very weak.

While I agree there is certainly an element of wanting to be "the teacher" that is very malignant among "conspiracy theorists", and I think this is by design, IMO it is distinctly different in the sense that it is more based on their lack of a frame of reference for the world after their belief systems are destroyed after having to readjust them. They enter a psychological space where everything should be questioned (healthy) then simply keep drifting off into space never reintegrating their frame of reference for the world, and their belief system (unhealthy). I find the kind of knob who would line up to die on Mount Everest is the same type that would have a garage full of Lambos and wrap his face around a tree trying to impress some woman rather than trying to be "the teacher". They generally never believe in anything to begin with.

I'm confident that I could turn organic plant and animal tissue into stone in a time-frame of weeks or days with a concrete-like process. That being said what proof does "science", and when I say "science" I don't mean the scientific method but instead, the authority-based crap the government and media forces on the public, what proof do they have that the Earth is older than 10,000 years?

I don't buy radio-carbon dating. Evolution as described by "science" requires billions of years, what proof is there of "billions of years ago"? I know the Earth is an engineered structure and for it to be any older than thousands of years is ridiculous.



"It turned out to be a human skull retrofitted with an orangutan’s jaw and chimp’s teeth" -- Piltdown Man: The Secret Life of Charles Dawson (2003)

^^^ Still just a lizard:
So, where is the ETE proof? Even if this is a strong form of adaptation evolution, it is only the tiniest of beginnings toward proving that evolution is the thing that changes one kind of animal into another, and that this is the way that all creatures developed on earth.

Evolutionists desire evolution to be true so much, that they are working as hard as they can in every direction they can think of. Part of this work is to proclaim evolution as truth, even though all they have found is some possible evidence, and no fact.

I'm not saying that all this search and research isn't providing some useful knowledge about how nature operates. But calling it ETE when it is not known to be ETE in any sense is a hoax.

Evolution is a hoax.