i talk with wayki chain direction and we decrease weekly posts to 20 because they not love spam and they are serius project
First, good to hear that you managed to talk them into decreasing weekly posts to 20, but I am not so sure about the other part, that they do not like spam. On the contrary, they even hired bumping service to promote their project, and that is worst kind of spam you can get, I reported dozens of their spam posts few months ago, others probably did the same thing as well. You can read more about it in this thread that was started by zasad@ New Shill farm: 11 accounts connected They kept opening new threads with various news, and sock puppet accounts were promoting them. Most of those ANNs have been reported and deleted. Well, at least they gave up on those bumping services and decided to promote themselves through signature campaign.
|
|
|
Hmm već je utorak a samo 1 prijava. Ako ne bude interesa za ovaj natječaj i nagrade u meritima budem ga poništio i otvorio u beginners sekciji foruma za sve.
Ma sigurno da ima zainteresiranih, ali uvjet je malo specifican (postovi koji su najvise omogli novim clanovima) pa onda ljudi valjda traze adekvatne postove ili se mozda ustručavaju. Uostalom ima jos dosta vremena do kraja. Budem ja danas nadopunio ovaj post sa svoja 3 prijedloga, valjda bude bar jos par prijavljenih. E da pitam jel baš moramo submitati postove koji su pomogli newbie memberima, ili mogu proci i postovi koji služe i ostalima?
|
|
|
Bojim se da sve ovo ne pije vodu i da admine baš jako zaboli u predjelu odmah ispod pojasa šta se piše u temi za Regulusa.
Iskreno cak i mislim da nije tu stvar da admine boli briga, nego vise da oni imaju upute sa vrha da ignoriraju i da se ne petljaju u takve threadove. Bas sam nedavno prosao kroz thread, i koliko sam skuzio apsolutno niti jedan admin nije dao neko svoje misljenje, pa cak i bilo kakav komentar, sto me navodi na to da su tu u pitanju neke striktne upute i pravila za takve situacije. Neznam, mozda grijesim i oni nekad odgovaraju na takve threadove, al takav sam dojam dobio. Jedino što se može desiti je da ona Lucija pokupi ban ako bude dodatnih prijava protiv nje. Da, na nacin na koji taj clan sudjeluje na forumu, ban ne bi bio neko veliko iznenadjenje. Ono sto me zbunjuje oko cijeke te situacije je da sam prvo mislio da ga ne zele odbanati da ne naprave neki presedan, pa se ne zele uopce zajebavati sa tim, to bih jos nekako i razumio, ali izgleda da su vec neki clanovi bili odbanani, tako da je cijela ta situacija bas cudna. Kad vidim ovu situaciju, sjetim se Forum.hr koji je u zescem kurcu, al tamo bar imas kutak za banirane, pa ako popijes ban bar dobijes neki odgovor kad se zalis, pogotovo ako si vec neko vrijeme poveo na forumu, ne kuzim zasto bi to bio problem i ovdje.
|
|
|
90% of the time Firefox+VPN (Express VPN) 10% of the time Brave +VPN, mostly while on the mobile phone.
I was using almost exclusively Brave for a few months, just to check it out and it was a fine browser but in the end I reverted back to Firefox that I've used for many years now (my primary browser since 2005 I think).
|
|
|
Personally i don't buy that 180k BTC claim, it seems like a bait to me, they will say just about anything to get people's money. In that cryptoslate article you linked they think the same thing, that number is heavily inflated. But i wouldn't be surprised if real number is few hundred/few thousands BTC, and that still makes it pretty big and successful scam, that should be stopped before more people get sucked into it. Same tactic is used by bunch of shit ICOs where they claim to raise millions of USD, but without any proof.
|
|
|
On top of plagiarized content and fake photos(they decided to ignore questions about recent findings by morvillz7z), BetaFunds team went full retard and decided to shill their own thread too. Flag against @patrick_betafunds raised, please support. Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1676In some cases its quite hard to detect this kinda faces and thats why recent scam scammers are using those pictures heavily.
That's true, software has been improving constantly and yeah, that will be big problem in the future (not that already isn't). I hope detection programs will follow them with the same pace, so scammers have tough job.
|
|
|
MASS was on my watch list for some time, but they really increased the activity in the last few days, known bumpers shilling their thread. There is no doubt now whether they hired "marketing agency", as they like to call it, so it's time to add them as well to the list .
|
|
|
Jedna stvar u kripto svijetu koju 99.99% zele napraviti je uzeti lovu, tj da je imaju u ruci i cesto traze neke kartice da mogu preko bankomata povuci lovu tj da ne povlace preko banke. Zanima me na koji nacin vi povlacite lovu tj sto tocno koristite? Hvala.
Svu lovu do sada sam izbacio preko BTC ATMa. Nije najjeftiniji način (fee je 4.5%) ali bar nije išlo preko računa pa me porezna ne može zajebavati oko toga. Sve u keš pa pod madrac. Ionako kartice izbjegavam koliko je moguće . Coinbase-Revolut kombinacija je vjerojatno bolja opcija, manje zajebancije a i manji je fee, samo se moram natjerati odraditi KYC na Revolutu. Ali veliko pitanje je da li se država može nekako nakaciti na to i uzeti harac kroz porez na kapitalnu dobit ili na već koju osnovu otimaju (to vjerojatno nije veliki problem ako se radi o manjim iznosima)
|
|
|
Yes, every time I did something wrong too my account was compromised and I changed my email and password to prove this theory. Yep, in this case that excuse is as plausible as that old one with dog and homework. Some Merits seems to have been sold.
Based on your last merit transaction, I would say business is still going strong. You sent tome merit few days ago to Piskaev, known sock puppet account that worked on bunch of threads (Crybet, IndexChain, Burstex, MalwareChain, Livecoin etc). Or maybe this is just one of your alt accounts? Just don't say it's been hacked again.
|
|
|
I could try to do what Rikafip suggested - to report again all those posts - but that will take a lot of time, as I'd have to pass again through 600+ posts.
My situation was a bit different though - my reports were marked as good, but posts weren't deleted, that's why i reported them again. On top of that, it was only 7 posts and I knew exactly which ones to report again, so it was much easier for me, than what you would have to do. As o_e_l_e_o said, it would be waste of time to go through all that process again. Imho, best is simply to wait, sometimes reports stay unhandled for days until some mod comes and deletes them. What you could do in the future with similar posts is to report just 1-2 to see whether reports are good or bad, and act upon that. At least that's what i was doing in the beginning. Once you reach 300 good reports it becomes much easier, as before that you don't really know which ones are good/bad when you report in bulk.
|
|
|
So there seems to be an error. If I reported 100 (or 103; don't remember exactly) and I have an accuracy of 34%, this should mean that 34 posts were deleted. However, only 8 were deleted, which means 8%. Why?
Similar thing happened to me few days ago. I reported bunch of posts, and according to post history reports were marked as good, but they were not deleted at all. So after 24 hours or so i reported them again, an this time they were deleted. I guess mods simply forgot to delete them in the first place. I made post about it in Spambusters thread. Besides, as I mentioned above, if only 1 such report was correct, then all should have been declared accurate, as in all posts reported by me these users shilled their side. How could be only 34% (and 34 in numbers as well, as I reported ~100 posts) declared accurate and the rest inaccurate? Weird stuff like that probably happened to all of us that regularly report spammy posts, like few posts out of bunch marked as bad while all other similar were deleted, but in your case it's pretty extreme number. All you can do now is wait, as sometimes i waited for days before someone deleted the reported posts. It would be much easier to track all those reported posts if we had access to report history right from the beginning, and not after 300 successfully reported posts like it is now. The current forum staff seems to be ICO/ANN bumping friendly, also off-topic and derailment friendly. I would exercise caution reporting really unless this changes sooner rather than later. Dunno about off-topic reports, but in the last few months i had approximately 2k reports (mostly ANN bumping and fake ANNs with malware) and maybe 4-5 of them were marked as bad, so it wasn't that bad I think. But yeah, you have to be careful when reporting, probably best idea to focus on the most obvious ones. Besides, in many cases incorrect information was stated (such as Bitcoin not having a 21 million cap and so on). But to see that you have to know Romanian.
So this happened in the Romanian local board? I thought posts reported in local boards are sorted by local mods.
|
|
|
Sure, kill altcoin section....and expect to see all the spammers and bumping groups moving here No altcoin section=no bumpers, as nothing really to bump, altcoin projects are the ones that usually hire them. And they won't spam mindlessly for free. No bounty campaigns too, so way less spam as well. But it would affect traffic on the forum though, therefore BTC signature campaigns too, and I'm not so sure that many would be in favor of that. By removing altcoin section completely some other forum would probably take the piece of bitcointalk cake (altcointalk maybe), at least here the most obvious scams are regularly busted. It is true that signal-to-noise ratio on that part of the forum ain't good, but I don't think that removing it completely is realistic.
|
|
|
Nisam bas neki veliki fan Podcast Inkubatora jer me voditelji znaju iritirati, ali ako me bas jako zanima gost, onda bacim oko. A Cro Copa se ne propusta, on je uvijek zanimljiv sugovornik, ne moze da bude dosadno kad je on u pitanju, covjek bas moze trkeljati. Ako se ne varam ovo ce mu biti trece gostovanje tamo. Bilo bi zanimljivo vidjeti da ga Joe Rogan pozove, mislim da bi se jako dobro snasao i u tom okruzenju.
|
|
|
|